Cross-racial shootings?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 5, 2006
Messages
2,377
Location
Myrtle Beach
I was wondering if anyone here could help me out with a paper I have to write. Does anyone have any links to any stories concerning police officers using deadly force on someone of another color, thereby triggering any sort of racial instability in the community? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
 
2001 Cincinnati riots

Just Google that and you'll get plenty of links.

K
 
Uh yeah, pretty much any cop shooting that draws attention was cross racial.

The best ones were:

The groom outside a strip club before his wedding night.
The African immigrant in NYC.
Bunch of border patrol shootings.

Call the Rainbow coalition, they would be happy to fill you in on why whitey shoots blackie. If you do, try to post the highlights, as most of us find JJ and Al to be hilarious.
 
Check out the Chicago Tribune and Sun Times websites. There have been a number of police shootings in recent months.

In Chicago these shootings are complicated by a number of issues:

1. Community "activists" portray ANY police shooting as wrongful, regardless of the circumstances. Stories by suspects and their families which a five year old should sneer at are taken at face value.

2. The Chicago Police Department has such an ABYSMAL record of violent crime, misconduct and lying to the public that ANY statements by police are [rightfully] viewed with skepticism. This leads to nonsense tales by criminals being taken seriously where they never ought to.

The result is a death spiral induced by liars who mindlessly support or condemn the police, totally divorced from truth and reality.

In Chicago, it's not the good guys vs. the bad guys. It's the bad guys vs. the worse guys. It's up to the individual to judge for himself which is which.
 
Well,I've read an article from the Socialist Worker's paper about the infamous Special Patrol Group department,of the Greater London Metropolitan Police deapartment,detailing Blair Peach's supposed murder,by cops from this department in 1977 and from incidents in 1981,during the Brixton riots and in 1985,when one black womans front door was smashed in with a sledgehammer and she was shot in the back and cripped,by an SPG cops .38 revolver.This was possibly in revenge for the death of PC Keith Blakelock who was stabbed to death in 1985,during the Broadwater Farm riots,in Tottenham,North London.The woman was suspected of shielding the identity of Blakelock's murderer/s and so the heavy-mob went over,to teach her a lesson-although they or he,have never been caught-so although the case is over 22 years old,it's still open.

The death of Blair Peach,was caused presumably by pickaxe handles,baseball bats and sledgehammers and one or this particular operation was nicknamed 'Operation n*gger hunt' or something similar.Some cops were linked to neo-Nazi organizations such as the National Front and Nazi materials were found at these cops homes,during a search.

Just think those incidents happend in the 70s and 80s and these incidents rarely happen now.A world away from the modern Britain.

I'll see if I can find the link,linking these events to the relevant articles.
Ah,well here's one about Blair Peach's demise in the Southall riots,in 1977.
http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=393
 
Last edited:
The death of Blair Peach,was caused presumably by pickaxe handles,baseball bats and sledgehammers and one or this particular operation was nicknamed 'Operation n*gger hunt' or something similar.Some cops were linked to neo-Nazi organizations such as the National Front and Nazi materials were found at these cops homes,during a search.
Talk about your coincidences!

I remember hearing a US National Public Radio segment in the late '80s or early '90s about racially motivated violence in the UK. One of the incidents cited, lined up almost EXACTLY with your quote above. The only real difference was the lack of a police tie-in...
 
Talk about your coincidences!

I remember hearing a US National Public Radio segment in the late '80s or early '90s about racially motivated violence in the UK. One of the incidents cited, lined up almost EXACTLY with your quote above. The only real difference was the lack of a police tie-in...
Yes,well unfortunately these terrible events,were a result of genuine racists in the force,as the screening proceedures to weed them out,weren't really around then and also the 'old-school' cops(Not racist,but harsh in disciplinary methods and enforcement values.),believed most black males and youths to be trouble makers anyway and so when you have this combination of personality types,in a police department or in the force in general-it can be quite explosive.
 
Yes,well unfortunately these terrible events,were a result of genuine racists in the force,as the screening proceedures to weed them out,weren't really around then and also the 'old-school' cops(Not racist,but harsh in disciplinary methods and enforcement values.),believed most black males and youths to be trouble makers anyway and so when you have this combination of personality types,in a police department or in the force in general-it can be quite explosive.
Last year(?) a couple of Cleveland, OH cops started a racially motivated bar fight. They were charged and tried for a variety of offenses. One (who was cold-cocked by the victim in seconds) was convicted of a minor offense. The other was acquitted. Both are... pursuing other opportunities... other than law enforcement, after being fired.

I remember noting at the time that you NEVER hear about the sort of racially motivated home invasions described in the NPR story in the US, simply because the perpetrators would get shot to doll rags.
 
Tyron Lewis in St Petersberg shot dead in a stolen car by a white officer. Both the incedent and the "wrong" out come after the investigation caused riots. Henry Cisernos (sp?) promised millions of Uncle Sam's dollars to make things right. As far as I know the money never got to St Pete.
 
Thanks everyone for your help. I want to not only write aboput all the actual wrongs commited by actual racist LEOs, but also officers that were scrutinized by the media, yet vindicated in their actions.

Keep 'em comin', if ya got more! Thanx again!
 
After just about any police shooting in Hartford, when the officer is white and the perp is black, the black community is out in force crying foul. Currentely, one officer, Lawlor, is facing manslaughter charges for shooting a black suspect, whom he claimed used his vehicle as a weapon after he and an ATF agent confronted the vehicle because of a potential gun sighting. The shooting was ruled by the department to be a good shoot, yet the states atty. still went to a grand jury, got an indictment, and a perfectly good cop is being run through the ringer.
 
City of Austin(TX) has had a few dramas over the past ten years involving cross cultural police shootings.
 
[SIDELIGHT]
Interesting sidelight on this?

Since the British Police don't carry firearms, they resort to alternatives...

The death of Blair Peach,was caused presumably by pickaxe handles,baseball bats and sledgehammers...

Do I smell a lesson there?

Indeed, I think I do.
[/SIDELIGHT]
 
crazed_ss said:
Well, it wasnt a shooting, but I'm sure everyone remembers Rodney King's beatdown at the hands of LA's finest.
Rodney King was from Altadena, California. I was living in Altadena at the time he got his ass whooped. King already had a local reputation as a bad man. What happened with the LAPD is really TWO issues:

1. Why was he stopped in the first place?

2. Why did he get beat like that after he was stopped?

Answers:

1. He was driving in a manner indicating that he was probably intoxicated. (King was a known PCP user.)

2. He got snotty with the cops, and they put him down and cuffed him. For those of you who don't know King, he is a LARGE and physically imposing individual. He refused to comply with police orders, and he kept trying to get up. He was resisting arrest. You resist arrest, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves. He got beat because he was not complying.

Did the cops over-react and beat him too much? Possibly, but the blame for that lays squarely on King's shoulders for steadfastly and physically refusing to comply with their orders after he was under arrest. If he had acted reasonably, he would have most likely been treated reasonably. He made his bed, and then he didn't want to sleep in it.

Also, where King got stopped, it is a semi-rural area.

http://www.courttv.com/archive/casefiles/rodneyking/:
The truth of the matter about the Rodney King beating is that even though to most people it's symbolic of this police brutality, it is a very atypical incident.

Rodney King had done all of these things before the videotape. He'd resisted the officers, he'd charged the officers, he'd thrown four officers off his back, he'd been shot twice with a stun gun, which keeps most people down. 50,000 volts of electricity each time, it didn't keep him down. This was a case where a great effort was made to take Rodney King into custody without hurting him, believe it or not.

There are many other instances where people were injured or in some cases killed in encounters with police where shots were fired or the baton was used or other things were done with very little provocation.

If you look at what had happened in the years before the King incident, the number of lawsuits against the city was steadily mounting.

Most of these cases had been settled out of court because the city attorney would look at these cases and say, "Hey, if this goes to court there's going to be huge damages." So I think that had it not been Rodney King, there would've been some other incident that would have come along, and somebody else would have had a camcorder. And maybe it would have developed differently but we would have had some incident.

In the book you describe the King video as Rashomon: a story that has multiple sides and no single clear narrative. More specifically, there are segments of that tape that, though it was shown around the world, most people never saw. What was the significance of the omissions?

The videotape that was broadcast around the world and that most people have seen is 68 seconds in length.

The actual King incident is 81 seconds long. he took the tape to KTLA. after the police showed no interest. First, by the way, he called CNN and CNN at that time did not have any phone on in the middle of the night. They do have now, they've got round the clock service because of that incident. And then he called KTLA and he took it in. And the KTLA people gave the tape unedited to the police department because they wanted to make sure that it was authentic, and the police confirmed it. And then they put on in their newscast 68 seconds of this 81 seconds. The first 3 seconds are critical because they show Mr. King lunging in the direction of Officer Laurence Powell, who then responds with this baton blow.

Holliday moved his camera slightly after these first three seconds, trying to get a better look at what was going on. So the next 10 seconds are blurry. And what the television station did was just take out the first 13 seconds.

And in doing so sacrificed meaning to clarity, so the viewer just sees these police wailing away at King for apparently no reason.

The significance of these first three seconds are not that they make the videotape look nice.

It's brutal in any version, but the first three seconds that were omitted by the television station are a window into all of the things that have happened before the videotape begins. So what the viewer is seeing is a partial record of a partial record.
[The King incident began with a 7.8 mile car chase conducted by California Highway Patrol officers, one of whom drew a gun on King before the LAPD took over.]
It was L.A.'s news media that made it into a race thing. If I recall correctly, what often gets left out of the story is that one of the officers on the scene is a black man. Although he did not participate in the beating, neither did he make any effort to stop it. Certainly, the LAPD had a record at the time of brutality, but even a broken clock is a right twice a day. In this particular case, the preponderance of the blame for the beating AND all of the fallout that erupted because of it lies on Rodney King's shoulders.
 
Check for any NYPD shooting or look up Al Sharpton and it will probably give all causes he has been involved in. Quite a few involve shootings.
 
The Brandon McCloud shooting caused a huge controversy which led to at least three investigations by the county coroner, the FBI and a retired judge. Plus the usual demonstrations and even now is still in the news because the two officers involved are suing the City of Cleveland while they are being sued by McCloud's family.

Here a two-part article about it:

http://www.freetimes.com/stories/14/41/suspect-down-officers-involved
 
The Brandon McCloud shooting caused a huge controversy which led to at least three investigations by the county coroner, the FBI and a retired judge. Plus the usual demonstrations and even now is still in the news because the two officers involved are suing the City of Cleveland while they are being sued by McCloud's family.
They're beating the proverbial dead horse.

I'm so critical of police, I sometimes make Al Sharpton sound like Shawn Hannity, but I don't see it.

If you're listing ways to AVOID being shot by the police, you SHOULDN'T include "jumping out of a closet at police, clutching a knife". Of course "DON"T BE AN ARMED ROBBER" should be right at the top of the list.

Unlike Patrick Dorismond or Michael Pleasance, McCloud wasn't the victim of police misconduct. He was the victim of his own stupidity.
 
http://www.nbc15online.com/news/loc...=1af91cd3-70b1-4902-94f7-86025dd05b0e&rss=217

Here's one from yesterday, no confirmation on whether the undercover deputy was white, but if he's mobile co. there's a good chance.

Highlights include:

"I want to know what happened cause, he ain't never bother nobody. He didn't bother nobody," said Monica Morrisett.

and:

"It was a fully-loaded .40 caliber pistol. The pistol has been identified as having been stolen in a car jacking last month," said Cochran.

Sounds like this guy was on his way to the scout lodge when he was murdered for no reason. :D:D:D:D
 
Since the British Police don't carry firearms, they resort to alternatives...
WRONG,The Special Patrol Group were licensed to carry Smith and Wesson .38 revolvers and booked them out quite frequently,to use as frighteners,in the guise that they would be sitting ducks,from black gunmen.Detective Sergent/SO19 Sergent Roger Gray,a famous ex-LEO,was a member of the SPG,in the 70s upto about 1986,when it was disbandoed,due to racism(From what I've heard and replaced by another unit.).But coshes and pixaxe handles were used to beat people up,during riots and incidents,not involving guns,such as breaking in and arresting petty crooks.

The Flying Squad or Serious and Organized,nowdays,weren't no different to the SPG in the 70s and 80s,but they got income from being on mobsters payrolls and from the porn trade,in Soho-so they wanted to safeguard their cushy,lucrative-on the side-incomes,but were exposed in 1977 and members were jailed,including the cheif.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top