1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

D.C. gun owner saves boy from pitbull, now investigated for "discharging firearm"

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Gaiudo, Jan 24, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Gaiudo

    Gaiudo Well-Known Member

    Anything we can do to advocate for this guy, pressure the DA, etc.?


  2. bowserb

    bowserb Well-Known Member

    This is what Tom Gresham, Massad Ayoob, and others warn about. What to do when you see someone needing the benefit of your gun ownership. As Gresham says, there are three or four things that can happen when you display a handgun, and they are mostly bad for you. Your first obligation is to yourself and your family, and coming to the defense of someone else, can put your family's financial future at risk.

    That said, I don't think I could stand by and not try and stop pit bulls attacking a child.

    Sent using Tapatalk...so please excuse the typos!
  3. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Here's the Washington Post article on the incident. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...07c43ee-63ea-11e2-85f5-a8a9228e55e7_blog.html

    We can enter comments, but I have to point out that there's nothing in the article critical of the person that intervened to save the child and that there's no indication that the District is looking into charging them so our comments and support should include wishes for a rapid recovery for the child and praise of the gunowner as a hero.
  4. radiotom

    radiotom Well-Known Member

    Just what we need, people second-guessing what is the right thing to do.
  5. tarakian

    tarakian Well-Known Member

    Can't he just say he was exercising his first amendment rights against the mauling of children by dogs?
  6. Skribs

    Skribs Well-Known Member

    I don't see how this is related to 1A.
  7. USAF_Vet

    USAF_Vet Well-Known Member

    What a world we live in. 10 years ago, this person would have been praised and the pit bulls vilified.

    But because a gun was used... Disgusting.
  8. 481

    481 Well-Known Member

    I couldn't stand by and watch as pitbulls savaged a child either.

    Seems that the liberals would have it both ways- either you dispatch the animal and save the child only to be prosecuted or you stand by and watch the dog devour the child and be vilified as an insensate monster.

    What a fine bunch, the Left.
  9. Ryanxia

    Ryanxia Well-Known Member

    While this is horrible what else can you do? Not save him? It's just sad he had to run all the way into the house to get it or he might have saved the kid from even getting hurt that bad.

    Maybe this is something we push on a federal level, a Bill that says unless there's good cause to believe it was anything other than defense, no investigation can be undergone.
  10. tarakian

    tarakian Well-Known Member

    Kind of a joke, figured if the reporter in DC could use this defense for a 30 round mag when specifically told he couldn't, why not try to apply it in this case.
  11. c4v3man

    c4v3man Well-Known Member

    Great, another story proclaiming that pitbulls are attack dogs...

    Dogs are what you make of them. Pitbulls aren't inherently evil or aggressive.

    That being said, I agree on the 1st Amendment defense above. Sounds like a bulletproof argument to me with precedent.
  12. mgmorden

    mgmorden Well-Known Member

    Not sure if it was the citizen or the cop, but the kid was hit by a bullet in the foot. If it turns out that the citizen did that, he may well be looking at a lawsuit from the child's family too.
  13. bowserb

    bowserb Well-Known Member

    I think that's "Assault Dogs", and I think it's time we had an ADB...Assault Dog Ban.
  14. wojownik

    wojownik Well-Known Member

    This may or may not be true. Another post article noted that "police said they had no record that either a shot fired by the officer or the neighbor struck the boy."

    Hopefully they will investigate the firearms owner to the same level they investigated Dick Gregory.
  15. aeriedad

    aeriedad Well-Known Member

    You mean David Gregory.


    IMO, if the hero in the OP is investigated, he should call Mr. Gregory for advice on how best to avoid charges.
  16. sonick808

    sonick808 Well-Known Member

    what about THE CHILDREN ? damned if we do, damned if we don't. we are just evil people that own guns i guess.
  17. Manco

    Manco Well-Known Member

    Freudian slip in calling things what they are? :evil:
  18. Cesiumsponge

    Cesiumsponge Well-Known Member

    Help someone in need and the public calls you a vigilante.

    Sit back and watch, and the public calls you a terrible human being.
  19. InkEd

    InkEd Well-Known Member

    THANK YOU c4v3man!

    In the case of ANYTHING. The REAL problem is the BAD PEOPLE.
  20. Ridgerunner665

    Ridgerunner665 Well-Known Member

    Davey Crockett had a saying that applies here I think....

    Be sure you are right, then go ahead...

    Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page