1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Differences between sig an glock?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Mossy Bloke, Apr 4, 2003.

  1. Mossy Bloke

    Mossy Bloke New Member

    Dec 25, 2002
    I'm looking at getting a 357. Can someone tell me the differences between a p229 and say, a midsize glock in 357?

    I know this is probably comparing apples to oranges, but just indulge me. Personal opinions are welcome.
  2. Handy

    Handy Guest

    Glock .357/Sig .357:

    Plastic frame/aluminum frame
    Light "Safe action trigger"/DA/SA trigger
    Built in grips/replaceable grips
    1 frame lever/2 frame levers
    Really tough finish/decent finish
    Really expensive mags/almost as expensive mags
    Slim/not so slim
    A basic 9mm pistol with .357 barrel as an afterthought/a gun built around .40/.357 ammo family.

    Personal opinion: .357 Sig is an expensive and difficult to load specialty cartridge. Consider a 9mm for price and capacity or a .45 for oomph.

    Of the two pistol types, they both do well, but I feel the DA/SA trigger of the Sig offers safer carry and more options.
  3. Dave T

    Dave T Active Member

    Jan 19, 2003
    Mesa, AZ
    SIG has two distinct trigger pulls and sets rather high in the hand (increased felt recoil). It is also expensive.
    Glock has one spongy trigger pull and sets lower in the hand (less felt recoil). Some say the polymer (plastic) frame flexes and soaks up some recoil. Glock is cheeper than the SIG by a couple hundred bucks.
    I prefer and recommend to my students a consistant trigger pull so I would go with the Glock of these two (I carry 1911s) but this is so subjective it boils down to individual preference.
  4. CWL

    CWL Mentor

    Jan 6, 2003
    Personal opinions?

    Sigs are like a well-tuned German sportscar.

    Glocks are like a well-tuned pickup truck.

    They both get you to your destination. You probably won't care about dinging-up the pickup.
  5. treeprof

    treeprof Active Member

    Dec 31, 2002
    Those guys have covered it well. I have both SIGs and glock in 357 SIG, and enjoy shooting both makes. Both the ergonomics and operation are different, as explained above. Grip-bore angle is quite different as well, and you may prefer one over the other as it relates to your natural point of aim. SIG's have the edge in overall feel and accuracy IMO, but I more often have the Glock with me - the pick-up truck analogy at work.
  6. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Elder

    Dec 24, 2002
    In this case, I'd go w/ the SIG.
  7. arizona

    arizona New Member

    Feb 15, 2003

    I have had both in 9mm and recommend the Sig. IMHO the Sig feels better in the hand, not as thick. Also, is safer and more accurate.

    The Glock has a tougher finish.
  8. HadEmAll

    HadEmAll Member

    Jan 1, 2003
    San Antonio, Texas
    Everything's been pretty well covered except one thing. The SIG is almost guaranteed to be somewhat more accurate than the Glock when fired single-action, but I'll go out on a limb and state that for 99% of shooters, the Glock will be more accurate (hit closer to where you actually intend to hit) than the SIG for the first shot out of each pistol, IF the SIG is fired double-action. That first shot is important to me, so I'd go for the Glock if you're going to carry it for SD. Basically, in my opinion, the SIG is the better range gun, the Glock the better carry gun. Both are great.
  9. C. H. Luke

    C. H. Luke Active Member

    Feb 7, 2003
    Not a .357S fan as reload. Have had a G32 and have a SIG P229
    {with both .40 & .357S bbl's.}. 229 shoots with typical SIG "Softness", the Glock did not.......

    Other than that the SIG reeks of pure Class!
  10. cratz2

    cratz2 Senior Member

    Dec 24, 2002
    Central IN
    I'm not a fan of the round and not a big fan of either Glocks or SIGs but between the two, I'd probably go for the Glock. The SIGs don't seem to have more recoil per se, but tend to be flippier in the hand, esp when comapring the smaller guns.

    It's a shame more companies don't offer the 38 Super and 9x23 in more factory guns. 9x23 offers 357 SIG performance in a smaller diameter case allowing more rounds in a given magazine length and a infinitely stronger case and easier to load/reload package as well.
  11. firestar

    firestar member

    Jan 2, 2003
    If you get the SIG, you can buy SIG .40 cal replacment bbls really cheap right now and be able to shoot either cal. I would not buy a .357 sig because I don't like to pay $1 per shot but that is just me. I would also suggest a 9mm, there are some pretty hot loads for the 9mm out there that will give you some real speed and energy.

    The SIG and the Glock are strong guns that you will probably never wear out but the SIG will be much more accurate and there is more pride of ownership in owning the best production pistol on the market. The Glock is fine if you want a plastic framed Ruger with no hammer for three time the price.:rolleyes:
  12. TechBrute

    TechBrute Senior Member

    Feb 22, 2003
    DFW, TX
    Oooh, oooh... Get the Sig!! It costs 50% more so you can brag to your friends about how much you spent. Oh yeah, while you're in the mood to spend money, buy lots of ammo to practice with, because the DA/SA trigger pull on the Sig takes WAAAAY more training to learn to shoot well under stress. Also, with the extra $200, you get all the neat, but useless, buttons, levers, switches and other such gizmos on the Sig.

    Recap: No one can knock the quality of a SIG, but the DA/SA trigger pull was deveoped due to lawyers and insurance companies. It is NEVER preferred to a consistent trigger pull among shooters.

    Oh yeah, just get a .40S&W, regardless of the gun.:D
  13. Don Gwinn

    Don Gwinn Moderator Emeritus

    Dec 21, 2002
    Virden, IL
    Never say never. . . . some people like DA. I don't really prefer it, but I've learned to shoot a P220 pretty well and don't consider it a major problem. I shoot my 220 better than my G30, but then the 30 has that shorter grip.

    People will tell you that you need a lot of training to "overcome the obstacle" of DA. I would say that the corollary is that you need a lot of training to be so good that DA is a major hindrance to your shooting ability.
  14. Quintin Likely

    Quintin Likely Active Member

    Dec 29, 2002
    Relay 3, Target 17
    firestar said...

    Now, there's no need to be rude...

    I've got both, a Glock and a Sig although neither of mine are in 357 SIG...my P239 could be, if I bought the 357 barrel and magazines though. The Sig feels like its put together more solidly than my Glock is, but they're both fine shooters regardless of caliber.

    My advice? Get your hands on Glock 31/32/33 and a Sig, shoot both, buy whatever suits you best. It is, afterall, gonna be *your* cannon.
  15. T.Stahl

    T.Stahl Active Member

    Dec 29, 2002
    near Hamburg/Germany
    Several, independent sources told me that Sigs can rust.
    I've never heard that Glocks rust.
  16. faustulus

    faustulus Participating Member

    Dec 28, 2002
    Middle Tennessee
    Both are excellent guns it comes down to which feels better in your hands. Both have their pluses, what it comes down to for me is the grip angle. The glock grip is different from 99 percent of the guns on the market, if you don't have any other pistols I don't think this would be a problem, for me it renders the gun useless. You cannot go wrong with either.
  17. Handy

    Handy Guest


    DA triggers were developed for handguns in the 19th century. They have proved to be the preferred carry method for the majority of shooters for the last 100 years. The largest majority of police and military, East and West, prefer DA triggers above all else for people that actually use firearms.

    So, which "shooters" are you talking about? Those that teach classes, compete in competitions, or write for magazines?

    The lawyers came into the game a little late to influence much of anything.

    Also, saying that a Sig is a bad value compared to a Glock is ludicrous. Sigs have barely changed price in 15 years. Glocks have doubled.
  18. Mr. Purple

    Mr. Purple member

    Mar 30, 2003
    SIGs rust, the 220, 226 and 228 with the stamped slides (45 and 9mm).

    SIGs in 40 (226, and all caliber 229, and 239s) have stainless slides and are less likely to rust.

    Glocks all have tenifer finish and don't rust.

    Having handled copies of both brands, I find both to be outstanding and purchase a matter of personal preference.
  19. dan_s

    dan_s New Member

    Jan 13, 2003
    Sterling, Va.
    Forget the comments you may read about the 357 Sig being difficult to load. It is not...
  20. Waste of Money

    Waste of Money New Member

    Jan 4, 2003
    Ulster Cty, NY
    If you're concerned about the price of 357SIG ammo, worry no more. The cost has been dropping for the past year or two and now equals 40S&W costs for practice fodder ammo.

    Check outGeorgia Arms and look for "Canned Heat". They're excellent quality reloads and priced lower than anyone. I tried many calibers and have had no failures.

    Some folks carry the Sheer Power Plus which are new brass stuffed with Gold Dot bullets and plenty hot.

Share This Page