1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

For the sake of argument; Good gun control laws.

Discussion in 'Legal' started by reagansquad, Aug 16, 2004.

  1. reagansquad

    reagansquad Member

    Aug 7, 2004
    Here's the situation;

    You have been selected by a moderate, Southern Democratic senator, to write some sensible gun control legislation. This is compromise legislation, so "No gun control" bills will simply not do. What the senator is looking for is something that keeps guns out of the hands of criminals whilst simultaniously hurting legal gun owners as little as possible. He does believe in restrictions on some firearms, though he's more interested in banning guns most commonly used in crimes instead of 'assault weapons' which are commonly owned by collectors and perfectly legal 'plinkers' and he chose you to write a bill which is fair and educated. Your mission; write this gun control bill. You also have the power to, in this bill, remove all previous gun laws from the record and replace them. Again, please no "Everything is legal including nukes." type posts. Have fun!
  2. deej

    deej Member

    Dec 24, 2002
    (Occupied) California Republic
  3. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Dec 24, 2002
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
  4. reagansquad

    reagansquad Member

    Aug 7, 2004
    Aww comeon you guys. Why post if you aren't gonna play the game?
  5. MeekandMild

    MeekandMild Participating Member

    Dec 25, 2002
    If I were crafting laws for your fellow I'd quit. Why? He is looking for a deux ex machina to fix a social problem which is caused by something totally different. He is looking to stop crime but he is ignoring the factors which cause crime. He needs instead to look at what factors have promoted the parasite class in America, have empowered thugs and shills; he needs to forget cosmetics.

    I won't say that he's a moron, but he is bought and paid for by morons so there is no hope for him. I don't say this in any way to make you angry but (from my too long experiance in the behavioral management of the criminally insane underclass) what you ask is not going to do anything whatsoever to achieve your goals. :rolleyes:
  6. pdog

    pdog New Member

    Jan 18, 2003
    Maybe he should ban baseball bats too.
  7. Monkeyleg

    Monkeyleg Mentor

    Dec 25, 2002
    Decatur, AL
    How about "it shall be against the law for any person to murder, rape, assault, or otherwise harm another person?" Penalties for violating the above will be set by state legislatures.

    Oh, wait. Never mind. We had that before gun control laws.
  8. RJ357

    RJ357 Member

    Jun 9, 2004
    Ban any pistol with sights on it's side.
  9. Michigander

    Michigander Participating Member

    Feb 9, 2004
    If you're not in jail/prison or a fugitive, you can own firearms.

    editted to add:

    "good gun control law" is itself an oxymoron.
  10. geekWithA.45

    geekWithA.45 Moderator Emeritus

    Jan 1, 2003
    SouthEast PA
    Here's my law:

    The Second Amendment, which provides that:

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    Is hereby clarified as follows:

    1) It is indeed incorporated to the States as per the 14th amendment.
    2) Arms means arms of any description without reference to their form, function, or utility or lack of utility in the organized or unorganized militia.
    3) People means free people of any description, without reference to their membership of nonmembership in any organized militia.
    4) "Shall not be infringed" means shall not be impeded, dimished, or obstructed in any way shape or form.
    5) People convicted of violent felonies may have their gunrights suspended (for a fixed period of time?) by way of a specific unanimous finding by a jury of their peers, as a part of their sentence.
    5a) The onus is upon the State to show that gunrights have been suspended, and a person shall be deemed fully vested in their gunrights unless their name appears upon a diligently and correctly maintained list, which is available for lookup to all citizens via phone call. ID may be required for acquisition or transfer of a firearm, and no records shall be kept of any transfer queries.
    6) People having suffered such loss of gunrights, having served their sentence, may appear before a jury of their peers once a year to plea for the restoration of their gunrights.
    7) People who are shown to have mental problems such that they present a danger to themselves or others shall be treated in a secure facility until such time that they do not present a danger to themselves or others, at which point further suspension of their gunrights would be pointless, now wouldn't it?
  11. mountainclmbr

    mountainclmbr Participating Member

    Oct 25, 2003
    On top of a mountain in Colorado
    The signers of the Constitution and Bill of Rights would be wishing that your life was cut short if you did this. Who am I to argue against doing a self-destructive act?

    Cuba is a leftist utopia with gun bans, and you can go there easily. The average salary is only $10 per month, but Castro is among the richest rulers in the world. I just don't understand why gun banners don't just flock to utopia land.

    Please go...please, please, please.....
  12. chetth

    chetth New Member

    Apr 12, 2004
    Suburbs of Philadelphia
    All gun crimes, regardless of gun type or caliber have one thing in common. Therefore that thing should be prevented or prohibited. For a gun, any gun to be used in a crime, it must be held by a criminal. Therefore the following criminal activities are prohibited.....

    This would actually work if the law enforcement, education, and public service sectors were perfect, greatly reducing, but not actually eliminating, crime... but that's utopia
  13. FPrice

    FPrice Senior Member

    Dec 22, 2002
    People's Commonwealth of Massachusetts

    "Aww comeon you guys. Why post if you aren't gonna play the game?"

    Possibly because even in our collective wildest imaginations there are no good gun control laws.


    Treat every gun as if it is loaded.
    Do not put your finger on the trigger until you are ready to shoot.
    Do not aim your firearm at anything you are not willing to destroy.
    Be sure of your target AND what lies beyond it.

    Now those are some good gun control laws.
  14. Stand_Watie

    Stand_Watie Participating Member

    Jan 7, 2004
    east Texas
    Eddy Eagle or similar in all public school curriculum would be an o.k. gun control law.

    Also, even though I lean heavily towards libertarian ideals, I don't object too strenuously to some of the early mandatory militia drill statutes, as long as they have liberal exemptions for consciencious objectors.
  15. HankB

    HankB Mentor

    Mar 29, 2003
    Central Texas
    I'd modify geekwitha.45's suggestions as follows:

    2) Arms means individual arms of any description, including rifles, handguns, and shotguns of any description as intended to be used and operated by a single individual.

    This would allow all "sporting" arms as well as military-pattern arms as meant to be used by an individual soldier. So a .50 Barrett, 12 ga Streetsweeper, M16A2, HKMP5SD, Ithaca Auto-Burglar, etc., would all be legal. Things like Stinger missles, 81mm mortars, and WMD's would not be legal.

    3) People means free people of any description who are adult citizens of the United States, without reference to their membership or nonmembership in any organized militia.

    The rationale is that we don't want little kids having full access to firearms, and foreign nationals - including those who are here legally - are here at our pleasure, and should only enjoy rights granted at our pleasure.

    4) "Shall not be infringed" means shall not be impeded, dimished, or obstructed in any way shape or form, nor shall these rights be subjected to fees, permits, licenses, registration, or review by any member of any government whatsoever, or those working on their behalf.
  16. Brett Bellmore

    Brett Bellmore Active Member

    Dec 28, 2002
    Capac, Michigan
    How about strict (And exclusive) liability for anyone who's holding a gun at the time it's fired? No, "I didn't know it was loaded." No, "It just went off!". You were holding it, it was pointed at somebody, the legal presumption would be that you intended to shoot them. Rebutable, of course, for freak circumstances.

    MAURICE Active Member

    May 22, 2003
    Lincoln, AR
    Ban Criminals.
    People using guns illegally and violently are put away for a long, long time.

    That should take care of it.
  18. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Dec 22, 2002
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    Hokay. Take a different direction: The folks who wrote the BOR spoke of denial of 2A rights to "those of unsound mind"--the insane--and "those of bad repute"; those whom today we refer to as felons.

    What format of law would you write to reduce the ability of those people to acquire firearms?

  19. Durus

    Durus New Member

    Jul 30, 2004
    I've thought about this. We already have a ton of laws that have to be "fixed" and the only way to do this is through legislation. Basically my goal of this legislation would be to repeal all of the restrictions while leaving some of the infrastructure in place

    The "oh ya there is a second amendment" Bill

    1927 concealable weapons mail order ban. (Repeal)
    1934 National Firearms Act (repeal)
    1968 Federal Firearms Act (repeal)
    1986 Armed Career Criminal Act (no change)
    1986 Firearms Protection Act (repeal)
    1986 Law enforcement Officers Protection Act (repeal)
    1990 Crime Control Act 1990 (repeal)
    1994 Brady Bill (repeal)
    1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act other wise known as the "assault weapons" ban (repeal)
    All executive orders concerning arms importation repealed.

    In order to purchase firearms through the mail you would have to apply for an FFL. This would be "must issue" at only a cost to cover administration. Standard background check would apply.

    To purchase a firearm you must be at least 18, a U.S. Citizen, not a fugitive, and not on probation. Checked via an instant check system.
  20. TimRB

    TimRB Active Member

    Jan 27, 2004
    "What the senator is looking for is something that keeps guns out of the hands of criminals whilst simultaniously hurting legal gun owners as little as possible."

    Since the senator seems to be a real simpleton, how about a law like this?: "If you are a criminal, you can't own a gun." Oops, we already have plenty of laws like that.


Share This Page