1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

FYI: new proposed "safety" device

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by LkWinnipesaukee, May 1, 2011.

  1. LkWinnipesaukee

    LkWinnipesaukee Well-Known Member

    Based on what this guy has been saying he's confident this will be on every new gun sold.... Thoughts?


    THE DARK KNIGHT Well-Known Member

    He does have a point. The only reason car makers ever started making safer, more fuel efficient, less pollutant cars is because the government mandated that they do so. Crash tests from the 50's and 60s are absolutely horrendous with even the smallest accident resulting in horrendous death. Car makers continued to make inefficient, non-aerodynamic cars with lackluster horsepower and 6-8 average MPG. Fun fact, many modern 4cyl engines produce greater horsepower/torque than classic V8 muscle cars with triple the engine displacement. Detroit kicked and screamed over the years and avoided virtually every innovation in their arrogance and learned a hard lesson as a result.

    Honestly I'd be more interested to see more about the device and maybe it's a good alternative to a gun lock.
  3. crm7290

    crm7290 Well-Known Member

    With automobiles it was the owners calling for safety. With guns its the people who do not own them calling for more safety.

    Maybe if the adults were practicing safe gun handling with that hunting rifle they wouldnt have had issues. Has anyone every been shot when everyone was safely handling the firearms? I don't think so (unless an accidental shot went up in the air and came down to hit someone but what are the odds of that)

    The people who care about safety more than likely already have trigger locks and some form of safe. Sure you can get by a trigger lock, but no little kid will be doing that.
  4. TexasRifleman

    TexasRifleman Moderator Emeritus

    Really? I thought the purchase of automatic weapons had pretty much fallen off since May of 1986.

    Uh, no they aren't. M4's ship with a 7-9 pound trigger pull.

    Sounds like he doesn't know nearly as much about guns as he claims. Wonder if he sells shoulder things that go up?
  5. M-Cameron

    M-Cameron member

    do we have any servicemen or veterans who can confirm this....?

    i dont know if its the fact that im used to my ultralight match triggers......but 12 lbs seems excessively high.....almost to the point that it would impede the accuracy of the weapon.
  6. scythefwd

    scythefwd Well-Known Member

    my m16a2 was no where near that.
  7. unspellable

    unspellable Well-Known Member

    Bird brain wants me to ship him my pistol frame via USPS marked as parts? No thanks, I don't need an all paid for vacation at one of those government resorts.
  8. EddieNFL

    EddieNFL member

    I have enough clutter in the gun room.
  9. M-Cameron

    M-Cameron member

    now i found this on their site.....and it kind of disturbs me......

    now ive never been in a gun fight, and thankfully ive never needed to use one to defend my life.........but this quote from topgun comes to mind:
  10. TexasRifleman

    TexasRifleman Moderator Emeritus

    Wow you're right, I missed that part. Now we know he's completely insane and hasn't the slightest idea what he's talking about.
  11. HorseSoldier

    HorseSoldier Well-Known Member

    None of the M16s or M4s I've ever been issued had what I would consider a wonderful trigger, but all of them were probably right around the nine pound figure quoted by TexasRifleman, not the 12 pounds from the original article.

    So this device basically basically fits your handgun with a pin that raises trigger pull to double action pistol levels for one shot, after which it breaks and your normal trigger pull comes into play? No part of that sounds like a winner to me -- I guess it might stop really small kids from being able to actuate a loaded weapon, but that's about it.
  12. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Well-Known Member

    Wonder where the pieces of the shear pin go after that first shot?
    Might they bind up the trigger and keep you from getting off a second shot?

    They are coy about the price of their service and make no mention of bulk quantities of shear pins if you should happen to want to practice with the gimmick. Although they mention that you can take the pin out if you are in a "tournament."

    I notice that they spell "preformance" about as well as the typical facebooker.
  13. firearmnut

    firearmnut Well-Known Member

    I have to say no thanks.
  14. M-Cameron

    M-Cameron member

    it is becoming blatantly apparent this guy has never shot a gun in his life........i wonder if he know the "safety bullet" guy.

    so heavy triggers........mean more accuracy.......?

    man, better not let all those professional and Olympic shooters in on that little secret......
  15. gc70

    gc70 Well-Known Member

    From TM-9-1005-319-23-P, Rifle 5.56MM-M16A2 W/E, Carbine 5.56MM-M4, Carbine 5.56MM-M4A1

  16. Zach S

    Zach S Well-Known Member

    Not hardly. Some 6 cyls maybe, but you're still comparing to the published hp rating. A lot of those engines were under-rated to save on insurance premiums. Take the 375hp L78 for example, it actually made closer to 425.

    Maybe they shouldn't have been so careless with a hot rifle...
  17. infuriatednoodle

    infuriatednoodle Well-Known Member

    Oh God, not again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :uhoh:
  18. Owen Sparks

    Owen Sparks member

    Sounds like a trigger job in reverse, no thanks.
  19. chevyman097

    chevyman097 Well-Known Member

    Is this a late April fools? Because this guy cant be serious....oh wait...
  20. grilledcheese

    grilledcheese Well-Known Member

    From the inventor:

    Thanks jackwagon. Nice way to throw every new gun owner under the bus.

    I have the perfect name for Mr. Lee's device: "DEFECTIVE BY DESIGN".


Share This Page