1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

G-Gordon says it's a "Pop gun"

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by BulletFan, Feb 3, 2006.

  1. BulletFan

    BulletFan Well-Known Member

    So I was listening to one of my heroes on his radio show today. G Gordon Liddy. Today being Friday, it's gun discussion day....someone called in praising the versatility of the 7.62 NATO and the M1, the M14 and on and on. Now I love listening to G Gordon and I usually agree with just about everything he says. BUT, today his opinion on the new AR-15 and even the M-16's of the past being "cutesy little pop guns" is just a bit harsh.
    Granted the M1 and the M14 are wonderful guns, and I'm sure that if I were a ground troop cresting over a hill with enemies all around me at distances of 75-100 yards and I had some cover, I'd probably prefer the 7.62, but you know what, warfare has changed since the days of the M1 and M14. The portability and ease of use of the AR-15 and the like have proved to be vital in combat use of today. If I were climbing in and out of Hummers and tanks, jumping in and around barriers, crawling through allies etc, I would definately choose a weapon easier manuvured and higher capacity in ammo.
    I could just have no idea what I'm talking about, I have no military experience and I'm not about to join up, but am I alone in thinking that overall, for today's combat situations, the AR-15 is just great? Besides, the AR can be converted over to 7.62 NATO in about 1 minute anyway...so why call it a pop gun!?

    What are your thoughts. Military opinions appreciated, especially those of you who faught using something other than the AR or M-16.

  2. armoredman

    armoredman Well-Known Member

    I barely qualify - we had M14s on board ship, but I "trained" with the M16 in Amry ROTC...if you can call it that.
    I fell in love with the old fence post on board ship.
  3. shecky

    shecky Well-Known Member

    Mistake number 1: Listening to G.Gordon.

    It all goes downhill from there.
  4. DF357

    DF357 Well-Known Member

    Compared to an M1 or M14 the AR is a popgun. If you ever fired one, you'd know.

    That said, it does the job for today's purposes and that's what is important.
  5. BulletFan

    BulletFan Well-Known Member

    Okay, so it IS a pop gun...

    But it still gets the job done...
    Two in the chest, one in the head. I tell ya what, I wouldn't get up after that. 75 virgins or not.
  6. Devonai

    Devonai Well-Known Member

    Bulletfan, you can't convert a 5.56x45mm AR-15 to 7.62x51mm in any given amount of time. The magazine well is too short to accomodate the cartridge. AR-style rifles in .308 must have a dedicated lower receiver.

    I think every squad should have a designated marksman with an M14, but that's just because I'd like to be him. I think the .308 is an excellent combat round but modern Infantry tactics require too much suppressive fire to make widespread use of the M14 practical.
  7. BulletFan

    BulletFan Well-Known Member

    Aha, I thought the .308 was able to fit in the same lower.
  8. TexasRifleman

    TexasRifleman Moderator Emeritus

    It's a radio show, as in SHOW business.

    If he didn't say controversial things no one would listen.
  9. Skofnung

    Skofnung Well-Known Member

    I always laugh when anyone calls any cartridge gun a "popgun."
    They will all kill. .22 short to .50 BMG. Some better than others, but all are lethal.
  10. roscoe

    roscoe Well-Known Member

    Liddy is the popgun.
  11. Roudy

    Roudy Well-Known Member

    It's not the rifle that is in question here, but the cartridge.

    Comparing the .233 to the .308 or 30-06 is like comparing a tack hammer to a 5 pound sledge hammer.

    Granted that heavier weapons are more difficult to carry in combat situations, but to arrive at a firefight inadequately armed just because you don't want to be tired is poor tactics.

    BTW do 3 rounds of .223 weigh less than 1 round of .308?:p
  12. KriegHund

    KriegHund Well-Known Member

    Lets shoot him with this supposed popgun, and see how long it takes him to die w/o immediate medical attention.
  13. Nightdiver

    Nightdiver Member

    Someone please help me out here. What war did Liddy fight in?:confused:

    Oh yeah, he was assigned to an AA battery in New York during the Korean conflict.

    So much for his expert opinion.;)
  14. R.H. Lee

    R.H. Lee Well-Known Member

    The level of indignation indicates the statement has some merit. The 5.56/.223 is, after all, a varmint and plinking round.
  15. Roudy

    Roudy Well-Known Member

    with the .308 or 30-06...medical attention may be a moot point!:)
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2006
  16. Sunray

    Sunray Well-Known Member

    "...climbing in and out of Hummers and tanks, jumping in and around barriers, crawling through allies(sic) etc..." The PBI have always done that. The PBI did it during W. W. I, W. W. II and Korea with a heavy rifle with no fuss. Ok, they don't climb in and out of tanks nor did they always have Hummers, but the running about with a rifle in hand and everything they own on their backs is what they do.
    "...with the .308 or 30-06...medical attention is a moot point..." Nonsense.
  17. Roudy

    Roudy Well-Known Member

    Me thinks Ya'll are taking this thing to seriously. :what:
  18. mustanger98

    mustanger98 Well-Known Member

    Ya'll remember, this is just the internet.

    FWIW, I shoot a Mini-14 and an M1 Garand. I like both. I'd hate to see somebody get hit with a round from either. But if I were going into harm's way, I'd rather have the Garand because .308 or .30-06 does have more power.

    BTW, fired from a bolt gun, in my experience M193 ball ain't all that great, accuracy-wise.
  19. kaferhaus

    kaferhaus Well-Known Member

    I see the keyboard commandos are at it again.

    Some of you guys need to actually do some ballistics/wound cavity research before you prove your ignorance to the rest of the world by opining on it.

    There's no doubt that putting a big hole in someone is better than putting a small hole in them. The reason is energy transfer and faster "bleed out" NOT lethality.

    At normal rifle engagement ranges the 06 and 308 are no more lethal or debilitating than the 5.56.

    At 600M the 5.56 M855 round actually has better penetration than the 308..

    It is easier to shoot the M16 accurately than any other military firearm ever produced. An off the rack M16 is more accurate than any M14 that was ever a standard issue weapon.

    Even when "accurized" for DCM competition, the AR is kicking the M14s tail even at 600M

    Not having to carry a 10lb rifle all day is a plus

    Not having to carry a "fence post" all day is a plus

    Being able to carry twice the ammo is a plus

    Having to change magazines half as often is a plus

    Being able to move through tight spaces while still having your rifle at the ready is a plus.

    Having a more accurate rifle is a plus

    Being able to shoot that rifle accurately for a sustained period of time is a plus (recoil)

    Even during WWII the vast majority of rifle engagements was less than 200M, nearly 60% was under 100M.

    The 308s only advantage as a military rifle round is it leaves a bigger hole for blood to flow out of and transfers a little more energy to the target. Hit a target in the same spot with either round and the tissue damage will be as near identical as you could possibly imagine.

    Now before some genius pulls out a data table and trys to say the muzzle energy of a 308 is "X" vs the 5.56 is such and such, that's nearly a useless statistic in the "real world". The bullet would have to stop instantaneously against an immovable object for that nifty little stat to mean squat.

    The 5.56 is an excellent infantry round. Hundreds of thousands of dead enemy soldiers can't be wrong.
  20. Andrew Wyatt

    Andrew Wyatt Well-Known Member

    My comments are in red. I don't have a dog in the fight, I just thought some things needed answering. also, the first three lines irritate me.


Share This Page