1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

GEICO cancels car insurance over guns!!

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by hk-sigman, Jan 23, 2013.

  1. hk-sigman

    hk-sigman Well-Known Member

    This is ridiculous!!

  2. trailgator

    trailgator Well-Known Member

    FYI. Your personal info is still visible where you marked it out.
  3. hk-sigman

    hk-sigman Well-Known Member

    Not mine. This was posted on a conservative news blog. I'm just passing it along.
  4. robertn

    robertn Active Member

    Yeah that would pretty much upset me quite a bit...
  5. Inebriated

    Inebriated Well-Known Member

  6. cfullgraf

    cfullgraf Well-Known Member

    I had a bad experience with GEICO Insurance 35 years ago and have not gotten over it yet.

    i am not surprised.
  7. mcdonl

    mcdonl Well-Known Member

    Well... hold on now. I had my insurance cancled once because I had (Thankfully removable) signs on the side of my truck when I ran a landscaping business.

    I suspect that if the policy holder had a "Business dealing with the sale of pharmacuticals" or something along those lines the result may be similar.

    You are not supposed to conduct business with a vehicle holding a personal policy.
  8. gunNoob

    gunNoob Well-Known Member

    Wow. Good thing I have USAA.
  9. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    We should know all the facts before we break out the pitchforks and torches.

    Was this a private vehicle policy instead of a business vehicle policy and the insurance company cancelled it for that reason OR is it a prejudicial practice based on an association with firearms?
  10. beatledog7

    beatledog7 Well-Known Member

    The letter clearly sates that the reason for cancellation was an association with the "weapons industry." Why is that ambiguous to you?
  11. hk-sigman

    hk-sigman Well-Known Member

    Considering that the letter states specifically the gun industry then I would say that they have something against guns. If it were because the vehicle is used for business then I suspect that they would have stated that he needs to insure it as a business policy rather than a personal policy. Most insurance companies would rather tell him to upgrade the policy rather than lose the policy by cancelling it.
  12. blarby

    blarby Well-Known Member

    Geico does not do heavy industry commercial auto.

    It says GEICO COMMERCIAL INSURANCE right on it. Chances are the insured seriously misrepresented the nature of the business to the rep who took the policy over the phone, or in person.

    Once U/W pulls the digital registration ( as they do on ALL COMMERCIAL POLICIES- this is not a witch hunt) and determines the course of business of the insured, standard underwriting practices are applied.

    They cover briefcase business, thats about it. They will do some light industrial uses- such as landscaping ( but no gasoline transport) construction workers trucks ( but no oxy and acet, etc)

    It could have been a popcorn company- it does not matter.

    Most states require that insurance companies notify the insured in writing if their course of business does not meet their underwriting criteria, and what that criteria is - in this case, the class of business.

    They also don't insure welding rigs over 22k GVW, or , and here's the important part here :vehicles that transport hazardous or flammable materials for a profit.

    This is not a gun issue. This is a "we don't insure certain classes of business due to the liability involved" issue.

    FWIW- as an auto agent- I used to get a lot of these types of letters in my office.

    We usually got them when placing business that the insured didn't want to disclose to an agent in person- so they called someone over the phone who didn't ask the right questions. Licensed agents who make money on the retention of business, not just point of sale- do.

    Underwriting always does. They just don't get to ask it over the phone during the sales call. They don't get the opportunity.

    Chances are ( more than sure on this one- knowing GEICOs regular business practices) that the underwriter called the insured, and asked about all his daily activities using the vehicle.

    The insured told him, and it involved transporting firearms and/or ammunition as the course of business.

    Sorry folks- they are considered hazardous or dangerous cargo. Less so the firearm- moreso the ammunition, but they do put them together. No, an underwriter will not willingly believe that you are in the firearms business, and transport firearms- but never transport ammunition. I was one, and I wouldn't believe it either. You might get a rookie to take a declaration, written and signed under penalty of perjury that you don't do "x, y. or Z"... but if you have an accident, and you are indeed doing " X, y, or Z" they will not cover it.

    It happens. I have seen it. People lie to save money. In insurance- this is never a good idea. The coverage you need is out there. Its all about the law of large numbers- they insure the percentage of risk, with a little profit. Think your rate is high ? Consider the risks you are trying to insure.

    All those crazy tin-foil hatty ideas we all have about things that can go wrong, once in a million times ? Thats what insurance companies cover you against- so yes, they consider them. They are on the hook for the vagaries of fate- and the certainty of human error.

    Sorry, put the pitchforks down, snuff the torches.
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2013
  13. G.barnes

    G.barnes Well-Known Member

    it said "used in conjunction with a company". sounds like he was using it as a part time commercial vehicle.
  14. jim243

    jim243 Well-Known Member

    That does not matter, the company is owned by Waren Buffet one of Oboma's biggest supporters, I just don't trust slimy green lizzards.

  15. blarby

    blarby Well-Known Member

    Type short lane LLC into google.

    See what comes up.

    This is not a hard concept to understand................

    Call then- tell them you need a policy that covers you while transporting dangerous and hazardous materials.

    Say whatever you want. Then at the end of the call, say it also involves ammunition and firearms, or commerical use of explosive gases- see what they tell you.

    Then call back, and ask for a quote on a commercial policy. Tell tem you are a manager of a firearms company, and that they give you a vehicle in the company name, which you use for going to sales mettings, marketing meetings, and general office duties.

    You might take a display sample, once in a while- but its very rare, and not part of your regular duties.

    One of these is insurable. One of them is a realistic explanation, the other one is clean-sheeted to pass underwriting. I can bet which one he used to get the policy..........
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2013
  16. BSA1

    BSA1 Well-Known Member

    I did a quick search on Google and PRESTO!


    Well whadda know. They are a "percision manufacturer of shotgun adapters and shotgun accessories." Sounds like to me to they had a company vehicle insured under the wrong kind of policy.
  17. Tcruse

    Tcruse Well-Known Member

    USAA is not gun friendly. They tried to keep guns out of the cars of their employees and got an exception to the Texas law that allows such.
  18. Husker_Fan

    Husker_Fan Well-Known Member

    I would not be surprised if vehicles used in firearms related businesses are more often broken into than the general commercial fleet. Having different underwriting standards for different businesses isn't exactly surprising.

    GAMALOT Well-Known Member

    I've been wanting to blow that Lizard away anyway!
  20. Double Naught Spy

    Double Naught Spy Sus Venator

    The name not blacked out isn't because of the OP as he noted. The former insuree posted the information on his Facebook page, LOL, that has a link to the website that is selling their products. So no real privacy is being violated that isn't voluntary. The information was made public.

Share This Page