1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Gun Control is out in DC...

Discussion in 'Legal' started by OldSchooler, Jul 11, 2006.

  1. OldSchooler

    OldSchooler Well-Known Member

    An article in the current issue issue of USN&WR is of interest here. In summary, it has the advocates ogf gun control, the dems and liberals, failing fast when they side with gun control advocacy.

    As evidence, several pro gun initiatives are expeceted to pass the Congrees easily this session, as gun control advocates find themselves increasingly marginalized and largely ignored. A decade ago the gun lobby seemed in trouble with the Brady initiatives and assualt bans of the 90's coming on strong. Now, gun control is quickly becoming a no-touch issue for Democrats.

    "It's different now. Those were the glory years", said Paul Helmke, CEO of the Brady Center to Control gun Violence. (One suspects he said it with some sense of loss. - David)

    As we know, the assault weapon ban was allowed to languish into obscurity, CCW restrictions are steadily being lifted nationwide and according to Wayne LaPierre, of the NRA, gun-owning freedoms are "...in the best shape they've been in decades."

    Currently, a new bill is being proposed that will prohibit police from confiscating firearms during emergencies, a response to such foolishness as was seen during Hurricane Katrina. "Five years ago, such a proposal would have been sneered at; now it is sure to become law," says OK Senator Dan Boren - D, a strong gun-rights supporter.

    Gun control of some kind is still favored by many, according to polls. But it has become an emotional "us against them" issue, a make or break matter. As such, it stirs up lots of ire - and money - from both sides.

    However, gun-rights groups have given over 14 times as much in political donations as gun-control supporters, according to Ohio's Second Amendments Research Center's. Saul Cornell.

    The recommendations from John's Hopkins' Center for Gun Policy and research now, is to target unscrupulous gun dedalers (are there any of those??) and stay away from political hot potatoes like bans and restrictions.

    So let us say that our side is winning battles and, one hopes, the war. Keep your pressure on, join the NRA and let your representatives know that we recognize that personal security is in our hands at the moment of threat, and that we wish to pursue our lawful use of firearms ~ ~ and the rights which secure it.

    Take heart, fellows - there is hope in our lifetime.
  2. tube_ee

    tube_ee Well-Known Member

    Though many here are loath to admit it, I think the worm has turned. I'm a frequent contributor to left-wing boards and blogs, and gun control is dying as an issue. When the current Dem leadership passes into history, it'll be done.

    The current head of the DNC had a top rating from the NRA as a governor, and leftie, Birkenstock-wearing Vermont leads the nation in lack of gun restrictions. 20 years ago, that would have been unthinkable.

  3. longeyes

    longeyes member

    It is in the nature of tyrants to disarm the peasants. Most of this planet is still run by tyrants. Be afraid, be very afraid.
  4. Translated: "The gravy days are gone. We're in real danger of having to find real work that actually might require some brains. I'm doomed."
  5. Silver Bullet

    Silver Bullet Well-Known Member

    That article is on page 47 of the July 17, 2006 issue, for those who want to read the whole thing ("Packing Heat on the Hill").

    My favorite sentence is

    The article pointed out that we have made progress during this administration on several fronts: repeal of the AWB, shield of gun makers, and "eased restrictions" on CCW. And it's very important that we make progress when the pro-guns are in the majority; otherwise, each time the anti-gun guys are in control we keep ratcheting backwards.
  6. mzmtg

    mzmtg member

    Is there any risk that this push to go after bad gun dealers could codify some of the BATFExyz's crazy "policies" into law?
  7. bigun15

    bigun15 Well-Known Member

    That might end up in my sig line. I like it.
  8. mp510

    mp510 Well-Known Member

    The change may already be beginning. I know the Hillary's, Schumers and Kerry's rot- but even Reid (senate majority leader) is rated in the B range.

    Glad to see the people of DC may get some protection.
  9. Igloodude

    Igloodude Well-Known Member

    As far as I know (having lived in Vermont for a few years a while back), Vermont has always led the nation in lack of gun restrictions, as they've never had a law restricting concealed carry in the first place. The population centers of Vermont might be progressive/socialist, but the rural areas are populated almost purely by the most red-state-ish of folks.

    That aside, the article makes me all warm and fuzzy inside. :D
  10. Camp David

    Camp David member

    Most of the sane folks have moved out of DC (either north toward Maryland or south to Virginia) in order to own handguns and protect themselves... I doubt strongly that DC will ever change its discriminatory gun rules and prohibition of handguns... Just last evening there were two more attacks on the National Mall in DC and about five homocides in the city...(JUST LAST NIGHT)...

    Touring the Capital City is no longer safe... The Mayor, however, says nothing about these National Mall attacks, muggings, rapes, and shootings... tourists are a target in DC!

    Check out crime rates for DC here...1960-2000, simply awful...
  11. RealGun

    RealGun Well-Known Member

    Under what premise will such a federal bill claim jurisdiction? It won't be the Second Amendment. A funded mandate maybe, but I can't imagine how that would work.
  12. RealGun

    RealGun Well-Known Member

    Proliferation of concealed carry is to no credit of any "administration". That has been occurring at the State level.
  13. RealGun

    RealGun Well-Known Member

    That will be a hard fought battle that will require the full attention of gun owners. Do the high fives when it actually happens.
  14. antsi

    antsi Well-Known Member

    Is there any risk that this push to go after bad gun dealers could codify some of the BATFExyz's crazy "policies" into law?

    If the anti-gun people are pushing it, you can bet it is bad for us.

    Often on this board people fall into the trap of saying, "that's a problem for the dealers and manufacturers, but it doesn't affect my rights." Don't fall into that trap.

    Since it is becoming unfashionable to go after the gun owners, they're switching to the dealers and manufacturers. But they wouldn't be doing this if it didn't advance their ultimate agenda of disarming the US citizen.
  15. TIZReporter

    TIZReporter Well-Known Member

    When the anti-gunners are twarted in one area, they shift to work in other areas.

    They thought the UN conference would be a huge success for them, it wasn't.

    In Canada however the new Conservative government appears willing to continue acting like Liberals (http://www.theinfozone.net/salw-news.html).

    South Africa is facing new very harsh laws.

    While what happens in other countries might not seem important to Americans remember that there are many trade agreements that America signs and gun owners are affected by and often not aware of.

    How many here know about the ramifications of the Marking and Tracing OAS treaty?

  16. ilbob

    ilbob Well-Known Member

    How about the specific authority of the 14th amendment that grants congress the right to pass laws to insure states do not violate our liberties?

    The second amendment clearly guarantees individuals the right to keep and bear arms. The 14th amendment says congress can enforce that right when a state might want to infringe that right.
  17. mrmeval

    mrmeval Well-Known Member

    One thing that needs to be done is to protect gun dealers from the predations of the ATF.
  18. Henry Bowman

    Henry Bowman Senior Member

    That has been my observation as well.
  19. Zrex

    Zrex Well-Known Member

    And yet, with a republican house, senate and white house, we still can not repeal the 89 import ban, the 86 MG ban, the sporting use language of the GCA, or anything else. The only way AWB vanished is because of the sunset. This is pitiful.
  20. Camp David

    Camp David member

    It would be a interesting endeavor for someone who has legal connections and time to devote to the task to apply for a Gun Store permit in the District of Columbia, with the point being to sue the City when your permit is denied. There are no current gun stores now but under the law it might be interesting (and perhaps profitable) to sue for the right...

Share This Page