1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Gun Liability Insurance Not Feasiable

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Solo, Apr 22, 2013.

  1. Solo

    Solo Well-Known Member

    The Insurance Journal explains why gun liability insurance cannot work.

  2. TheSaint

    TheSaint Well-Known Member

    On top of all that, according to one article I read, in NY alone, where one legislator was proposing a minimum $1 million dollar policy per gun, that would make your yearly premiums $2600! Talk about a poll tax when you try to mandate insurance that costs five times as much as your average pistol.
  3. AlexanderA

    AlexanderA Well-Known Member

    Liability insurance could, at most, cover claims arising from negligent use of a gun. What these legislators are talking about, in effect, is the posting of a "peace bond" that would be forfeited in case of intentional misuse of a gun. Let's say the amount was set at $1 million (per gun, per owner, or whatever). That would mean placing a lien on property worth at least that much, or else paying the standard 10% premium to a bondsman, which would amount to a nonrefundable $100,000 per year, out of pocket. Either way, this would confine gun ownership to the very wealthy, and would thus be a clear violation of the 2nd Amendment.

    Criminals would pay no attention to this. Formerly law-abiding gun owners would have the choice of turning in their guns, or becoming criminals themselves. Any legislator proposing such a scheme is either crazy or grossly ill-informed, and rightfully should be turned out of office.
  4. I expect insurance companies to JUMP on any new gun insurance. From a broad view, very few guns/gun owners get into an occurrence that would require a payout, and the vast majority would just be paying for insurance that never needs a payout. Isn't that how insurance companies make a profit?
  5. 19-3Ben

    19-3Ben Well-Known Member

    Well, there's also another issue at play here. If the insurance is mandatory, then the net effect is that someone's ability to legally exercise their right is decided by the insurance companies. If the insurance companies decide not to issue me a policy for whatever reason, then I cannot legally own a gun. It puts WAY too much power in the hands of those corporations.
  6. Sheepdog1968

    Sheepdog1968 Well-Known Member

    I don't think liability insurance such as an umbrella policy is a bad thing to have in general it covers you for all kinds of things However, 1 million per gun would be excessive. If they aren't careful, it will get challenged as a poll tax in trying to limit folks ability to exercise their constitutional rights.
  7. Vector

    Vector Well-Known Member

    Another good point.
  8. Vector

    Vector Well-Known Member

    I hope you are not proposing it should be mandated on any level. Sure an individual could decide they want to pay some type of coverage as a precautionary measure, but that is their choice. It is akin to choosing to have a gun safe. However gun ownership should not be contingent on it.
  9. JRH6856

    JRH6856 Well-Known Member

    The proper term for what is being called "Gun Liability Insurance" is "Surety Bond". A surety bond is a promise to pay one party (the obligee) a certain amount if a second party (the principal) fails to meet some obligation, such as fulfilling the terms of a contract. The surety bond protects the obligee against losses resulting from the principal's failure to meet the obligation.

    A bail bond is a form of surety bond where the obligation is to appear in court at the required date and time.

    In the case of firearms, the principal's obligation is to obey the law regarding the possession and use of the bonded firearm(s) and the obligee is the person or persons damaged by the illegal use of the firearm(s).

    A surety bond is generally guaranteed by a bonding agent which may be an insurance company. The bonding agent will require an up front posting of cash or other security. As with insurance, the amount required up front will be dependent on the bonding agent's calculation of risk having to pay the bond and may require the principal to post the full amount of the bond plus a premium.

    While liability insurance is not a feasible vehicle for this purpose, a surety bond is the perfect vehicle. The question is whether or not it is a 2A infringement to require such a bond.

Share This Page