1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

How are Ruger GP100s more durable than S&Ws?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by ejnogarb, Feb 15, 2011.

  1. ejnogarb

    ejnogarb Well-Known Member

    When comparing Rugers to S&Ws, I've always heard that S&Ws have a better trigger and finish, but that Rugers are more rugged and durable. Anyone else always hear that? What is it about the Ruger design that makes it a hardier firearm?
  2. Sleipnir

    Sleipnir Member

    The reasoning I've always heard is that Ruger revolvers are over-engineered compared to S&W. Kind of like a HMMWV (Ruger) versus a H1 Hummer (S&W).

    That being said, I own an SP101 and the only thing out there about them is that they are little tanks; I've not heard of one cracked forcing cone using SAMMI spec hot 125 grain .357 loads which is incredible. The GP100 can have forcing cone issues with those same rounds if fed a regular diet of the stuff, but rest assured it encounters those problems long after the S&W would have had those same issues.

    Ruger's revolvers are incredible for the prices, though it's recommended in the SP101 to get the 10# Wolff hammerspring to even out the trigger pull, not sure about GP100 or others.
  3. Snubshooter

    Snubshooter Well-Known Member

    Rugers use coil springs throughout that last much longer, Smith has a few flat springs that seem to make the pull smoother. Also the forcing cone appears slightly thicker. Generally Rugers have more metal on board than Smiths. Smiths are like race horses and Rugers are draft horses. 100_0924.jpg
  4. MrBorland

    MrBorland Moderator

    I'm no gunsmith, but based on my observation, I see S&Ws having 2 weak links Rugers don't share:

    Smith's use a single yoke screw to hold the cylinder/crane assembly to the frame. Remove the screw, and the cylinder & crane simply slide off the front of the gun. Unfortunately, hard use (e.g. from lots of reloads) can bend the screw, especially newer guns that use a screw/spring-loaded plunger assembly. Bend enough, and the cylinder won't close, or will even fall off the gun.

    Also, the front of the cylinder assembly in Smiths are locked at the front end of the ejector rod, relatively far from where the strain is being applied. Also, unlike the Ruger, Smith ejector rods also turn as the cylinder turns. If the ejector rod gets bent a bit, it may have trouble locking up, and/or affect the trigger pull as it binds on its retaining plunger during rotation.

    Serious competitive revolvers shooters aside, I suspect that neither of these is ever an issue for most, though.

    Ruger frames are cast, whereas S&W frames are forged, so it's a bit of apples & oranges. Thicker cast vs thinner forged may come to the line together, but I'm not enough of a metallurgist to say either way. Nonetheless, this debate continues, though I suspect differences in metallurgic strength aren't enough of a real issue for most to worry about.
  5. Sunray

    Sunray Well-Known Member

    Rugers are far more heavily constructed. Compare the thickness of the cylinder walls next time you're in a shop.
    "...Smith has a few flat springs..." Only the mainspring. Colt's, specially older Colt revolvers, have several. Even Pythons.
    Any new revolver requires a trigger job due to frivolous law suits. Makes no difference who made it.
  6. lexjj

    lexjj Well-Known Member

    No side plate on the Ruger.
  7. FullEffect1911

    FullEffect1911 Well-Known Member

    The cylinder bolt and the pawl are both over built on Rugers and tend to last longer. The notches are also offset and therefore can be deeper without compromising the cylinder's strength. This leads to a stronger cylinder and longer wearing notches without increasing the weight of the cylinder.

    They also the lockup at the crane and have more bearing surface inside the cylinder where endshake could batter things.

    Among many other durability improvements. They are well engineered guns if the design philosophy was focused on durability.
  8. Naybor

    Naybor Well-Known Member

    Ruger gets my vote ~ SP101 .357!

    Very well built ~ disassembles easily ~ super trigger with 9# or 10# Wolff spring. Ours is totally reliable with the 9# spring, some reported having to go to 10#. The wife loves it now and is getting deadly with the DA action. She practices with .38 Special and Carries .38 +P.

    Considering price, durability, accuracy, attractive SS, the Ruger gets our vote.
  9. GP100man

    GP100man Well-Known Member

    I think the sheer weight helps longevity by absorbing recoil.

    But that weight also has it`s drawbacks also , carrying the extra weight needs consideration of good belts & holsters !! & Ruger says "dry firing" is ok but think of those big heavy parts , getting em started & stopped takes it`s toll !!!

    The Rugers I could shoot all day !!!

    The Smith&Wesson Revolvers are built more refined in overall designs of the frame (liter & has a plate) generally the barrels are liter , meaning recoil is transfered more to the shooter & I just can`t shoot a S&W all day ! & if I did I would need to stop & titen the side plate screws ( The GP100 has only 3screws ,2 sight adjustment & 1grip screw & if all three fell out the revolver would still run)

    Are Rugers immune to problems ???? No !! But NONE are !!

    It comes to a personal liking or price or features of a certain firearm or firearms .

    I`ve shot abunch different kinds from all 3 companies ,The Rugers stay !!!

    But I`m not BIASED I like all Rugers
  10. ColtPythonElite

    ColtPythonElite Well-Known Member

    I know this is about the GP, but do a Google search about the torture test Ruger put a SP thru. They ran 5k hot .125 grain magnums thru it only stopping long enough to reload and dunk the gun in a bucket of water to cool it down. At the end, they spec'd and and found no wear, frame stretching, ect.
  11. derek45

    derek45 Well-Known Member

    anybody remember these revoler wars commercials in the 1980's

    The S&W L-Frame(586/686) was designed to handle a stead diet of full house .357 magnum loads.


    Either one is plenty strong.

  12. ColtPythonElite

    ColtPythonElite Well-Known Member

    In reality, an good .357 should handle a steady diet of magnums and likely will. I've never seen a warning in an owner's manual warning you to limit the number of rounds you put thru one.
  13. 9mmepiphany

    9mmepiphany Moderator

    The big things about the Ruger design that makes it stronger than the S&W are:

    1. Solid Frame, No sideplate
    2. Off-set bolt notches...cut between the chambers where there is more metal than directly over the chamber
    3. Better lockup of the yoke into the frame at the front of the cylinder
    4. Coil spring powered action
  14. The Lone Haranguer

    The Lone Haranguer Well-Known Member

    Heavier construction overall with thicker metal in highly stressed areas (e.g., the forcing cone), solid frame with no sideplate, front cylinder lockup directly on the crane/yoke instead of way out on the end of the ejector rod. In fact, the GP100's ejector rod does not even turn with the cylinder.
  15. derek45

    derek45 Well-Known Member


    Yeah, the Ruger is thicker, INVESTMENT CAST steel

    the S&W is FORGED steel

    The S&W is also smoother, better action, better looking and higher resale value.
  16. MCgunner

    MCgunner Well-Known Member

    The key that everyone misses. Weird how a revolver enthusiast can over-look this design feature and the strength it adds. It's the same reason single action frames are stronger. There is no side plate, two sided frame bearing the loads.

    Personally, I consider the little SP101 stronger than an L frame. I have done no torture testing, though, couldn't afford the ammunition it'd take to break either one.

    I do prefer Rugers. I won't buy a new production Smith. Older Smiths if the price is right, but I will buy NEW production Rugers. Far more for my dollar with a Ruger IMHO and a fine weapon. I still miss my SP101, need to replace that one.
  17. Drail

    Drail Well-Known Member

    5K rounds of hot 125 gr. loads will eat the forcing cone out of any make of revolver. It might not hurt the frame but it'll toast the first inch of bore. I pretty much burned a forcing cone up on a GP 100 and it took a lot less than 5 k rounds to do it. Maybe 500. Back to the OP's question, Rugers are extremely overbuilt machines compared to S&W's level of construction. The S&W will have a nicer trigger pull than a Ruger. They're both very good firearms. It's hard to beat Ruger's pricing considering their quality.
  18. ColtPythonElite

    ColtPythonElite Well-Known Member

    Hmmm.....I have a Colt King Cobra that has seen no less than 20k rounds in the past 20 years. Not all of those were 125's, but I'd guess it's seen several thousand hot 125 grain loads. As a matter of fact, the Blue Dot load that Alliant now advices us not to use it what it saw the most of. The forcing cone in that gun hasn't been "eaten"....A burned up cone in 500? My gun's seen nearly that many this year so far. Heck, I just loaded up 1k 125's last week. I don't plan on not shooting them.
  19. MCgunner

    MCgunner Well-Known Member

    I shoot mostly 165 grain gas checked SWC over 14.5 grains 2400. I don't like the 125s. I carry 140s, feel they perform better out of a short 3" barrel. Check that, I KNOW they perform better, have chronograph to prove it.

    I don't know if hot 125s hurt forcing cones or not and I will never know. :D
  20. HelterSkelter

    HelterSkelter Well-Known Member

    ruger is like that idea you had a long time ago. "why don't they just make EVERY part of the gun strong, not just a few parts?" they took that idea and made all of their guns with that in mind.

    also they have AMAZING customer service. when i sent my revovler in, they had ups come by and pick it up, they paid for everything. also i had the flu at the time and the customer service rep noticed i was sick, and gave me a few new hampshire remedies for it lol. they fix whatever is wrong with it. some of the things weren't things that were wrong but just things that bothered me, they fixed all the little rattles and noises it made.

    ruger's guns are just built to last longer.

Share This Page