1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Is Hollywood preempting anti-terrorist work ?

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Silver Bullet, Aug 15, 2004.

  1. Silver Bullet

    Silver Bullet Well-Known Member


    I was playing a video last night, and this message popped up:

    We've all seen something similar every time we use our vcr or dvd to play a movie. My question is, why is the FBI spending resources on nailing somebody for copying a movie instead of using those same resources to pursue terrorists ? Is this why we have an F.B.I. ? How did Hollywood get so influential as to impose this travesty of priorities ? Or does this apply to all copyrighted materials ?

  2. Treylis

    Treylis Well-Known Member

    "The VCR is to the American film producer and the American public as the Boston Strangler is to the woman alone."
    --Jack Valenti, MPAA, trying to get VCRs banned way back when
  3. RJ357

    RJ357 Well-Known Member

    I don't think they spend very much time on it. It seems that copyright infringements get handled in civil courts far more than criminal courts.

    It is simply in their jurisdiction.
  4. El Tejon

    El Tejon Well-Known Member

    FWIW, the USA's civil side does most of the enforcing in the form of injunctions from what I've seen.
  5. Zundfolge

    Zundfolge Well-Known Member

    Nice Non-Sequitur ... the department of the FBI in charge of "nailing somebody for copying a movie" is not the same department of the FBI in charge of pursuing terrorists (and I suspect the personell in the copyright violations department have zero training in dealing with terrorism).

    The job of the FBI is to investigate violations of ALL federal laws ... not just "hunt terrorists".

    As a professional graphic designer, I'm glad there's a division of the FBI out there to hunt down people who steal my work.
  6. Silver Bullet

    Silver Bullet Well-Known Member

    That's a good answer ... thanks !

    Actually, I was being somewhat facetious, which I tried to convey with my [rant]s.

    But, every time I see that message pop up at the beginning of the video, I think about terrorist infiltration and an undermanned FBI trying to track them all.
  7. sendec

    sendec member

    Given the choice between working duped videos and wearing a cool windbreaker at a major incident, which do you think the typical agent wants?;)

    Though if you check into it the movie/music/entertainment industry loses beaucoup bucks due to piracy, primarily from overseas/Asia. I would'nt trust industry figures for half a heartbeat, but I am confident they have found ways for us to pay for their losses.

    Some of Hollywood's work should be considered acts of terrorism - during the last couple movies I watched I was praying for a quick death.
  8. Zundfolge

    Zundfolge Well-Known Member

    Ah ... okay, I missed the tone ... use one of these next time :evil: or :neener: ... really underlines the sarcasm well :D

Share This Page