1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Kahr cm9 or pm9?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by GlackAttack, Aug 4, 2012.

  1. GlackAttack

    GlackAttack Well-Known Member

    I am debating for my next concealed carry firearm, my current SR9c is a little large for me (5'11" 165lbs). The Kahr's are attractive to me because of their small size, reliability, and customer service. Also they seem to have many accessories when compared to the nano, keltec and others in this group. I like glock, but these glock clones are much smaller than the G26.

    So, help me decide between the 2 in the title, and hell, the .40 versions as well. The pm9 generally sells for about $200 more than the cm9. So far I am leaning towards the pm because it employs polygonal rifling, which is much easier to clean. Also it is much easier to put night sights on the pm, according to my lgs. This is because the front sight is "pinned in" on the cm.. also the pm9 has cool looking bevels on the slide.. the pm comes with extra mag whereas cm does not. im probably missing something but anyways I'm sure some of you have been through this, so I am just asking for input. Any other suggestions are welcome. Anyone own one of these with accessories? I'd love to see them.
  2. Inebriated

    Inebriated Well-Known Member

    That's about it. I think the PM slide is also 1/8" shorter.

    If you can afford it, go for the PM. The night sights are kind of a big deal, and the extra magazine and polyganol rifling are always nice.
  3. Lost Sheep

    Lost Sheep Well-Known Member

    Trigger group, too

    I was in my LGS last weekend and looked at those two models. The counterman told me that the PM also has a superior trigger group (though I could not tell the difference between the two individuals I handled).

    If you shoot lead bullets, the polygonal rifled barrel NEEDS to be cleaned better, before shooting jacketed or plated bullets. I am told that a leaded polygonal barrel exerts more drag on copper-clad and can result in greatly increased pressures.

    I went home with a Ruger SR1911, which is what I went there for. But gee whiz, those were two REALLY NICE small 45s.

    Lost Sheep
  4. wow6599

    wow6599 Well-Known Member

    I have a PM9, my wife a CM9.

    I used to think that the CM9 was the better "value", but as time goes on - I think the PM9 is worth the extra money.

    The CM9 has much sharper edges, one less magazine, MIM slide lock, plastic sights, ugly laser marks, etc.

  5. GlackAttack

    GlackAttack Well-Known Member

    They dont have the same slide lock? What is MIM? Whats the difference?
  6. Dreamliner787

    Dreamliner787 Well-Known Member

    They are almost indentical and the PM isn't worth the high price. The best value is the CM.
  7. TennJed

    TennJed Well-Known Member

    Do you happen to shoot lead of of them? I am curious to know if anyone owns both and can compare the leading difference (if there is any)
  8. wow6599

    wow6599 Well-Known Member

    No, although I do roll my own. Lots of Berry's bullets to break them in.
    I will say though, I still shock myself with my PM9.....I shoot that little thing better than most full size 9's - crazy accurate, and very light on felt recoil.
  9. Skylerbone

    Skylerbone Well-Known Member

    I bought my dad a CW9 and recently picked up a K9. Both are excellent, a C Series can be dehorned if need be (neither of us found it objectionable) and the front sight replacement is quite simple, actually easier than the P Series for an individual.

    Don't let the slide stop material bother you, Kahr's implementation of MIM is excellent and as far as trigger mechanisms I don't believe there are significant differences between the two the OP is considering. The Elite Series is a whole nother level.

    I honestly wouldn't recommend shooting lead through polygonal rifling ever, it isn't just lead build-up that increases pressure but the design of the rifling itself.

    Best prices I've found on Kahr magazines: http://www.ivanhoeoutlet.com/shop/index.php?l=product_list&c=43
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2012
  10. fxstchewy

    fxstchewy Well-Known Member

    Guns are the same except MIM slide stop/release, sights, standard barrel and less detailed slide on the CM9, for a small carry sidearm the CM9 is perfect, kinda like a S&W 642 semi.
  11. GlackAttack

    GlackAttack Well-Known Member

    So can anyone tell me why one would prefer the pm9 slide lock over the mim slide lock in the cm9? The price isn't a huge factor and the polygonal barrel, night sights almost sells it for me.
  12. Ramone

    Ramone Well-Known Member

    I own a PM9, and have some experience with a CM9 (owned by a range buddy, have shot it, stripped it, cleaned it, etc.,).

    The CM9 is a good value, no doubt, but the PM9 is worth the extra money. Getting to know the CM9 has not made me regret spending the extra for the PM9, and my buddy has expressed regrets that he didn't spend the extra.

    Really, it just comes down to the PM9 being "nicer"- IMO, it is worth the extra <US$200.00 for something I carry on a semi-regular basis.

    edited to add:

    the slide stop is no biggy to me, and the CM9 shows every bit of the fit and finish of the PM9 (Kahr is excellent at this, IMX), just having less pretty added.
  13. 340PD

    340PD Well-Known Member

    I went PM9 just because I could. Love that little sucker and I carry it pretty much daily. Night sights alone will add $100 plus to the CM9. You also get an extra mag with the PM9. Another $35-$40 bucks.
  14. Scimmia

    Scimmia Well-Known Member

    Nope. The older PM9s have a 1/8" shorter slide, but it was changed a number of years ago.

    Kahr has a new trigger on the PM9s, but only on models with an external safety. It's a slightly shorter pull. The standard PM9 uses the same trigger group as the CM9.

    MIM is metal injection molding, a manufacturing process that's cheaper than machining. It's generally not as strong as a machined part, but breaking slide stops hasn't been a problem, so I see this an a non-issue.

    Just about every model Kahr makes now comes with the "Elite" trigger. It's the standard trigger on the PM and CM series.
  15. GlackAttack

    GlackAttack Well-Known Member

    Thanks Scimmia, you cleared up a couple things I was wondering about.
    Thanks 340PD for the accessories pic.
    I think the PM9 will be my new baby.
  16. Shipwreck

    Shipwreck Well-Known Member

    I realize this is off the mark - however... I had a PM9 for 2.5 years. I got a Shield about 2.5-3 months ago... I was in love. Sold the PM9 that first week - bought a 2nd shield since then too.

    Less recoil than the PM9, and a better trigger IMHO... Worth a look if you can find one
  17. GlackAttack

    GlackAttack Well-Known Member

    Last edited: Aug 4, 2012
  18. wow6599

    wow6599 Well-Known Member

    I can pocket carry my PM9, which is a huge plus. I haven't held a S&W Shield yet......but I know it's a little bit bigger. Can the Shield be PC'd?
  19. Shipwreck

    Shipwreck Well-Known Member

    I have pocket carried my shield for 3 months now...

    Here are some pis and comparison photos...



    PM9 on top of a shield:

  20. Skylerbone

    Skylerbone Well-Known Member

    Actually $80.00 for Trijicon sights for the CW9 from Kahr, $27.50 for OEM magazines from my above link.

    CW9 + night sights + second magazine = $506.50 (based on Bud's price for pistol)
    PM9 with night sights (not standard) and second mag. = $682.00 (Bud's)
    for a difference of $175.50

    As far as the Elite trigger being standard on the PM Series with the external safety, Kahr's website lists the very same parts as a standard PM and without an E designation after part code #. Scimmia, could you provide more info for us? Would be great if it does include the upgrade as that is a rather spendy upgrade.

    It's not a huge divide money wise but there is a price difference. I bought my K9 with night sights used for $351 after shipping just as I was gearing up to purchase a second CW9. That price for the steel frame made it even money and added night sights so I couldn't pass it up. Had I not caught that deal I would have happily lived with the CW. My other carries are an M&P 9c ($400 used) and a custom 1911 ($1,500 and counting) so money isn't my primary concern when choosing. I guess you can't go wrong either way...that Shipwreck has really got me wondering about the new Shield...

    Enough rambling, lets have more pictures!




Share This Page