1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

LAPD officer shot by his son sues gun maker

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by CountGlockula, Jul 10, 2008.

  1. CountGlockula

    CountGlockula Well-Known Member


    No CA bashing PLEASE.


    Last edited: Jul 11, 2008
  2. 30 cal slob

    30 cal slob Well-Known Member

    why isn't the officer being charged with child endangerment on two counts - unrestrained in a moving vehicle and leaving a loaded firearm within reach of a young child?

  3. ilbob

    ilbob Well-Known Member

    5.5 pounds of pressure on the trigger frequently results in discharges. Thats what it is supposed to do.
  4. TCB in TN

    TCB in TN Well-Known Member

    How was it an accidental shot? Someone pulled the trigger!:uhoh:
  5. LiquidTension

    LiquidTension Well-Known Member

    Ah yes, blame everyone but the person at fault. Standard procedure these days.
  6. ilbob

    ilbob Well-Known Member

    Who wants to go after a paralyzed guy?
  7. blkbrd666

    blkbrd666 Well-Known Member

    I see a moron who's trying to blame someone else for his own mistakes...typical. He really should have taught the kid how to doubletap. Maybe when he gets done with the gun manufacturer, he can sue the automobile manufacturer for not installing bulletproof seats...or maybe his mom for raising such an idiot.
  8. ilbob

    ilbob Well-Known Member

    No doubt his lawyer is telling him this is a way to potentially get set for life. A paralyzed guy does not have as many options as the rest of us, and even such a patently silly lawsuit like this has some chance of success.
  9. buzz_knox

    buzz_knox Well-Known Member

    Did the officer leave the weapon in the backseat or did the 3 year old somehow get the weapon out of the holster without the officer bothering to notice?

    In any event, Glock's lawyers probably flinched when hearing this case was on its way, then relaxed when they saw the facts.
  10. Mil-Spec45

    Mil-Spec45 Active Member

    Why doesn't he sue Hornaday or Federal for making such dangerous paralysis-inducing bullets?
  11. DoubleTapDrew

    DoubleTapDrew Well-Known Member

    So the gun functioned exactly as it's supposed to, and the defective part was the guy allowing his kid access to the gun. It's idiots like this that force manufacturers to incorporate features that endanger your safety when you actually need to use the gun.
    Glock: Stop selling to the LAPD. That should make him popular with the officers that aren't mentally deficient.
  12. rodngun

    rodngun Active Member

    Sounds kinda like a hot cup of coffee to me...what a MORON.
  13. GRB

    GRB member

    This lawsuit, and the cop filing it, are in my opinion unbelievable in the scope of their arrogance. It is absolutely amazing that the courts would even entertain a suit like this, but hey, that's America.
  14. jason10mm

    jason10mm Well-Known Member

    This is just a money soak. Hit up all the parties and hope for a settlement. The retail stores can't afford to fight it and the guys lawyer knows a guy in a wheelchair on the stand makes for good PR. They are hoping Glock coughs up a few hundred grand.

    I will drive to Smyrna personally to buy a Glock if this goes to trial. Actually, can I do that anyway? Do they have a FFL on site? I would love to get a G30 straight from the womb...:p
  15. Reddbecca

    Reddbecca Well-Known Member

    It'll be interesting to see how this lawsuit plays out, especially since gun manufacturers are shielded from frivolous lawsuits just like this.
  16. Tyris

    Tyris member

    Too bad he did not take it in the back of the skull. It would save glock some money.

    He should take some personal responsibility, but that is astonishingly rare in California.

  17. Justin

    Justin Moderator Staff Member

    Evidently he was already paralyzed from the neck up.
  18. Eyesac

    Eyesac Well-Known Member

    The only reason this is even allowed is because is because we don't have common sense laws about lawsuits like this. Looser should have to pay all legal bills of the winner.
  19. usmarine0352_2005

    usmarine0352_2005 Well-Known Member


    And can't you not win legal damages if what you did was in commission of a crime?

    Since he was committing the act of child endangerment and unrestrained child in a motor vehicle, shouldn't he not be allowed to profit by law?

    Similar to you rob a bank at gun point, and fall and break your leg in the bank vault, you can't sue the bank for the broken leg, because you were in comission of a crime.

    And, his son pulled the trigger, it went off, that's what it's supposed to do.

    When he bought the gun, he knew that there wasn't any safety on it (besides the Glock's Mickey Mouse trigger safety).

    Not like his son dropped it on the ground and it fired.

  20. ilbob

    ilbob Well-Known Member

    criminals have successfully sued homeowners when they have hurt themselves while engaged in burglarizing a home.

Share This Page