1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

More Crazy Stuff for the Mall Ninja...

Discussion in 'NFA Firearms and Accessories' started by mesinge2, Apr 16, 2010.

  1. mesinge2

    mesinge2 Well-Known Member

    Last edited: Nov 26, 2010
  2. Yo Mama

    Yo Mama Well-Known Member

    Hate to say it, but it looks good to me. :)
  3. Ragnar Danneskjold

    Ragnar Danneskjold Well-Known Member

    Looks illegal in my state.
  4. winchester '97

    winchester '97 Well-Known Member

    Looks like an expensive and impractical carbine that wont do anything a high point 9mm carbine won't. High point carbines are reliable and i doubt they would get outshot by a glock with a shoulder stock.
  5. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Looks like a $200 tax stamp and a handgun forever reclassified as a Title II "short barreled rifle."

    (Thus, moved to NFA sub-forum.)
  6. mesinge2

    mesinge2 Well-Known Member

    Thanks, Sam1911.

    I could not figure out where to post it.

    FIVETWOSEVEN Well-Known Member

    All it is, is a shell that a handgun goes in, no longer barrel or anything.
  8. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    All it is is a buttstock attached to a handgun, making it meant to be fired from the shoulder and thus a rifle. Which would be fine, if the barrel was over 16".

    At that point (actually right at the moment you installed the shoulder stock), the ATF would consider that the firearm (the serial numbered Glock frame) IS a rifle, and putting the pistol barrel back into it (even if first removing the butt stock) would make it an unregistered Title II Short-Barreled Rifle. As in, "a firearm made from a rifle" as defined by the NFA '34.

    Everyone seems to mention a longer barrel in these discussions. The NFA doesn't care how long the barrel of a handgun is. A 37' barrel on a handgun would be fine. It's the full butt stock that makes it intended to be fired from the shoulder -- and that's the distinction.
  9. medalguy

    medalguy Well-Known Member

    I agree. SBR.
  10. BRad704

    BRad704 Well-Known Member

    I like it... Not worth any money realistically, but still "cool"...
    And if you started with a 5" threaded barrel on your Glock, could you screw-on an 11.1" extension to the barrel to make it a std carbine? I know it sort of defeats the goal, but it could be a work-around...

    Or how about you mount the actual pistol in the rear of the butt-stock and have a bullpup trigger further forward with the longer barrel? hmmm....
  11. smince

    smince Member.

    But you have the option of way more than 10 rounds...
  12. Girodin

    Girodin Well-Known Member

    A $300 (or less) sub 2000 does too.
  13. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Any removable (screw-on) barrel extension would not count toward making it a Title I rifle. The extension would have to be pinned and welded or otherwise permanantly attached.
  14. mgregg85

    mgregg85 Well-Known Member

    I think I'd rather have my SUB-2000. Pistol caliber carbines seem pretty impractical to me but they are a lot of fun to shoot.
  15. rodensouth

    rodensouth Well-Known Member

    That is silly
  16. blackdog714

    blackdog714 New Member

    Just for the future, a firearm labeled SBR can be removed from the registry and brought back into Title 1 status. Unlike a MG which is once a MG, always an MG.
  17. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Yes, that is true, sort of. It actually isn't removed from the registry, FWIR, but a note is made in the registry that the gun with that description and serial number is no longer registered as a Title II weapon.
  18. Ragnar Danneskjold

    Ragnar Danneskjold Well-Known Member

    I also would not want to have a carbine made from a Glock. Every carbine, no matter what size or caliber, that I know of at least, has some from of manual safety. This is key because you're using a sling at most, not a holster. Glock handguns can get away with no safety because they rely on a high quality and secure holster to prevent anything from interacting with the trigger until you're drawing. Not so with a carbine. I would never sling a gun that I couldn't put on "SAFE". It's a neat idea, but I'll take a UMP any day.
  19. millertyme

    millertyme Well-Known Member

    I knew it was only a matter of time before something like this came along.
  20. spartywrx

    spartywrx Well-Known Member

    If we didn't have the SBR law, it would be pretty nifty.

Share This Page