1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Obvious rebuttal to Piers Morgan

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by JustinJ, Jan 18, 2013.

  1. JustinJ

    JustinJ Well-Known Member

    Every time i watch Piers Morgan debate in favor of gun control he cites the total number of "gun murders" in England and other countries relative to the US. Has anybody countered with the question of "why do only gun murders matter to him" and "is murder by other methods acceptable"?
    Also, it should be pointed out that total number violent crimes in a given time is not comparable when two samples have completely different population sizes.

    It seems odd how many pro-gun advocates on his show fail to recognize these two manipulations. Maybe somebody has made this counter point when debating him but i've not seen it.
  2. radiotom

    radiotom Well-Known Member

    Because gun murders are so much more uncivilized for Brits than using knives, clubs, etc.
  3. Waywatcher

    Waywatcher Well-Known Member

    Yeah, I feel the same way.

    Would it make Piers feel better if the deranged murderer had used a longsword? The carnage would have been much more traumatic and just as devastating and rapid.
  4. nathan

    nathan Well-Known Member

    Last edited: Jan 18, 2013
  5. brnmw

    brnmw Well-Known Member

    The anti's don't recognize it as a valid argument therefore do not recognize it at all. Kind of like the analogy of the gun did not pull its own trigger the evil person behind the gun pulled the trigger... they do not again recognize that for every "One" or "Two" people that commit mass killings with as they call " High Powered Assault Machine Guns" there are another Million(s) that own them would never commit such an act. Then realize (the liberals to clarify) that those acts by everyone else's viewpoint that owns one... is actually appalled\disgusted at the acts in question carried out by the Evil & Sick perpetrators.
    *I don't know if that made any sense but it sounded good in my head any way's.
  6. robhof

    robhof Well-Known Member


    They also include justified shootings in their statistics, so in their eyes, if you defend yourself, you are a murderer, as well as police shootings, they must be murderers too, unless they are defending a Leftist zealot???:cuss::fire::banghead:
  7. jamesbeat

    jamesbeat Well-Known Member

    What about the number of violent crimes that take place in Britain that could have been prevented had the victim been able to own a HD shotgun or carry a concealed handgun?

    I'm from Britain, and believe me, it is far from being a crime-free utopia.

    I sleep a whole lot better in my new home in the States than I ever did when I lived in the UK. I may live in NY, but at least I'm still able to own a shotgun (for the time being at least)
  8. MedWheeler

    MedWheeler Well-Known Member

    Gun control is not about guns. It's about control. Here, the people have it, and the government wants it.
    In Britain/the U.K., the government now has it. It's not nearly as concerned with the crime rate there.
  9. JustinJ

    JustinJ Well-Known Member

    I'm more concerned about why nobody debating him has made this point. Are our spokesman a little too entrenched in the script to engage in discourse?
  10. DanMar757

    DanMar757 Active Member

    His numbers don't always add up either!

    I watched a youtube video of his interview with Ted Nugent the other day and Piers made the comment that there are 80 gun murders a day in the US. By my math that equates to 29,200 per year.... or way, way off the mark which is somewhere around 9,000 murders committed with a gun out of a total murder count of ~12,000 (from the FBI crime statistics). The surprising thing to me was that Ted played right along with the numbers, something like "yes, but 75 of those were committed by felons that were let out of jail by the broke justice system". I thought that statement by Ted legitimized Piers obvious and likely deliberate lying about the facts. Big surprise!

    The exchange with the bogus numbers begins at around the 2:00 mark in this link

  11. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    This information has been given here at THR. The UK Home Office published their version of our DOJ/FBI Uniform Crime Report and ranked the UK in the middle of the pack for murder. That in the face of European countries far more liberal about firearms ownership than the UK (and some more so than the US in some respects) having lower violent crime and murder rates.

    That information should be presented as comments every time Piers Morgan is brought up (I did in response to his Daily Mail rant in the UK).
  12. HarcyPervin

    HarcyPervin Well-Known Member

    DanMar - i was just in the process of putting that link up....it seems Piers is getting his butt handed to him more and more these days. People have figured out that they just have to go right through his badgering and bullying. Ted is a bit of a nut-case, but he did a great job of citing his source for that information and stopping the Brit in his tracks.
  13. 10mm Mike

    10mm Mike Well-Known Member

    And what exactly makes him a nutcase? Being passionate about something he believes in? Refusing to be bullied by some british jerk that needs to be deported? Having statistics to back up his claims? Being a good showman?
  14. Manco

    Manco Well-Known Member

    This is how he, or at least typical antis who know how to debate, would counter: "But we're talking about ASSAULT rifles/weapons here, not about swords or handguns, for that matter. Don't try to avoid the subject by changing it."

    Just like that, our valid comparisons are swept aside, with an accusation of attempted avoidance thrown our way for good measure. It's like trying to ask why guns are used to protect Obama's children--as far as the antis are concerned, our point is automatically invalid and we are "cowards" for even mentioning his children. Meanwhile, they can parade all the children they want on stage with them, and manipulate public sentiment using murdered children--no problem. And if we call them out on it, then they'd just say "You're choosing ASSAULT weapons over children--SHAME on you!"

    They can't beat us with reason and logic, so they avoid it and use more effective techniques that more of the population can understand. That's when some of us who are actually on TV debating the topic can lose and have lost our cool, making a mockery of our cause.
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2013
  15. Skribs

    Skribs Well-Known Member

    That's why I say that laws focusing on the gun aren't going to do anything. Focus on the root cause of violence is harder, but in the end will yield better results.
  16. Evergreen

    Evergreen Well-Known Member

    He is the world's biggest hypocrite. If it wasn't for how stupid a majority of people were, he would have been kicked off the air a long time ago.

    He keeps crying about how much gun violence America has, yet his whole thrust is banning "dangerous and deadly assault weapons". Yet, when people challenge him and ask if he against disarming the American people, he says, "No, he supports the 2nd Amendment". He says people should be able to own handguns for self-defense. Yet, all the statistics he cites on gun violence are committed with handguns, not the"assault weapons" he is so against, which contradicts his argument.

    Of course anybody with half a brain knows Piers is full of crap and is doing what he can do to look like a hero, increase show ratings and he probably, himself, hates the fact that any "Yank" has the ability to own a gun and to defend himself from his beloved Queen.
  17. HarcyPervin

    HarcyPervin Well-Known Member

    Read his auto-biography, watch his show. Nothing wrong with passion, and absolutely nothing wrong with how he conducted himself here. The man, for lack of a better term, is out-there. He is a very opinionated person, and his opinions are quite genuinely Ted Nugent. I don't agree with everything he says, but I think he's a hell of an ally and spokesman for our cause.
  18. BHP FAN

    BHP FAN Well-Known Member

  19. Fred West

    Fred West Well-Known Member

    He went to any lengths to sell papers. Got the sack several times I believe for overstepping the mark and was up to his neck in the phone hacking scandal in Britain several years ago which resulted in the Sunday paper The News of the World being forced to close. He always seems to come up smelling of roses. Anyway, you've got him now and good riddance to the piece of filth. I just hope he gets his comeuppance some day but I'm not holding my breath.
  20. JustinJ

    JustinJ Well-Known Member

    You don't? So just allow his viewership to be misled by distorted statistics? Then what's the point of gun rights advocates going on his show in the first place?

    I don't care for Piers Morgan either but ad hominem attacks are not helpful and actually make one appear as though they lack the ability to actually defend their position.

Share This Page