1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

OK, S397 passed, good, but...

Discussion in 'Legal' started by armoredman, Jul 30, 2005.

  1. armoredman

    armoredman Well-Known Member

    What action is going on in the House? Anyone watching them? Any action? Did we do like last year - win in one, just to lose in the other? Will they get to it within the time frame required? What the heck IS the time frame?
  2. LAR-15

    LAR-15 Well-Known Member

    The House will vote on it in September.

    I guarantee Larry Craig will try to keep all amendments in the bill.

    Why? :confused:
  3. armoredman

    armoredman Well-Known Member

    Why? I want to know. Just a question. Thank you for your response.
  4. LAR-15

    LAR-15 Well-Known Member

    I don't know but two amendments are his anyway.

    And the other one passed by a good margin.

    It will be up to the House to demand they be stripped out.
  5. Eightball

    Eightball Well-Known Member

    Two amendments? I only heard of one :confused: that was pertaining to gun locks (however, I was just reading the summation threads, not the detailed ones, so I may have missed something).
  6. sumpnz

    sumpnz Well-Known Member

    They also tacked on one that would increase the penalties for using AP pistol ammo on a cop and fund a study on the use of AP pistol ammo (that was to keep the Hero of Chappaquidick's rifle ammo ban out). Can't remember what the third ammendment was, if there was a third.

Share This Page