1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Perhaps the single-most idiotic statement EVER opposing CCW

Discussion in 'Legal' started by FireBreather01, Feb 1, 2006.

  1. FireBreather01

    FireBreather01 New Member

    I had to read this 3 times yesterday to make sure I hadn't mistakenly ingested hallucinogenic mushrooms in my dinner the previous night.

    This 'thinking', if it can be loosely described as such, shows exactly what we're up against here in WI. Can you believe this drivel?????????

    MONDAY, Jan. 30, 2006, 6:31 p.m.

    By Jerry Resler, editorial writer
  2. lucky_fool

    lucky_fool New Member

    :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

    Armed criminal, unarmed victim. Advantage: armed criminal.

    `Nuff said.
  3. telomerase

    telomerase Active Member

    See, if the citizen doesn't have a gun, they don't have the problem that their draw is too slow.

    And of course we all know that waistband carry is faster than IWB.
  4. georgeduz

    georgeduz New Member

    i live in nj so there is no hope for me.nj doesnt belive in the 2nd amendment nor do they care about the bill of rights.unlike your state they dont want citizens to own a gun,or let any harm come to a Armed criminal,for they have more rights than I,i served in the army in iraq for one year just to come home and find out i lost more freedoms,i came home and this state made me a criminal with all there new gun laws.
  5. Lion_dog

    Lion_dog New Member

    Yup, he's right.:rolleyes:

  6. Pilgrim

    Pilgrim New Member

    The hesitation works true for both sides. The thug does not have a monopoly on decisive action.

  7. Firethorn

    Firethorn New Member

    I carry with a CZ75BD, in a fitted holster, with one in the pipe, hammer down.

    Who's less likely to have a snag?
    Who's more likely to shoot a somewhat important part of themselves?

    It'll take me how long to get a shot off? The CZ75BD doesn't even have a manual safety. I got it due to experience with a bad range instructor that wanted us to rely on the manual safety way too much. So I got a semi without one.

    Darn tootin I pay attention to trigger control with that puppy.
  8. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    I could believe such drivel more easily if you were to tell me the "author" was a high school kid.
  9. Crosshair

    Crosshair New Member

    Crack does not smoke itself.:barf:
  10. progunner1957

    progunner1957 member

    So according to this brain-dead moron, an unarmed "normal person" is better off to be unarmed against an armed thug?


    So by his "reasoning," police would be better off with no guns too - they might hesitate to shoot due to all the paperwork involved when they do.

    What a freaking idiot!:barf:
  11. Jeff

    Jeff New Member

    I wasn't aware that "gang members and other street thugs" were largely a danger to regular citizens. Don't such lowly elements mostly just shoot each other?

    The idea behind concealed carry is to protect oneself from other types of human dangers, such as pathological predators, impulse subjects (i.e. road rage, street rage involving weapons), women protecting themsleves from rapists, robberies, muggings, etc.
  12. foghornl

    foghornl New Member


    We do have CCW here in Ohio, but also have some of the dumbest restrictions...

    When you get into car, has to immediately go from concealed to "in plain sight" ...whatever THAT means....[switch from say IWB to an outside thigh holster]

    Media has full access to, AND PUBLISHES names/ages/county of resisdence of CCW holders.

    pretty well sums up the discussion.
  13. Ezekiel

    Ezekiel New Member

    "I'm not certain that I have an issue with that."

    If the entire concept of the 2nd Amendment is to promise access to firearms, who cares if the exercising of such is advertised? :confused:
  14. boofus

    boofus Guest

    Well you have a right to use those drug store enema bags too. Do you want the entire world knowing what brand and how long you use them for?
  15. Ezekiel

    Ezekiel New Member

    It's not as if you're buying them online and having them shipped to your door in brown paper. John Q. with a case of Depends in his shopping cart is pretty much "in public."
  16. MechAg94

    MechAg94 New Member

    Yes you are.

    You don't need a license to wear Depends.
  17. gt3944

    gt3944 New Member

    ok retards,:cuss: what the hell, was I at your house for dinner....
  18. lucky_fool

    lucky_fool New Member

    How many people with a carry permit own only one gun? I don't know any, and they can't either stay home or carry all of them all the time.

    How hard is it to find an address for someone if you know their name and county of residence? Not hard.

    Why are you okay with newspapers essentially giving criminals lists of houses that almost certainly have guns in them?
  19. Ezekiel

    Ezekiel New Member

    Because this would be marginally different then offering lists that have jewels, electronics or cash in them?

    1. Criminals know what you have, based upon things that have nothing to do with the paper.
    2. I find it amusing that folks want 2nd Amendment "rights" but desire nobody to know about it.
    3. An address is a simple thing to locate in any event.
  20. Manedwolf

    Manedwolf member


    I just have no idea what to say to that. It's like something from the mad tea-party as written by Lewis Carrol...

Share This Page