1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Principal May Be Charged in Cat Killings (shooting)

Discussion in 'Legal' started by gunsmith, Oct 15, 2006.

  1. gunsmith

    gunsmith member

    why not just call animal control?


    Principal May Be Charged in Cat Killings
    Email this Story

    Oct 15, 11:02 AM (ET)

    INDUS, Minn. (AP) - A school principal has resigned and could face felony firearm charges after he shot and killed two orphaned kittens on school property last month.

    Wade Pilloud, who resigned as principal of the K-12 Indus school, 40 miles west of International Falls, said he shot the kittens to spare them from starving to death after their mother was killed in an animal trap.

    Pilloud said the shooting, which occurred on school grounds, endangered no one.

    "I have bred cats, and I currently own two myself," he wrote Friday in an e-mail to the Minneapolis Star Tribune. "I am not a cat hater. I did not want the animals to suffer."

    The incident happened Sept. 21, and several students still on the grounds for after-school activities heard the shots.

    "There were parents who felt, apparently some rather strongly, that there were concerns about the safety of their children," said Joseph Flynn, an attorney for the South Koochiching/Rainy River School District. "The district's position is that safety was not compromised."

    John Mastin, acting sheriff in Koochiching County, said Pilloud could be charged with felony possession of a firearm on school property and reckless discharge of a firearm, a misdemeanor.

    County Attorney Jennifer Hasbargen said Friday that the case was under review.

    Mastin said the shooting put no one in danger but said Pilloud used "poor discretion and poor timing," especially amid the growing fear of gun violence in schools.

    The district put Pilloud on administrative leave after the incident. Flynn said Pilloud agreed to an undisclosed settlement and resigned.
  2. Tommygunn

    Tommygunn Well-Known Member

    I hate hearing these kinds of stories. If he was so concerned about these cats starving to death, why didn't he try to find them homes?
  3. c_yeager

    c_yeager Well-Known Member

    There are a hell of a lot more cats out there than there are homes for them.
  4. Aguila Blanca

    Aguila Blanca Well-Known Member

    " ... could be" charged?

    I want to know why he wasn't already charged. If he "could be" charged with those things, they must be against the law. If any of US carried a gun onto school property and started shooting stray cats, do you think for a nanosecond that acting Sheriff Mastin would just send us home while he considered whether or not me might be charged?

    I don't think so. I think we'd be hauled off the school yard in handcuffs and have to make a significant bail before being allowed to go home. Yeah, it's a bad law ... but even bad laws are worse when they are not applied objectively and uniformly.
  5. beerslurpy

    beerslurpy member

    Why is this even an issue at all, let alone a crime? The cats didnt belong to anyone and no one was harmed by his firing of the gun. This whole thing reeks of nanny-statism.
  6. "Felony firearms charges" sure sounds intimidating, but I read of no specific charges.

    Maybe he should have used an air rifle.
  7. beerslurpy

    beerslurpy member

    He should have stuck them in a garbage bag and tied the open end around the tailpipe of his car. Bingo, no firearms charges and no animal cruelty because thats how the shelters do it.

    Still, who cares about destroying feral cats? Unless you're offering to adopt them (hope you have a million pounds of kitty feed), they need to be disposed of. As long someone doesnt use an especially cruel method of dispatching them, I dont see how it is a big deal.

    Shooting cats with a gun is not an especially cruel method of killing them, especially if you shoot the CNS. It isnt like he set them on fire or put them in the blender.
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2006
  8. Vairochana

    Vairochana Well-Known Member

    Apparently that is the Ethical way yo do it (PETA)
  9. bouis

    bouis member

    I have no qualms about disposing of unwanted animals, but shooting them is unnecessary and probably unsanitary. I would have just drowned them...
  10. Phenom

    Phenom Well-Known Member

    No, that's not how vets do it. Vets use the "Lethal Injection" method;) He could have taken the kittens to an animal shelter instead. He's very lucky I wasn't around him when he did that terrible thing. I most likely would have shoved the rifle down his throat, buttstock first:D
  11. Panthera Tigris

    Panthera Tigris Well-Known Member

    I'm with Phenom. Even if there are more animals than homes for them, you have to at least take them there and try. And, drowning is just about the cruelest way to kill something. I have no respect for anyone that says they'd drown an animal.
  12. bouis

    bouis member

    Rats are probably more intelligent than cats and thousands or millions of them are killed every day in incredibly inhumane ways and no one gives a damn, even the tree-hugging vegans.

    Drowning is a very quick and easy way to dispose of very young animals. It's no less humane than letting them them develop until they're much more aware, only to spend their entire lives in a cage before being killed in an unnecessarily expensive way because it eases consciences and fattens a few wallets.
  13. Gunfire

    Gunfire member

    Does anyone know if this is a state law or the federal unconstitutional 'guns in school zones amendment'?

    This could be a good challenge to strike it down a second time.

    I suspect they won't charge him with the federal crime just so he can't challenge it. Yes, he's a dumbass but still an up-standing principal, with no criminal intent, caught up in the unintended consequences of federal over-jurisdiction.
  14. Liberal Gun Nut

    Liberal Gun Nut Well-Known Member

    Very stupid of him to end his career by doing this. I think he wanted to shoot something. The simple and sensible thing to do is to call the county animal control office and let them handle it. The way things work in this society, you don't win by trying to solve problems that are not your problem.
  15. SoCalShooter

    SoCalShooter Well-Known Member

    The world has far to many people who dont think

    Come on, seriously take the cats home, feed them and then take them to a shelter or see if any parents at the school would like some orphaned kittens.
  16. garyk/nm

    garyk/nm Well-Known Member

    Having a gun in a no-gun-zone. Strike 1.
    FIRING a gun in a no-gun-zone. Strike 2.
    Killing defenseless kittens, oh lord, don't get me started.
    I hope they fry his stupid azz. :fire:
  17. SoCalShooter

    SoCalShooter Well-Known Member

    He should absolutely be punished to the full extent of law, his actions were not that of a responsible gun owner.
  18. PotatoJudge

    PotatoJudge Well-Known Member

    High schools are about the best place to get rid of kittens (without a gun of course). My mom has probably found 50 kittens new homes in the years she's taught. Shooting them was very stupid, at the least, and stupid people shouldn't be in charge of education. Now if it comes out that the kittens were covered in ants and dying already, that's a different story- but still one that shouldn't involve guns at school.
    As for the parents that were afraid for their childrens' safety over this, lets hope they're not in education either.
  19. cyco668

    cyco668 Well-Known Member

    The principal decided to euthanize (the humane way of killing) the cats. Some would of tried to find a homes or have the students adopt them. Some people may agree with killing the cats. I think the guy made a bad decision with how and when he did it. He shot a gun at school while students were present on school grounds. Isn't that the important issue? Not killing cats, but shooting a gun at an elementary school when the little kids were present. Adults may understand why he killed the kittens, but will all the 8 yr old girls understand? School grounds wasn't the place to do it.

    Drowning doesn't always work. I tried drowning my fish, over and over, and they just wouldn't drown! No matter how long i kept them underwater.
  20. Trip20

    Trip20 Well-Known Member

    This reminds me how Wisconsin almost introduced a feral cat season. That would have been fun. ;)

Share This Page