1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Recommended Defense Ammo for 3" 1911s

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by CDR_Glock, Sep 3, 2010.

  1. CDR_Glock

    CDR_Glock Well-Known Member

    Reading the ballistic reports of 45 ACP through various length barrels, the velocities are lower in shorter barrel pistols.

    I have tried some Golden Sabers, Corbon +P, Blue Dot Glaser and Critical Defense 230 grain without an issue in reliability of feeding.

    Anyways, what ammo do you find is effective for your 3" 1911? In your opinion what is the most effect ammo for stopping power?
  2. EdLaver

    EdLaver Well-Known Member

    I use the Corbon PowR'ball 165gr +p in my 3" 1911. Feeds reliably, bullet speed is fast, and recoil is pretty tame.
  3. TIMC

    TIMC Well-Known Member

    I hand load for mine but I like the 185 grain Golden Saber bullets out of my Para LDA Carry.
  4. dogsoldier0513

    dogsoldier0513 Well-Known Member

    My wife's SA Micro Compact Operator is loaded with CorBon 165gr. DPXs. My Glock G36 is currently loaded with W-W 230 gr. JHPs (white box).
  5. Ben86

    Ben86 Well-Known Member

    I don't own a subcompact 1911. However, I would like to add that IMO you should use the same ammo weight for your subcompacts as you do your full size handguns. Many people think they should use a lighter bullet for a shorter barrel because of the loss of velocity and therefore loss of expansion. Loss of velocity also means loss of momentum which means less penetration. When you decrease both the weight and velocity of the bullet you are really going to decrease its momentum. Sure they may expand less when shot out of a shorter barrel, but adequate penetration will be better assured.

    Also, heavier (therefore longer) bullets loose less velocity than lighter bullets because they stay in the barrel longer than shorter, lighter bullets.

    So I think you ought to stick with some premium 230 grain jhps or 200 grain at the lightest. I keep 124 grains in all my 9mms, I could go with 115 grain in the guns with 3'' barrels, but it seems like penetration is less than satisfactory from my patented "double jug" test. SD ammo must be able to pass through at least 2 full size jugs (milk jugs) filled with water and expand well to be up to par with me. That's just my philosophy though.

    MICHAEL T Well-Known Member

    I use Corbon 185gr DPX +P this has worked in My Defender and Agent fine my 2 Officers like it also.
  7. DustyVermonter

    DustyVermonter Well-Known Member

    230gr Gold Dots would be the top choice, then Corbon DPX.
  8. orionengnr

    orionengnr Well-Known Member

    All of my 1911s are well tested with Winchester Ranger 230 +P.
    A few of the 3 and 4 inchers have been tested with CorBon 185+P DPX.

    I am confident with either load.
  9. The Bushmaster

    The Bushmaster Well-Known Member

    7.7 grains of WSF under a hornady 185 grain HP/XTP. 850 fps (+/- a few) from a Kimber UCC II 3" barrel. Believe that will do the trick.
  10. bigfatdave

    bigfatdave Well-Known Member

    Dump the frangible stuff, maybe try some Hornady or Speer offerings, then stock up on whatever HP (or HP with squishy ball) round that:
    1 - you can find at a decent price
    2 - feeds reliably from your carry mags
    3 - expands well in your own testing, if possible

    I wouldn't lose sleep over which premium HP round was in my carry magazines. The difference in "stopping power" within duty calibers is minimal, and within ONE duty caliber is negligible. Stocking plenty of them and cycling them through once in a while is (in my opinion) far more important than picking the ultimate death-ray ammo (that doesn't exist in ANY duty handgun caliber anyway) out from a bunch of stuff designed to meet the same criteria and feed reliably in the same guns.
  11. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Any premium JHP that will feed 100% in your gun. Mindset and shot placement trump everything.
  12. rd2007

    rd2007 Well-Known Member

    230 gr Ranger T-Series work fine in my Defender and ESP.
  13. gofastman

    gofastman Well-Known Member

    HST 230gr +p's
    Gold Dot 200gr+p's if you are made of money.
  14. G27RR

    G27RR Well-Known Member

    I like 230gr JHP in any of the following...
    Gold Dots
    Winchester PDX

    As someone else mentioned, I like to use the same rounds as I do in my larger 1911s.
  15. W.E.G.

    W.E.G. Well-Known Member

    Anything that FUNCTIONS RELIABLY is all you need.

    Its a .45
  16. gofastman

    gofastman Well-Known Member

    ...out of a 3" barrel
  17. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    My Kimber CDP II Ultra eats 200 Gr +P Gold Dots like candy, but I stand by my first post. Any premium JHP that feeds 100% in your gun.


    Attached Files:

  18. DasFriek

    DasFriek Well-Known Member

    This is some of the best thoughts on the subject that ive read in many different threads like this.
    Myself im all about penetration, And to get that you need 2 things. Weight and speed, But Weight being the biggest factor.
    Ive read, Studied, And watched video's until i was sick of it and i found one thing thats true.
    Its that paper lies. What you read on manufactures sites never seems to match real world testing threw chronometers. One caveat is you do need to research if a certain load will perform better than the maker says it will as many times if its a powder meant for a 5" gun it will cause velocity issues in a 3"
    People read they get less velocity with shorter barrels, The problem is its a higher percentage the lighter the bullet is. The heavier bullet will not slow down as much percentage wise.
    I never went threw this with my 1911 as i carry a full sized one. But my .40 is a sub-compact 3" and i battled over bullet weight in both threads and in my head.
    With that gun i went with 165 gr as i wasn't pleased with the thought of a subsonic 180gr bullet mainly for expansion. But it will penetrate more then 2" more than a 165gr bullet.

    I want a 3" 1911 also, And ive given this much thought also.
    Ill either use a 230gr +p but most likely a 200gr +p will be what gets the job.

    But as others have said feeding and expansion are more important than weight as long as you dont go too lite,IMO.
  19. KyJim

    KyJim Well-Known Member

  20. Mags

    Mags Well-Known Member

    ^^^^^ +1k

Share This Page