1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Revolver question

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by SHOTGUNJOE, Oct 3, 2007.


    SHOTGUNJOE Well-Known Member

    For a pistol - my dream gun has always been a Smith & Wesson .357 mag. After comparing prices I've realized Taurus is lower in price w/ a limited lifetime warranty & Rossi is even lower in price.

    Is Taurus and/or Rossi as good as Smith & Wesson in dependability, qaulity, & longevity.
  2. Hokkmike

    Hokkmike Well-Known Member

    Just my opinion, Taurus YES, Rossi NO.

    If I were you I would save up and get the gun you really want.
  3. highfive

    highfive Well-Known Member

    I own a Taurus revolver and a Rossi also and I have never had any problems with them. The Taurus one is the one I carry 90% of the time. I love that thing...happy hunting
  4. glockman19

    glockman19 Well-Known Member

    NO. Pay more and get the S&W. If you want a cheper revolver get a Ruger. Otherwise there are two manufacturers I'll never buy from. Taurus & Rossi.

    You get what you pay for.

    I'd rather pay for quality & reliability.

    Also, Buy USA
  5. Deer Hunter

    Deer Hunter Well-Known Member

    S&W, based on the trigger alone.
  6. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Especially the older ones with the hammer mounted firing pin.
    Taurus & especially Rossi are not even close to being in the same ballpark!

    You can find an older used S&W in great condition, and pay much less for it then a brand new Taurus wanna-be!

  7. cpirtle

    cpirtle Well-Known Member

    I've owned all in question and it's the Smith hands down.

    If you're worried about money find yourself a nice used model 10 (or something like that) and never look back. You can get a nice used S&W for $300 +/- and it will run circles around almost anything made today.

    If you want to buy new still get the Smith, I think (for the most part) their new guns are every bit as functional as their older counterparts, with just a slightly lower degree of fit and finish.

    Smith also has a lifetime warranty but they match that with one of the best service histories in the business. Taurus offers a lifetime warranty and has a terrible service record for following through on it.

  8. Wild Deuce

    Wild Deuce Well-Known Member

    be patient, save the money and get a Ruger or an older S&W ....

    Two reputable gunsmiths don't recommend Taurus.




    Previously discussed:


    I own a S&W 340PD that cracked the alloy frame with less than 30 full power rounds and under 100 .38 special rounds. S&W did replace the gun. I also own three Rugers (Super Redhawk and two GP100s) ... go with Ruger (GP100 or SP101)
  9. Gunbabe

    Gunbabe Well-Known Member

    My husband and I own three Taurus handguns each and he has the .357. He loves it and we have never had any problems with any of them. I don't understand the ppl that won't even give them a chance. It's your money but I would recommend the Taurus. He just bought the Taurus Tracker .44 Magnum. It's a beauty.

    SHOTGUNJOE Well-Known Member

    Thank you all for your valuable input. I love this forum which my friend turned me onto.

    Think I'm already hooked.
  11. wheelgunner1911

    wheelgunner1911 New Member

    [​IMG]If you want a really good 357 search around and get a mod28
    thay are built on the heavy N-frame and will last 10 times longer than a taurus. and thay can be found fairlly cheap
  12. 40SW

    40SW Well-Known Member

    Several facts first.
    1. Taurus now owns Rossi. ,but obviously different platforms in many respects.
    2. Taurus makes good quality firearms for the money, but their customer service department sucks.

    Having said that.
    I own several Taurus autos and revolvers and love both, they are obviously not Smiths and Rugers, but for the money, I am not complaining.
  13. warriorsociologist

    warriorsociologist Well-Known Member

    Cry once now (when you open your wallet a little wider) or, inevitably, cry a lot more later...when you sell the T or R at a loss and end up buying the S&W you really wanted in the first place. :)
  14. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Well-Known Member

    From my experience -- NO.
    As has been mentioned, you will get what you pay for ;)
  15. Mr. Designer

    Mr. Designer Well-Known Member

    Get a S&W.
  16. Bearhands

    Bearhands Well-Known Member

    Absolutely.... S&W or Ruger..... you wont regret either purchase
  17. cpirtle

    cpirtle Well-Known Member

    Gunbabe, I don't know how many of the people in this thread are dismissing Taurus without having experience with them. I have owned at least 5 Taurus/Rossi wheel guns and a few Taurus semi's. (still have a PT1911 and an 85)

    Customer service aside (honestly, there's no comparison there), the comparison is like a Timex to an Omega.

    S&W's generally run like glass very consistantly across the board with the occasional dud. Taurus can be all over the place with their action.

    In my experience, cylinder lock-up & timing is much better and more consistant with S&W. I have also not had a Smith go out of time, but I did on a Taurus (twice). Not to say it does not happen but it's never happened to me and I've got a lot of Smiths and have shot them a heck of a lot more than my Taurus.

    With that said, I think the Taurus is an okay gun for someone who's not willing to spend more and wants to buy new. Someone who sees the value in a Smith & is willing to lay down the money for one that is considering a compromise to save a few $$ will never be satisfied.

    I live about 40 minutes from Canton and have 24/7 access to my gun club, if you ever want to do a real world, side by side comparison let me know. I'll bring 5 or 6 Smiths and you & your husband can shoot them. I never need an excuse to go shoot :)

    I have a factory 19 that's never been worked on, dates back to 1967 and will drop the jaw on just about anyone who shoots it.
  18. Zebraranger

    Zebraranger Well-Known Member

    Definitely go with the Ruger or Smith & Wesson, they will out last the Taurus or Rossi, and resale value will hold well. You probably would not have a problem if its not used very often. But if you use it on a regular basis, say for instance regular use at the range and repeated firing, Ruger and Smiths will hold up, the other two most likely will experience failure. Price comparison between Smiths & Ruger....Ruger's have the better price.
    Good luck
  19. CU74

    CU74 Well-Known Member

    I have Smiths, Colts and Rugers. I have no desire to own a Taurus or a Rossi, (or any other "second tier" revolver) nor do I buy new Smiths. In my opinion, the older Smiths and Colts are the best revolvers, quality throughout and excellent Company support. The Rugers are a bit less "finished" but are tough as nails and can be "tuned" quite well - I have a GP-100 that had an action job done by a local police department armorer and it has a better trigger pull than any of my Smiths or Colts.

    Bottom line - why spend your money for less than the best? Get a used Smith "K" or "L" frame and lots of .38 Special ammo. Or, get the Smith Model 28 and some .357 Magnum and have some fun.
  20. Fly'nBuff

    Fly'nBuff Active Member

    I have two Rossis and have yet to have a problem with either. That being said, I also have Smiths and Rugers. Spend the extra money if possible and get one of the latter. A Rossi is better than nothing, but you might kick yourself for settling.

Share This Page