Sex offender registration - for a sheep-abuser???

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't help but think that this was not the original intention of the sex offender registries. I really don't think the general public has a right to know everybody else's kink. How long before we start registering folks for practicing anal or oral sex? Cohabitation? Pre-marital sex? They're all illegal in various locals. How long before the registries get so watered down by the BDSM crowd and the crossdressers that they're useless to the "normal" folks?

I can't condone what this guy did. He trespassed and caused damage to another's livestock. I do not think he deserves a lifelong scarlet letter for his actions, and I further believe that registering him as a sex offender is a disservice to those who the registries were intended to protect.

I personally don't want to end up in a country where anything more than the missionary position with the lights off for the purpose of procreation is a felony. If you can't stomach somebody else's kink, then look the other way. In general, folks should have a reasonable expectation to be left the hell alone, regardless of another individual's (or society's, for that matter) take on morallity.
 
proud2deviate said:
I can't help but think that this was not the original intention of the sex offender registries.
Click to expand...

What IS the point? If the guy is cured and has paid his debt, drawing attention to it is cruel and likely to create problems.

If he's not cured, why the #@!$% is he out on the streets?:scrutiny:
 
The point of sex offender registry is to have a type of punishment that doesnt have to go through the justice system, a bit of "extra-constitutional" legislation that doesnt have to go through the tangled web of civil rights.
 
It should bring animal cruelty or another charge without a doubt
Click to expand...
The other side of that is
If I come to your house and your dog mounts my leg can I consider that an attack and have him put down?
 
Up until just a few years ago certain common consensual sexual acts between a man and his wife were felonies here in Georgia.

I'm quite sure that people convicted under this medieval pap would have been put on the registry if it had existed at the time.

Think about it and be honest with yourself. Would you have been in danger from this law?

There is a quotation attributed to George Washington that I find very apt even though I am not positive of its provenance:

"Government is not eloquence. It is not reason. It is force. And, like fire, it is a fearful servant and a dreadful master."

That belief leads me to ask myself a question on any question of pending legislation or formulation of government policy. The question I ask is this:"Is this issue important enough that I will countenance an agent of the state-acting for me as a member of the sovereign people-blowing the heads off of my neighbors for failure to comply? And if the answer to that question is no then I am opposed to that law, that government policy, or that government action. Needless to say, I am opposed to most laws, most government policy, and most government actions.
 
I'm quite sure that people convicted under this medieval pap would have been put on the registry if it had existed at the time.
Click to expand...
A few years ago one of the news magazine shows did a report on a man in a Georgia prison for performing oral sex on his wife.

She claimed he raped her the jury believed her but the prosecution did not prove it so they went with the sodomy charge which was still on the books
I believe he got either 5 or 10 years
 
joab said:
A few years ago one of the news magazine shows did a report on a man in a Georgia prison for performing oral sex on his wife.
Click to expand...

Saw a writeup on that. His case was not helped when his desperate lawyer said to the female judge, "Oh, come on, judge, you can't tell me you'd complain if it was being done to you."

And in some states, infidelity is still a FELONY.

Breach of contract, maybe. But a FELONY???:scrutiny:

And re: the dog. Yes, Joab. You could have it put down.
 
joab said:
The other side of that is
If I come to your house and your dog mounts my leg can I consider that an attack and have him put down?
Click to expand...
Joab,
That would depend on the local statute as to what constitutes a "dog attack", bites etc, I doubt humping would.
I would suggest you not dress so provocatively on future visits....
CT
 
madmike said:
And re: the dog. Yes, Joab. You could have it put down.
Click to expand...

SO, you have researched the state and local statutes in all 50 states and they all provide that a dog that humps a stranger may be destroyed in all of them?:rolleyes:
CT
 
madmike said:
What IS the point? If the guy is cured and has paid his debt, drawing attention to it is cruel and likely to create problems.
Click to expand...

So that sheep and lamb nearby can be aware of the dangers around them. God-fearing law-abiding American sheep have a right to know.

-Colin
 
So that sheep and lamb nearby can be aware of the dangers around them. God-fearing law-abiding American sheep have a right to know
Click to expand...
All they have a right to do is make me a sweater and be tasty

I wonder if the guy had poked a hole in a rack of lamb if we would be having this conversation.
 
Lupinus said:
I wonder if the guy had poked a hole in a rack of lamb if we would be having this conversation.
Click to expand...

Are you suggesting that this is part of a sheep's duty to society...? The sheep WAS injured in the incident.

Don't put him the sex-offender registry, put him on the Freakin' Weirdo Registry.

-Colin
 
"Er...have you checked out some of the people on this board?"

Hey now wait a damn minute here MadMike, I (rep?)resent that remark.

HAHAHA

GET OFF THE FARM STAY OUT THE BARN READ A NURSERY RHYME.

Sorry.

I agree, the sex offender registry thing is a bit over the top. Sex offender registry I use it to protect my children from predators. I am going to assume he is a child molestor for being on it. If I found a sheep raper on the local sheriff's version of the registry I'd call up and give him the third degree for wasting my time, and my children's time.

As for the dog? I've had a dog do it once. TRIED to do it anyway. As soon as dog started to mount up I punted the pooch accross the room into the wall. The pooch was never scared of me after the fact, in fact was my little buddy, but it never EVER even once after that tried to mount my leg again. In fact whenever punted pooch was near my legs he never took his eyes off it.

For you animal rights activists, punt does not mean kick. Pooch was on leg, I simply flung pooch, but punted the pooch sounded WAY cooler then flung the pooch so there.

Rev. Michael
 
OMG Leave it to you to notice that. That one COMPLETELY slipped pass me :banghead: :banghead: . Good catch. See what happens when I have to deal with the inlaws? UGH

Rev. Michael
 
fantacmet said:
OMG Leave it to you to notice that. That one COMPLETELY slipped pass me :banghead: :banghead: . Good catch. See what happens when I have to deal with the inlaws? UGH

Rev. Michael
Click to expand...

The pooch is your in law?:confused:

Or the sheep?:confused:

Are you from Oregon or Montana?:confused: Or Kentucky?:confused:
 
Oleg Volk said:
On a purely logical level: it is legal to kill a sheep you own, make a condom out of its skin and wear it while sexing with another human. It is not legal have sex with the live sheep. Where does intimacy with a dead, unbutchered sheep fall, legally?
Why is this thread even get to THR instead of APS?
Click to expand...


I believe that's called "Necrofleecia"
 
HighVelocity said:
I believe that's called "Necrofleecia"
Click to expand...
Ah! That would explain the antiquated Montana law forbidding "fleetio" with sheep within town limits.
Biker
 
A lot of people who will do things like that to animals, will also do those things to children, too...

http://www.pet-abuse.com/pages/cruelty_database/case_details.php?case_id=4702

Date: May 22, 2005
Disposition: Alleged
Case Images: 2 files available

Alleged Abuser: Cory Michael Williamson

Case Updates: 1 update(s) available


Case ID: 4702

Classification: Bestiality

Animal: dog (non pit-bull)



Cory Michael Williamson's neighbor reportedly witnessed the seventeen year old having sexual contact with her 6-month-old dog over the weekend.

Williamson, 17, is now in the Spartanburg County Detention Center charged with buggery.

Last year, Williamson was charged with criminal sexual conduct against a 4-year-old girl and a 13-year-old girl.

The solicitor's office said that it has petitioned a circuit judge to revoke bond for Williamson.

Prosecutor Gowdy is taking this case very seriously, and fully understands the impact of this situation.

The Honorable Trey Gowdy
Solicitor, 7th Circuit
180 Magnolia St., 3rd Fl.
Spartanburg, SC 29306



Case Updates
Posted on Jun 10, 2005 - 6:54AM
The Campobello teen accused of raping one neighbor's dog and another neighbor's two little girls. Now the dog has died and charges against the teen have been upgraded.

The Dog died of internal bleeding this June 5 because of the rape. The vet stated she had a little blood in her urine and that she was bleeding inside.

After receiving word that the dog died possibly because of the rape. Fox Carolina called the Solicitor's office to see if now new charges would be filed against the teen. An hour later Solicitor Trey Gowdy called to say that the charges will be upgraded to the "most serious animal cruelty charges they have on the books."

The dogs owners would not have believed Cory Williamson raped Princess exactly two weeks to the day she died had they not seen it with their own eyes.

When the dogs owners arrived they we were laying on the deck looking at him and he had his pants down and he was doing sexual activity with the dog like a man would do to a woman.

The Dogs family says Princess wouldn't eat or play anymore after the attack. She (Princess) couldn't even sit down, her bottom was swollen sore.

The Solicitor's office says it wants to make sure Williamson is out of this neighborhood while he's awaiting trial on the molestation and dog rape charges so they are requesting that his bond be revoked. Williamson's bond hearing will be held next June 17.
Source: fox21.com - June 10, 2005
Click to expand...
 
Chrontius said:
First... thank you for the jokes. You made my day a little better :evil:

Second, I'm not sure how I feel about this. Many zoophiles are pretty harmless, but many animal abusers are not -- there is a difference. (abnormal psych books can be quite eye-opening :what: )
Click to expand...

Wait, wait...No. Do NOT tell me there's now a "kindler, gentler" PC term for these sick b*stards.

Zoophile? PLEASE! They're bestiophiles, or a term that wouldn't pass the censors here.

Did a leftist come up with that?! :uhoh:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Shipwreck
  • Locked
New Subdivisions Ban Sex Offenders From Moving In
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
razorburn
R
J
  • Locked
Sex offender gets his name wiped off state registry
2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Gray Peterson
G
D
  • Locked
(vpc) U.s. House Bans Gun Possession By Sex Offenders
2
Replies
34
Views
1K
denfoote
D
S
  • Locked
sex offenders question
Replies
2
Views
493
Ebbtide
E
J
  • Locked
Sex Offender's Homes to be Searched without Warrant Whenever a Child is Missing
2 3 4 5
Replies
102
Views
3K
DRZinn
D
Back
Top