1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Sheer MADD-ness: When Drunk Driving Deterrence Becomes Neo-Prohibition

Discussion in 'Legal' started by roo_ster, Oct 9, 2005.

  1. roo_ster

    roo_ster Well-Known Member

    I thought the .08 BAC was a bad idea, first & foremost because the federales have no business fiddling with traffic laws enforced by the states.

  2. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Well-Known Member

    I am not sure I understand why the tax exempt status would be revoked. Even if MADD has changed its mission, it would still qualify as tax exempt if it is non-profit.
  3. TarpleyG

    TarpleyG Well-Known Member

    MADD is no better than the MMM IMO. Just a bunch of nosy old bitties with nothing better to do than butt into other people's business. Granted, driving drunk is a problem--but so is driving tired, driving while on the phone, driving while putting on makeup, driving while reading, etc....

  4. Leatherneck

    Leatherneck Well-Known Member

    Tax-exempt organizarions cannot step over the line into legislative advocacy.

  5. stevelyn

    stevelyn Well-Known Member

    Our court system has become so clogged w/ marginal DUI cases (especially the .08-.10 BACs) that both sides look for ways to $^!T can cases just to get rid of the bottleneck.
    It's a wonder our real criminal cases see the light of day in a reasonable time.
  6. Yanus

    Yanus Well-Known Member

    Let's just ban the manufacture, possession, sale, and consumption of alcohol. That'll certainly work........... :banghead: Idiots!

  7. robert garner

    robert garner Well-Known Member

    heh heh heh

    My daugher has spent 17 yrs on a ventilator(breathing machine) we collect both
    feces and urine in a bag . This has destroyed this familys hopes dreams and any possibility of retirement.
    The drunk (.27) was fined 2k and served 17 1/2 mos.
    I guess thats fair?
    To keep this on topic I did not shoot the B@#$%rd ,but then we all make mistakes,don't we? If he had gotten drunk and walked down the street indiscrimately firing a shotgun, bet justice would have been seen.
  8. Ezekiel

    Ezekiel Well-Known Member

    There's really no way to "follow" such a post, so won't: other then to say that there is a HUGE difference between .27 and .08 as a number. I don't think that .08 should be prosecuted.

  9. Lupinus

    Lupinus Well-Known Member

    It is insanity. .08 is a low number. And that having any alcohol before driving is a crock. So I go to dinner with my kid and have a glass of wine I am going to loose him? BS. And so is the ignition tube. It is my personal private property. The goverment has no right mandating I instal something on it so that I can drive it. What if im at .09 and it is an emergency? What if I had a drink that would bring me to .04 a few minute's ago, and because of that there is still some alcohol left in my mouth so it screw's with the reading?

    We tried prohibition. It was stupid then and it is even more stupid now that we perfectly see it does not accomplish anything. If I want to drink and alcohol is prohibited I can make a few gallon's of alcohol a week in some five gallon bucket's and sugar.

    It is insane. The people that support them need to stop being voted into power.
  10. beerslurpy

    beerslurpy member

    Having .08 is the equivalent of less than a single beer. Do you guys realize how easy it is to blow .08? You can blow up to .04 without having a drink. It is just like the ultra low speed limits designed to catch people who arent driving recklessly.

    Above .15 to .20 is too drunk to drive. I've seen too many people drive completely safely with that much in their system to think it is unsafe. Someone who is hammred is going to blow way over that amount and someone who has had a beer or two over 4-5 hours of hanging out at a bar will blow below that.
  11. Driving while intoxicated is no more of a crime than running with scissors.

    So low we've sunk. It's not your BAC that counts, it's what you do with it.
  12. Ezekiel

    Ezekiel Well-Known Member

    Well, I personally disagree with THAT, but 0.08 is ridiculous...
  13. Lupinus

    Lupinus Well-Known Member

    I have to disagree.

    If you run with a pair of scissor's and fall the most you are going to do is make a hell of a mess for someone else to have to clean up. If you don't fall and run into someone else the worst you can do is kill someone else.

    If you are highly intoxicated and get behidn the wheel of a car you can ruin live's. Many live's. You can make a bus swerve and go off the road. You can run into a car with an entire family in it. You can run into the back of someone and cause an explosion or fire and mame them for life provided they don't die. You can jump a curb and plow through a sidewalk full of people. You can not hit anyone, but you can make they swerve to avoid your stupid move and smash into a tree or telephone pole.

    There is to extreme..and this is way to extreme IMO. .08 is way to low and random checkpoint's are IMO rediculas and illegal.

    But it is no where near just runnign with a pair of scisor's. Runnign with scisor's you at most end one life or injure someone. Getting behind the wheel drunk you can destroy many, many live's.
  14. Gewehr98

    Gewehr98 Well-Known Member

    Cropcirclewalker, are you so certain?

    I'd invite you to my brother's Christopher's headstone. He was killed at age 12 by a drunk driver. What you so cavalierly assign to fate, I'd assign to an undeniably conscious choice by that particular drunk driver. :mad:
  15. slzy

    slzy Well-Known Member

    every body who reads this thread that drinks stop for just one year,and see if you start back next oct.9 2006.
  16. Daniel T

    Daniel T Well-Known Member

    And the point of that is...?
  17. Kurush

    Kurush Well-Known Member

    OK, but only if you stop posting messages on the internet for one year and see if you start back first :neener:
  18. Lupinus

    Lupinus Well-Known Member

    I already don't drink on a regular basis. I will occasionaly have a glass of wine or other drink.

    But reguardless....I have no clue what stoping for a year and seeing if you start agian has to do with anything
  19. spartacus2002

    spartacus2002 Well-Known Member

    Isn't there a word for this, derived from an old latin term for "bundle"?
  20. longeyes

    longeyes member

    More like shooting your guns in the air in a public venue, I'd say.

Share This Page