1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Staged age restriction change?

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Isaac-1, Jan 13, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Isaac-1

    Isaac-1 Well-Known Member

    There is a lot of talk of comprimise now, but I have a different question for you. Would you support a change in minimum age to buy any semi-auto up to 21 (handgun, rifle or shotgun), if at the same time we were to lower the age to 16 or 17 (say same age as drivers license in any given state) for purchase of select firearms, say any single shot, or perhaps sinlge shot with caliber restriction?
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2013
  2. brboyer

    brboyer Well-Known Member


    No Compromise, No Concession, "Shall Not Be Infringed".
  3. GI_Jared

    GI_Jared Well-Known Member

    No way! If our government can give a machine gun to an 18 year old and send them to war, then an 18 year old should be able to buy whatever kind of firearm they want.

    This image kind of sums it up.
  4. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Not a chance. I would be in favor of removing the 21-to-buy-a-pistol (from a dealer) law, though. That would be good.

    And remember, in many states there is already no minimum age limit to own a shotgun or rifle, so what you're proposing is not exactly a "compromise." More just another case of us giving up something good in exchange for nothing.
  5. Waywatcher

    Waywatcher Well-Known Member

  6. Stumpknocker

    Stumpknocker Active Member

    What in the world would these staged restrictions accomplish? I can't see any merit to such a law for either side.
  7. xfyrfiter

    xfyrfiter Well-Known Member

    There are a whole bunch of men and women from the ages of 17 to 97, who would beg to differ, as they were handed a gun, and with minimul training, told to go kill your country's enemies.
  8. c4v3man

    c4v3man Well-Known Member

    I agree, I think this makes a wonderful case for why people under the age of 25 shouldn't be allowed to vote.

    If you're old enough to
    a. Go to war
    b. Determine the direction of our country (vote)
    c. Get married/make other adult decisions
    d. Purchase fertilizer/gasoline/other "weapons of mass destruction"

    Then you're old enough to own a marginally more effective firearm than a bolt rifle.

    What were we talking about again?
  9. Inebriated

    Inebriated Well-Known Member

    What would that solve? How many crimes are committed by people under 21 with legally-owned (by them) semi-auto firearms?
  10. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Well-Known Member

    NO NO NO!

    There is currently no minimum age for long guns, so this would be stricter laws all around.
  11. Coop45

    Coop45 Well-Known Member

  12. Buck Kramer

    Buck Kramer Well-Known Member

    A gun, is a gun, is a gun. Stop applying arbitrary numbers to things.
  13. TRX

    TRX Well-Known Member

    Well, if you're going to deny someone their Constitutional rights until they're 25, it would only be fair to exempt them from the draft, and income tax, too...
  14. 22-rimfire

    22-rimfire Well-Known Member

    I would favor a staged reduction in the age requirements. Does that answer your question?
  15. jimmyraythomason

    jimmyraythomason Well-Known Member

    Answered. Next question.....
  16. Justin

    Justin Moderator Staff Member

    Instead of wasting time posting threads on gun forums about fanciful ways to incrementally give up our rights, maybe it would be better to call/write/email/fax/carrier pigeon a message to your elected representatives stating that you do not support any further restrictions on the rights of law-abiding US citizens.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page