1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Update: Muffs vs Plugs

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by bdjansen, Aug 7, 2007.


Ear muffs vs plugs vs both.

  1. Muffs

    21 vote(s)
  2. Plugs

    17 vote(s)
  3. Both

    43 vote(s)
  1. bdjansen

    bdjansen Member

    Jun 19, 2007
    Olympia, WA
    Ok, here is a new poll so that will include the choice of both ear plugs and muffs at the same time.

    I have never worn both before. I am very keen on keeping my hearing intact though. I have done lots of live sound mixing in my life. When it gets too loud or any where close to too loud I have my earplugs in. But I know how to put them in correctly.

    Using muffs or plugs I have never had any ringing or pain or any problems after shooting. It seems to me that when you have damaged your ears a little it is clear afterwards. I have not had this sign when shooting.

    Does anyone know what the db rating of a larger cal gunshot is? I'm thinking about 140? 140 - 30 = 110. 110 db's is not a problem in the short quick pops. Much better then the 120 over a substained period of time of a rock show. :rolleyes:
  2. Bruce333

    Bruce333 Participating Member

    Aug 22, 2005
    Smithfield NC
    yes it is. Anything over 85 over a period of time is going to cause some damage. Impluse noises like gunshots are the worst though.

    Sound Advice article
  3. Sheldon J

    Sheldon J Active Member

    Jul 11, 2005
    Cereal City, Michigan
    electronic, with reusable plugs attached to my ball cap for the times when I want to shoot and they are not handy.
  4. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Jan 3, 2003
    0 hrs east of TN
    This has been debated here repeatedly with solid facts with references supporting the use of plugs and muffs.

    Small arms fire noise levels range from 120 dB for "quieter" rounds to upward of 170 dB.
  5. Zen21Tao

    Zen21Tao Participating Member

    Apr 15, 2004
    Gainesville, Fl
    This poll doesn't account for where or what you are shooting. I do double up when using pistols and some rifles at an indoor range but I only use plugs when shooting at an outdoor range or when using a rifle indoors when I the muffs get in the way of aiming the rifle. Also, sound disperses better outdoors than it does indoors.
  6. slabuda

    slabuda Member

    Feb 17, 2007
    Southern Idaho
    I can tell you from 17 yrs experience in the USAF working on fighters that they require double hearing protection for a reason. Especially when inside a hardened aircraft shelter. In an indoor range the sound just bounces around and doesnt dissipate. Even outdoors i wear both. Ive lost considerable hearing and I have always worn both around running jet engines.
  7. benEzra

    benEzra Moderator Emeritus

    Dec 25, 2002
    Down East in NC
    Here are some data for some common guns; it's higher than you'd expect. For long guns, there is a definite correlation with barrel length.

    Here is some data. Not sure if these figures are straight dB or dBA.


    For those who don't grok decibels, it's a logarithmic scale (usually log10); a 3dB difference equals twice the radiated acoustic energy, and a 10dB difference is ten times the radiated acoustic energy. The ear perceives a 10dB difference as a doubling in volume, and IIRC the average person can just barely distinguish a 1dB difference. A car interior at highway speeds is 60-70 dB, a vacuum cleaner in the 80's to 90dB, I think.

    Contrary to popular belief, there doesn't seem to be a huge difference between shotgun, pistol, and rifle noise levels, although the sound spectrum is undoubtedly different. There is a correlation with caliber (e.g., .30-06 is louder than .223 and .357 is considerably louder than 9mm or .45), but the most striking difference to me is how much louder a muzzle brake makes a hunting-caliber rifle (nearly 6 dB louder than an unbraked rifle, using an 18" .30-06 as a comparison, or translates to approximately 4 times the radiated acoustic energy). There's a tight correlation with barrel length (shorter is louder for any given caliber), but also less correlation with velocity than I expected (i.e., a slowpoke .30-30 round out of a 20" barrel is a smidgen louder than a faster but much smaller .223 round out of an 18" barrel). For all the 7.62x39mm shooters out there, I'd assume the sound levels would be about the same as .30-30, which it resembles.

    Personally, I always double up when shooting (foam earplugs AND slimline earmuffs, I like Silencio plugs and Peltor Shotgunner muffs), but these figures are a good argument for doing that. Consider that typical hearing protection reduces the noise by ~30 dBA, and you're still looking at >130dB for some guns, and >=140dB when shooting a heavy hunting-caliber rifle with a muzzle brake, so with either plugs alone or muffs alone, you could still have sound levels higher than you'd like. I personally wear both.
  8. cwmcgu2

    cwmcgu2 Member

    Feb 27, 2007
    I usually use plugs because the muffs I have get in the way of a good cheekweld. I can already tell a loss of hearing though from a few times shooting without anything though and I'm only 22.
  9. phaed

    phaed New Member

    Jun 19, 2007
    i use the electronic muffs. great stuff.
  10. Stevie-Ray

    Stevie-Ray Senior Member

    Feb 22, 2003
    Mitchi-gun, the Sunrise Side
    Plugs and muffs. Silenzio Magnums over Max plugs, usually. Hard of hearing and trying to preserve what I've got. I need some electronic ones bad.
  11. shc1

    shc1 New Member

    Jan 2, 2007
    Plugs and muffs. Wish I had started years ago so every other answer isn’t Sorry what was that?

Share This Page