1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Update on the UN Arms Treaty?

Discussion in 'Activism' started by DoubleMag, May 28, 2013.

  1. DoubleMag

    DoubleMag Well-Known Member

    There was a post on this forum a while back where there was a trial vote for/against the UN Arms Treaty currently pending. I get emails & reg. mail from RKBA groups on this, stating it's getting ready to be signed by Pres O, then ratified by Senate. No posts here equal a non issue in my view, or am I missing something here.

    basically whats the latest!
  2. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Mostly garbage information is being passed around.

    The UN ratified the Small Arms Treaty, but it may be mostly symbolic since it has no binding/penalty components and many countries are not expected to adopt/ratify it. It's supporters are almost laughably naive in expecting a toothless UN "treaty" that isn't going to be international law in any meaningful sense to accomplish anything. Each country would have to ratify the treaty and we already know that Russia and China won't. It would also be impossible to get through the House and unlikely to get through the Senate for ratification and would be meaningless for any impact on us anyway if it did since it is essentially a "tattle tale" approach reporting on "illegal" traficking. Read the test for yourself and decide.


    Last edited: May 28, 2013
  3. JRH6856

    JRH6856 Well-Known Member

    It would be impossible to get through the House because it wouldn't go through the House in any event. Only the Senate ratifies treaties. The House as no role.
  4. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member


    Good point.
  5. Trung Si

    Trung Si Well-Known Member

    That is Correct and It will never make it in the Senate, not even close!;)
  6. jack44

    jack44 Well-Known Member

    I read something that says that the little O and UN have a bill that dosent need the Senate to become LAW!.
  7. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Oh...since neither the President, nor any part of the UN may introduce a bill into the US Congress to even be considered for voting into law...how's that work exactly?
  8. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member


    I know they didn't quit teaching how our government works because my daughter went through it in middle school last year so why would anyone believe anything so easily disproven?

    LAWs are passed by Congress and the signed by POTUS. That's the only way anything becomes a law in the U.S.

    Perhaps this will help ;)- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyeJ55o3El0
  9. HD_Ride

    HD_Ride Well-Known Member

  10. jack44

    jack44 Well-Known Member

    I know how a bill become law but O dosent play by the rules!
  11. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Oh brother. "Doesn't play by the rules?" What in heaven's name does that even MEAN?

    Yes, he bloody well DOES play by the rules, at least the rules of how government works -- things like passing laws and issuing executive orders, etc.

    We've watched what he's been able to do as he and his team have DESPERATELY tried to make something happen out of the Sandy Hook tragedy. Frustrated nearly to the point of public tears, they've accomplished NOTHING on the federal level.

    You think if he didn't "play by the rules" there wouldn't be a new AWB, a new mag ban, federal registration of all semi-autos, ... heck, how about even a teensy weensy little "universal background check" law? He can't do any of that -- couldn't get it done at the one moment he had the most support for it.

    If he was able to break the rules in enacting law, he WOULD HAVE ALREADY.
  12. kwguy

    kwguy Well-Known Member

    Very well said Sam1911.

Share This Page