Washington Post: Obama is lying on background checks

Status
Not open for further replies.

AlexanderA

Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2011
Messages
10,582
Location
Virginia
This is a must-read:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...02e06ce-9b0f-11e2-a941-a19bce7af755_blog.html

The reliably anti-gun Washington Post is calling out the Obama administration for falsely repeating the claim that "40%" of gun sales take place without a background check. The article points out that the real figure is half that much, at most. It gives Obama a rating of "3 Pinocchios." Obama is lying, and he knows he's lying.
 
Hmmm! "Lies, damned lies, and statistics", as Mark Twain would have stated.

Who would expect the truth come from any politician with such an agenda as his. Who would not expect they use whatever data, credible or not, to slant the discussion to support their agenda.

It is interesting to see the Post actually have an article calling him out.
 
Selecting the most supportive numbers from any source shouldn't be a surprise, but having the Washington Post point out the weakness of the President's argument AND call him a liar in print IS surprising. Good for them.
 
Hmmm! "Lies, damned lies, and statistics", as Mark Twain would have stated.

Who would expect the truth come from any politician with such an agenda as his. Who would not expect they use whatever data, credible or not, to slant the discussion to support their agenda.

It is interesting to see the Post actually have an article calling him out.
AKA figures lie, and liars figure.
 
Obama lying!!!:what: Hum, his lips must have been moving. Only 3 years and 9 months of this garbage left.
 
Update: The referenced article did not appear in this morning's print edition of the Post. This is not really surprising, given that it does not comport with the Post's antigun "party line." OTOH, since it was posted on the Web at 6:00 A.M., perhaps it missed the deadline and we'll see it in print tomorrow. Or maybe not.
 
Obama has been stretching the truth since during his campaign. No reason for it to stop as it seems to work for him.
 
Well, I feel vindicated (not that I needed WP)

I have been on top of this in other forums:
17 Jan 2013: http://www.gunrightsmedia.com/showt...ers-no-check&p=5408337&viewfull=1#post5408337
25 Jan 2013: http://www.gunrightsmedia.com/showt...ers-no-check&p=5408965&viewfull=1#post5408965

Beware of Politicians Quoting Statistics...

...Or,
Q: How do you tell when a politician is lying?
A: His lips are moving and statistics are coming out.


Recent hearing exchange:
LOBUCHAR: And is it true that about 40 percent of gun sales take place at the gun shows?

J. JOHNSON: Statistics reveal that 40 percent of gun sales take place at gun shows and other non-licensed dealer sales arrangements. Nearly 6.6 million guns through that process a year. . . .

The 40% stat has been repeated by Los Angeles Times quoting US VP Joe Biden, Washington Post quoting Brady Campaign, Time quoting "Gun-control advocates", New York Daily News quoting NY Gov Andrew Cuomo,

And the 40% has been used in op-eds by Julie Roginsky at Fox News (40% of guns are not purchased though licensed dealers who do bacckground checks) and Dean Obeidallah at Huffington Post ("...40% of the guns legally sold are to people who have had no background check...").

"40% gun sales", "40% gun buyers", "40% gunshow sales".

The survey being cited was the 1994 National Survey on the Private Ownership and Use of Firearms, which was conducted by the survey firm of Chilton for the Police Foundation on a grant from the US Department of Justice.

251 people in the survey sample reported "acquiring" guns during 1993-1994.

This is "firearms acquisitions" not "gun sales". In fact, when the NSPOF asked the 251 sample

What Best Describes HOW You Obtained Your Gun?
73% Bought it
19% Received it as a gift
3% Traded something for it
5% Inherited it

Where did these folks "acquire" their guns?

60% from stores (gun shops, pawnshops, sportings goods counter at a department store, etc.), which after 1968 would have to hold a Federal Firearms License and from Nov 1998 were required to run a background check on buyers.

From What Source Did You Obtain This Gun?
43% Gun store
6% Pawnshop
11% Other store
"Stores" 60%
4% Gun show or flea market
3% Through the mail*
17% Member of the family
12% Friend or acquaintance
4% Other
"Not stores" 40%


73% acquired a gun by purchase ("bought").
60% cited the source as "stores".
Which implies 13% bought guns from private individuals at gunshows, flea markets, friends, acquantainces, family or "Other" implying either stranger or source not given.

27% were not a gun buyer acquiring a gun from a gun seller:
19% Received it as a gift
3% Traded something for it
5% Inherited it

The 40% "non-licensed dealer sales arrangements" include 27% gifts, trades or inheritance among family members, friends, acquaitances. BTW "unlicensed dealer" or "dealing in firearms without a federal firearms license" is a federal crime. However, ATF says giving firearms as gifts to family members or occassionally buying, selling or trading guns among family, friends or acquaintances is legal under the 1968 GCA and does not make you eligible to get a FFL.

THE BIG LIE:
40 percent of gun sales take place at the gun shows and no background checks are run.

THE TRUTH:
The survey that gave 40% of gun "acquisitions" as non-store "acquisitions" did not say 40% of gun "sellers" were at gun shows and did not run background checks on gun "buyers".

The biggest source of non-store gun acquisitions was 19% gifts from family or friends who did not run background checks on the family or friend recepients.

Maybe 13% of gun acquisitions are private sales among family, friends, acquintances or strangers, where the private seller does not run background checks on the buyer.

Gun shows plus flea markets were the source of firearms for 4% all gun acquistions. Most vendors at gunshows I have attended were dealers and they did run NICS background checks on me. The claim that 40 percent of gun sales take place at the gun shows without background checks is an example of Joseph Goebbel's Big Lie propaganda technique.


AGAIN the 40% lie:
Piers Morgan interviewing Michael Moore 19 Mar 2013:
MORGAN: I just find it completely offensive. The idea that you would want to have a continued loophole where 40 percent, minimum, of all guns sold in America are sold at gun shows where nobody can check anything. You can buy an AR-15 tomorrow at a gun show. Nobody knows. This is the stuff of madness.

-------------------------------------
*NOTE on 1993-1994 mail order: the 1968 Gun Control Act outlawed mailorder gun sales. According to NIJ report authors Philip Cook and Jens Ludwig, mail orders of modern guns are shipped to local gun shops, where the sale is completed by a licensed dealer with Form 4473 (and since Nov 1998) with a background check. Only antique or replica muzzleloaders are directly sold by mail.
 
The MSM has been lying too and THEY know it!! Think we will see them even mention the LIE. NO. They are pressing again hard for gun control Getting hysterical again and pushing.
 
The real news would be Obama being honest. That's what should be reported if it ever happens.
 
So only 4% of acquisitions took place in a gun show, BUT there is no information on whether a background check was done for those sales? Therefore, the true number of guns bought at a gun show with no background check is anywhere between 0-4%, am I reading the stats breakdown correctly?
 
Just a little lie compared to...

90% of guns seized from Mexican crime scenes come from US gunstores...

Anyone remember that old "fast & furious lying thru the teeth but now under DOJ investigation"? Or "Bush started it?" Sure, we do. But The Press???!!!??? How's that investigation going, eh MSM? :rolleyes:

:banghead: :banghead: (you know, it feels so good when I stop banging my head against the wall)

Then again, I guess we have based an entire war, maybe 2, on lies or slight prevarications from duh trut... but only when needed for the betterment of mankind, of course (that should go without saying) :cool:
 
99% of what Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Reid, Schummer, Feinstein and all the other anti-2A statists say are LIES.
 
They named the Teddy Bear after T.R. because of his actions.
I hope they name a plague/cancer after Obama because of his actions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top