1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Why no love for the SR9?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by marb4, Sep 21, 2012.

  1. marb4

    marb4 Well-Known Member

    Whenever I see discussions surrounding which full size 9mm is "best", which to buy, etc I always see the usual contenders - Glock, Sig, HK, etc. Rarely if ever do I see the Ruger SR9 included in the list. A few weeks ago I picked up a lightly used one on a whim and must say that I am thoroughly impressed with this handgun. Its very comfortable, points naturally, has fully adjustable sights, fit and finish are excellent, has been 100% reliable through 500 rounds, simple to tear down and clean, high capacity (17 rounds), has an excellent trigger (at least mine does), is American made, and is backed by Ruger CS. And oh yeah, it priced significantly less than other pistols on this "list". I'm just curious why it doesn't get more "love and attention" when it comes to discussing service sized 9mm's. Mine is quickly becoming one of my favorites.
  2. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Not sure, really. I only see them show up at competitions every once in a while, and never in the hands of anyone who's skills would give me a good sense of the gun's comparative merits.

    Don't they all come with a magazine disconnect "safety?" If so, that would probably have something to do with it. (IDPA doesn't let you remove that if the gun comes with it, and very very few shooters want them.)
  3. Bozwell

    Bozwell Well-Known Member

    I don't think there's really anything wrong with them. They feel great in the hand, seem to be reliable guns and Ruger has great CS. I hated the trigger in the one I shot, but I hear the SR9c's are better in that regard, and I typically do a trigger job/have one done anyways on handguns, so that's probably a resolvable issue.
  4. mgmorden

    mgmorden Well-Known Member

    I think they're a great value personally, but for me they put in more lawyer features than I'd like. For me to REALLY embrace the gun I'd want the following:

    1. Remove the manual safety - or at least make it both with and without.
    2. Remove the magazine disconnect - its just a plain annoying feature.
    3. Remove the shark-fin LCI and just use a witness hole instead. Ruger already does this on the LCP, so they're not completely opposed to the idea.
    4. Make a version with a barrel between 5" and 5.25".

    I realize that particularly on #2 and #3 those can be done yourself, but as Sam stated removing the mag disconnect isn't allowed for IDPA (though it is in USPSA which is my game of choice), but I don't think disabling the LCI is legal in either sport - unless it comes from the factory that way.

    I still may get one eventually (like I said for most people they're a great value), but if they did all of the above I'm about 84.2% sure that I'd pick up one of these over my M&P to start shooting competition with.
  5. TarDevil

    TarDevil Well-Known Member

    I dearly love my SR9c.
    Why, to answer your question? It has a thumb safety (don't use it if you don't want to). It has a mag disconnect safety (easy to remove). It has a loaded chamber indicator that IS large but doesn't get in the way or is even visible when shooting the gun.

    But it has EVERYTHING else any gun enthusiast would ask for: reliable, accurate, some of the best customer service in the world.

    At a price point below the rest.
  6. Fiv3r

    Fiv3r Well-Known Member

    The SR9 was my first handgun. I really liked the way it felt, but I got a good amount of the dreaded barrel peening that was supposedly "normal wear and tear", and I hadn't even shot it that much.

    Don't get me wrong. I'm still a Ruger guy. I love my revolvers, my Mk iii, my P-89, and LCP. However, that left a sour taste in my mouth.

    As chunky as it is, I prefer a Glock these days. Certainly not "perfection", but it works for me.
  7. The smiling swordsman

    The smiling swordsman Well-Known Member

    I have only shot one SR9 and I loves the look and the feel of the gun but hated the trigger.
  8. TarDevil

    TarDevil Well-Known Member

    ...something Ruger long ago corrected.
  9. M2 Carbine

    M2 Carbine Well-Known Member

    I liked my first SR9C so well I bought a second one. Then I bought a third SR40C.
  10. The smiling swordsman

    The smiling swordsman Well-Known Member

    If that's the case then I might look into them again. Like I said I loved the feel and the look.
  11. marb4

    marb4 Well-Known Member

    I had heard that the trigger on the SR9 was pretty abysmal but the one on the used SR9 I bought was very crisp and smooth. Feels nearly identical to the triggers on my G19 and G26. And yes, the trigger and all components are completely stock.
  12. MarshallDodge

    MarshallDodge Well-Known Member

    Probably because for a little more money you could pick up a Springfield XD, S&W M&P, and of course a Glock.

    Not saying that there is anything wrong with the Ruger but the amount of aftermarket support for the above mentioned models is far greater.
  13. M2 Carbine

    M2 Carbine Well-Known Member

    I heard the early SR9 triggers were bad but that Ruger corrected the problem and is now like the SR9C.
    The SR9C trigger is what finally sold me on the gun.
  14. RBid

    RBid Well-Known Member

    Newer SR9s do have the improved trigger, as found on the SR9c.
  15. TarDevil

    TarDevil Well-Known Member

    I would assume this is exactly what prompted the OP. I guess it depends on how much after market support one needs, but I get all the aftermarket support I need for my SR9c. So why spend more for above listed?
  16. dom1104

    dom1104 Well-Known Member

    Because Glocks, M&Ps, and XDs are better, easier options to do what people do with guns.
  17. Mikey Idaho

    Mikey Idaho Well-Known Member

    I've thought about his topic before as my brother in law has a SR9 and it's a perfectly capable gun. Though compared to my M&P9 and Glock 21 the fit and finish and "solid" feeling isn't quite the same. Also if you look at high level competition and LE/military use it is essentially completely absent as far as I know which probably is the reason the aftermarket for the SR isn't nearly as vast as for it's higher level competitors.

    Sent from my Verizon Galaxy S III using Tapatalk 2
  18. atblis

    atblis Well-Known Member

    Not low enough IMO. If they were sub $300, they'd get my attention. I'd probably snag one just to try.
  19. JTQ

    JTQ Well-Known Member

    I'm not a competitor, but didn't that rule get changed within the past year or so? It seems like I may have even read it here on this forum or maybe a Hi-Power focused forum.
  20. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Ahhh, you're right! I do believe that changed back in March. Too me a minute to jar that fuzzy memory loose. :)

Share This Page