1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Wounded Warriors Project doesn't deal with companies involved with Firearms?

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by firstater, Nov 7, 2012.

  1. firstater

    firstater Active Member

    Tom Gresham tweeted that Wounded Warriors turned down a spot on Gun Talk because they don't deal with companies involved with firearms. Doesn't the NRA work with the wounded warriors project? Anyone involved with this project on the forum please chime in. I'd like to know where they stand and if this is true what other groups are out there to help wounded veterans?
  2. Warp

    Warp Well-Known Member

    No. Wounded Warriors doesn't want to have anything to do with firearms.
  3. Walter

    Walter Well-Known Member

  4. Double Naught Spy

    Double Naught Spy Sus Venator

    The NRA does work with wounded warriors, but I don't immediately see where they are working with the Wounded Warrior Project, though they do work with Project Enduring Pride for wounded warriors.
  5. StrutStopper

    StrutStopper Well-Known Member

    A friend at work is a wounded warrior. He was telling me about a pheasant hunt that he was just on sponsored by the program.
  6. sherman123

    sherman123 Well-Known Member

    I donated $5 to Wounded Warriors at a gun show for a chance to win a S&W 500 Magnum being raffled off.
  7. GRIZ22

    GRIZ22 Well-Known Member

    My club has an annual event where the Wounded Warriors come in for a shoot.
  8. Cal-gun Fan

    Cal-gun Fan Well-Known Member

    I can think of legitimate reasons they wouldn't want to. PTSD problems, for one of them. There is more to life than guns, gentlemen :)
  9. psyopspec

    psyopspec Well-Known Member

    The father of an NCO I served with hosts hunts for wounded warriors on his ranch. They get connected through WWP. This was as of early 2012, and I have no reason to doubt it.

    We should determine what the policy is before deciding what to think about it. In some cases you're most certainly right. In others, the shooting sports can be an "anti-drug;" that is, a reason to get out of the house, something to put the focus into, a social event where veterans can be welcomed, etc.
  10. timhernandez

    timhernandez Well-Known Member

  11. Double Naught Spy

    Double Naught Spy Sus Venator

  12. Tim the student

    Tim the student Well-Known Member

    I'm friends with a guy that got to go to Perry as part of a wounded vets program. I thought it was Wounded Warriors. I'm going to see him later today, I'll try to remember to ask him.
  13. mr.scott

    mr.scott Well-Known Member

  14. ClickClickD'oh

    ClickClickD'oh Well-Known Member

    We do WWP hunts on our ranch... so, uh...
  15. ApacheCoTodd

    ApacheCoTodd Well-Known Member

    'Bout the only thing I hold in less regard than "tweets" & FB postings as pertains to my forming an opinion are the repeating of unsupported tweets.

    Now folk can go about saying in their gunshow authoritative way that they "heard" WW is antigun.
  16. vernon

    vernon Member

    Straight from their website:


    Are there any fundraisers WWP does not support?

    WWP fundraisers can not be sexual, political or religious in nature, and cannot be partnered with alcohol brands or the exchange of firearms. This messaging conflicts with our mind, body, and spirit approach to programs. As everyone is aware, alcohol and substance abuse have been a significant problem with segments of the Wounded Warrior population, often with deadly consequences. WWP would not be honoring and empowering Wounded Warriors if the warrior population perceived partnerships with these types of events as encouraging the use of products that contribute to that problem.
  17. ApacheCoTodd

    ApacheCoTodd Well-Known Member

    ".... exchange of firearms." What an interesting turn of phrase.

    I kinda read it as fundraisers not taking in firearms as prizes in a raffle sort of scenario more than a "...they don't deal with companies involved with firearms."

    But that's just interpretation on my part. I wonder if say, Colt were to offer a WWF AR for sale with proceeds going to WWF in the form of cash - whether or not they'd turn it down or even allow the connection in manufacturing and marketing to begin with.

    It'd be sad if they had a pat "NO FIREARMS!" policy across the board but then I've long since ceased to be surprised by the actions of the folk who generally, naturally take over "foundations" and charitable or otherwise "trusts".
  18. ArfinGreebly

    ArfinGreebly Moderator Emeritus

    So . . .

    Why, exactly, would any pro-gun organization decline to get free time on a show like GunTalk?

    He had a fifteen minute segment with HAVA today, covering their activities in rehabilitating wounded vets.

    Why on earth would WWP turn down that kind of air time?

    Tom's show isn't even vaguely radical. Moreover, today's show is the Veterans' Day Special edition. You would think WWP would be falling all over themselves for that.

    I don't get it.

  19. we are not amused

    we are not amused Well-Known Member

  20. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Well-Known Member

    I've heard "PTSD" blamed for everything from mass murders to low job figures. I wonder how many people have actually taken to the time to look up the actual diagnosis:


    It has nothing to do with mass murders or spouse shootings. And it isn't specific to combat. It can be linked to suicide via depression. But a very sizable chunk of the American population has been depressed. And how hard is it to commit suicide? You find a bridge or a body of water. And oddly I see nothing in their FAQ about no events near bridges. By adopting the anti-gun stance, WWP is buying into and supporting the popular notion that vets all have PTSD and that PTSD is going to make them shoot people or themselves. Which is rubbish. And actually helps to smear the reputation of wounded vets and make them into children/invalids rather than men and women. I'm always leery of these outfits, since they have a direct interest in ensuring that the people they treat remain dependent on them to ensure donations keep coming. If you get straightened out and don't need them, they become irrelevant. So anything that helps brand vets with a mark of Cain is great for them.

    I hope they change their policy. It sounds like some of their people have been ignoring it already in organizing hunts and such.
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2012

Share This Page