THR  

Go Back   THR > Social Situations > Legal

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 20, 2009, 06:06 PM   #1
RoostRider
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 28, 2008
Posts: 517
Legalities of Post Office Carry... parking lot?

Can anyone here cite the laws regarding having a firearm on Postal Property?

It is my understanding that it is a Federal offense to carry your gun, permit or not, into the Post Office. (correct me if I am wrong here)

It is also my understanding that there is some issue as to whether the parking lot qualifies as Postal Property, or as a standard public parking lot.... which, in the latter case, would allow you to store your firearm there while you went in to do business....

This isn't a "should this be allowed" thread... or an "this is oppression" thread... this is a please cite me the law and source thread.... thus, if you have an opinion or assumption, state is as such...

Thanks.....

PS- I did do a search first, but this subject gets so many hits, and very little of it is even relevant to this threads specific nature.... link me if I'm lame and missed it.....
RoostRider is offline  
Old June 20, 2009, 06:31 PM   #2
MT GUNNY
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 19, 2006
Location: Kalispell MT
Posts: 1,421
Your state would Help?

In Montana its Fine to have a Firearm in your vehical, or OC through the Parking lot!
__________________
“whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, [life, liberty and the individual freedom to define and pursue happiness] it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government”
MT GUNNY is offline  
Old June 20, 2009, 06:37 PM   #3
average_shooter
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 26, 2007
Location: mn
Posts: 927
I don't have the law itself in front of me, but what I remember seeing posted on signs at the post office said something to the effect of carry only being legal "for lawful purposes." Which would put PO carry in a gray area, unless you are carrying into the PO with the intent to commit a crime.

Some may read the law and interpret it to mean that if you are carrying for lawful self-defense and are properly licensed, then the law allows for that. Then again, it is federal property which is generally a no-no.
average_shooter is offline  
Old June 20, 2009, 07:07 PM   #4
divemedic
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 18, 2007
Posts: 1,127
Part of the confusion is rooted in the wording of 18 USC 930(d). Subsection (d) provides:

Quote:
(d) Subsection (a) shall not apply to-

<snip irrelevant part>

(3) the lawful carrying of firearms or other dangerous weapons in a Federal facility incident to hunting or other lawful purposes.
Many people have seized upon (d)(3) with the argument that they have a CHL, so their carrying of a firearm is an "other lawful purpose" and therefore they are exempt from the sign. First, 39 USC 410 exempts Post Offices from 18 USC 930:

Quote:
(a) Except as provided by subsection (b) of this section, and except as otherwise provided in this title or insofar as such laws remain in force as rules or regulations of the Postal Service, no Federal law dealing with public or Federal contracts, property, works, officers, employees, budgets, or funds, including the provisions of chapters 5 and 7 of title 5, shall apply to the exercise of the powers of the Postal Service.

(b) The following provisions shall apply to the Postal Service:

(1) section 552 (public information), section 552a (records about individuals), section 552b (open meetings), section 3102 (employment of personal assistants for blind, deaf, or otherwise handicapped employees), section 3110 (restrictions on employment of relatives), section 3333 and chapters 72 (antidiscrimination; right to petition Congress) and 73 (suitability, security, and conduct of employees), section 5520 (withholding city income or employment taxes), and section 5532 (dual pay) of title 5, except that no regulation issued under such chapters or section shall apply to the Postal Service unless expressly made applicable;

(2) all provisions of title 18 dealing with the Postal Service, the mails, and officers or employees of the Government of the United States;
So then we turn to postal regulations: 39 CFR 232.1, which clearly does prohibit guns in post offices. In pertinent part, it states:

Quote:
(l) Weapons and explosives. No person while on postal property may carry firearms, other dangerous or deadly weapons, or explosives, either openly or concealed, or store the same on postal property, except for official purposes.
So the answer is that carry on postal PROPERTY is prohibited, not just within a postal building. This means that a parking lot that belongs to the post office is prohibited.
divemedic is online now  
Old June 20, 2009, 07:35 PM   #5
NavyLT
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 14, 2005
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 1,942
Quote:
Originally Posted by MT GUNNY
In Montana its Fine to have a Firearm in your vehical, or OC through the Parking lot!
It's still against FEDERAL law, even in Montana. 37 CFR 232.1.
NavyLT is offline  
Old June 21, 2009, 01:06 AM   #6
Dokkalfar
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 7, 2009
Posts: 161
Quote:
(l) Weapons and explosives. No person while on postal property may carry firearms, other dangerous or deadly weapons, or explosives, either openly or concealed, or store the same on postal property, except for official purposes.
I dont see anywhere in 39 CFR Ch.I with a section for definitions. If you have a CHL, you are officially allowed to CC a handgun. The official purpose of the CHL is to permit the citizenry to carry a handgun in a concealed manner. So, technically, any carry of the firearm could be considered for 'official purposes', could it not?
Dokkalfar is offline  
Old June 21, 2009, 01:43 AM   #7
RoostRider
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 28, 2008
Posts: 517
Yeah, thats exactly what I thought..... there is no clear definition as to the parking lot issue....

I agree that arguments made might make some sense for concealed carry being allowed, but it would appear that this is an issue that could get real cloudy.

I don't see how it matters what state I live in since I am asking about Federal Law.... but I am in MN.... and I believe MN statute specifies that public parking lots cannot ban guns..... which leaves it even more grey.... but my guess is it is going to depend on the disposition of the local Post Master and/or police/prosecutors.... at least until some sort of precedent is set....

Anyone know of any case law?
RoostRider is offline  
Old June 21, 2009, 02:14 AM   #8
TCOV
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 11, 2006
Location: OLYMPIC PENINSULA
Posts: 80
I guess mailing a firearm is an official purpose.
TCOV is offline  
Old June 21, 2009, 02:21 AM   #9
Maverick223
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 19, 2008
Location: Huntersville, NC
Posts: 3,231
Quote:
I guess mailing a firearm is an official purpose.
I don't believe you [legally] can mail [a pistol by USPS].
__________________
If you ever NEED more than three or four mags: You ain't short of mags, you're short of people on your side of the argument. -Art Eatman
Maverick223 is online now  
Old June 21, 2009, 02:22 AM   #10
Eightball
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 31, 2005
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 4,102
Quote:
I don't believe you [legally] can (USPS anyway).
IIRC, long guns are allowable. Hand guns are not.
__________________
cracked butt-"Getting shot in the head from across the street with a .22 would surely ruin your day."

gezzer
-"You do not want to fall down in a pasture of EMU's. They will eat you."
Eightball is online now  
Old June 21, 2009, 02:25 AM   #11
Maverick223
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 19, 2008
Location: Huntersville, NC
Posts: 3,231
Quote:
IIRC, long guns are allowable. Hand guns are not.
I am reasonably certain that you are correct...I was referring to a handgun (something that generally would be concealed) but that wasn't clear...so I shall revise.
__________________
If you ever NEED more than three or four mags: You ain't short of mags, you're short of people on your side of the argument. -Art Eatman
Maverick223 is online now  
Old June 21, 2009, 02:34 AM   #12
TCOV
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 11, 2006
Location: OLYMPIC PENINSULA
Posts: 80
An FFL can mail a handgun.
TCOV is offline  
Old June 21, 2009, 02:46 AM   #13
average_shooter
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 26, 2007
Location: mn
Posts: 927
Quote:
So, technically, any carry of the firearm could be considered for 'official purposes', could it not?
Black's Law Dictionary (Eighth Ed.) defines "official" thus:
Quote:
official, adj. 1. Of or relating to an office or position of trust or authority <official duties>. 2. Authorized or approved by a proper authority <a company's official policy>.
So I would think a CCW license/permit could be argued to be an "authorization or approval by a proper authority."

Ultimately, I think it's so unclear because nobody has been willing to be a test case yet. At least, I haven't heard of any high-profile post office carry legal cases.
average_shooter is offline  
Old June 21, 2009, 03:12 AM   #14
TAB
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 18, 2007
Posts: 2,478
Quote:
So I would think a CCW license/permit could be argued to be an "authorization or approval by a proper authority."
1 prob with that... the federal goverment didn't authorize you, your state did.

So if you took the it strickly as the meaning you posted, you would still be in violation of the law. Since states have no power over federal property( unless the feds give it to them)
TAB is offline  
Old June 21, 2009, 03:49 AM   #15
stickhauler
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 22, 2009
Posts: 98
"Offical Purposes?"

Though not a lawyer, I'd see that phrase as meaning a sworn law enforcement officer from a local or state agency, or a Federal law enforcement official or a person authorized by a local agency, a state agency, or a Federal agency to carry, not a citizen who has a state's license or permit to carry a firearm. Either way, if I'm going onto government owned or controlled property, unless it's stated I am allowed to carry a firearm there, I'm not doing it. I hear Levenworth isn't a really great vacation destination.
stickhauler is offline  
Old June 21, 2009, 09:07 AM   #16
bonza
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 2, 2007
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 473
I'm a USPS employee & work at a large facility here in Washington state. The only posted notices that I see expressly forbidding weapons on the property is by the door at each building entry, there is nothing as you enter the secured parking lot. However, a few years ago one of our maintenance guys on night shift was fired for having firearms in his vehicle in that same employee parking lot. He was an FFL-holder & was going to be attending a gun show when he got off work the next morning & had a bunch of mil-surp rifles on the back seat of his car 'covered' by a blanket. Apparently another employee saw them & reported it to management & the Postal Inspectors were called in.
__________________
"Decadence: we're on the verge of it.....you get air-conditioning & the next day Mom leaves the house in a skin-tight dress, holding a cigarette & a glass of gin, walking an ocelot on a leash."

Garrison Keillor: Lake Wobegon Days
bonza is offline  
Old June 21, 2009, 09:26 AM   #17
Deltaboy
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 21, 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 979
My post office has no signs here in Texas. And my town has 30,000 people.

As far as the Fed goes in Texas the State allows me to carry in the parking lot of a public school and to store in my car as a public school parking lot inspite of the Fed Laws Gun free school zone act.
I just play it smart and go to the drive through at the PO and use a private shipping store for everything else.
__________________
I just an ole sinner saved by Grace and protected by Smith & Wesson.
Deltaboy is offline  
Old June 21, 2009, 09:27 AM   #18
Art Eatman
Administrator
  
 
Join Date: December 22, 2002
Location: Terlingua, Texas
Posts: 23,294
I gayrawntee you that in the eyes of the federal government, "Official business" means federal or state LEO types of some sort or another. Toting as part of their job, their duty. It won't include Joe Sixpack with a CHL.
__________________
You're from BATFE? Got your order form and Crayola? I really like your products!
Art Eatman is offline  
Old June 21, 2009, 12:05 PM   #19
NavyLT
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 14, 2005
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 1,942
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deltaboy
My post office has no signs here in Texas. And my town has 30,000 people.

As far as the Fed goes in Texas the State allows me to carry in the parking lot of a public school and to store in my car as a public school parking lot inspite of the Fed Laws Gun free school zone act.
I just play it smart and go to the drive through at the PO and use a private shipping store for everything else.
That's because the Fed Laws Gun Free School Zone Act specifically exempts you from the prohibition against carrying because you have a licensed issued by the same state that the school zone is located in, so long as that state takes fingerprints and does a background check.

There is no such exemption written into the Post Office regulation. You are not playing it safe by using the PO drive through, it is still a Federal crime, albeit harder to get caught doing.
NavyLT is offline  
Old June 21, 2009, 01:57 PM   #20
SHvar
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 14, 2008
Posts: 510
Do not carry in a post office, its illegal, and the parking lot (usually if its belongs solely to the post office with no other business connected to the building) is part of that gun free zone.
Unless you are an on duty LEO forget it, just like carrying in a federal building, or courthouse.
Its not an official purpose to be carrying with a CCL, CHL, CWL, etc.
SHvar is offline  
Old June 21, 2009, 04:32 PM   #21
RoostRider
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 28, 2008
Posts: 517
Lots of great information here guys....

I think it is safe to say that no one here so far can be absolutely sure that the Post Office parking lot is a legal place to carry, or even store a firearm.

Most of the true 'facts' posted (in the form of legislation, not speculation) seem to suggest that it is not legal, or, at very best, an 'iffy' situation subject to interpretation by whoever it is that catches you doing so (Post Master/cops).

Suffice to say, I wont be carrying or storing a gun in my car in the Post Office parking lot.
RoostRider is offline  
Old June 21, 2009, 04:55 PM   #22
divemedic
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 18, 2007
Posts: 1,127
The post office is a funny place. We recently did a walk through training session of the Post Office in my first due area. The postmaster informed us that if the post office catches fire, we cannot enter the facility to put out the fire without first contacting the postmaster or his representative and getting permission to do so.
divemedic is online now  
Old June 21, 2009, 05:55 PM   #23
MT GUNNY
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 19, 2006
Location: Kalispell MT
Posts: 1,421
Federal Law:

Sec. 930. Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facilities



(a) Except as provided in subsection (d), whoever knowingly possesses or causes to be present a firearm or other dangerous weapon in a Federal facility (other than a Federal court facility), or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.

(b) Whoever, with intent that a firearm or other dangerous weapon be used in the commission of a crime, knowingly possesses or causes to be present such firearm or dangerous weapon in a Federal facility, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(c) A person who kills or attempts to kill any person in the course of a violation of subsection (a) or (b), or in the course of an attack on a Federal facility involving the use of a firearm or other dangerous weapon, shall be punished as provided in sections 1111, 1112, and 1113.

(d) Subsection (a) shall not apply to:

(1) the lawful performance of official duties by an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof, who is authorized by law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of any violation of law;

(2) the possession of a firearm or other dangerous weapon by a Federal official or a member of the Armed Forces if such possession is authorized by law;or

(3) the lawful carrying of firearms or other dangerous weapons in a Federal facility incident to hunting or other lawful purposes.

(e) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), whoever knowingly possesses or causes to be present a firearm in a Federal court facility, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.

(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to conduct which is described in paragraph(1) or (2) of subsection (d).

(f) Nothing in this section limits the power of a court of the United States to punish for contempt or to promulgate rules or orders regulating, restricting, or prohibiting the possession of weapons within any building housing such court or any of its proceedings, or upon any grounds appurtenant to such building.

(g) As used in this section:

(1) The term "Federal facility" means a building or part thereof owned or leased by the Federal Government, where Federal employees are regularly present for the purpose of performing their official duties.
(2) The term "dangerous weapon" means a weapon, device, instrument, material, or substance, animate or inanimate, that is used for, or is readily capable of, causing death or serious bodily injury, except that such term does not include a pocket knife with a blade of less than 2 1/2 inches in length.

(3) The term "Federal court facility" means the courtroom, judges' chambers, witness rooms, jury deliberation rooms, attorney conference rooms, prisoner holding cells, offices of the court clerks, the United States attorney, and the United States marshal, probation and parole offices, and adjoining corridors of any court of the United States.

(h) Notice of the provisions of subsections (a) and (b) shall be posted conspicuously at each public entrance to each Federal facility, and notice of subsection (e) shall be posted conspicuously at each public entrance to each Federal court facility, and no person shall be convicted of an offense under subsection (a) or (e) with respect to a Federal facility if such notice is not so posted at such facility, unless such person had actual notice of subsection(a) or (e), as the case may be.
__________________
“whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, [life, liberty and the individual freedom to define and pursue happiness] it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government”
MT GUNNY is offline  
Old June 21, 2009, 06:00 PM   #24
divemedic
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 18, 2007
Posts: 1,127
MTGunny:

First, 39 USC 410 exempts Post Offices from 18 USC 930,


(a) Except as provided by subsection (b) of this section, and except as otherwise provided in this title or insofar as such laws remain in force as rules or regulations of the Postal Service, no Federal law dealing with public or Federal contracts, property, works, officers, employees, budgets, or funds, including the provisions of chapters 5 and 7 of title 5, shall apply to the exercise of the powers of the Postal Service.

(b) The following provisions shall apply to the Postal Service:

(1) section 552 (public information), section 552a (records about individuals), section 552b (open meetings), section 3102 (employment of personal assistants for blind, deaf, or otherwise handicapped employees), section 3110 (restrictions on employment of relatives), section 3333 and chapters 72 (antidiscrimination; right to petition Congress) and 73 (suitability, security, and conduct of employees), section 5520 (withholding city income or employment taxes), and section 5532 (dual pay) of title 5, except that no regulation issued under such chapters or section shall apply to the Postal Service unless expressly made applicable;

(2) all provisions of title 18 dealing with the Postal Service, the mails, and officers or employees of the Government of the United States;



and then we turn to postal regulations: 39 CFR 232.1, which clearly does prohibit guns in post offices. In pertinent part, it states:


(l) Weapons and explosives. No person while on postal property may carry firearms, other dangerous or deadly weapons, or explosives, either openly or concealed, or store the same on postal property, except for official purposes.



So the answer is that carry on postal PROPERTY is prohibited, not just within a postal building. This means that a parking lot that belongs to the post office is prohibited.
divemedic is online now  
Old June 21, 2009, 06:00 PM   #25
MT GUNNY
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 19, 2006
Location: Kalispell MT
Posts: 1,421
Montana has this also:

Exemption from Federal Gun Free School Zones Act

45-8-360. Establishment of individual licensure. In consideration that the right to keep and bear arms is protected and reserved to the people in Article II, section 12, of the Montana constitution, a person who has not been convicted of a violent, felony crime and who is lawfully able to own or to possess a firearm under the Montana constitution is considered to be individually licensed and verified by the state of Montana within the meaning of the provisions regarding individual licensure and verification in the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act.
__________________
“whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, [life, liberty and the individual freedom to define and pursue happiness] it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government”

Last edited by MT GUNNY; June 21, 2009 at 06:30 PM.
MT GUNNY is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.