Quantcast
642 Club Part Three - Page 50 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Revolvers

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 27, 2012, 02:48 PM   #1226
DAdams
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 28, 2007
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 3,068
rayban, yes, the Hogue Monogrips will work very nicely. Full grip and cover the backstrap. You may find that if you are going to pocket carry they may expose, depending on your pocket, cover etc.

You might also consider the Pachmyars.
http://www.amazon.com/Pachmayr-Grips...m_cr_pr_sims_t

http://smith-wessonforum.com/s-w-rev...-vs-hogue.html

I have Monogrips on my 686, I liked them better than the stock Pachmayrs.

If you can find a local gun store that carries both you could probably try them both. They aren't that expensive even at the LGS.

Here is what they will look like in a Mika Roundcut on a J Frame.



__________________
Quote:
After a bad opening, there is hope for the middle game. After a bad middle game there is hope for the end game. But once you are in the endgame, the moment of truth has arrived - Edmar Mednis

Last edited by DAdams; November 27, 2012 at 02:53 PM.
DAdams is offline  
Old November 27, 2012, 07:14 PM   #1227
Nematocyst
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 5, 2005
Location: Downeast Maine
Posts: 11,648
I'll echo what DA said. I've got full Hogue Monogrips on both my 642 and my 65. Love the additional control they offer. Of course, I don't pocket carry my 642; OWB only. So, YMMV.

When I finally get a 340M&P, it'll wear a set of them, too.

(I'm actually considering selling both my 65 and 642 to upgrade to a 340. Oh, the heresy! )
__________________
______________

Blades, Levers, Sticks & Wheels
Nematocyst is offline  
Old November 28, 2012, 01:02 AM   #1228
RetDep310
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 102
Nematocyst: Don't think you'll be run out of town for getting a 340. I have one, but still check out the 642 Club. You will love the 340!!
RetDep310 is offline  
Old November 28, 2012, 01:32 PM   #1229
DAdams
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 28, 2007
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 3,068
Seeing that dirty J Frame is getting me worked up for some time off over the Holidays to get to the range.

__________________
Quote:
After a bad opening, there is hope for the middle game. After a bad middle game there is hope for the end game. But once you are in the endgame, the moment of truth has arrived - Edmar Mednis
DAdams is offline  
Old November 29, 2012, 12:56 PM   #1230
Old Bull Lee
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 1, 2009
Posts: 35
Another Hogue Monogrip endorsement here. Improved my shooting 1000%. I could never grip the weapon properly with the stock grips.

If you pocket carry in a small pocket (like the ones in jeans) and the butt of the gun is visible, the Hogue grip may cause you a problem. If you pocket carry with larger pockets (like the ones in work pants or tactical pants, or even some cargo pants), the Hogue will be fine.
Old Bull Lee is offline  
Old November 29, 2012, 03:11 PM   #1231
jake_yer_booty
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 13, 2012
Posts: 15
NCyst:

If you are carrying OWB at all, why not keep the M65 for that application? The additional weight of a 3-4” all SS M65 is a huge aid to controllability with heavy .357 loads. Moreover, to wear out an issue that’s probably been posted here quite a bit, in a 1.9” barrel, the performance difference between the +P .38 and full-house .357 is not that great. The 340 is cool and super-light, though, so I can’t say I don’t appreciate the emotional side.

Again, I am a very big believer that training with pocket-carried self defense firearms demands a “shoot it like you’ll be using it” focus, mainly because it’s such a challenge to execute that effective FIRST SHOT from concealment. But all of us must maintain our basic sight alignment and trigger control skills. I still shoot all my defensive weapons in a stand-on-your-hind-legs-like-a-man, deliberative fashion at the range just for skills verification. All shooting is done at least at an NRA Rapid-Fire pace (5 shots/10 seconds) dictated by their likely use “in anger”.

Although I am certainly not an instructor and I don’t pretend to be one, I have given a number of friends and acquaintances some pointers in safe range practices and basic handgun handling and shooting. The first target is typical for me and achievable by any reasonably coordinated person. It is what I have told my “students” they should generally strive to achieve with their carry load before they step into more serious practical training.

It was fired from the 442 with some old +P Hydra Shocks. As you can see, I used a reversed B2 target. I tell people that they won’t have a nice orange bull or a fat guy silhouette with rings when the SHTF, and shooting from low ready at a blank sheet is a good test of how your eye will naturally find a CoM. Anyhow, if you can’t read the tiny writing, this was at 10 Meters, starting from low ready with a Speed Strip reload, 28 seconds end-to-end. (Yes, the 442 can shoot better. Stacking the trigger -- yes, I do it for recreational shooting -- I can shrink this group by half. Stoke the little fella with my 148Gr WC handloads, and I can carve off some more. But that’s just for showing off.) My normal Rem 158gr +P is about the same ferocity, and groups are similar.

From here I apply a rule that was espoused by a retired Houston Constable: Take the worst group you shoot in rapid fire on any given day. Now double the maximum spread of your hits. That’s the BEST you’ll do in a gunfight at that range -- probably worse. When you look at this target, you can see that I am at my limit for effective use of a lightweight J Frame with .38 +P.

Now, switch to the 65, and here is the result:

I didn’t have Speed Loaders with me so it’s only 5 shots and it’s fired NRA Rapid Fire pace. (I have no idea what I was thinking when I wrote “H-S” on the target; it should read HP. Also it's clearly NOT my M64. I think the noisy range distracted me.) You can see I tend to walk my shots to the left in rapid fire with a high-recoiling load. Plus I cheated by having an aiming bull. But it's a pretty typical result and it shows how much the extra weight “tames the beast”, and the additional inch+ of barrel really helps reduce error at impact. I am dead confident in the 65 at ranges beyond arms length with the hottest loads I can purchase. Fired SA, you can drill them into one big hole at that range.

I have actually fired the 65 “in anger”, successfully stopping a large feral dog that was determined to take charge at our campground. The range was less than 25 feet but both shots (the old Fed .357 125gr HP made famous by Marshall, rightly or not) went exactly where they were aimed in a very frantic situation. I’m sure the J Frame would not have served as well with the same load.

tl/dr: Although you didn't ask my opinion, I think the 65 is about the minimum .357 piece for me, and I shoot it better than the 442.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg sw442web.jpg (36.9 KB, 49 views)
File Type: jpg M65web.jpg (19.0 KB, 49 views)
jake_yer_booty is offline  
Old December 5, 2012, 07:21 PM   #1232
jake_yer_booty
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 13, 2012
Posts: 15
Well, I was playing hooky at the range today, and after some serious competitive shooting practice, I broke out some of the fun stuff. I had a mixed box of old ammo and decided to try the 442 at 50 feet.

This was the best target, using the last of some old Remington 158gr LRN, and the last five rounds of some great old (25+ yrs) Federal 148 gr Match ammo. I fired at a slow pace (five shots in about a minute), going to low ready and relaxing breathing between each shot but maintaining grip for all five.

I must say I have seen others post better slow fire results from a J Frame at this distance. But I'm OK with these, and I think they speak well for the gun. It ain't John McClane cutting the power line in Die Hard 3, but it shows that a barrel under 2 inches long can send bullets to the right place consistently.
I also relearned a few things today:

(1) When firing purely for accuracy, slowly and with regard only for sight alignment and trigger control, I am reminded of how fundamentally uncomfortable the Airweight really is (WC rounds excepted). Honestly, when shooting with an eye to speed, the recoil just doesn't seem to smack as hard as when you are slow and deliberate. Ow. Just ow.

(2) Even though the sights are chunky and square, the 442's sight radius cruelly announces your slightest error to the whole range. So not only does it hurt but you really look silly.

(3) Grip variance is also very apparent with the 442. Observe the marked lateral difference in POI.

(4) Excepting my Beretta Jetfire, of all the guns in my safes it's the toughest to shoot well by far. OK, I'm finished with the excuses.

(5) Old ammo stored properly can still be great ammo. Despite the fact that it was manufactured long before the word "text" became a verb, in my M27 or 28 the Federal wadcutters would have been in a ragged hole.

(6) I love my 158gr LSWC Rem +Ps for carry, but I would not feel under gunned with a match WC round in a pinch. Look at those clean holes. It doesn't slip through -- it CUTS a hole from the start.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 442targ.jpg (110.3 KB, 52 views)
jake_yer_booty is offline  
Old December 6, 2012, 02:32 PM   #1233
Win1892
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 18, 2008
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 301
My 642 trigger pull exceeds the limits of my Lyman scale, which puts it close to 13 lbs. While that is workable for me, several women I know would struggle with that.
Can I get that down to maybe 9 pounds without sacrificing reliability?
__________________
If you're unhappy about something, you have three options...you can leave it, change it, or change your attitude about it.
Win1892 is offline  
Old December 6, 2012, 03:16 PM   #1234
jake_yer_booty
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 13, 2012
Posts: 15
The guy local to me who has done several S&W revolver action jobs managed to get both of mine to the 9-10 lb range. He did the usual deburr and smoothing job as well as install the Apex J Frame Duty/Carry spring kit. It really makes a difference.

Before anyone rains the Reply of Death on my head for recommending a lighter spring kit, let me say quickly that I run the snot out of ANY action job before I assign that piece to actual carry. I define my “snot” measurement as 100 “hard” primers lit off, zero FTF. Internet lore and personal opinion tend to drive the choice of test primer. For the past couple of years a lot of people claim that prize goes to Wolf. I spent about $20 on 1000 of these in 2010 -- haven’t used them for anything but testing the two 442 action jobs. I still have 800 left; the Apex springs have not proved to be a problem.

Nonetheless, you should be sure to keep the old springs, should you go this route. If you are skittish about such radical surgery, be assured that smoothing alone makes a big difference.
jake_yer_booty is offline  
Old December 6, 2012, 03:18 PM   #1235
jake_yer_booty
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 13, 2012
Posts: 15
double tapped post -- apologies to all
jake_yer_booty is offline  
Old December 6, 2012, 07:08 PM   #1236
DAdams
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 28, 2007
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 3,068
Thumbs up

Good stuff there Jake.
__________________
Quote:
After a bad opening, there is hope for the middle game. After a bad middle game there is hope for the end game. But once you are in the endgame, the moment of truth has arrived - Edmar Mednis
DAdams is offline  
Old January 1, 2013, 12:37 AM   #1237
Brett Byers AKA Slow
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 30, 2007
Posts: 62
I just bought a 642 with wood boot grips but I haven't had a chance to shoot it with my work schedule. I bought Remington 158 LHP +P, Federal 129 +P, Winchester WWB 125 +P, WWB 130, Double Tap 110 Barnes +P and Underwood 125 +P to see what it and I like best.
Brett Byers AKA Slow is offline  
Old January 1, 2013, 01:03 AM   #1238
Nematocyst
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 5, 2005
Location: Downeast Maine
Posts: 11,648
Happy new year, 642'ers.

May 2013 be better than 2012.

(And the world didn't end on 12.21.12.)
__________________
______________

Blades, Levers, Sticks & Wheels
Nematocyst is offline  
Old January 3, 2013, 09:08 PM   #1239
lg&m
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 2, 2008
Location: Kind of in the middle.
Posts: 81
Happy 2013 all
__________________
What a great day to be outside.
lg&m is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 01:38 AM   #1240
warrconn
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 18, 2010
Posts: 28
642 and 442 availability

I have a 442 that I love.My question is, why are they not readilly available anymore? Most outlets are sold out of them and 642s. Is S&W limiting/stopping production?
__________________
"A motorcycle is a spiritual object........
When I ride I'm exactly in the moment........it's like meditation. I'm in the flow."
- Indian Larry
warrconn is offline  
Old January 11, 2013, 09:43 PM   #1241
Nematocyst
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 5, 2005
Location: Downeast Maine
Posts: 11,648
The 442 is still listed on Smith Wesson's site, WarrConn, so no indication there of doing away with the model. Can't imagine they would. Way too popular.

Their limited availability right now may have more to do with either 1) being in between production runs and supplies are low ( I mean, talk about great stocking stuffers), or 2) a run on them driven by fear of reduction in gun rights (even though it's not wheel guns that are threatened, but hi caps - but lots of people are driven by fear, not reason).
__________________
______________

Blades, Levers, Sticks & Wheels
Nematocyst is offline  
Old January 12, 2013, 01:24 AM   #1242
LFR
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 12, 2013
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1
Hello all, I ended up getting a 642 last week as a late xmas present to myself. I had been looking for one pretty much all of December and all my LGS were sold out or were asking ridiculous prices ($650 at one pawn shop). I ended up finding a shop up in TN that were selling new production 642-1's at $419. Not a huge steal but with everyone even panic buying revolvers it seems I wen't ahead and pulled the trigger.

This is going to replace my M&P9c in the summer when the heat just doesn't want me to carry a gun that large/heavy.

LFR is offline  
Old January 12, 2013, 06:32 AM   #1243
rayban
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 5, 2011
Location: on the Ohio/Mich line
Posts: 187
Nice one LFR....around here, anything under $500 is a good deal.
__________________
Rayban
www.rgleather.freehomepage.com
rayban is offline  
Old January 12, 2013, 11:02 AM   #1244
MartinS
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 610
Nicely photographed. You'll have it so long the purchase price will be irrelevant.
Please let us know how the DeSantis works out for you.
MartinS is offline  
Old January 12, 2013, 10:54 PM   #1245
sixgunner455
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 25, 2006
Posts: 2,863
I remember when mine looked that pristine. It's a lot shinier now - more aluminum showing through the finish.
__________________
Life is too short to hunt with an ugly dog. - me

If you can't hit a snake at 20 feet with a 12 gauge, you ain't gonna hit a dove, either. -McGunner
sixgunner455 is offline  
Old January 20, 2013, 10:50 PM   #1246
electrode1998
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 4, 2007
Location: Baton Rouge, LA.
Posts: 290
DAMN!!!!!!!!!!!! it has been way too long.................I can 't believe i almost missed part 3 of the 642 club.................

I still have mine and carry the little thing almost every day (except to work which would be a felony).....

I have to admit I am serriously thinking about getting mine changed to a flat black with duracoat. I never have been a fan of silver firearms even if I have owned several and I REALLY like the flat black look for a CCW..............

If I do it I'll post the pics.............
__________________
"This place is a geographic anomaly--two weeks from everywhere."
electrode1998 is offline  
Old January 21, 2013, 05:49 PM   #1247
Nematocyst
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 5, 2005
Location: Downeast Maine
Posts: 11,648
E'trode, have you considered just trading for a 442? Might be cheaper in the end unless you're just tied to that particular 642.

Believe it or not, I'm considering selling my 642 and 65 and apply those funds to an MP 340. Won't happen soon, but could in the next few months.
__________________
______________

Blades, Levers, Sticks & Wheels
Nematocyst is offline  
Old January 22, 2013, 11:27 AM   #1248
Stainz
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 24, 2003
Location: Pinson, AL
Posts: 3,109
Nema... say it isn't so... a 642 and a 65 for an M&P 340? Gasp!

I shot a 'friend's' 340, a 10.6 oz Al/Sc/Ti gun similar to the 642, a few years back. The 'friend' snookered me - loaded it with hot CorBon .357 Magnums - big ouch! The absolute worst handgun recoil - and that was while I was shooting my .454 SRH and other friends S&W .500 Magnum (8+") and MR .45-70 BFR and .50AE DE II. Nasty little kicker - and nothing to hold on to, either.

If you want a smaller .357M, think 3" 60 Pro... Better yet, a 3"+ 65... which you already have! Me, I've gone the other way... a 351PD - 7-shot .22 WMR! I still have the 642 - my 24/7 EDC CCW.

Stainz
Stainz is offline  
Old January 22, 2013, 11:22 PM   #1249
IBEWBULL
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 21, 2010
Location: Wisconsin Central State
Posts: 307
http://tangoyankee.com/sold/09-09-21/09-09-21.html

Anyone know the production numbers on this gun?
A LGS has one like new whth box etc. for $350+ tax and BG
Thanks in advance.
__________________
Steve AKA Bull from WI
http://beachbodycoach.com/esuite/home/KASHUBIAN
Survival also means being capable of taking the task on.
IBEWBULL is offline  
Old January 22, 2013, 11:44 PM   #1250
SOUTHPAW
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 1, 2010
Location: CT
Posts: 319
Unfortunately I'm no longer a part of the club.

Sold my 642 a couple of weeks ago to help take some of the brunt after a big purchase of other gun related things I'd get more use out of. Didn't carry it, didn't shoot it, didn't need it, so it had to go. It was an extremely well made firearm, just not for me.
__________________
•Glock •Glades Gun Works •Kel-Tec •LWRC •M&P •Mossberg •Ruger •Smith & Wesson •Walther

Our 2nd amendment ensures all others...
SOUTHPAW is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.