Quantcast
The Marlin 39 Club - Page 158 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Rifle Country

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 6, 2012, 12:07 PM   #3926
rdefabri
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 2, 2012
Posts: 12
CB,

I asked them this morning interestingly - they were cool either way. Don't get me wrong, I'm not clamoring to jettison it - I was just taken aback by the value of it. Factor in my limited use and it makes sense to allow someone else to enjoy it.

Lo and behold - this gun is technically not legal in NJ given the capacity of the mag. I'm not up on the NJ statutes - which are draconian and contradictory - but I don't know if there are any grandfather clauses that allow me to keep it.

Given that - I'm leaning towards offering it to a better caretaker.

I don't make this decision lightly...
rdefabri is offline  
Old December 6, 2012, 07:03 PM   #3927
dfariswheel
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 26, 2002
Posts: 5,970
I believe that .22 tube fed rifles are not covered under the law.
Most states exempted .22 lever rifles.
dfariswheel is offline  
Old December 6, 2012, 07:07 PM   #3928
dfariswheel
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 26, 2002
Posts: 5,970
Maltise

Here's a site with 39-A disassembly instructions.

http://www.rimfirecentral.com/forums...d.php?t=357328

I can caution you that reinstalling the fore end cap is a bad situation.
The screws often just don't want to line up properly and it's common to see 39-A's with the screws cross threaded.
For that reason, I don't recommend disassembling the fore end and fore end cap unless you absolutely have to.

The rest of the rifle, magazine tube and action, comes apart with little trouble, EXCEPT for the hammer and main spring. Again, unless you have to, leave the hammer and mainspring in place.

When reassembling the magazine tube make sure it seats into the receiver. To do this, just insert the tube into the rifle until it stops, then push on the tube as you rotate it until it slips into place.
You'll know the tube is seated when the small notch in the tube lines up with the hole in the magazine tube ferrule on the barrel.

Last edited by dfariswheel; December 6, 2012 at 07:31 PM.
dfariswheel is offline  
Old December 7, 2012, 01:57 PM   #3929
rdefabri
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 2, 2012
Posts: 12
Here's a pic of mine - needs to be cleaned up, but barely used.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg marlin 4.jpg (105.4 KB, 28 views)
rdefabri is offline  
Old December 9, 2012, 09:04 PM   #3930
Nematocyst
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 5, 2005
Location: Downeast Maine
Posts: 11,648
I echo FFrank's opinion in 3916, and Mo's in 3921: keep the 39.

Way behind reading here. Life is a zoo ... again.
__________________
______________

Blades, Levers, Sticks & Wheels
Nematocyst is offline  
Old December 12, 2012, 04:48 PM   #3931
greevestim
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 19, 2012
Location: rural missouri
Posts: 30
model 39 question

Found an M series straight stock (1954) with what appears to be 4 factory holes drilled and tapped for a scope. Looks like a factory job. Could that be correct?
Firearm is about 95%, a few dings in stock
Please advise if some had the factory scope holes
Thankyou all
ti
greevestim is offline  
Old December 12, 2012, 07:11 PM   #3932
dfariswheel
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 26, 2002
Posts: 5,970
"As far as I know" (note the qualifier) Marlin only drilled two holes in the top of the receiver for scope mounts.

The only four hole scope mounts I've seen were the old pre-war barrel mounts where four holes were drilled in the left side of the barrel.

I don't know when Marlin started drilling the 39-A as standard.
dfariswheel is offline  
Old December 12, 2012, 07:17 PM   #3933
greevestim
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 19, 2012
Location: rural missouri
Posts: 30
This 1954 edition (M) has four holes on the left side of the barrel and only one hole on the top of the receiver. The four holes were most truly done professionally. The screws have never been removed nor are they buggered up. Seems to me I read in one of the posts on this site some many months ago the the barrel being drilled was a factory option, prior to the receiver having the standard 3 hole configuration..
Any other ideas?
Thanks for your earlier response.
greevestim is offline  
Old December 12, 2012, 07:34 PM   #3934
greevestim
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 19, 2012
Location: rural missouri
Posts: 30
I am not sure if I am answering my own question or not, so I am posting this as a point of interest for those that may be interested.
I thought I had remembered at some point in time, the factory, that being Marlin had drilled and taped Weaver style N mounts for the barrell.

Sears sold firearms (Marlin 39A), and for two years, see Brophy's book page 290. The two years were 1954 (mine) and 1955.

What do you think??

Thanks Dfariswheel for you response.

Tim
greevestim is offline  
Old December 13, 2012, 02:30 PM   #3935
kynwatch
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 25, 2011
Posts: 52
I finally got to join the 39a club. I stopped by the LGS and saw a 1977 39a on the rack. Probably paid to much, but I've been looking for one for over a year. I'm now $450 lighter and still happy! Metal condition is 99% and looks gorgeous. Wood has a hole were someone messed up trying to drill for a sling stud. I'll have the local furniture restoration guy fix that after I enjoy it for a few weeks.

I stopped by the range on the way home and fired a few rounds off. Man it's worth it. Fired 50 rounds at 50 yards and the 10/22 is going bye bye. It might be the nicest trigger I have on any rifle.
kynwatch is offline  
Old December 13, 2012, 02:45 PM   #3936
chuckles
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 14, 2003
Location: Nevada
Posts: 279
That"extra" hole is probably where the Marlin Bullseye should be. They do fall out every now and then. You can replace them. Do a search here.
__________________
_____________________________________________
"He should have armed himself if he was going to decorate his saloon with my friend."
Clint Eastwood in 'Unforgiven'
chuckles is offline  
Old December 13, 2012, 02:48 PM   #3937
Bill Jones
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 9, 2011
Location: Fall Branch, TN
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckles View Post
That"extra" hole is probably where the Marlin Bullseye should be. They do fall out every now and then. You can replace them. Do a search here.
I bought a Mountie a few weeks ago that was missing the bulls eye. I picked some up from Midway, USA.
Bill Jones is offline  
Old December 13, 2012, 05:47 PM   #3938
JustsayMo
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 20, 2004
Location: the Evergreen State
Posts: 1,385
Welcome Kynwatch!

I think trading green paper for a fine rifle is always a good deal. Finding one for less may have taken months or years and if you put any value in enjoyment you got a bargain.

The value of the grin factor memories of a day in the field shooting dirt clods, pine cones, cans... will far outweigh a few bucks you might have had to pay. I'm betting also you wouldn't part with it for $450...

The question I asked myself once I got my first 39 was, why did I wait so long! Of course that lead to getting more... a TDS, a couple of Mounties, three 39 LTD's and a 1897 Cowboy...

I'd estimate my 39's have made more trips with me into the woods than all my other long guns combined. The reason, they're just plain fun rifles to pack around and shoot. I LOVE it when the calendar hits September and I can hit the woods with my 39 looking for Grouse. There just aren't many things in this world that are more fun, plus if you are successful, you eat good too.

JustsayMo is offline  
Old December 13, 2012, 06:09 PM   #3939
kynwatch
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 25, 2011
Posts: 52
I'm quite ashamed to admit, but thats what the hole is! I'd completely forgotten about the bullseye. Ordered one from Midway USA. So now that is taken care of I'm very pleased with the price.
kynwatch is offline  
Old December 13, 2012, 07:39 PM   #3940
dfariswheel
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 26, 2002
Posts: 5,970
greevestim

We're starting to narrow it down.
My 1950 also has only one hole in the top of the receiver, and that's the screw that retains the upper bullet guide inside.

So, we know that as of 1954, Marlin was not drilling receivers for scopes.

As I recall, (again the qualifier) Marlin would drill and tap the side of the barrel as a factory option. I don't think they ever did it as a standard modification.

Of course, a lot of rifles were drilled by local gunsmiths, and from the look of some of the drilling jobs, a lot were botched up by garage gun owners.
dfariswheel is offline  
Old December 15, 2012, 08:07 AM   #3941
fastfreddie
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 21, 2010
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 23
FWIW, greevestim.

I also have a 1955 "M" straight stock 20" barrel with 4 holes on left side if barrel and 1 hole on top of receiver. The 4 holes are nice and clean. Looks factory for sure. I recall reading about the Sears rifles around the time I picked it up.

Mine came in rough condition and it's now my favorite gun.
__________________
"Modesty is the only sure bait when fishing for praise."
fastfreddie is offline  
Old December 15, 2012, 08:14 PM   #3942
greevestim
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 19, 2012
Location: rural missouri
Posts: 30
Thanks fastfreddie for answering my email post and dfariswheel also, I never mentioned a receiver, only the 4 holes in barrell. However thanks to you two and a little research on my own, I think we are more or less satisfied.

By the way in my travels of late into the frozen wasteland of the north, found in a box store (gander mtn) two really choice 39 mounties in like or almost like new conditon, which had been traded by unworthy grandson including a real nice 1897, a few fancied up 39's, and a 39 shortie (16in). He traded 9 total. Bet old grandpap rolled over in the frozen grave.

Merry Christmas
greevestim is offline  
Old December 18, 2012, 07:09 PM   #3943
Nematocyst
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 5, 2005
Location: Downeast Maine
Posts: 11,648
^ Man, that's sad.
__________________
______________

Blades, Levers, Sticks & Wheels
Nematocyst is offline  
Old December 19, 2012, 04:01 PM   #3944
rdefabri
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 2, 2012
Posts: 12
In light of the recent political posturing by our President, I will not be selling my Marlin 39A. Simply doesn't make any sense, and it's far too valuable to let go.
rdefabri is offline  
Old December 24, 2012, 01:31 AM   #3945
Fast Frank
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 17, 2007
Location: Houston, Texas (Woodlands)
Posts: 951
When you pry it from my cold dead hands

Yeah, I know...

Nobody is trying to ban my model 39s.

The political situation seems to have some folks downright scared. It's all over the gun forums.

I don't know where that's all going to go, but I just wanted to say that my model 39s mean more to me than my AR15 does.

I think I can imagine life without my "Evil black Rifle", But life without a model 39 sounds like insufferable hell.

I think I'll pull them out of the safe and fondle them a little, just because I can.


Merry Christmas, guys.
Fast Frank is offline  
Old December 25, 2012, 01:03 AM   #3946
Nematocyst
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 5, 2005
Location: Downeast Maine
Posts: 11,648
Quote:
my model 39s mean more to me than my AR15 does.
I can almost say the same,
but my version is slightly different.

I own a 39, but not an AR.

I'll keep the former,
but have no interest in the latter.

What does that tell you?

Great post, FFrank.
Good to see you in these parts again.

ETA:

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdefabri
I will not be selling my Marlin 39A. Simply doesn't make any sense, and it's far too valuable to let go.
Excellent point. Thanks for starting this segment with a rational, matter of fact statement.
_______

Merry Christmas to all, indeed.

May there be a 39 in your stocking.
__________________
______________

Blades, Levers, Sticks & Wheels

Last edited by Nematocyst; December 25, 2012 at 01:13 AM.
Nematocyst is offline  
Old December 25, 2012, 01:09 AM   #3947
Nematocyst
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 5, 2005
Location: Downeast Maine
Posts: 11,648
Just took a minute to scroll up this page, revisiting the posts that have happened here over the last month or so.

I found this image of Mo walking in his meadow wood.

This is what it's about. Let's not forget that.

__________________
______________

Blades, Levers, Sticks & Wheels
Nematocyst is offline  
Old December 25, 2012, 12:54 PM   #3948
Fast Frank
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 17, 2007
Location: Houston, Texas (Woodlands)
Posts: 951
Couldn't agree more, Nemo.

Not sure if this one has been posted here or not.



That's me on the right.

Dude on the left is Ken, a friend of mine.

He wasn't too impressed when I told him the rifle I was loaning him to hunt squirrels with was 60 years old.

He looked at my model 39, then back at the one he was holding, and said "Seriously? It's 60 years old?"

I think he believed I had handed him a junker and kept the nice one for myself.

Well...

After a few hours of stomping around and taking some squirrels out of some tree tops ken was asking "Where can I get one of these?" and asking me how much I payed for it.
Fast Frank is offline  
Old December 25, 2012, 04:55 PM   #3949
CB900F
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 22, 2003
Posts: 3,722
Fella's;

I think the concern over the model 39's and possible proposed legislation concerns the tubular magazine capacity of the 39's, and many other .22's for that matter. In the now dead AWB, the issue was not a factor. However, trying to predict what the politicians will do in the coming year is futile IMHO. Only thing we can do is wait & see.

900F
__________________
_____________________________________________
CB900F is offline  
Old December 25, 2012, 08:02 PM   #3950
76shuvlinoff
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 6, 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,128
THe sad thing is I think us 39 owners (and all .22lr shooters) are going to have to wait a bit for the shelves of 22lr to be restocked.
__________________
The very same allegedly sensible people that try to get everyone to focus on mental health side of gun control are the very same people that freely use: "gun nuts", "gun crazies" and "gun fanatics" when cornered in a debate.
76shuvlinoff is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.