Quantcast
New York State Ban - We need your help as well as other states - Page 4 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Social Situations > Activism

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 15, 2013, 12:12 PM   #76
Paladin7
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 16, 2003
Posts: 306
Please call now!!!

The nys assembly is debating the bill now and are taking calls.

One staffer told me that they are taking the number of calls and updating their assemblymen on the floor real time.

Your calls are critical now.

Thanks!
Paladin7 is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 01:17 PM   #77
mboylan
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 23, 2009
Posts: 231
This probably will be passed and signed by Cuomo. Next step is to get an injunction ASAP. Several parts of this law will not hold up in court.
mboylan is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 01:39 PM   #78
GlockFan
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 23, 2009
Location: Obamasville, IL aka the western suburbs of Chicago
Posts: 275
Good luck to you guys. It sounds bad...and this from a guy in Illinois! Hope we can stop this and but an end to this stupidity.
__________________
Former Chicago Mayor, Rich Daley, on his request for 24hr armed bodyguard protection after he leaves office.........
Quote:
“There’s been threats all through my career. … The safety of my family comes first”
GlockFan is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 01:49 PM   #79
hso
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: January 3, 2003
Location: 0 hrs east of TN
Posts: 33,819
Are they taking emails as well as calls and updating the legislators on those numbers?

Has it been pointed out that banning without grandfathering is confiscation since it is denial of property to existing owners.
__________________
SAF Life Member/NRAILA Contributor
******************
Please Read The Forum Rules

TheHighRoad exists to provide a higher grade of discussion than is found on some other gun forums so antis and undecideds can see that gun owners and RKBA advocates are not the reckless misanthropes they tell everyone we are. Personal attacks, group stereotyping, macho chest-thumping, and partisan hackery are low road and hurt all of us.
hso is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 01:55 PM   #80
steveracer
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 10, 2005
Location: VA Beach
Posts: 1,435
Ex Post Facto laws are against the NYS constitution. This would easily crumble under state court scrutiny. I will happily be the guinea pig. I maintain a NYS driver's license and my folks live there. I will load up all my 10 round mags and stick them on the dash and get pulled for speeding and see what happens. I'll be soliciting for defense funds shortly thereafter.
__________________
"The most brutal part of the zombie apocalypse is pretending I'm not excited."- Deer Hunter
steveracer is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 02:02 PM   #81
dom1104
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 3, 2007
Posts: 1,362
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveracer View Post
Ex Post Facto laws are against the NYS constitution. This would easily crumble under state court scrutiny. I will happily be the guinea pig. I maintain a NYS driver's license and my folks live there. I will load up all my 10 round mags and stick them on the dash and get pulled for speeding and see what happens. I'll be soliciting for defense funds shortly thereafter.
Really? Or just for internet-funny?
__________________
Smith
STI
Daniel Defense
Colt
dom1104 is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 02:04 PM   #82
steveracer
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 10, 2005
Location: VA Beach
Posts: 1,435
Really. Like, I already told my boss to expect my phone call about it.
__________________
"The most brutal part of the zombie apocalypse is pretending I'm not excited."- Deer Hunter
steveracer is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 02:10 PM   #83
gfanikf
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 16, 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveracer View Post
Really. Like, I already told my boss to expect my phone call about it.
The only problem is the law isn't ex post facto. It would be ex post facto if it made it a crime to own them a year ago.
gfanikf is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 04:24 PM   #84
Evergreen
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 16, 2009
Location: Tacoma Area, WA
Posts: 459
I am just wondering what will happen when the New York government starts trying to confiscate all the magazines that they believe are being illegally possessed. I personally fear there will potentially be bloodshed and violence. Some say any violence committed by people defending their property will be fuel for even more gun confiscations, although I myself, don't necessarily agree. I think the people who are now considered criminals are probably respectable people in their communities and their imprisonment or murder would not be looked on favorably.

All I know is, in theory, if I was a New Yorker and the government was knocking on my door and demanding I turn in all my magazines or risk imprisonment, I don't think I would comply.

All I can say is I am in shock and fear that this legislation can infect other states.

New Yorkers need to become very vigilant and organize themselves to fight these Unconstitutional laws.
__________________
Germans who wish to use firearms should join the SS or the SA - ordinary citizens don't need guns, as their having guns doesn't serve the State.

-Heinrich Himmler, Nazi Leader
Evergreen is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 09:00 PM   #85
mf-dif
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 8, 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 233
This is a horrible blow to the constitutional rights to the citizens of New York. I hope this can be overturned by the SCOTUS.
mf-dif is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 09:33 PM   #86
dcarch
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 2, 2010
Location: The Hawkeye State
Posts: 998
Praying for you folks.
__________________
Iowa State Code 10465A: All persons operating a truck, or other vehicle with a cab and/or cargo bay area shall be required to raise at least two fingers in cordial acknowledgment to other drivers while utilizing all public roads within the state of Iowa. This law does not apply to residents of cities with a population exceeding 7,500 persons.
dcarch is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 09:39 PM   #87
the_skunk
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 1, 2011
Posts: 114
They now record anyone that buys ammo ..... I would say the show is over for gun owners
the_skunk is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 09:44 PM   #88
Jim K
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 31, 2002
Posts: 13,224
I like the section that allows the use of an assault weapon on a firing range if it has been rendered permanenty inoperable! Even if I favored that bill, I would have to say the idiot that wrote that should never be allowed to sit in any legislature.

Jim
Jim K is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 09:45 PM   #89
dcarch
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 2, 2010
Location: The Hawkeye State
Posts: 998
Time for y'all to get the heck out of that state. Wonder what Kimber and Remington are going to do?
__________________
Iowa State Code 10465A: All persons operating a truck, or other vehicle with a cab and/or cargo bay area shall be required to raise at least two fingers in cordial acknowledgment to other drivers while utilizing all public roads within the state of Iowa. This law does not apply to residents of cities with a population exceeding 7,500 persons.
dcarch is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 09:55 PM   #90
1stmarine
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 29, 2010
Location: The high road when I can find one although it is getting harder every day.
Posts: 1,967
The bill was printed at 11pm and voted on at 11:30pm. I am sure many didn't even read it and of course no hearings
were allowed. Totally unheard off.
Overnight they made criminals of honest citizens, security personnel, firefighters, law enforcement and other public servants.
Cuomo is not thinking about what is best for New York and is looking for the high fives from Obama at the state
of the union address. Cuomo 2016, God save us all !!

Sign up here. It takes a minute...

http://nysecond.org/

http://impeachandrewcuomo.com
__________________
Giving money and power to Government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. -- P.J. O'Rourke
1stmarine is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 10:06 PM   #91
Billy Shears
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 16, 2008
Posts: 780
Quote:
This is about needs. It's about rights. The burden is on the government to demonstrate why they "need" to curtail our rights. They've have failed to provide any evidence that banning these weapons would make us safer, thus they have failed to establish a need.
As far as Morgan and his side are concerned they did address it. When he rattled off the litany of mass shootings perpetrated with an AR-15, as far they are concerned, that alone establishes the need. Having asserted that the AR-15 is the mass murderer's weapon of choice, and further asserting that they can envision no self-defense scenario where an honest citizen would need that kind of firepower provides them all the justification they think they need. Never mind that you and I CAN envision scenarios where an honest citizen would need that much firepower, they can't, and no one has articulated such a case to them. (The argument that citizens might need such weapons against a government grown tyrannical one day was met, as you saw, with contempt and derision.) So Morgan and his ilk can sit back and smugly claim to support the 2nd amendment and the right of self-defense, while simultaneously claiming the ban of high capacity magazines and semi-automatic firearms as "reasonable" restrictions that don't infringe a person's right to self-defense or his ability to exercise it.

We need to better articulate why they are dead wrong on both counts. We're in a war of ideas. Victory will go to the more persuasive and articulate side.
Billy Shears is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 10:20 PM   #92
1stmarine
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 29, 2010
Location: The high road when I can find one although it is getting harder every day.
Posts: 1,967
Victory goes to the sensationalist media and those who fuel that media with the fears of a brainless population. All politicians do is to see the opportunity and exploit those fears to further their radical agendas.
Tomorrow you will see Obama surrounded by little children to give his message.

It is history repeating itself over and over again. Edward Murrow warned about these dangers and they are here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anNEJJYLU8M
__________________
Giving money and power to Government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. -- P.J. O'Rourke
1stmarine is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 10:34 PM   #93
Billy Shears
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 16, 2008
Posts: 780
I thought NY state senator Greg Ball spoke rather effectively on the matter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=2rRSUEaLKvA

He was quite right; you have people out there with dangerous mental health issues, and people who have children they fear are ticking time bombs and need help with them, not getting it, and the NY state legislature has done nothing to address that problem. Instead they chose to do the easy thing: to grandstand about gun control and pat themselves on the back that they've done something to prevent violence. They haven't, of course. The bill was rushed through in the middle of the night, it got no public discussion at all, and was passed by state senators who had not even read it. It transparently is not a well-thought out, carefully considered, legitimate effort to make the people of NY state safer. It is, as Sen. Ball observed, a naked attempt on the part of a 2016 Democratic presidential contender to take a big, strategic highly visible national lead on the "progressive" cause du jour.
Billy Shears is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 10:36 PM   #94
boom boom
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 24, 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 39
A modest proposal

I would suggest that 2nd Amendment supporting Dem's on this board, especially if you are from Iowa and New Hampshire, point out to Mr. Cuomo through emails, faxes, and phone calls, that signing this midnight bill to take away your rights will seriously affect his presidential chances in 2016.
boom boom is offline  
Old January 15, 2013, 11:31 PM   #95
1stmarine
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 29, 2010
Location: The high road when I can find one although it is getting harder every day.
Posts: 1,967
Thank you guys! you are the best.
We are also in the lookout for your states and for Obama's circus performance that is about to start.

Cuomo and his buddies forced a 'legalized' illegal law and sold us out.

The Cosa Nostra would be a lot better because they would be up front so you would know what to expect when something was going to be enforced upon you.

Cuomo as president would be another total failure just like the current one.
I hope the GOP put their $hit together by then.
__________________
Giving money and power to Government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. -- P.J. O'Rourke
1stmarine is offline  
Old January 16, 2013, 12:11 AM   #96
Okiegunner
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 19, 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 612
A question???

Will Gov. Cuomo's security staff be limited to 7 bullets?
Okiegunner is offline  
Old January 16, 2013, 12:13 AM   #97
OpelBlitz
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 15, 2009
Location: West Chicago, IL
Posts: 398
Doubtful. You should ask.
OpelBlitz is offline  
Old January 16, 2013, 12:30 AM   #98
1stmarine
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 29, 2010
Location: The high road when I can find one although it is getting harder every day.
Posts: 1,967
I think even less than 7 because he might have banned all the ammunition and manufactures will no longer want to do business with Newyorkistan so his full time security detail will be out of ammo soon. Or those might be able to order online while he pretends he is not looking.

Welcome to the new world order. Cuomo for Fuhrer in 2016. wow!
__________________
Giving money and power to Government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. -- P.J. O'Rourke
1stmarine is offline  
Old January 16, 2013, 07:54 AM   #99
hso
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: January 3, 2003
Location: 0 hrs east of TN
Posts: 33,819
Cuomo's War is a NYS ban opposition site that has some coordination information . http://cuomoswar.com/2013/01/16/peti...-help-save-ny/
__________________
SAF Life Member/NRAILA Contributor
******************
Please Read The Forum Rules

TheHighRoad exists to provide a higher grade of discussion than is found on some other gun forums so antis and undecideds can see that gun owners and RKBA advocates are not the reckless misanthropes they tell everyone we are. Personal attacks, group stereotyping, macho chest-thumping, and partisan hackery are low road and hurt all of us.
hso is offline  
Old January 16, 2013, 07:20 PM   #100
burk
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 16, 2005
Posts: 115
Question about the National Socailist Republic of NY state gun ban.

They are requiring NICS checks for ammunition purchases (as I understand). My understanding of NICS is that it is a Federal system (I work part time at a Big box gun counter) designed only for the checking of backgrounds on the purchase of Hand gun or Long gun. Wouldn't there have to be Federal legislation to authorize access for background checks for ammo purchases? My understanding of the Federal statute is that to use the NICS system for any other reason is illegal.
burk is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.