Quantcast
380 Is A Handful - Page 3 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Autoloaders

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 13, 2013, 02:14 PM   #51
brickeyee
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 25, 2005
Posts: 2,818
Brother in law had a nice tiny .380 he used to carry.

It was so much of a PITA to shoot he rarely practiced with it, and even then could not hit anything beyond about 10 feet.

A couple inches of sight radius on rudimentary sights is not all that conducive to hitting anything.

He was only fooling himself.
brickeyee is offline  
Old February 13, 2013, 02:39 PM   #52
WRGADog
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 22, 2009
Location: Brevard County, FL
Posts: 481
I have a Kahr P380 and find it easy to shoot and control with very manageable recoil and second shot capability. I have put ~1000 rounds through the gun with zero problems. The only issue I have had was with quality of the initial magazines which Kahr immediately replaced.
WRGADog is offline  
Old February 13, 2013, 02:41 PM   #53
GCBurner
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 18, 2010
Posts: 1,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by brickeyee View Post
Brother in law had a nice tiny .380 he used to carry.

It was so much of a PITA to shoot he rarely practiced with it, and even then could not hit anything beyond about 10 feet.

A couple inches of sight radius on rudimentary sights is not all that conducive to hitting anything.

He was only fooling himself.
It does take practice. When I first got my P3AT, it was grouping all over the paper at 10 yards. I put some bright white enamel paint of the front sight, and started squeezing the trigger instead of just quickly pulling it, and I can keep everything in an 8-inch bullseye now. Still not exactly target competition accuracy, but good enough for defensive use at 30 feet or less, which is its intended purpose.
__________________
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
GCBurner is offline  
Old February 13, 2013, 08:51 PM   #54
jon_in_wv
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 8, 2006
Posts: 3,632
380 does offer less recoil in an appropriately sized weapon like the Bersa 380. Expecting low recoil in the tiniest, lightest possible platform for the caliber seems a little naive. My Bersa 380 has very light recoil and follow up shots are ridiculously fast and easy. MY BG380 is a little tougher to shoot and has more recoil but its half the size too.
__________________
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity."
Sigmund Freud: General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. (1920)
jon_in_wv is offline  
Old February 14, 2013, 06:09 PM   #55
Paul7
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 3, 2008
Posts: 220
My Colt Mustang is very soft shooting, unlike an LCP I used to have.
Paul7 is offline  
Old February 15, 2013, 01:40 PM   #56
Captcurt
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 9, 2010
Location: Ozark Mountains of Arkansas
Posts: 727
Just got a Ruger LC380 in. I may have to keep it. It is looks like a LC9 except it's 380. I will ring it out and get back with you.

I really like the Sig P238 but you are talking twice the money.
__________________
In God we trust, all others pay cash!
Captcurt is offline  
Old February 15, 2013, 04:29 PM   #57
Dakotared
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 15, 2012
Posts: 48
I have the LCP 380 and if that thing hurts your hand you may want to give up shooting!!!

I am joking with ya but I honestly do not think it is bad at all. Maybe because I was expecting much worse from such a small gun. Like others have said smaller gun more felt recoil.
Dakotared is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 10:48 AM   #58
Soldiernurse
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Location: Cedar Park, Texas
Posts: 210
Sir, I mean no disrespect but my TCP 738 is very manageable. At 3-7yds I was very accurate w/mighty mouse. Very surprised since barely could see the front site. I'm not going to target shoot very often with it. It's a BUG

Also, you have it backwards regards to smaller the handgun equals less recoil. My G4G19, PPQ40, or XD40sc have a light recoil.
__________________
USMC-ArmyRet w/TX CHL, Member of/NAGR, NRA, TSRA, USCCA, TCHA; CA .40 Pitbull Revolver, XD40sc, PPQ40, (Beretta) Stoeger Cougar 8040F, Taurus PT745MilPro/PT140MilPro/TCP 738, EMP9, G4G19 & G4G30, S&W M&P9c, BP9cc, PF9, & Mossberg500 JIC Cruiser

Last edited by Soldiernurse; February 16, 2013 at 11:37 AM.
Soldiernurse is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 11:05 AM   #59
Torian
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 10, 2013
Posts: 275
Another vote for the 232. It's about as tame as any .380 out there, but it doesn't come cheap.
Torian is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 11:22 AM   #60
hardluk1
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 27, 2009
Location: nc mountains
Posts: 3,603
I really like the 380TCP. We have two of them. My youngest daughter claimed my first one. Then my wife bought one and later a bersa 380CC so I may get one back. I did the break in on both and with 400 rounds thru each i have not had a single issue.

My main CC is a cm9 with 124gr +P ammo. . So 380's recoil is nothing special even in a small pacage. Anyone that has a TCP try shooting it one handed, For me its way easier to control. Accurate for a small pistol also . Best trigger pull of most any defence handgun too. Easy for me to shoot 3" 7 yard groups even with my bad eyes. The tcp C models we have also do not seem to have issues with any ammo we have tried, fmj or hp. I also added a piece of inner tube cut to cover as much grip as possible to aid control. I can not get two hands around that little gun. So one handed shooting.

I have highlighted the sites, Wifes SS model has a blacked out rear sight area and a yellow front sight.
hardluk1 is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 11:33 AM   #61
Soldiernurse
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Location: Cedar Park, Texas
Posts: 210
BTW, speaking of Taurus my PT140 MilPro is very manageable. Have not shot my PT145 MilPro... bought it just last week. My (Beretta) Stoeger Cougar 8040FS, w/revolving barrel, is a dream to shoot.
__________________
USMC-ArmyRet w/TX CHL, Member of/NAGR, NRA, TSRA, USCCA, TCHA; CA .40 Pitbull Revolver, XD40sc, PPQ40, (Beretta) Stoeger Cougar 8040F, Taurus PT745MilPro/PT140MilPro/TCP 738, EMP9, G4G19 & G4G30, S&W M&P9c, BP9cc, PF9, & Mossberg500 JIC Cruiser
Soldiernurse is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 12:59 PM   #62
Mosbyranger
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 13, 2012
Location: Occupied Colorado
Posts: 77
If you can find one, try the Colt Government in .380. Very nice.
MR
__________________
To defend ourselves we must depend on ourselves
Mosbyranger is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 02:07 PM   #63
Match14
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 2, 2006
Location: South/Central Indiana
Posts: 109
Colt .380 Government

I have one and like it for the most part, but the sights on the modern pistols are much better.
Mine is an early one (1983) and it just has the old style low profile, low visibilty sights.
Also I had to take mine to a gunsmith to get the feedramp redone so it would feed flat nosed rounds, before that it would only feed ball ammo reliably.

I would only go with this if you can find one for like $500 or less.

I really wish someone would make a 9mm version but the same size. Sig almost does but it has the same grip length as their P238. I like the longer grip on the Government .380 because I can grip it with all the fingers.
Match14 is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 04:30 PM   #64
Clark
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 3, 2003
Location: Where I5 meets the rain forest
Posts: 3,778


If you think factory ammo is a handful in tiny 380, you should try with handloads that push a 90 gr Gold Dot bullet at 1100 fps from a Kel-Tec P3AT.

The cases eject so hard, that if they bounce off a wall at the range, they cut flesh.

Buffalo bore claims this same performance, but I don't know how they do it. I am tuned right up to the threshold of case bulge in that pistol.

I have the Kel-tec P3AT, the Ruger LCP, the Kahr P380, and some other larger 380s.
They all have their advantages.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books." "Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 04:52 PM   #65
kokapelli
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 27, 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark View Post


If you think factory ammo is a handful in tiny 380, you should try with handloads that push a 90 gr Gold Dot bullet at 1100 fps from a Kel-Tec P3AT.

The cases eject so hard, that if they bounce off a wall at the range, they cut flesh.

Buffalo bore claims this same performance, but I don't know how they do it. I am tuned right up to the threshold of case bulge in that pistol.

I have the Kel-tec P3AT, the Ruger LCP, the Kahr P380, and some other larger 380s.
They all have their advantages.
I always enjoyed your pushing the envelope when you posted at the KT board, but I came to the conclusion that pushing 380 JHP rounds to higher velocity had little benefit since the rounds expanded faster at the higher velocity and would probably have shallower penetration.

I did purchase a bunch of Buffalo Bore 380 but eventually decided that there was really little benefit and now only carry Winchester fmj/FP ammo in my pocket 380 pistols.

This is just my opinion and I realize others feel differently about which ammo to carry in their micro 380 pistols.
kokapelli is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 06:52 PM   #66
hardluk1
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 27, 2009
Location: nc mountains
Posts: 3,603
After reviewing as many 380 gel test as I could find it looks like the corbon dpx ammo is the best mix of expansion and penetrationion.
hardluk1 is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 10:03 PM   #67
CZguy
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 25, 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 3,850
Quote:
I have the Kel-tec P3AT, the Ruger LCP, the Kahr P380, and some other larger 380s.
They all have their advantages.
I own all three of these also. Since I got the Kahr P380, the Kel Tec and Ruger are moving further and further back in the safe.
__________________
"When one engine fails on a twin-engine airplane you always have
enough power left to get you to the scene of the crash."

"Directions to heaven. Turn right, and go straight."
CZguy is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 10:42 PM   #68
Soldiernurse
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Location: Cedar Park, Texas
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokapelli View Post
Based on what? Is it because the TCP is much more pocketable, or maybe because the TCP is much lighter, or because the TCP is a locked breach action that has less felt recoil? Just curious.
Have you shot the Taurus TCP738? Light trigger pull, not uncomfortable recoil, locks back after last round... and very affordable.
__________________
USMC-ArmyRet w/TX CHL, Member of/NAGR, NRA, TSRA, USCCA, TCHA; CA .40 Pitbull Revolver, XD40sc, PPQ40, (Beretta) Stoeger Cougar 8040F, Taurus PT745MilPro/PT140MilPro/TCP 738, EMP9, G4G19 & G4G30, S&W M&P9c, BP9cc, PF9, & Mossberg500 JIC Cruiser
Soldiernurse is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 10:44 PM   #69
Soldiernurse
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Location: Cedar Park, Texas
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark View Post


If you think factory ammo is a handful in tiny 380, you should try with handloads that push a 90 gr Gold Dot bullet at 1100 fps from a Kel-Tec P3AT.

The cases eject so hard, that if they bounce off a wall at the range, they cut flesh.

Buffalo bore claims this same performance, but I don't know how they do it. I am tuned right up to the threshold of case bulge in that pistol.

I have the Kel-tec P3AT, the Ruger LCP, the Kahr P380, and some other larger 380s.
They all have their advantages.
Curious, why three .380 caliber guns?
__________________
USMC-ArmyRet w/TX CHL, Member of/NAGR, NRA, TSRA, USCCA, TCHA; CA .40 Pitbull Revolver, XD40sc, PPQ40, (Beretta) Stoeger Cougar 8040F, Taurus PT745MilPro/PT140MilPro/TCP 738, EMP9, G4G19 & G4G30, S&W M&P9c, BP9cc, PF9, & Mossberg500 JIC Cruiser
Soldiernurse is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 10:52 PM   #70
kokapelli
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 27, 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldiernurse View Post
Have you shot the Taurus TCP738? Light trigger pull, not uncomfortable recoil, locks back after last round... and very affordable.
Yes I have a TCP and it's my second favorite pocket postal after my P238.
kokapelli is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 10:52 PM   #71
Soldiernurse
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Location: Cedar Park, Texas
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by brickeyee View Post
Brother in law had a nice tiny .380 he used to carry.

It was so much of a PITA to shoot he rarely practiced with it, and even then could not hit anything beyond about 10 feet.

A couple inches of sight radius on rudimentary sights is not all that conducive to hitting anything.

He was only fooling himself.
You are both fool'n yourself looking for .380 accuracy like a 1911 Target Gun.
__________________
USMC-ArmyRet w/TX CHL, Member of/NAGR, NRA, TSRA, USCCA, TCHA; CA .40 Pitbull Revolver, XD40sc, PPQ40, (Beretta) Stoeger Cougar 8040F, Taurus PT745MilPro/PT140MilPro/TCP 738, EMP9, G4G19 & G4G30, S&W M&P9c, BP9cc, PF9, & Mossberg500 JIC Cruiser
Soldiernurse is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 10:54 PM   #72
Soldiernurse
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Location: Cedar Park, Texas
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokapelli View Post
Yes I have a TCP and it's my second favorite pocket postal after my P238.
No bashing by me, just curious the specifics that make your P238 more favorable than TCP738?
__________________
USMC-ArmyRet w/TX CHL, Member of/NAGR, NRA, TSRA, USCCA, TCHA; CA .40 Pitbull Revolver, XD40sc, PPQ40, (Beretta) Stoeger Cougar 8040F, Taurus PT745MilPro/PT140MilPro/TCP 738, EMP9, G4G19 & G4G30, S&W M&P9c, BP9cc, PF9, & Mossberg500 JIC Cruiser
Soldiernurse is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 10:59 PM   #73
Clark
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 3, 2003
Location: Where I5 meets the rain forest
Posts: 3,778
Quote:
Soldiernurse
Curious, why three .380 caliber guns?
Each 380 has advantages.
I just got the Kahr 3 days ago and have not evaluated it very well, but I am guessing I will shorten it's ejector.

The Kel-Tec, Ruger, Bryco, Beretta, and Husqvarna I have overloaded with Bullseye and 115 gr JHP until the case failed or the barrel failed.

I try to measure the case support and predict what load will make the case fail.
I try to estimate the barrel strength from measuring the chamber wall thickness at the thinnest spot.
I try to estimate the hottest load before slide slam give the product of [moving slide mass] [average recoil spring force over travel distance][ slide travel distance].

I weigh the pistols with ammo.
I am always looking for the most powerful concealed carry that is the least inconvenient to carry.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books." "Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 11:00 PM   #74
velojym
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 9, 2006
Posts: 606
My .380 Taurus makes my LC9 feel pretty nice, the latter being pleasant enough for plinking. The former is a bit snappier, but didn't cause any real problems for me. That being said, I'd rather spend the day with my .44 mag SBH, which is a real treat to shoot.

Like with snubby .38s, the mechanical accuracy is there, but it takes a lot of practice to be effective beyond belly gun ranges. My TCP was knocking down steel plates at 15 yards pretty regularly, but I had to be careful with trigger control, as I found myself moving that light little pistol with the trigger stroke. I think it's actually helping my technique with my larger guns, which are heavy enough to mask those errors.

Last edited by velojym; February 16, 2013 at 11:08 PM.
velojym is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 11:04 PM   #75
VA27
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 5, 2006
Location: Slovenly Manor, Dungheap-Upon-The-Hill
Posts: 1,397
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldiernurse View Post
You are both fool'n yourself looking for .380 accuracy like a 1911 Target Gun.
Unless you can find a Browning Model 1971. Scary accurate, but NOT a pocket gun.
__________________
-The United States already has a national gun policy. It's called the Second Amendment.-

-The NRA is my Union-
VA27 is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.