|Welcome to THR|
|You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.
|March 21, 2013, 09:19 PM||#327|
Join Date: September 20, 2009
Location: HeArT of DiXiE
Wow great find there hso. This is the most rational RKBA discussion I've seen. It helps that the host's demeanor was calm and neutral.
Surculus ergo sum
|March 21, 2013, 11:04 PM||#329|
Join Date: June 18, 2011
Their politics are usually pretty nearly opposite mine, but there is one thing I have always liked about PBS "anchors," whether on radio or TV; they don't scream at their audience.
This interviewer and guest are a shining example of how a dialog should be undertaken. The guest is dead on in her analysis, and the host doesn't berate her. Brilliant work from both.
Many seek the ruler's favor; but every man's judgment comes from the LORD.
Proverbs 29:26, AKJV
|March 22, 2013, 03:22 AM||#331|
Join Date: February 27, 2009
Location: DFW (formerly Brazos County), Texas
Sabbath, the web design there is not smart.
The words " examined the gun debate." Just before Judy Woodruf, are, in fact a link to the video.
Standing guard even sitting behind a desk.
Occupational hazard of my occupation just not being around (with apologies to Bubba)
|March 22, 2013, 04:07 AM||#332|
Join Date: October 6, 2008
Location: Eastern Kansas
Thank you. I guess I'm not that smart either sometimes.
|March 22, 2013, 04:40 AM||#333|
Join Date: February 26, 2012
Location: burien WA
dang i missed it, but the Newshour on PBS is the only (other than local news) news i watch on TV.
"hey look lois, the two symbols of the republican party an elephant and a big fat white guy who's threatened by change". Peter Griffin Family Guy
the .480 Ruger, for those who get it no explanation is needed, for those who don't get it, wouldn't understand.
|March 22, 2013, 05:43 PM||#336|
Join Date: April 16, 2012
I couldn't watch it on the link provided but found the same video on youtube and was able to watch it, it's good stuff.
|March 22, 2013, 06:10 PM||#337|
Join Date: June 5, 2011
Location: Dallas, Republic of Texas
That was a surprisingly level headed discussion considering the program.
Thanks for the link.
America: Stand and FIGHT!
Support the entire Constitution. Not just the parts you like.
|March 26, 2013, 08:39 AM||#341|
Join Date: January 3, 2003
Location: 0 hrs east of TN
The Lee Amendment vote tells us who our friends are in the Senate (even thought it didn't pass by one vote).
SAF Life Member/NRAILA Contributor
Please Read The Forum Rules
TheHighRoad exists to provide a higher grade of discussion than is found on some other gun forums so antis and undecideds can see that gun owners and RKBA advocates are not the reckless misanthropes they tell everyone we are. Personal attacks, group stereotyping, macho chest-thumping, and partisan hackery are low road and hurt all of us.
|March 26, 2013, 08:25 PM||#342|
Join Date: April 25, 2010
Location: Anchorage, AK
I know this is old news, but since it hasn't been mentioned I think I should point it out:
I believe this recounting of the NRA's history is inaccurate as told in this video.
I'd really, sincerely appreciate someone correcting me on this. My understanding is that the NRA was started earlier than the instances cited, specifically by two union soldiers upset at the lack of Northern aptitude at reconciling POA & POI.
It's true that some local chapters were organized for the reason he states and that the national organization chartered those local organizations, but the NRA as a national organization wasn't started for these reasons, AFAIK.
The NRA can and should rightly take credit for their involvement in helping freed slaves defend themselves from the KKK, but it's important to qualify this video up front with an acknowledgement that the history isn't quite accurate. Being honest and upfront about this avoids putting us in the position of losing credibility for promoting something that isn't historically accurate and thus distracting from the truly valuable substance of what's discussed.
Again, I'd really like it if someone more knowledgeable on this would correct me. Don't hate - just posting this in the spirit of helping improve our strength of representation and argument.
|March 26, 2013, 08:57 PM||#343|
Join Date: December 17, 2012
It's not the NRA making that statement, but those individuals.
It may be a case of them talking about the NRA from their particular perspective and context (local chapters, being chartered by the national organization) and not simply being concerned about when the 'national organization' actually formed.
Either way, that's a powerful statement, and since it flies in the face of the MSM, and reinforces the NRA as a positive organization, it'll never make 'prime time'. But I hope more people see it.
|March 27, 2013, 12:33 AM||#344|
Join Date: April 7, 2008
Location: Bitter Clinger from PA
theshepard, I've been doing a lot of research on this lately. Here's something I came across that may or may not be of value to the conversation. It concerns the rifle club that was created by civil rights activist Robert Franklin Williams and chartered by the NRA.
"The policy of the American government is to leave their citizens free, neither restraining nor aiding them in their pursuits." -Jefferson
|April 1, 2013, 04:31 PM||#345|
Join Date: September 24, 2003
In MS, you can look over all the bills: http://billstatus.ls.state.ms.us/201...es/notdead.xml
or do keyword searches: http://index.ls.state.ms.us/2013Session.html
You may need to start with the main legislature page in future years:
Miss. St. Firearms Owners Assn.
"He who goes unarmed in paradise had better be sure that that is where he is."
|April 4, 2013, 05:42 PM||#346|
Join Date: February 25, 2006
Location: PNW WA
More reading on this subject:
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. Thomas Jefferson
|April 5, 2013, 06:20 PM||#347|
Join Date: January 27, 2010
American Patriot in "Rural Georgia"
"if a little rebellion now & then was good for our country back then, then nothing has changed.The time is definately ripe for another"
|April 17, 2013, 04:59 PM||#348|
Join Date: June 18, 2010
Senator King - add him to the list
theautobahn mentioned King sent out an e-mail and I just checked and sure enough this is what he wrote.
My brief response.
Vote in November for your Pro Second Amendment representatives. State and Federal.
Join NRA Today!
Takes 2 minutes to donate to NRA-ILA https://www.nraila.org/get-involved-...re/donate.aspx
Bloomberg is spending, we can too. Every little bit helps.
|April 17, 2013, 05:49 PM||#350|
Join Date: April 12, 2013
Location: Goleta, CA
The reason for high capacity magazines is simple:
They are the tools we use to level the field against tyranny in this Nation.
The progression by the left is simple:
High cap>15 round>10 round>7 round>wheelguns only>38 caliber and smaller only>single shot>no shot
|Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.|