Quantcast
223 - Help explaining these pressure signs - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Ammunition, Gear, and Firearm Help > Handloading and Reloading

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 19, 2014, 07:57 PM   #1
dsmhero
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 16, 2014
Posts: 5
223 - Help explaining these pressure signs

This is my first load up of 223 but I am getting some odd pressure signs when I believe there shouldn't be.

Data:
RRA LAR-15
16" barrel
Cheap 224 55grain fmj bullets I bought at a gunshow
COAL - 2.235
Accurate 2230
6 1/2 primers
Once shot mil brass

So I did a load up of 22grains - 24grains by 0.5grain increments. Outside temp was 85F.

At 23grains I had one pierced primer out of 10 rounds.


Back row is 23.5 and front is 24 grains


I was getting extractor marks at 23.5


Here is the chrono data:
22grains - Average 2686 fps with sd 70 fps
22.5 grains - Average 2708 fps with sd 57 fps
23 grains - Average 2760 fps with sd 41 fps
23.5 grains - Average 2779 fps with sd 54 fps
24 grains - Average 2872 fps with sd 44 fps

Any idea on what is going on and if I am actually pushing this charge too far?
dsmhero is offline  
Old July 19, 2014, 08:56 PM   #2
dsmhero
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 16, 2014
Posts: 5
Problem solved. 6 1/2 primers are NOT to be used with high pressure cartridges.
dsmhero is offline  
Old July 19, 2014, 08:59 PM   #3
solvability
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 3, 2003
Location: HSV, AL.
Posts: 351
As you say:

Warning:
Remington does not recommend this primer for use in the 17 Remington, 222 Remington, 223 Remington, 204 Ruger, 17 Remington Fireball. Use the 7-1/2 Small Rifle Bench Rest primer in these cartridges.


This 6-1/2 Small Rifle primer is primarily designed for use in the 22 Hornet.
solvability is offline  
Old July 19, 2014, 09:01 PM   #4
dsmhero
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 16, 2014
Posts: 5
Yeah, unfortunately I bought these awhile ago when components were hard to find, long before I even started to reload for 223. I hate wasting $. Thanks again.
dsmhero is offline  
Old July 19, 2014, 10:08 PM   #5
billybob44
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 16, 2007
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 841
Pistol loads...

Quote:
Originally Posted by dsmhero View Post
Yeah, unfortunately I bought these awhile ago when components were hard to find, long before I even started to reload for 223. I hate wasting $. Thanks again.
Not a waste at all..You are probably shooting/loading a pistol caliber that uses a small primer..

I have used a LOT of Rem. 6 1/2's in .357, .40 S&W, and 9MM loads..Bill.
__________________
Outdoor Sportsman
NRA Life Member Since 1976
billybob44 is offline  
Old July 19, 2014, 10:27 PM   #6
dsmhero
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 16, 2014
Posts: 5
Have you noticed that you had to change your load when switching to small rifle primer? I am loading for 9mm with 5.0grs of unique.
dsmhero is offline  
Old July 19, 2014, 10:45 PM   #7
HighExpert
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 30, 2010
Location: Central VA in the woods
Posts: 423
I have never had to change because of primers. If you were loading at absolute max you probably should back off .1gr.
__________________
Life Member of the NRA.. Do it..it feels good!
HighExpert is offline  
Old July 19, 2014, 11:02 PM   #8
dsmhero
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 16, 2014
Posts: 5
I don't believe I am anywhere close.

COAL 1.160
115gr RN
5.0gr Unique
Average 1060 fps
SD: 26 fps
dsmhero is offline  
Old July 20, 2014, 12:30 AM   #9
ArchAngelCD
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 25, 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 17,530
I have no idea why Remington is still making their 6 1/2 primers. They are only rated for extremely low pressure rifle rounds like the 22 Hornet. I don't think they even burn as hot as a small pistol magnum primer. I have 400 I bought by accident years ago before I knew a Remington Small rifle primer couldn't really be used in rifle ammo!

I don't think and change in powder charge is necessary when using the 6 1/2 primers in place of SPP as long as you aren't bumping right up against the high limits of the powder charge. In that case you should always drop back and work up even when changing one brand of SPP for another.
__________________
Remember boys and girls, gun control only prevents law abiding Americans from owning guns because the Bad Guys donít obey the laws, no matter how restrictive or lenient the laws are!
ArchAngelCD is offline  
Old July 21, 2014, 07:17 PM   #10
Walkalong
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: November 20, 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 35,912
The primer problem is easily fixed by switching to a better suited primer. What concerns me is where the extractor had such a hard time pulling the case out of the chamber.
__________________
Do you ever wonder why nobody ever robs the bag man for the mob? No, you don't.

"Oh bother" said Pooh, as he chambered another round. Author unknown.
Walkalong is offline  
Old July 21, 2014, 07:42 PM   #11
gahunter12
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 21, 2011
Location: Winder, Ga
Posts: 722
Looks like you have solved your primer issue. I just looked back at my notes from last year using AA2230. I really liked my results I got from AA2230. Looks like you are right in mark with my results. I also noted that I had a ejecter mark on a few of my case heads and pretty flat primers @ 24gr. I settled on 23gr of AA2230/ 55gr FMJ/ CCI #41 primers with Avg Velocity of 2780fps, Extreme Spread= 12fps, and Standard Dev=6.
__________________
IDPA A52214
Elbert Co Gun Club
Auburn Lodge No. 230 F.& A.M
gahunter12 is offline  
Old July 22, 2014, 11:08 AM   #12
mstreddy
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 15, 2010
Posts: 512
OP, on loading the 6 1/2 primers in pistols. I too ended up with a bunch of them and have been using them in my pistol loads. 9, 40, and 38 special. I have had zero issues.
mstreddy is offline  
Old July 22, 2014, 11:22 AM   #13
vongh
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 16, 2013
Location: NM
Posts: 112
Did you shoot any steel laquered cases before you shot those reloads? I had the same problem with hard extracts and failure to extracts on a mini-14. I had to scrub the heck out of my chamber and switch to only brass. I have'nt had any problems since.
__________________
Will machine parts. PM for an RFQ.
vongh is offline  
Old July 23, 2014, 05:01 PM   #14
spitballer
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 20, 2013
Location: Central FL
Posts: 359
Possiblly the OAL of 2.235". Isn't it normal to load the 55gr FMJ's to around 2.260 or so? Are you crimping on the cannelure? Normally seating depth isn't a big deal unless you're running a max load, but I'm not familiar with the powder you've described.
spitballer is offline  
Old July 23, 2014, 05:47 PM   #15
ArchAngelCD
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 25, 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 17,530
Quote:
Originally Posted by spitballer View Post
Possiblly the OAL of 2.235". Isn't it normal to load the 55gr FMJ's to around 2.260 or so? Are you crimping on the cannelure? Normally seating depth isn't a big deal unless you're running a max load, but I'm not familiar with the powder you've described.
You do realize how very little the difference between those two, right? 25 thousandths of an inch when your COAL is well over 2" is not going to raise the pressures enough to pierce primers. 2 tenths of an inch might and I mean might but not 25/1000 of an inch.
__________________
Remember boys and girls, gun control only prevents law abiding Americans from owning guns because the Bad Guys donít obey the laws, no matter how restrictive or lenient the laws are!
ArchAngelCD is offline  
Old July 23, 2014, 10:36 PM   #16
rcmodel
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 49,121
There is nothing to explain.

Except he was using Remington 6 1/2 primers that the warning on every box says Not To Use in .223 and other high-pressure calibers.

rc
__________________
Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Or all your primers in a glass jar!
rcmodel is offline  
Old July 23, 2014, 10:44 PM   #17
ArchAngelCD
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 25, 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 17,530
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcmodel View Post
There is nothing to explain.

Except he was using Remington 6 1/2 primers that the warning on every box says Not To Use in .223 and other high-pressure calibers.

rc
Ding Ding, that post rings the bell just like Post #2.
__________________
Remember boys and girls, gun control only prevents law abiding Americans from owning guns because the Bad Guys donít obey the laws, no matter how restrictive or lenient the laws are!
ArchAngelCD is offline  
Old July 24, 2014, 10:28 AM   #18
spitballer
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 20, 2013
Location: Central FL
Posts: 359
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArchAngelCD View Post
You do realize how very little the difference between those two, right? 25 thousandths of an inch when your COAL is well over 2" is not going to raise the pressures enough to pierce primers. 2 tenths of an inch might and I mean might but not 25/1000 of an inch.
Right, normally not a big deal.
spitballer is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.