Quantcast
Which to buy S&W M&P or Springfield XD? - Page 2 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Autoloaders

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 1, 2014, 10:11 PM   #26
TarDevil
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 29, 2009
Location: NC Coast
Posts: 1,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockyriver View Post
XD = Junk in my honest opinion.
I might prefer the M&P but I've got enough XD trigger time to attest that they are anything but junk. Preferences aside, it's a well made gun.
__________________
"...remember the ultimate goal was to be smart enough not to shoot but good enough that if you have to shoot you can solve your problem."
Clint Smith
TarDevil is offline  
Old September 1, 2014, 10:12 PM   #27
viking499
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 9, 2007
Posts: 3,062
The trigger on my Shield is way better than on the compact I had.
viking499 is online now  
Old September 1, 2014, 10:27 PM   #28
p95
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 24, 2010
Posts: 21
M&P would be my pick-"made in the USA"
p95 is offline  
Old September 2, 2014, 02:03 AM   #29
thefamcnaj
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 17, 2011
Posts: 651
For the he full size gun I prefer the xd(m). I just shoot them better and they run great and are very accurate. The only little complaint I have with the xd is the triggers. They are mushy or spongy feeling. I've got use to that over time. Ill always have an xd(m) or two around. They feel great in the hand and point naturally for me.
For the smaller guns(shield and xds) I will take the shield all day. My xds(both of them were head aches.)
I would try both out. If you like both then I would go m&p......the m&ps are cheaper than the xdm(s).
The regular xd is in the same price range as the m&p.
__________________
"God and Guns is what makes us strong...its what this country was Founded on....so please don't let em take our God and Guns"-Lynyrd Skynyrd
thefamcnaj is offline  
Old September 2, 2014, 02:11 AM   #30
peacebutready
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 20, 2011
Location: South West
Posts: 469
The M&P were first built around the .40 cartridge. There have been problems with the 9mm version in the past. I don't know about now.

The XD was first built around the 9mm. I don't know if the .40 version is as reliable and accurate.
peacebutready is offline  
Old September 2, 2014, 09:30 PM   #31
Teachu2
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 17, 2012
Location: Keene, CA
Posts: 1,562
Shoot 'em both and buy what you like best. I strongly dislike the checkering on the XD line, enough so that I don't own a single one. I REALLY tried to get to like them, as I like the design, but I couldn't convince myself to buy a gun I'd have to sand down to enjoy. I enjoy shooting my wife's M&P 9c, but I shoot my G26 more accurately and much, much faster.

It's great to have a variety of quality firearms to choose from. In full-sized poly-framed 9mm, the XD, G17/19, Sig SP2022, and M&P 9 are all excellent choices.
Teachu2 is offline  
Old September 3, 2014, 05:12 PM   #32
stchman
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 13, 2009
Location: Saint Peters, MO
Posts: 1,106
I agree with TestPilot, grip safeties are just plain dumb, especially when the XD has a Glock style safe action trigger.
__________________
The 2nd Amendment is worth defending.
Do not let ignorant anti-gun liberals take our rights away.
http://www.stchman.com
stchman is offline  
Old September 5, 2014, 01:11 AM   #33
Lycidas Janwor
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 19, 2014
Posts: 29
I had a Springfield Armory .40 XDM and it was a fantastic pistol. Sure, it's a pretty large pistol and it's not made for conceal carry but it shoots fantastic. 16+1 in .40 and it shoots just like a Glock 17. Nice. Very nice.
Lycidas Janwor is offline  
Old September 5, 2014, 09:40 AM   #34
JohnnyBravo
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 17, 2007
Posts: 80
I will not buy a gun that I can't get parts for and Springfield wouldn't even sell me magazine springs for my XDM 9mm. They wanted me to return the whole shebang to them. My one and only XD experience is long past.
__________________
Hope, is not a strategy.
JohnnyBravo is offline  
Old September 5, 2014, 01:15 PM   #35
Lycidas Janwor
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 19, 2014
Posts: 29
why buy magazine springs when I'm guessing it's more cost effective to just buy an entire new magazine? That is probably why Springfield Armory said no thanks to your request.
Lycidas Janwor is offline  
Old September 5, 2014, 06:50 PM   #36
btg3
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 30, 2007
Posts: 1,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lycidas Janwor View Post
...I'm guessing...
So noted.
btg3 is offline  
Old September 6, 2014, 12:58 AM   #37
Cee Zee
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 23, 2012
Posts: 1,950
I went with an XDm .40 because of the way it feels in my hand. It has a low axis too which means better followup shots. I like the safeties. I like the mag capacity too. But mostly I like the grip. Accuracy and reliability are a must of course and mine will do both.
Cee Zee is offline  
Old September 6, 2014, 08:55 AM   #38
btg3
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 30, 2007
Posts: 1,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cee Zee View Post
I went with an XDm .40 because of the way it feels in my hand. It has a low axis too which means better followup shots.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhb View Post
I find the lower bore axis of the m&p superior on quick follow up shots.
Both are good guns.
btg3 is offline  
Old September 6, 2014, 09:03 AM   #39
JWH321
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 9, 2014
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 169
Save another hundred and grab an H&K VP-90. It'll save you money in the long run, because you will eventually buy one anyway.
JWH321 is offline  
Old September 6, 2014, 06:27 PM   #40
Cee Zee
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 23, 2012
Posts: 1,950
Quote:
Both are good guns.
I don't doubt that a bit. I'm not that familiar with the axis on the S&W so I don't know if it's better than the XDm or not. I just know I like what I have.
Cee Zee is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.