THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Revolvers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 28, 2004, 11:17 PM   #1
..
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 25, 2003
Posts: 578
Defensive Ammo for Snub

My favorite HP are Gold Dots but looking at the pics on ammolab.com they don't expand out of short barreled .38's What's a good choice?
.. is offline  
Old March 29, 2004, 12:53 AM   #2
Josey
member
 
 
Join Date: February 11, 2003
Location: Catfish Co, KY
Posts: 1,478
Remington Golden Saber
Josey is offline  
Old March 29, 2004, 01:40 AM   #3
tbeb
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 30, 2002
Location: Northwest Indiana
Posts: 838
My feeling has always been that just because a bullet doesn't expand when fired thru denim into gelatin doesn't mean it won't expand or deform in a human being.

Speer has a new +P load that uses a 135 gr. Gold Dot hollowpoint. It was designed for snub nose revolvers. Expansion and penetration is good in denim/gelatin test.

I personally use +P 158 gr. lead hollowpoints, but I would be perfectly okay with using a +p 125 gr. Gold Dot or Golden Saber.
tbeb is offline  
Old March 29, 2004, 01:45 AM   #4
Preacherman
Moderator Emeritus
 
 
Join Date: December 20, 2002
Location: Louisiana, USA
Posts: 13,323
There are two new rounds out that I highly recommend as being probably the best snubby ammo available right now. First, Speer has this new load (described on their Web site):
Quote:
38 Special +P Gold Dot® Ammunition

For 2004, Speer® introduces a new +P loading with a heavier bullet for better performance. The new load carries a newly-designed 135 grain Gold Dot hollow point built for 38 Special velocities. It features a broad, deep cavity and has true bonded-core construction, patented* two-step cavity formation that establishes expansion parameters for both core and jacket, which has made Gold Dot the fastest-growing handgun bullet for “missioncritical” work.

FEATURES & BENEFITS
• Velocity of 975 ft/sec from a 4" vented test barrel
— Insures sufficient velocity for optimum terminal performance, even in 2" barrels
• Uni-Cor® technology
— True bonded-core technology virtually eliminates core-jacket separations
• Special cavity design
— Give full expansion at 38 Special velocities
• Nickel-plated brass case
— Armored for real-world environmental conditions
• CCI® primers
— Non-corrosive and non-mercuric
— Sure-fire ignition under tough conditions

PART NO. DESCRIPTION
23921 38 Special +P 135 Gr. Gold Dot Hollow Point - 20 per box; 500 per case
Then, Buffalo Bore is developing a new 158gr. LSWCHP load giving a genuine 1,000 fps from a snubby - without excessive pressure! They also load the 125gr. Speer Gold Dot to higher velocities. Their Web site has this to say about them:
Quote:
Heavy .38 Special +P

Item No. 20A20 158 gr. L.S.W.C.H.P.--G.C. (1,000fps/M.E. 351 ft.lbs.) Per Box of 20 $19.99

Item No. 20B20 125 gr. L.V. Gold Dot (1,050fps/M.E. 306 ft.lbs.) Per Box of 20 $19.99

About Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special +P ammo

The new buffalo Bore Heavy 38 SPL+p ammo will maximize the effectiveness of your 38 SPL revolver. All velocities are taken from S&W J frame revolvers with 2 inch barrels. The powders are flash suppressed so as to not hinder your vision should you be required to drop the hammer in low light.

Item 20A/20 is the terrific SOFT lead semi wad cutter hollow cavity bullet, however we've added a gas check to stop the leading that this load typically causes with other manufacturers version of this bullet.

Item 20B/20 uses the low velocity (LV) Gold Dot bullet that is designed to expand at as little as 800 fps, so will get expansion out of very short barrels.

Whether you prefer the very soft semi wadcutter lead bullet, or a very soft JHC, (jacketed hollow cavity) these HVY 38 SPL+p loads will turbo charge your 38 SPL revolver.
I suspect the BB 158gr. load may be a bit much for an alloy/lightweight snubby, so I've ordered some of the 135gr. Speer loads (should be here next week) for those guns. I think the BB load will be the ne plus ultra for full-weight (i.e. steel-frame) snubs and conventional 4"-barrel .38's (perhaps even for those who want a lighter load for their .357 Magnum snubbies).
__________________
Proud THR plank-owner

Let's put the fun back in dysfunctional!

Please visit my blog: http://bayourenaissanceman.blogspot.com/
Preacherman is offline  
Old March 29, 2004, 02:43 AM   #5
Jim March
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 8,758
Preacherman is right. Two points of clarification:

* The Buffalo Bore load will be shipping sometime this summer.

* Being slick, heavy and loaded hot, those 158s may get yanked out of the cases in the ultralight snubbies in Aluminum, TI and Scandium. I don't think they're going to be a good idea for any gun under the 20/21oz weight range of a steel-frame S&W snubbie...and even then not without testing - I'd load five, fire four, check to see if that last one is starting to yank out of the shell. By the time you hit the 26oz weight range of the Ruger SP101, short-barrel S&W 66 or heavier, this should be a non-issue

Speer's documentation on the new 135 says that they've researched this "ultralight bullet puller effect" and made sure it's a non-issue. In a 10.5oz/12.5oz late-model S&W I'd still check with the "shoot four, measure the fifth" trick a couple times but they should be fine - Speer is a pretty competent bunch.
__________________
Jim March
TFL Alumnus
Equal Rights for CCW Home Page
http://www.equalccw.com
Airplane Pictures
Jim March is offline  
Old March 29, 2004, 08:25 AM   #6
MikeB
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 30, 2003
Location: Northeast PA
Posts: 383
Quote:
Being slick, heavy and loaded hot, those 158s may get yanked out of the cases in the ultralight snubbies in Aluminum, TI and Scandium.
Not to try and argue but, I keep reading this type of thing, and I don't believe it's true. My Scandium Smith says on the barrel "no less than 120 gr bullet" and the manual says that separation can happen with less than 120 gr bullet. The manual makes no statement at all about heavier bullets.

BTW I've been shooting .357 mag and .38spcl +p 158 grain bullets out of mine and have never had any separations occur.
MikeB is offline  
Old March 29, 2004, 08:31 AM   #7
wally
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 2, 2004
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 5,367
Yes, trust but verify.

.357 Winchester 145 gr Silvertips jumped out of their cases after only one or two shots locking up the gun. I ran the rest thru a Lee Factory Crimp die and gave them a heavy crimp. These shot fine.

158 gr Hydrashocks have been fine in my 11.5oz SC360 "scandium".

--wally.
wally is online now  
Old March 29, 2004, 10:36 AM   #8
..
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 25, 2003
Posts: 578
Thanks guys. I'm gonna order the new 135 gold dot.
.. is offline  
Old March 29, 2004, 10:40 AM   #9
Ultraman
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 2, 2003
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 165
This might help...
http://www.hipowersandhandguns.com/Feedingthe38Snub.htm
__________________
Procrastination;
Self induced stress.
Ultraman is offline  
Old March 29, 2004, 01:32 PM   #10
Jim March
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 8,758
Mike: this is one of those things where I *really* hope my concerns are groundless. The 12.5oz Scandium 357s are certainly *strong* enough to deal with the new BuffBore 158+Ps.

I would do the "load five, shoot four, measure the fifth" trick at least three times before carrying that load in any of the 15oz-or-under critters. Heck, I intend to do so in my 17oz mixed aluminum/steel construction Charter Arms Undercover if I score some (may stick with GD135s pending a look at some credible gelatin photos and test data).
__________________
Jim March
TFL Alumnus
Equal Rights for CCW Home Page
http://www.equalccw.com
Airplane Pictures
Jim March is offline  
Old March 29, 2004, 10:16 PM   #11
Grump
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 22, 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,259
Should you choose any load/handload using Hornady 125-gr XTPs (one of my favorites for accuracy and good design), make sure you actually get a velocity at or above 850 fps. It's designed for terminal velocities from 800 fps all the way up to .357 MAXIMUM levels, and has been tested in both water (hard medium) and paraffin (soft medium) before being turned loose on Jello(r). Fackler says straight water results in penetration something like 1.6 times the penetration in ballistic gelatin, but is much easier to test with as long as you aren't taking photos.
__________________
Putting it print just don't make it so.
Grump is offline  
Old March 29, 2004, 10:26 PM   #12
MikeB
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 30, 2003
Location: Northeast PA
Posts: 383
Jim, no offense either taken nor intended, I just noticed a lot of don't shoot "heavy" bullets advice; while my firearm, manual, and experience said don't shoot "lightweight" bullets. Although that isn't always accurate either as explained by wally.

Anyways I usually shoot "heavy" semi-jacketed .38spcl +p or .357mag hollow points out of my snubbies. I'm not positive these are ideal, but I'd sure hate to get hit by one.
MikeB is offline  
Old March 29, 2004, 10:42 PM   #13
..
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 25, 2003
Posts: 578
How about CorBon PowRball? They make a 100gr+P loading in .38
.. is offline  
Old March 30, 2004, 12:46 AM   #14
Jim March
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 8,758
I don't know what to make of the 100grain Pow'R'Ball. Seems a bit light but if it's going fast enough...

We need good test data .
__________________
Jim March
TFL Alumnus
Equal Rights for CCW Home Page
http://www.equalccw.com
Airplane Pictures
Jim March is offline  
Old March 30, 2004, 02:06 AM   #15
Ridge Counter
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 15, 2003
Location: Peoples Republic of California
Posts: 3
I'll second the Golden Saber High Performance Cartridges, 38 Special+P, 125 Grains, Brass Jacketed Hollow Point, 25 Rounds per Box, 20 Boxes per Case.

Personally, I prefer the .357 Magnum Golden Saber in 125 grains; just a little more oooomph!!

RichM
Ridge Counter is offline  
Old March 30, 2004, 02:19 AM   #16
Marshall
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 26, 2002
Location: Oklahoma, Green Country
Posts: 5,244
For what it's worth I'm shooting the following out of M60 .357 snub:


Speer .357 125gr Gold Dots

Win. .357 145gr Silvertips

Win. .38+P 130gr SXT's

Rem. .38+P 125gr Golden Sabers

and

UMC .38 130gr MC for blasting


The gun seems to like them all and is most accurate with the Gold Dots, not by much though. The M60 handles all these very well, glad the guns no lighter when shooting the .357's!
__________________
Marshall

"A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both."
Dwight Eisenhower

"We should not forget that the spark which ignited the American Revolution was caused by the British attempt to confiscate the firearms of the colonists."
Patrick Henry

The Best Snowblower & Lawnmower Forum
Marshall is offline  
Old May 10, 2006, 08:06 PM   #17
atlctyslkr
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 2, 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 409
Federal 129gr 38 Special +p has a good feel to it (to me). I've tried it in a 38 Special and 357 snub. Doesn't have as sharp of a bite as Corbon and I haven't heard of Federals jumping out of cases.
atlctyslkr is offline  
Old May 11, 2006, 12:16 AM   #18
Loyalist Dave
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 5, 2006
Location: People's Republic of Maryland
Posts: 695
Every thing that I have read, as well as conversations with medical examiners, indicates that if a handgun round aint going supersonic on impact (1100 fps or more) you can't depend on a mushrooming of a factory slug no matter what the slug design. (soft all-lead from a handload is a different story) You won't get speed like that from a snubby. You should also have at least a 125 grain projectile, and the heavier the better as you may have to go through some stuff before getting to the necessary areas of the target.
Loyalist Dave is offline  
Old May 11, 2006, 01:54 AM   #19
sm
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 23, 2002
Posts: 26,501
http://www.hipowersandhandguns.com/S...ctionLoads.htm
__________________
Use Enough Gun
TFL illuminaughty
sm is offline  
Old May 11, 2006, 03:33 AM   #20
Stephen A. Camp
Moderator Emeritus
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Posts: 2,312
Hello. If interested, here are some water expansion tests with some .38 Special rounds mentioned.

http://www.hipowersandhandguns.com/3...on%20Tests.htm

In the J-frame S&W, I've cast my lot with Remington's 158-gr. LSWCHP+P. For me it has expanded when shot into water, super-saturated newsprint, and results were very similar to what I've seen when they've been removed from animals when a snub was used to finish them off. When bone was hit, the bullets were less uniform and more "jagged", for lack of a better description. This was before I had a digital camera so I have no pictures of them.

I've not yet had (or taken) the time to try Speer's 135-gr. Snub Load, but folks testing it indicate that it works nicely. I will get around to shooting this load as I'm very curious/interested in it.


Here are three expanded bullets fired from an S&W Model 642 into water. From left to right: Corbon 110-gr. DPX, Remington 158-gr. LSWCHP +P, and Federal 125-gr. Nyclad hollow point standard pressure.


A firearms examiner sent me this picture. It is of a Remington 158-gr. LSWCHP+P fired into ballistic gelatin.

It is my understanding that few hollow points fired from the snub .38 will expand reliably after passing through 4-layers of denim, which is described as a "worst case scenario." The DPX does so, but I'm not sure on the newest Speer snub 135-gr. Gold Dot. It very well may.

For those considering the Remington load mentioned, I've had no problems with it in several Airweight S&W snubs (aluminum frame), but S&W warns against using non-jacketed bullets in their super light revolvers, so the Gold Dot or DPX would be the better choices there for sure. I have tried this out just to see and lead bullets do unseat themselves in the ultra lightweight snubs. For me, it repeatedly happened on the 4th or 5th shots of the cylinder.

I have not tried Hornady's XTP in .38 Special and while I like it quite a lot in other calibers, I have no information whatsover on it from a 38 snub.

My own informal "tests" have led me to believe that unless the revolver is being carried in the pocket or absolute total concealment is a primary consideration, the 3" bbl has much more to offer than might initially be expected with but a slightly longer barrel and over the chronograph, some loads show essentially equivalent performance to the 4" service barrels; not all but some. If the revolver is to be a "car gun", holstered belt gun, or used for home defense, I'd go with the 3" over the 1 7/8" snubs.

The .38 snub with Remington's LSWCHP+P is what my snubs are loaded with at present. This may very well not be the choice for other folks, but something that remains constant in my opinion is getting the vital hit(s) as quickly as possible. Whatever one's choice in ammo winds up being, I still believe that we have got to put it in the right place (or places) to make a felon stop because he has to rather than just wants to.

Best.
__________________
"Clueless Emeritus"

Please feel free to drop by Hi Powers and Handguns and http://hipowers-handguns.blogspot.com/

Wengert Knives: http://www.hipowersandhandguns.com/Wengert%20Knives.htm
Stephen A. Camp is offline  
Old May 11, 2006, 11:04 AM   #21
Byron
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 2, 2003
Location: TN
Posts: 722
This link is some informal tests I posted earlier. Byron

http://thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=197620
Byron is offline  
Old July 16, 2006, 10:32 PM   #22
jon_in_wv
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 8, 2006
Posts: 1,813
I fired some golden sabers from my 442 into water a few years ago. The bullets expanded well and I was pretty happy with the performance. I was carryin the gold dots but from what I've read about the powrball rounds they seem to penetrate pretty well for a light bullet and the claimed velocity means they are really moving out compared to most 38 loads. They also make reloads a lot easier too with the rounded profile. The jury is probably still out on this round but I'm thinking they will be pretty effective.
jon_in_wv is offline  
Old December 22, 2006, 11:48 PM   #23
jon_in_wv
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 8, 2006
Posts: 1,813
I forgot to mention, when I fired the Gold Dots on the range, one of the rounds 'Keyholed". It tumbled and hit the target sideways. That is why I chose the Powrball rounds over the Gold Dots.
__________________
To locate, close with, and destroy the enemy----God Bless the Marine Corps.

Experts say there is no GOD, man is the cause of global warming, personal ownership of firearms causes crime, and disciplining your kids is child abuse. Thank God I'm not an expert.
jon_in_wv is offline  
Old December 23, 2006, 04:33 AM   #24
ArchAngelCD
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 25, 2006
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,367
Marshall,
Why are you carrying the 125 gr Gold dot .357's when they make a 135 gr Short Barrel .357 round?
__________________
Remember boys and girls, gun control only prevents law abiding Americans from owning guns because the Bad Guys dont obey the laws, no matter how restrictive or lenient the laws are!
ArchAngelCD is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.