THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Autoloaders

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 24, 2004, 11:14 PM   #1
Mulliga
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 13, 2004
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 2,251
Anybody ever shot a Glock or SA XD underwater?

I've heard that these guns are capable of firing underwater, albeit with obviously limited range. Anyone ever do this? Could be useful when the SHTF (shark hits the fan).
__________________
Join the UF Pistol and Rifle Club!

"Much madness is divinest sense."
- Emily Dickinson
Mulliga is offline  
Old March 24, 2004, 11:22 PM   #2
tc300mag1
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 4, 2004
Location: Wayne, Mi
Posts: 1,913
never have and dont want to anygun will fire underwater 1911 hk even a revolver but ill pass as the concussion alone can do serious internal damage from what i have read
__________________
Your Results May Vary
An armed society is a polite society-Robert A. Heinlein
tc300mag1 is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 12:00 AM   #3
Quintin Likely
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 29, 2002
Location: Relay 3, Target 17
Posts: 898
I've never tried it, but from what I've read, I think it ranks in the "bad ideas" file. Something along the lines of blowing your gun up and/or seriously injuring yourself. There's a handful of parts you can install in a Glock 17 that'll make it underwater okay, but again, I've never seen or tried doing so myself.
__________________
You'd think that as many times as I've been up this creek, I would have remembered to bring a paddle.
Quintin Likely is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 12:27 AM   #4
Benjamin
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 26, 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 435
Quintin -- the parts you refer to are glock maritime spring cups. They're two little plastic bits about the size of a grain of rice. Paperwork included with them stated, IIRC, that they're to ensure the proper function of the firing pin underwater for successive shots.

The story goes that a stock glock 17 will fire underwater without damage, provided it is done properly. 'Properly' in this case means ensuring the barrel is completely full of water, using only FMJ ammo, and probably a few other things that escape my memory.

However, like everyone else, I have not attempted to fire any glock or any other firearm under water.
Benjamin is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 12:38 AM   #5
DJCharlie
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 2, 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 35
May I ask why would you need to shoot underwater away. Does SHTF underwater a lot to you or what?
DJCharlie is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 01:09 AM   #6
joab
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Ocoee, Fla
Posts: 4,862
The old ad for Randall 1911s had a guy wearing snorkleing gear firing one in a swimming pool. I've never tried it with mine, just can't think of a good reason to.
__________________
I have made my opinons crystal clear for anybody that want's to read them.
If you would like to discuss what I have actually written or try to change my views, I welcome the conversation
joab is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 01:21 AM   #7
Andrew Wyatt
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 25, 2002
Location: Bakersfield, California
Posts: 3,546
1911s go bang repeatedly underwater with no ill effects.

don't ask me how i know.
__________________
He heard a bang, well not really a bang but more of a crash with metallic overtones of platinum-encrusted steel alloys, hammering against unyielding iron and iridium plates; or maybe it was the clash of huge nickel-zinc rods hitting molybdenum fused sheets of tantalum, then he felt a stab of pain and heard another bang, and wished, instead of using his extensive metallurgy skills to try and analyze the sound, he would have run like hell when he first saw the gun pointed at him.
Andrew Wyatt is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 03:23 AM   #8
arinvolvo
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 5, 2003
Location: VIVA!!
Posts: 1,524
An underwater 9mm will not travel far, or do much damage...

Try firing one into a 5 gallon water jug...it wont go far.
__________________
_______________
"To squander or compromise this most basic of rights is to render life forfeit; to have it held hostage to the whims of others." -gburner, THR member
arinvolvo is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 05:40 AM   #9
zpo
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 9, 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 203
The reason to fire a gun underwater is the same one that "bump sticks" were invented. Shark protection.
__________________
Any person who has to ask the definition of the word "subtle" might just bring along a hatchet and take a few swings.
-stolen from Cordex
zpo is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 05:47 AM   #10
arinvolvo
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 5, 2003
Location: VIVA!!
Posts: 1,524
if you need a bang stick, get a bang stick...i did..

Have only used it against a sheepshead fish...and it was plenty effective...mine takes a 223 though.
The expanding gasses puff it up like a baloon..and it more or less explodes.
__________________
_______________
"To squander or compromise this most basic of rights is to render life forfeit; to have it held hostage to the whims of others." -gburner, THR member
arinvolvo is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 09:05 AM   #11
TBeck
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 22, 2004
Posts: 223
Are bangsticks considered firearams by ATF? I don't think I've ever seen one for sale.
__________________
"What a desolate place THIS is. Artoo...do you hear banjos?"
TBeck is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 12:35 PM   #12
Benjamin
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 26, 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 435
Bangsticks are not firearms.

This info came from a NAUI cert. SCUBA instructor with 28 years under his belt, who is also a FFL and active shooter.

Bang sticks work about as well with just blanks, from what he says. It's the gas, not the lead, that does the real work.
Benjamin is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 03:41 PM   #13
arinvolvo
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 5, 2003
Location: VIVA!!
Posts: 1,524
I can believe the blank thing...When i "tested" mine...it seemed like the little bullet hole was the least of its worries....the fact that it damn near split in half from the gasses was more important.
__________________
_______________
"To squander or compromise this most basic of rights is to render life forfeit; to have it held hostage to the whims of others." -gburner, THR member
arinvolvo is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 04:12 PM   #14
WonderNine
member
 
 
Join Date: December 27, 2002
Location: always offline!
Posts: 4,335
Hey I'd rather use a Glock on a shark than let a shark get close enough to use a bangstick. It's probably already too late then. I'll bet a 9mm FMJ has a little bit of energy at close range underwater. Probably at least enough to scare something off.

Something like an FN Five-Seven might even be the best idea as the water shouldn't have as much drag on it as other rounds.
WonderNine is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 04:26 PM   #15
zpo
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 9, 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 203
As far as I know, any gun will work underwater if it has fmj rounds and is completely submerged. I don't know if any have a useful range on them, or if it is multiple shot, contact only. Some sticks I've seen were 3-4 foot, so that could be an advantage if its contact only, (seems the case, with the gas comments).
__________________
Any person who has to ask the definition of the word "subtle" might just bring along a hatchet and take a few swings.
-stolen from Cordex
zpo is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 05:13 PM   #16
arinvolvo
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 5, 2003
Location: VIVA!!
Posts: 1,524
a bang stick should be on the end of a pole spear...and i have a few pole spears that are 10 feet or more in length...i think that is farther than a 9mm would be effective for.
__________________
_______________
"To squander or compromise this most basic of rights is to render life forfeit; to have it held hostage to the whims of others." -gburner, THR member
arinvolvo is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 05:44 PM   #17
No4Mk1*
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 25, 2002
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 317
A 40 mm colum of water with a diameter of 9mm has a volume of 2.547mL. Thus it's mass is 2.547 grams, and it would have a weight of 39.4 grains.
So if you put that in front of a 124 grain bullet you now have an effective weight of 163 grains in front of the same powder charge. Might be overpressure. The effective range would probably be about one foot.
No4Mk1* is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 06:03 PM   #18
WonderNine
member
 
 
Join Date: December 27, 2002
Location: always offline!
Posts: 4,335
Quote:
163 grains in front of the same powder charge. Might be overpressure. The effective range would probably be about one foot.
Argh, so every 40mm's or so of distance would do that..... yea doesn't sound like the range would be very far than. I guess you're probably best off using underwater harpoons or bangsticks.
WonderNine is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 08:12 PM   #19
Gordon
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 26, 2002
Location: central Kali.
Posts: 4,787
I have shot 1911's with ball in a pool! My head was just out of the water and from 15 feet it dented 3/4 plywood deeply. Blew a hole thru it at 4 feet!. This was in the late 70's when I hung with wild drinking LEO's and was a crazy stunt. Another guy fired a .357 4" model 66 submerged about 3 feet under and it blew water out of the surface and we stopped the experiment. Yes pressure does seem to have an exaggerated effect under water. Bullet mass counts. BTW handgun rounds fired into the water from steep angles would hurt pretty bad up to 6 feet or so.
Gordon is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 09:09 PM   #20
spacemanspiff
Senior Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: alaska
Posts: 4,071
how loud was the 1911 when shot underwater? with your head out of water, did you need/use hearing protection?

i should probably get a lanyard before trying any of my own experments out in the open water, huh?
__________________
Wearing a Yellow Armband in defiance of Tactical Jesus Land
2005 Mystery of the Year
I'm so Tactical I'm banned in California.
Cadet Spiff of the Bigot Police
spacemanspiff is offline  
Old March 25, 2004, 11:44 PM   #21
PO2Hammer
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 30, 2003
Posts: 1,348
How about in outer space?
PO2Hammer is offline  
Old March 26, 2004, 01:03 AM   #22
Kobun
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: On top of a big pile of ammo
Posts: 672
Quote:
Does SHTF underwater a lot to you or what?
A more correct trem would be SHTP.

S.hit Hit The Propeller.

Although, a rope in the propeller would be a bigger problem.
__________________
The only "Fair Fight" is the one you lose.
Kobun is offline  
Old March 26, 2004, 04:55 AM   #23
Clean97GTI
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 29, 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,189
Wasn't that loud with your head out of water. Don't stick your head under unless you've got hearing protection though. The water amplifies the sound quite a bit. I'll try and find pictures of what happened to a a guy (and his gun) when he fired a JHP round out of his Glock under water. Not pretty, came away with a handful of shredded plastic and some nasty cuts.
__________________
Americans sure do love their freedoms...too bad we have to go to other countries to experience them.
Click here to see who's got your freedoms.
goodbye Libertarian Party. I don't need you pushing a neo-con for president.
Clean97GTI is offline  
Old March 26, 2004, 03:54 PM   #24
zpo
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 9, 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 203
Needless technical correction: Water doesn't amplify sound, it transmits it 4 times more efficiently.(sp?)
__________________
Any person who has to ask the definition of the word "subtle" might just bring along a hatchet and take a few swings.
-stolen from Cordex
zpo is offline  
Old March 26, 2004, 04:23 PM   #25
Red_SC
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 18, 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 535
Quote:
How about in outer space?
I'd think a gun would function normally. Gunpowder contains it's own oxygen, so that wouldn't be a problem. But, air resistance wouldn't slow your bullet down! Just gravity from distant planets, etc. You'd have to depressurize your ammo, though, to keep the air from pushing the bullet out of the case when you get into space.


When ya gonna try it?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoblink
So let me make sure I've got this correct:

What's mine is hers, and what's hers is hers, except the things she doen't want, in which case, they are mine, but she can, at anytime, claim that they are hers again.
Red_SC is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.