![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: June 20, 2003
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 925
|
SAKO rifle kaboom
http://www3.telus.net/drswebspace/SAKO%20BLOW%20UP/
This one was originally over on the FAL forums. Evidently nobody was injured. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: March 22, 2004
Location: Salt Lake Valley
Posts: 821
|
holy crapola!
__________________
"The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it." -John Hay, 1872 Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 28, 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,717
|
Thats going to cause a nasty "flinch"....
__________________
10mm and 357SIG, the best thing to come along since the 38 super! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 30, 2003
Posts: 514
|
I'm starting to develop a flinch just looking at the pictures. Can you direct me to the thread that tells about it?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: July 21, 2004
Location: Minden , Nebraska
Posts: 696
|
are we to be lead to believe that do to the prominent display of the Federal ammo box that this was a factory load? or is this by a moron that tried to get an extra 100 fps out of his superduper reloads because after all we all know that reloading manuals are just a guide because they are always on the low side?
I guess in either instance I find it hard to believe nobody got hurt. I would that there should be at least one going to church from now on as he is one very lucky individual |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
member
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 5,299
|
Someone didnt follow the abcs of reloading!
WildandiveseenworseAlaska |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 31, 2002
Posts: 9,151
|
That incident was posted elsewhere and my analysis (FWIW) was that extreme pressure was not involved. The normal signs of high pressure (melted case head, blown receiver with intact barrel, brass melted into the bolt face) are not present. The case, though split, is virtually intact.
IMO, a barrel flaw caused the barrel to split, effectively "prying" the receiver ring apart and wrecking the rest of the receiver. The receiver appears to be cast, and there is a clear difference between the receiver breaks and the torn appearance of the forged barrel. One poster indicated that the barrel was fluted, and it seems possible that one (or more) of those flutes went too deep and seriously weakened the barrel. It is also possible that an off-center bore (more common than you might think) contributed, or that there was a flaw in the barrel metal. Anyway, a real train wreck. Jim |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: September 23, 2003
Location: Worcester PA
Posts: 197
|
My initial take is that the bore was obstructed. I don't think you could get enough powder in the case to cause a problem of this magnitude otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: January 21, 2004
Location: Plain Ol', Texas
Posts: 12,069
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 1, 2003
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 7,997
|
I'm in the "something was wrong with the rifle" camp. I can't imagine the brass looking that perfectly split if there had been excessive pressure.
You'd have liquid brass flowing all over the place and welded to the chamber walls. The brass just looks like someone cut it neatly into 3 petals and folded them out carefully so as to not detach them from the cartridge head... http://www3.telus.net/drswebspace/SA...P/SANY0022.jpg
__________________
Did you know there is a TEXAS State Rifle Association?
Check out Black Bear Flashlights. Gun Shows This Weekend. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 5, 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 1,160
|
Sports fans, I think this is an honest to god detonation of a less than full case of slow burning powder.
High pressure has been noted in the lab with belted magnum cases(like this one), when they are loaded with a too-light charge of slow burning powder. Look at the "river lines" of the split barrel - the burst occured just ahead of the chamber. The bullet had started moving when things let go. All the fracture surfaces appear to suffer ductile fractures, which implies the metal is not brittle. Remember that all moderns firearms are proof tested before they leave a factory. If the metal was truly grossly defective, I doubt it would have passed proof test. I think this is an ammunition problem.
__________________
"...the wine was bad, but not dull. It took the enamel off your teeth and left it on the roof of your mouth..." - Ernest Hemmingway, A Farewell to Arms |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Posts: 5,988
|
I'd agree, but ammo doesn't have to be the culprit.
Quote:
M1A kaboom analysis Note how similar the pictures are of the split barrels and cartridge brass. I'm thinking along Jim Keenan's lines, namely, too deep a barrel fluting job, in conjunction with an off-center bore. Add a few stress cracks between bore and barrel flute... |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 5, 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 1,160
|
Interesting article
He is right on the money noting large grain size as a potential source of fractures...on this Sako, though, the pictures look like the fracture surfaces exhibit fine grains, and I don't see anything that looks like a pre-existing crack. It's obviously hard to examine without the metal in hand, but I am still suspecting a wierd ammo pressure problem.
__________________
"...the wine was bad, but not dull. It took the enamel off your teeth and left it on the roof of your mouth..." - Ernest Hemmingway, A Farewell to Arms |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: February 13, 2004
Location: HEL; East of Sweden
Posts: 28
|
Why the case looks like it was cut with a jigsaw?
Why they don’t show us the primer of that splintered case? The overpressure marks should be clear and visible. Why the bolt looks intact? (No picture of the bolt head) By the laws of physics the bolt should have flown through shooters head. Why the mag is intact? How all splintered parts are so straight and symmetrical, not twisted? Where’s the billion-dollar lawsuit against Beretta? |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: July 21, 2004
Location: Minden , Nebraska
Posts: 696
|
I'm sure the lawsuit with Beretta and Federal will happen. they will give him a new rifle and scope. Federal will give him a case of ammo and everybody will be happy
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: November 14, 2003
Posts: 3,093
|
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthrea...hreadid=103191
Quote:
__________________
"Enjoy every sandwich" |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 3, 2003
Location: SW USA
Posts: 1,360
|
I've never seen a Sako with a "fluted" barrel. Guess the dealers just haven't had any when I was in. Haven't seen any in articles yet, either.
I HAVE seen Steyr barrels finished in a "swirl"" pattern. Is that what we're talking about? Never heard of one giving way, though. The three even pieces of the split barrel suggest to me that this is a problem of the barrel separating along stress/join lines. I've never seen a "blow-up" photo of a rifle that had the barrel separate so far back from the muzzle, and in even pieces. But I'm no expert on this stuff... This will be one case to follow, if it stays in the news! Thanks for posting. Lone Star |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Posts: 5,988
|
Lone Star, take a look.
From the photos provided in the link, it's most definitely a fluted barrel, not a "swirl pattern" Steyr (ie. hammer-forging marks)
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 5, 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 1,160
|
darn I wish some body had taken one more photo, like that one above, just with the pieces flipped over so you can see the fracture surfaces. I think that is where the failure started, and it would be interesting to see if there is a visible defect in the metal.
I was looking at a Remington VSSF .223 today, which looked pretty nice until I looked down the outside of the barrel, and noticed the flutes were visibly crooked. I doubt if that one shot well when it got hot.
__________________
"...the wine was bad, but not dull. It took the enamel off your teeth and left it on the roof of your mouth..." - Ernest Hemmingway, A Farewell to Arms |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Posts: 5,988
|
There's all sorts of pictures on that site.
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 31, 2002
Posts: 9,151
|
Hi, Tex_N_Cal and guys,
That business about "detonation" is a favorite theory every time a rifle blows, but detonation would destroy the case and wreck the receiver ring, not the barrel. I have seen a Winchester 70 blown with a triplex load (something that was a favorite topic in the gunzines at the time) using a hefty charge of Unique(!) and a couple of other powders. The case melted, the receiver ring let go, there was molten brass all over the front of the bolt, but the barrel landed on the ground intact. In fact, the barrel was reamed to remove the remains of the case, and installed on another rifle, where, AFAIK, it is to this day. (The shooter was seriously injured, but recovered.) The case split is normal in this situation. The barrel splits, and the strips act like levers to pry apart the receiver ring. The case is still under pressure and it splits also, as the chamber wall support is removed. The case head here appears to be intact, with no signs of bursting or melting, so I would rule out any "detonation" or excess pressure as a cause of the blowup. Jim |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 5, 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 1,160
|
well, you may be right - however the .300 win mag has been specifically noted in a couple of studies to give unusually high pressures with reduced charges of slow burning powder.
I once had a couple boxes of factory .25-06 that chrono'd 300 fps below spec. I didn't pull the charges, but I suspect it was undercharged. An undercharged .300 might have been at fault here. Gewehr I saw that one, but it doesn't quite have enough detail just ahead of the chamber.
__________________
"...the wine was bad, but not dull. It took the enamel off your teeth and left it on the roof of your mouth..." - Ernest Hemmingway, A Farewell to Arms |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 5, 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 1,160
|
Here's a cropped view of that photo - based on the "river lines" I've highlighted, the burst started just ahead of the chamber:
It would be really interesting also to pull down the rest of the rounds in that box, and see if they had normal powder charges.
__________________
"...the wine was bad, but not dull. It took the enamel off your teeth and left it on the roof of your mouth..." - Ernest Hemmingway, A Farewell to Arms |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 31, 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 3,582
|
My metallurgists eyes tend to agree with tex-n-cal.Wish I could see it up close !
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Senior Member Emeritus
Join Date: July 29, 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 978
|
Subject
--------------------------------------------------------------- Recall? Discussion Thread --------------------------------------------------------------- Response (Beretta Customer Support Team / JM) - 10/29/2004 02:01 PM David, There is a recall on a very small number of the stainless steel Tikka and Sako rifles. To find out if your serial number is affected, you may contact 1-800-503-8869 and provide them with your serial number and they would be able to let you know if your serial number is affected. Best Regards, Beretta Customer Support Auto-Response - 10/25/2004 11:18 PM
__________________
Quote:
http://www.derbyfals.com/home.htm |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|