Quantcast
Interesting facts on African hunting, just what PETA doesn't want you to hear! - Page 5 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Shooting Activities and Venues > Hunting

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 14, 2008, 08:15 PM   #101
Colt46
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 29, 2003
Posts: 861
Banning hunting only makes game worth nothing

An animal worth nothing is worth, well, worth nothing. No incentive to keep it around.
Colt46 is offline  
Old November 10, 2008, 06:32 PM   #102
LionHunter
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 10, 2008
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 16
I am new to this forum but not new to hunting, Elephants and other animals, and am certainly not new to hunting Africa in particular, having done safari more than a dozen times, covering many of the sub-Saharan countries. I count many contemporary African hunters, writers and film makers among my friends and acquaintances.

Unless one has seen firsthand the damage a herd of Elephant can do to an ecosystem, it is hard to understand the problem. I have driven for the better part of an hour through a Mopani forrest where every tree within sight on both sides of the road had been broken. This was not done for food but rather just a quirk of Elephant behavior. Any other animals in that forrest who required the Mopani for survival was now endangered.

There is no simple answer to the Elephant question, but to date, sport hunting has proven to provide funding and motivation to both government and local inhabitants showing that the Elephant has a value to them on the land rather than in the stew pot. This is the first step in eliminating poaching.

I have arrested poachers and burned their camps and removed their inhumane traps while on safari. I have culled animals gravely injured by such traps who would have only gotten sicker and suffered additional torment before starving to death or succumbing to their wounds. I have done so while accompanied by a government game scout, whose salary and per diem is paid for by me through the costs of the safari. These game scouts and rangers wouldn't be there if not for the sport hunters, they would not have a job nor would they be able to support their extended families.

There are many problems in Africa and no simple solutions. I look forward to writing more about my favorite place in the future.
LionHunter is offline  
Old November 10, 2008, 08:37 PM   #103
langenc
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 23, 2006
Location: Montmorency Co, MI
Posts: 921
I recall seeing pics of a pile of ivory as big as a house that was burned. Country?? Reason-to reduce the demand for ivory and thus poaching. The local 'elephant cops' had airplanes for patrol, but no gas for them. Ivory could have be auctioned and lots of gas purchased. The elephants that supplied the ivory were already dead. STUPID.
langenc is offline  
Old November 17, 2008, 08:56 PM   #104
LionHunter
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 10, 2008
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 16
The video you saw was old. Sales of confiscated Ivory was first authorized by CITES at the meeting of the parties in late 2002. Botswana (20 metric tons), Namibia (10 metric tons) and the Republic of South Africa were authorized to make the sales. Zambia and Zimbabwe requests to sell their Ivory was denied at that time.

There were literally tons of Ivory in storage. The dynamics of life in Africa includes the fact that secure indoor storage was not available for the quantities gathered over the preceding 13 year international ban on sales of Ivory. Some was simply legally stock piled and left outdoors where it deteriorated and was ruined.

A sale was just completed last month (Oct '08) in Namibia where 7.2 tons were sold for $1.3M to two Japanese and two Chinese buyers.

44 Tons were to be sold in Botswana later that month while 51 tons in RSA and 4 tons in Zimbabwe are scheduled for sale this month (November '08). Buyers are usually carver conglomerates who will sell/distribute the Ivory to their traditional carving artists.

Money gained from the sales is designated for Elephant protection.

The bunny-huggers are not pleased.
LionHunter is offline  
Old November 17, 2008, 09:09 PM   #105
Loomis
member
 
 
Join Date: August 10, 2008
Posts: 938
THey should legalize hunting of elephants. THe elephant tags should be auctioned to the highest bidder. PRocedes from the sale should be used to provide elephant proof homes and fences to the villagers. also, the owner of the elephant tag should only be allowed a small amount of the meat and the head or some other trophy. THe meat should be processed and provided to the villagers that have to live amongst the wild elephants running amok. After all, that elephant's flesh was built by eating the vegetation that would have otherwise been eaten by livestock owned by the villagers.

Fair is fair.
Loomis is offline  
Old November 17, 2008, 09:13 PM   #106
LionHunter
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 10, 2008
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 16
Animals in Africa have only one of two possible values to the native people.

1. In the cooking pot
2. As a resource that provides employment and financial renumeration

If you demonstrate that sport hunting (#2) will provide MORE value than the poaching (#1) does, then you will succeed.

#2 includes the building of schools, establishment of clean water points, medical attention, clothing, food, etc.

#2 always wins the hearts and minds.
LionHunter is offline  
Old November 17, 2008, 09:27 PM   #107
LionHunter
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 10, 2008
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 16
Elephant hunting is legal in five sub-Saharan African countries. Ivory may be taken, exported and Imported from these countries. Elephant safaris are generally a minimum of 21 days at a daily rate of $500 and up. Elephant license and trophy fees run over $10,000 and up each. Funds from the outfitters and the license and trophy fees are returned to the local community through the employment of local populace in the hunting camps and as trackers, skinners, anti-poaching teams and Game Scouts/Rangers. All meat, other than a small amount the hunters eat, is donated to local populace.

Most villagers do not live in close proximity to Elephants but can and do have occasional negative experiences with them. Nothing worse than a pissed Elephant who needs sorting out - I've done it and also been confronted by some rather cheeky Ele at different times when I was able to manage to avoid a shooting situation. Most Ele dine on natural crops rather than domestic.

I think you need to do some serious research before you express opinions based upon what you see on the Animal Planet channel.

Cheers.
LionHunter is offline  
Old November 17, 2008, 09:40 PM   #108
LionHunter
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 10, 2008
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 16
I've been to many African countries on many occasions yet I have never seen any program supported by PETA or by HSUS that provides a dime of support for the animals on that continent. I have seen programs and services supported solely or in a majority part by hunting-conservation organizations.

Wonder why that is?

BTW, the ALF (Animal Liberation Front), which some suspect is the enforcement arm of PETA and which PETA refuses to condemn, is listed by the FBI as a domestic terrorist organization.

Last edited by LionHunter; November 17, 2008 at 09:58 PM.
LionHunter is offline  
Old November 18, 2008, 12:41 AM   #109
H&Hhunter
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: January 28, 2003
Location: Colorado USA
Posts: 6,633
Lionhunter,

Welcome to THR you sir are obviously in the know. I appreciate your level of understanding and obvious experience in the field of big game hunting. Please keep posting.
__________________
Bell who?? He did what with a .275 Rigby?;)

“The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the most daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth.” - H.L. Mencken
H&Hhunter is offline  
Old November 18, 2008, 04:45 AM   #110
LionHunter
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 10, 2008
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 16
Thanks, H&Hhunter, I've enjoyed reading your posts about my favorite place in the whole wide world as well.


Last edited by ArfinGreebly; November 20, 2008 at 03:09 AM. Reason: noise removal
LionHunter is offline  
Old November 20, 2008, 03:13 AM   #111
ArfinGreebly
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: October 10, 2006
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 11,521
Noise Reduction

If you've had a post (or posts) disappear, I've removed some noise and chaff from the thread.

I'm re-opening it for on-topic discussion.

Please carry on.

__________________

Daughter: "Dad, how do I know who's a real friend?"
Me: "A friend is someone who cares how your life turns out."


"Truth is a dangerous thing: once found, you must never turn your back on it." -- gh@c2

"Look at it this way. If America frightens you, feel free to live somewhere else. There are plenty of other countries that don't suffer from excessive liberty. America is where the Liberty is. Liberty is not certified safe." -- gh@c2
ArfinGreebly is online now  
Old November 22, 2008, 08:04 PM   #112
moosehunt
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 10, 2008
Posts: 893
It's really just a matter of money (and government). The Kenyen Gov't recieves more money from the animal rights people than it recieves from hunters (basically zero when there is no hunting), so it applies the wishes of animal rightists because that means more money in their pockets. It is not a matter of what's good for the animals or what's good for the country (or it's people); it's what's good for the corrupt gov't "officials". The potential for hunting again in Kenya (and Uganda) is dependent on the efforts of a few, i.e. 1 or 2, outfitter/PH's that are attempting to get in bed with the gov't people. This may sound bad, regarding these outfitters, but it is the only hope. They are simply trying to do business the way it's done there. Uganda is beginning to crack a bit, but because of the cost of "doing business", the limited hunting being opened in Uganda is quite expensive, much more so than for similar animals in other African countries. Sadly, I don't think the future is good, but it is a start and just might work in the long run. The situation in Kenya is likely to follow suite. Of course there is the question of whether or not there are enough animals of quality left to warrent hunting in these countries. It very well may simply be too late.
moosehunt is offline  
Old December 3, 2008, 08:08 PM   #113
DeerSlayer300WM
member
 
 
Join Date: December 3, 2008
Location: CSA!!!
Posts: 12
Quote:
Yep,

It is pretty obvious if you have even the smallest spark in your brain.
Thank you H&Hhunter.
DeerSlayer300WM is offline  
Old December 3, 2008, 08:11 PM   #114
DeerSlayer300WM
member
 
 
Join Date: December 3, 2008
Location: CSA!!!
Posts: 12
H&H, you made my day. thanks for the good post.
DeerSlayer300WM is offline  
Old December 13, 2008, 12:57 PM   #115
moha0154
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 7, 2008
Posts: 4
This post has nothing to do with elephants, I know, but one reason for the overpopulation of deer, particularly in the Eastern US, is the lack of the deer's natural predators. The wolf and mountain lion were labeled 'varmints' and wiped out by hunters or government agents or whatever.
moha0154 is offline  
Old January 25, 2009, 09:42 AM   #116
Readyrod
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 15, 2009
Location: Japan planning the move back to Canada
Posts: 658
I know they aren't elephants but when I was a kid growing up in Quebec we use to go to this snow goose conservation area to see the snow geese every fall. It was a sight that was truly wonderful to see. Seems that many years before some hunting clubs worked very hard to save the place and the geese.
When I went to Zimbabwe I heard the same story about the elephants.
What people don't understand is that hunters (and sport fishers) are far more interested and involved in conservation than almost anyone else.
Readyrod is offline  
Old January 25, 2009, 11:12 AM   #117
Art Eatman
Administrator
  
 
Join Date: December 22, 2002
Location: Terlingua, Texas
Posts: 39,123
A birder can be thrilled by the sight of one of a few remaining members of an endangered species. The California condor, for instance. But a hunter cannot hunt unless there is a surplus of the species of game animal that is the intended target.

Hunters have the strongest vested interest of all outdoorsmen in habitat preservation and species protection.
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is offline  
Old August 1, 2009, 11:30 AM   #118
blackops
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 6, 2009
Posts: 1,218
My quote says it all
__________________
You don't have to be a great shot to be good hunter, but typically good hunters are great shots.
blackops is offline  
Old December 8, 2009, 03:31 PM   #119
antony35
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 2, 2009
Location: ohio
Posts: 32
perfect quote , and that is true
antony35 is offline  
Old January 1, 2010, 10:04 AM   #120
Howaido
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 6, 2006
Posts: 139
Quote:
Lions will eat your baby if given the chance
Don't hate on the lion for being a lion. It is the nature of the lion. The large predators will be gone world-wide soon enough. They are really just about there.

We have done the job on them here in the US, where there is no true "wild" left. Sure there are a few places where you might get confronted by a bear or mountain lion, but there are no wild places anymore.

If it weren't for TR and some other visionaries, these small pockets would be gone as well.
__________________
I got the last good 870 Express and you can't have it.
Howaido is offline  
Old January 1, 2010, 03:59 PM   #121
RockinU
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 9, 2009
Location: Brazos County Texas
Posts: 103
Quote:
Quote:
Lions will eat your baby if given the chance
Don't hate on the lion for being a lion. It is the nature of the lion. The large predators will be gone world-wide soon enough. They are really just about there.

We have done the job on them here in the US, where there is no true "wild" left. Sure there are a few places where you might get confronted by a bear or mountain lion, but there are no wild places anymore.

If it weren't for TR and some other visionaries, these small pockets would be gone as well.
__________________
There are more than you apparently think, you just have to work to get there, and I for one hope it stays that way. I don't live or travel much in areas where there are bear, but I do know (contrary to your above statements) that black bear populations are doing very well...they are even issuing tags for them in Oklahoma now. Mountain Lions...there are a whole lot more of them out there than most folks in the city are aware...may be hard to see, but they are no where near in danger of "disappearing". I think we may be a good bit farther from "there" than you seem to think we are.
__________________
Faster horses, younger women, older whiskey, and more money
RockinU is offline  
Old January 1, 2010, 05:15 PM   #122
Howaido
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 6, 2006
Posts: 139
True. Although, I don't consider a bunch of bears walking around in the burbs or a small town to be the wild, as I am sure you don't either.

Sure, it can get "wild" if one smells food and is coming through your door, but that isn't the wild. Same with a mountain lion attacking a jogger. Those are just some large predators that are fresh out of habitat and will be killed off for it.

Hunting is one way to control populations, sure. But, these large predators really have only a very few places to be. Very controlled, very small populations on very small plots of land. National parks and forests, crammed with people trying to escape the cities for a glimpse of something natural, are basically fenceless zoos.

Some mountainous regions, the SE swamps, some desert land. Parts of AK I guess are the last true wild. Some of Canada.

Shame but IMO we just have too many two-legged animals here in the U.S. to have much "wild" left if any at all. Population growing every day too.

All the world is moving in this direction to the point that most any big game hunting is dangerously close to being canned if not flat-out canned. "Go to Africa, hunt elephants!" About like shooting a cow from a convertible I heard from a guy who has killed just about everything that walked or crawled at one time or another, including elephant, polar bear, etc.

Most deer are taken in or around cornfields or whatever now. IMO, true hunting is just about gone. One can work around the realities and make the most out of it, as I did for some time.

As far as Africa goes, lions used to number in the hundreds of thousands. They can keep some on game preserves and let them breed to be killed by somebody who wants to shoot one, but fact is it is over for the lion as we think of lions. Think of the Grizzly bear here. Same deal for the lion in the present / near future.
__________________
I got the last good 870 Express and you can't have it.
Howaido is offline  
Old January 1, 2010, 08:21 PM   #123
RockinU
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 9, 2009
Location: Brazos County Texas
Posts: 103
Mountain Lions attacking joggers...I know of two fairly recent incidents...both involved over-populated (by the cats) areas in locals where hunting them is forbidden. Not enough food in over-populated areas causes wild animals to come into populace areas, sometimes with violent results. I'm not sure where you are from, or live, but here in Texas we have counties that are as big as some of the smaller states, and have residencies measured in hundreds of people. If you think "most" U.S. big game hunting is getting close to being canned, I suggest you have a DIY hunt in some of our Western states. I guess I don't understand your definition of wild, but based on my experiences I don' think you have traveled much, or looked very hard, because it's still there for those who crave it.
__________________
Faster horses, younger women, older whiskey, and more money
RockinU is offline  
Old February 1, 2010, 04:19 PM   #124
kiwihunta
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 16, 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 85
Most of these 3rd world govts in countries where this wild life exists are more interested in buying ak47s and military hardware to prop up there tin pot corrupt regimes than putting a cent into wildlife conservation programmes,corruption in many if not most african countries is rife and sadly rules and regulates the money go round.
kiwihunta is offline  
Old February 3, 2010, 11:28 AM   #125
Quilbilly
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 25, 2007
Location: Quilcene, WA
Posts: 162
I would think you would get them out of Botswana the same way you would get them out of Safeway. All you have to do is take the F out of "safe" and the F out of "way"....
__________________


"Gun control is like fighting drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to buy cars."
Quilbilly is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.