|
|||||||
| Welcome to THR |
| You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 13, 2011
Posts: 124
|
Which is better,Lee Loadmaster or 1000?
__________________
Wales says,"Dying ain't much of a living boy." |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 20, 2006
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 693
|
Loadmaster better
The Loadmaster allows you to separate seating the bullet from crimping.
The priming systems don't work all that well for me, so I size and prime before I put the case on the machine. There is a Loadmaster video site and forum, which is very helpful. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 10, 2010
Posts: 7,395
|
The Pro 1000 is primarily a pistol progressive press as it will only do short rifle cartridges like .223/7.62x39
Also, Pro 1000 is a 3 station press vs the 5 station Load Master. So if you want to seat the bullet and crimp in separate steps on the Pro 1000, you'll need to resize/prime the cases first and then finish loading the cases progressively. As to being mechanically inclined to get them to work right, like with any other progressive press, they require the user to be familiar with the press operations in order to maintain reliable function. The Pro 1000 has frustrated many reloaders (including me) with its gravity based primer feed attachment but it was mostly due to my lack of understanding of how the attachment operated and my lack of patience to troubleshoot the cause to resolve the problem. The Pro 1000 is not for everyone but if you are willing to learn and troubleshoot with patience, it can work for you. If you decide to go with the Pro 1000, THR has a support thread where solutions to most common Pro 1000 problems are posted. Here's one that addresses the primer feed problem - http://www.thehighroad.org/showthrea...44#post7877744 |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 26, 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 678
|
As much as I like Lee (Classic Turret Press) and a whole lot of dies, I would not be inclined to get one of their Progressives. As you mentioned, read the reviews and they seem to be a lot of frustration.
I do not have a progressive primarily because I do not need the volume. I do load a lot of calibers so the Classic turret lets me do that easily and not cost a fortune. If I had the need and the space for a progressive I would look hard at the Hornady even over the Dillon. JMO. If you need volume, than yes, a progressive is the way to go but not if you have to stop and fiddle with it all the time.
__________________
Reelin in the Years |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 1, 2009
Location: Alamogordo, NM
Posts: 242
|
I have to agree with Rule 3. I have too much respect for Lee's Classic line and their dies, but I'm not sure about their progressives. A month or so ago, there was a similar discussion, and several guys weighed in and lauded the Lee progressives. I've used Dillons (but never owned one). Their cost is prohibitive for some, but if I were shooting in IPSC or other pistol competitions, I'd go for the Dillon (or maybe Hornady - I just no experience with them).
If you're not shooting thousands of rounds a week, and can tinker and understand ok, the Lee progressives do come with some good reviews in opposition to the frustrated ones. Mostly, it's guys not wanting to spend enough time adjusting them until they're set just right, and the reloader is now experienced with the press.
__________________
_____________________________ Put your location in your profile! What are you scared of? Don't Be Scared© - Stretch |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 28, 2012
Location: S.W. of Chicago
Posts: 75
|
I've got the Loadmaster. All I load is 9mm & .45acp. After I learned how it all works and got the bugs worked out, I can say that I have no problems at all. I'm running with a primer fail issue of 1 or 2 per 100 rounds, and I can live with that.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: March 23, 2010
Posts: 168
|
How is that remotely acceptable? I still have a 1000 that doesn't get used anymore since I've got other presses but when I was using it as my only progressive I would have primer issues maybe only 1 time per session and that was a flipped primer in the chute that I would catch 99% of the time before it got seated.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: June 11, 2012
Posts: 65
|
I have 3 Lee Pro 1000's
9mm .357 .223 They work great.... I have never had much Primer issues at all.. Besides a Case issue and thats not Lee's Fault that the Primer pocket was too tight ![]() Any new Loader takes time to figure out and get dialed in.... The Primer feed in the LNL and Loadmaster turned me away... and since I have such good luck with my Lee Pro's... I ordered third One.. I dont really utilize the progressive aspect really.. though I did just order bullet feeders for 9mm and .357 to try... but will start out loading 1 case at a Time... Easier to keep an eye on the process that way... But in Pistol callibers I am planning on trying case and bullet feeders since i use so many 9mm rounds anyways my $.02 |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: March 13, 2007
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 589
|
I've only ever loaded on a loadmaster. So what do I know?
It does what it's supposed to do. Sometimes there's a glitch here and there, but they're mostly operator error. If there's ever any real issue, there are ton of videos and website tutorials.
__________________
Sent by my S&W M&P 9mm Our rights are not gifts from the government. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: September 12, 2010
Location: Il
Posts: 839
|
I have both. Both, considering the hype Lee puts out, are not great presses. If they had a good priming system....reliable, repeatable, stable, they would both be o.k. Way too many little adjustments required. Unfortunately, I grew up on a Star progressive (two of them) and expect things to work right for a long, long time. When dad passed away, we closed the commercial ammo business and sold those presses. Brother had a Dillon 550 and it was great. If I hadn't been "lucky" and got these Lees for a song, I'd be really upset.
Now, I size in batches, prime by hand and then run the rest of the way through one or the other of the presses. The Turret press, basically one of the Pro1000s perfected, works great. I'd convert both of my 1000s to that but the parts cost as much as the press. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 3,109
|
I don't have experience with either but have a friend that owns both. He like the P-1000 better. He said the priming system on the P-1000 has less problems.
__________________
I don't ever remember being absent minded. |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: September 6, 2009
Location: Manitowoc, WI
Posts: 3,537
|
Quote:
Whether you go with Dillon, Hornady, RCBS or Lyman, you'll be better off. I tried to go cheap with a Pro1000 & ended up putting it back in the box & selling it. It was terrible. I was spending MUCH more time adjusting or fixing than I was reloading. I finally bought a 2nd hand Dillon & couldn't be happier. If you just have to buy a Lee, look at the CLASSIC turret press
__________________
Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway - John Wayne <>< When you're holdin a hammer, everything looks like a nail - Bryan Glover |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 10, 2013
Posts: 15
|
I have two loadmasters & a breech lock single-stage. I tumble, then size & prime on the breech lock. Then i use the loadmasters to dump the powder, seat the bullets & crimp. There's too much going on when you try to size, prime, dump, seat bullets & crimp all at the same time. With the sizing & priming already done, its easier on your wrist & elbow & much less cussing. I tried letting the loadmaster do everything on 9mm, out of 80 rounds I had three sideways crushed primers & 1 flipped primer.. supposedly there is magic voodoo you can do to make the loadmaster prime properly, but i think the extra step isnt a bad thing - its one more chance to look over the brass for defects & the primers are 100% right, every time.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 28, 2011
Posts: 56
|
I load 10mm, 40 SW, .223 Rem and .308 Win. on the Loadmaster.
I pretty much tossed the priming system because it is very hit and miss on reliablility. I hand prime with an RCBS priming tool. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 10, 2012
Posts: 3
|
I hand prime before running through the loadmaster as well. I was seeing up to 10-15% of the primers flipped or crushed sideways. I use the lee ergo prime to hand prime.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: June 18, 2012
Posts: 75
|
At one time I had 4 Lee 1000's bought one new and the others bought from frustrated owners at gun shows. If you are mechanical, understand reloading and have unlimited patience you can turn out quality reloads. That being said after years of tinkering I sold them all, bought 2 Dillon SDB's for my pistol ammo and never looked back
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 10, 2013
Posts: 15
|
Lol.. cause *nobody* with a dillon has priming problems...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&r...iming+problems |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: March 21, 2004
Location: SC
Posts: 3,880
|
The Pro1000 case feeder tubes fit .45 and 9mm (.38). Feeding .40s is a problem with jams. I load .40s with more success on the Loadmaster, aside from the fact that I can keep a dedicated setup. So I have 9mm of the Pro1000, .40 on the Loadmaster, and the rest on the Hornady LnL. That includes .45 ACP, .45 Colt, and .357 Magnum.
I don't think I could use either Lee press without the support of http://www.brianenos.com/forums/inde...owtopic=109423 and http://forums.loadmastervideos.com/forums/
__________________
RealGun --------------- |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: August 23, 2011
Posts: 232
|
You guys having priming problems; the bench has to be stable, no wobbling around, no jumping up and down as you cycle the press. I have a 3/4" black iron pipe with flanges threaded to both ends. I adjusted them so I have to lift the bench 1/8" to get it under the bench top. This is right under the press. The bench weighs 125# empty, I have about 300# of bullets, casting ingots, and tools helping to hold it down. It doesn't move. That's what you have to do, let it bounce around, you'll have problems.
On a LM, load up the primer tray and then cycle the press. No brass installed. Look at how the primer is just balanced on the post. Nothing holding it in place. I would cycle the press thru a whole sleeve of primers and just watch what's happening. Pick the primer off the post before you do the next one... When you get to last 4 or 5 primers in the tray, you might see the primers not loading. You need the weight of most of a full chute to make them load. So look at the primer tray; don't just run it until you run out of primers and then blame the tool for your ineptitude. The only time I had priming issues was running crimped primer brass. The decapping pin was knocking the primer out, but the new primer was hanging up on the crimps and not install. So that one was lying there when the next primer came down the chute for the next cartridge. There's only room for ONE primer down there, so that one would get sideways or mashed together with the first one. Solution was to ream the primer cups on 100% of range brass. When I picked up my own brass, that wasn't crimped, didn't have a problem. Last thing is don't short stroke, it's all the way to the top stop and all the way to the bottom. Only take it 96% up or down, it won't work. Operator error. |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: July 22, 2012
Location: LV county KS
Posts: 552
|
Sounds like an awfully touchy design to me. I'm not putting the press down, but I'm glad I spent a little more on a press that isn't as touchy. I'd have been frustrated and never bought another Lee tool.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
| IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER |
| Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages. |