Quantcast
353 Casull (Freedom Arms md 83 in 357 magnum) - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Revolvers

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 7, 2013, 08:58 PM   #1
Peter M. Eick
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 28, 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,987
353 Casull (Freedom Arms md 83 in 357 magnum)

In my quest to see what the 357 magnum could do, I learned of the Ruger Redhawk so now I have two, well, one is still on the way, but soon I will have two.

At the same time I learned of the 353 Casull or the Freedom Arms model 83 in 357 Magnum. I spent some time on google and this looks very interesting. Basically a super heavy duty 357 magnum made for insane pressure levels and thus the new round called the 353 Casull.

I was surprised that the price was not that bad but it looks like it could be a long wait of 7 months to a year or more. I figured I waited that long for a custom Baer, so I might as well consider it.

So, does anyone have one or have experience with one? Advice or thoughts, suggestions?

I was thinking a premier grade md 83 in 7.5". I figure the 9" barrel will be a bit too long but with that heavy of a gun it might be a better choice. Part of me wants to make a non-standard barrel length of 8 3/4" so it would match the original 357 Magnum just for fun. For $90 it would be kind of neat to be unique.

Looking at the options, i was thinking of a 38 special cylinder (if they will make me one), possibly fluting the cylinders if that won't hurt the strength, Dovetail the front sight so I can change it. Trigger job and over travel screw (might as well make it as good as they can from the factory).

So if you have a Freedom Arms Md 83, or a 353 Casull, any advice comments or pictures would be appreciated.
__________________
10mm and 357SIG, the best thing to come along since the 38 super!
Peter M. Eick is offline  
Old April 7, 2013, 11:50 PM   #2
eldon519
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 21, 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,018
Hey Peter,

I think the limit on pressure becomes the brass. I was really intrigued by the 353 Casull, but nearly everywhere I read about it, I saw mention of having to toss brass really quickly due to enlarged primer pockets when using the top tier loads. That killed my interest but might be more tolerable to others. I still like to kid myself into believing I save money reloading ;-)
eldon519 is offline  
Old April 8, 2013, 01:08 AM   #3
bergmen
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 14, 2011
Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 1,165
I can only comment on the model 83 I have in .454 Casull (7 1/2"). It is the most fantastic single action revolver on the planet. Doesn't matter what caliber it is in, it is worth the wait, believe me.

Dan
bergmen is offline  
Old April 8, 2013, 03:33 PM   #4
Wil Terry
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 26, 2002
Location: Black Hills, South Dakota, USA
Posts: 780
I OWNED THE ONLY FA 4 3/4" 353 ever made, at least up to that time. It is nothing more than an extra heavy 357MAG, make no mistake about it. YES, I did load 357 small pistol pocket brass and shoot ammunition that turned new 357 brass into once-fired large-pistol-primer brass with 180GR bullets at 1700fps. This was written up years ago in PETERSON'S HANDGUNS handloading column.
Interestingly enough, I had to return it to FA for something long forgotten now, and they lost it never ever to be seen again, by me anyways.
One of my close pals loads his short 357 REDHAWK to 1425fps with cast 225grSWC bullts that shoot like a million bucks almost all the way to the promised land.
Wil Terry is offline  
Old April 9, 2013, 08:47 AM   #5
rswartsell
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 4, 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,323
Lost it???
__________________
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety-"

Benjamin Franklin
rswartsell is offline  
Old April 9, 2013, 01:27 PM   #6
unspellable
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 30, 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,667
Brass

I not all that familiar with the 353 Casull, but a couple of points occur to me.

I'm assuming this is done with standard 357 Mag brass? How about trimming back 357 Maximum or 357 SuperMag brass? The 357 SuperMag uses small rifle primers and is rated for 50,000 cup. The 357 Maximum is rated for 40,000 cup. SAAMI does not specify the primer for the 357 Maximum, but the brass I've seen took a small rifle primer.

Any way, trim it back and you have 357 Magnum length high pressure brass.

One BIG caveat. This brass has a thicker head then 357 Magnum brass, so you will have a tad less powder room. That will slightly reduce the maximum powder charge to keep pressures within proper limits.

Fluting the cylinder will have little effect on its strength.
__________________
unspellable

Gun control is not about guns.
unspellable is offline  
Old April 9, 2013, 03:11 PM   #7
PO2Hammer
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 30, 2003
Posts: 2,657
The front sights are interchangeable as is. F/A makes brass beads and fiber optic sights, others make target sight blades like the undercut patridge. Silhouette sights are also available.
PO2Hammer is offline  
Old April 9, 2013, 08:54 PM   #8
Peter M. Eick
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 28, 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,987
I was looking at those options. I tend to like a standard Partridge sight on the premier models.

I am honing in on my order but still piddling with the concept.

I am working between a 7.5" and 9" barrel. Part of me argues a 9" barrel will get me more velocity and is that not the purpose of this gun? It also gives me more mass and a bit more sight radius all of which should help with the shootability.

A 7.5" barrel will be a bit lower velocity (quickload says about 60 fps) but it will be more easily carried around and a bit less cumbersome. If I ever want to hunt with it, a 7.5" barrel would be easier.

FA agreed that fluting would have no impact but would make it easier to handle and load. I like flutes for the ease of handling.

They won't make me a custom 38 special cylinder so that idea is out the window.

Any advise on the barrel length? I will probably order one this friday or next week.
__________________
10mm and 357SIG, the best thing to come along since the 38 super!
Peter M. Eick is offline  
Old April 9, 2013, 09:29 PM   #9
parisite
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Paris, TX
Posts: 2,528
The bit smaller Model 97 frame might be just as stout in 357 caliber as the model 83, but don't really know. I've never handled one.

I will say however, I own a few custom and very nice 1911's but I enjoy shooting my FA 44 Magnum more than any of them and if it had to come down to it.......it would be the last to go.

For a bit of reference Peter, here is my field grade 44 Mag with the 10" barrel made for silhouette. I don't think FA makes this large of a patridge sight anymore. I bought mine used and it was sent new to Honolulu in 1990 according to the factory. I've always intended to buy some nice stocks for it to wear on Sundays, but just haven't.

__________________
I'm amazed at the number of working age, able bodied men who don't work and seem to be getting by just fine?

Last edited by parisite; April 9, 2013 at 09:45 PM.
parisite is offline  
Old April 10, 2013, 04:47 AM   #10
PO2Hammer
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 30, 2003
Posts: 2,657
The model 97 is not very beefy. Smaller cylinder dimensions than most SA .357's. The cartridge OAL restrictions of the 97 would also be a hinderance.
Ken O'Neill from Graybeard's forum made my patridge sight for me. He'll cut them to any height and has other shapes too IIRC.
PO2Hammer is offline  
Old April 10, 2013, 07:49 AM   #11
RCL
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 7, 2003
Location: Western New York
Posts: 519
Just a few thoughts....
At one time I had a Model 83 in .454.....the 7 1/2" barrel on my brother's M83 balanced a lot better than the 10" tube on mine. I like a little forward weight but the longer tube was to much.
My preference was for the Field Grade with it's satin finish. You can upgrade to the micarta grips and still be way ahead on price.
__________________
Bob
RCL is offline  
Old April 10, 2013, 08:16 PM   #12
Peter M. Eick
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 28, 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,987
Thinking about it, I have been talking myself into the 7.5" barrel version so I am pretty much set on it. While I sacrifice a bit of velocity I make up for it in a lot of handling "I believe". My 8" Supermag is a great target gun, but pretty unweildy. A 9" barrel is going to move it past the ease of toting to a decided range toy in my mind.
__________________
10mm and 357SIG, the best thing to come along since the 38 super!
Peter M. Eick is offline  
Old April 10, 2013, 10:59 PM   #13
parisite
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Paris, TX
Posts: 2,528
If I can use an old Texas expression, "if I had my druthers" that 10" pictured would be 7.5" too.

But then again I always have second thoughts every time I see its groupings at 75yds.
__________________
I'm amazed at the number of working age, able bodied men who don't work and seem to be getting by just fine?
parisite is offline  
Old April 11, 2013, 01:51 AM   #14
ArchAngelCD
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 25, 2006
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 13,845
Freedom Arms makes what is probably the best revolver in the entire world. If it were me I would purchase a 6" M83 instead of a 7.5" revolver. I'm a little embarrassed to admit I have never heard of the 353 Casull but it sounds interesting.

As for the above suggestion to use 357 Maximum brass because it uses a SRP, you can also use a SRP in normal .357 Magnum brass too. The SPP, SPM and SRP are all the same height unlike the LRP being higher than the LPP.

Maybe some day I will be able to purchase one. (but probably not)
__________________
Remember boys and girls, gun control only prevents law abiding Americans from owning guns because the Bad Guys don’t obey the laws, no matter how restrictive or lenient the laws are!
ArchAngelCD is offline  
Old April 13, 2013, 08:36 PM   #15
Peter M. Eick
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 28, 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,987
I was shooting my 7.5" Redhawk today and it felt good for a length of barrel. An extra 1.5" hanging out there would probably be great for silhouette, but I tend to just punch paper and plink a bit.

So while I am still considering a 9", 7.5" is probably what I will order. I am planning to think about it a few more days and order late next week.
__________________
10mm and 357SIG, the best thing to come along since the 38 super!
Peter M. Eick is offline  
Old April 14, 2013, 04:19 PM   #16
tuckerdog1
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 1, 2005
Posts: 753
I've posted this pic before. But OP asked for a picture. FA 353. Today it would be a model 83 chambered in 357.



This may be the article you Googled about the 353 Casull

http://www.sixguns.com/range/fa353.htm

Tuckerdog1
__________________
You live and learn. Or you don't live long.

Do not handicap your children by making their lives easy.
tuckerdog1 is offline  
Old April 18, 2013, 10:43 PM   #17
parisite
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Paris, TX
Posts: 2,528
A Freedom Arms in 357 Maximum would be drooling material.
__________________
I'm amazed at the number of working age, able bodied men who don't work and seem to be getting by just fine?
parisite is offline  
Old April 19, 2013, 03:54 PM   #18
roaddog28
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 5, 2009
Location: Fallbrook, CA
Posts: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter M. Eick View Post
I was shooting my 7.5" Redhawk today and it felt good for a length of barrel. An extra 1.5" hanging out there would probably be great for silhouette, but I tend to just punch paper and plink a bit.

So while I am still considering a 9", 7.5" is probably what I will order. I am planning to think about it a few more days and order late next week.
The Freedom Arms 83 is the best 357 magnum. You will find it will out distance the Redhawk. More accurate and will take the power house loads. They are not cheap but if you want the best then then that is the revolver. The Redhawk is a good revolver but I always like the Ruger Blackhawk better. The debate about strengh too me is not an issue. Either of the three I mentioned will take the strongest loads a shooter can handle.
Good luck,
Howard
roaddog28 is offline  
Old April 19, 2013, 05:06 PM   #19
bergmen
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 14, 2011
Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 1,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter M. Eick View Post
Thinking about it, I have been talking myself into the 7.5" barrel version so I am pretty much set on it. While I sacrifice a bit of velocity I make up for it in a lot of handling "I believe". My 8" Supermag is a great target gun, but pretty unweildy. A 9" barrel is going to move it past the ease of toting to a decided range toy in my mind.
Don't forget that the FA Single Actions (at least this is true with my 83) have some of the tightest barrel-to-cylinder gaps of any wheel gun out there. My .454 with the fitted .45 Colt cylinder has about a .0015 measured gap. IIRC, the .454 has about a .002 gap. This has a substantial positive effect on velocity.

Dan
bergmen is offline  
Old April 19, 2013, 06:05 PM   #20
Cosmoline
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 29, 2002
Location: Los Anchorage
Posts: 22,926
What about cutting down the stouter .357 Max brass and using benchrest rifle primers?
__________________
ad rem mox nox
Cosmoline is offline  
Old April 19, 2013, 08:43 PM   #21
CraigC
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 27, 2006
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 8,891
I wouldn't buy anything longer than 7½" but that's just me. An FA that length will almost certainly shoot faster than any other factory sixgun the same barrel length. The 83 .357 is already a really heavy sixgun. So much so in fact that I'd never own one. If I wanted an FA in that chambering it would be a 97 but that's tangent to the discussion.
__________________
"Wise men learn by others’ harms; fools by their own." - Benjamin Franklin
CraigC is offline  
Old April 20, 2013, 11:10 AM   #22
Peter M. Eick
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 28, 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,987
I have decided on the 7.5" so I agree with you CraigC. I handled my 8" Supermags and my 8 3/8" Pre-27's and decided that the extra barrel moves it from easy to handle to more challenging. Since I expect to shoot the 353 a lot, I don't want to have to fight the gun.

So probably mid this upcoming week I will order it. I need to finalize the order summary so I will spend some time on their site and lists the options out.

Thanks for the advice. Soon the roughly 8 month wait will start.
__________________
10mm and 357SIG, the best thing to come along since the 38 super!
Peter M. Eick is offline  
Old April 20, 2013, 11:21 AM   #23
bigdaa
member
 
 
Join Date: April 12, 2013
Location: Goleta, CA
Posts: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by parisite View Post
A Freedom Arms in 357 Maximum would be drooling material.
Yup. I am wondering why FA didn't go this way instead. .357 Maximum brass is still available and made for the job.
bigdaa is offline  
Old April 20, 2013, 11:23 AM   #24
bergmen
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 14, 2011
Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 1,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter M. Eick View Post
I have decided on the 7.5" so I agree with you CraigC. I handled my 8" Supermags and my 8 3/8" Pre-27's and decided that the extra barrel moves it from easy to handle to more challenging. Since I expect to shoot the 353 a lot, I don't want to have to fight the gun.

So probably mid this upcoming week I will order it. I need to finalize the order summary so I will spend some time on their site and lists the options out.

Thanks for the advice. Soon the roughly 8 month wait will start.
Excellent! You will not be disappointed and will cherish this outstanding revolver. Eight months is a long time but you will forget about it once you get the call that it has arrived.

Dan
bergmen is offline  
Old April 21, 2013, 10:47 AM   #25
CraigC
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 27, 2006
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 8,891
Quote:
I am wondering why FA didn't go this way instead.
Because it would require an all new frame design.
__________________
"Wise men learn by others’ harms; fools by their own." - Benjamin Franklin
CraigC is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.