Quantcast
The 686 - Page 21 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Revolvers

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 19, 2008, 02:32 AM   #501
sniper7369
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 2, 2008
Location: The People's Republik of New York
Posts: 116
Ya know, I've always been a semi-auto guy. Always. Until I made the mistake of looking at a used 686 in a gun shop one day.
This 686 has quite possibly become my favorite gun. Forget about it being a near perfect revolver. It's a near perfect handgun.
The single action pull on it is amazing. It's almost as if you need only THINK about firing it. Has to be the most accurate handgun I've ever fired.
OK, I'll shut up now and make with the pictures.



__________________
Μολών Λaβέ
sniper7369 is offline  
Old September 19, 2008, 03:01 AM   #502
Nematocyst
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 5, 2005
Location: 44°N x 69°W
Posts: 11,607
Wow.

Haven't been to this thread in a while.

Nice to see it simmering so nicely
with so many virtual friends keepin' it up.
(500 posts no less. Impressive. Testament to the gun.)

I sold my 4" 686 a couple of years back.
It was just too long (barrel heavy) for my needs.
I replaced it with a 3" 65 that I really like. Balances well.

Still, I hope some day to own a 2.5 or 3" 686.

Just something about that 686 ...
__________________
______________

Blades, Levers, Sticks & Wheels
Nematocyst is offline  
Old September 19, 2008, 07:58 AM   #503
brockgl
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 16, 2008
Posts: 160
Quote:
The single action pull on it is amazing. It's almost as if you need only THINK about firing it.
You know, I've actually had that exact same thought! The SA trigger is literally dangerously easy to fire. I actually had to train myself NOT to pull the trigger prematurely at the range. This 686 has to be the most smooth gun I've ever handled. I own a $900 Sig and a very well made 1911, both of which are beautiful semi-autos, but this 686 has then both beat in shere elegance and refinement. It is stout and tight, and it throws .357 magnums down range, so I'll never have to worry about being under powered. It's perfect. Well, mine has a 6" barrel, so I do wish it was easier to carry, but I'll manage =). (New Grips coming in today from Eagle Grips, I'll post pics when I get 'em on the gun!)
brockgl is offline  
Old September 19, 2008, 05:47 PM   #504
easyrider6042004@yahoo.ca
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 28, 2008
Posts: 732
Ok. After seeing so many well taken pictures of CLEAN 686s in this thread, I thought I'd never be able to post pictures of mine. I hardly ever clean my guns.
So please forgive this shot of my favorite L-frame after three trips to the range.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg S&W L Frames 023.jpg (586.6 KB, 150 views)
easyrider6042004@yahoo.ca is offline  
Old September 19, 2008, 10:43 PM   #505
Stainz
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 24, 2003
Location: Pinson, AL
Posts: 3,022
Hmmmm methinks you need to get thee to a wally World - and spilleth $3 or so for a bottle of this fine gun elixir - Hoppes #9. It will return ye well used beastie to a more presentable state. I don't know about that front sight, however... what is it - pinned and dovetailed?

I tried to see how nasty my 625JM could get and still function, earlier this year. I got to well over 500 - pushing 600 rounds - in just over a month. It still hit within minute of SPC plates reliably, but it looked like it was growing hair on the cylinder's face. I have made two trips without cleaning, but it's a rare occurence. Admittedly, I am anal re cleaning.

Stainz
Stainz is offline  
Old September 20, 2008, 05:49 PM   #506
easyrider6042004@yahoo.ca
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 28, 2008
Posts: 732
Quote:
Hmmmm methinks you need to get thee to a wally World - and spilleth $3 or so for a bottle of this fine gun elixir - Hoppes #9. It will return ye well used beastie to a more presentable state.
You're right but I'm on a secret quest to find out the "ultimate number of rounds between failure" of the S&W 686. She has 550, mixed 38/357, 5:1 ratio right now. Will report back when and if she FTF for any reason. Will be shooting all .38 from here on.

Quote:
don't know about that front sight, however... what is it - pinned and dovetailed?
Pinned only. My 686-3 is a "Silhouette" model, with adjustable 4-position front sight.
easyrider6042004@yahoo.ca is offline  
Old September 21, 2008, 03:56 PM   #507
JCMAG
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 1, 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 287
I've got a question for you noble followers of the X86:

How different is shooting the X86 versus a model 13 or 19? A 4" 6 shot X86 appears to only be about 4 ounces heavier than a model 10--how does the X86 handle and carry on the belt as opposed to the K-frames?

The reason I ask is because I'm not really looking for a heavy-duty shooter, but want something that will take a beating and keep on shooting all the same.

I'm in the market for a medium frame .357 magnum revolver. The 586 sure is looking good...

Thanks for any insights you can offer.

Last edited by JCMAG; September 21, 2008 at 04:41 PM. Reason: To be more specific
JCMAG is offline  
Old September 21, 2008, 11:11 PM   #508
sniper7369
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 2, 2008
Location: The People's Republik of New York
Posts: 116
Quote:
I've got a question for you noble followers of the X86:

How different is shooting the X86 versus a model 13 or 19? A 4" 6 shot X86 appears to only be about 4 ounces heavier than a model 10--how does the X86 handle and carry on the belt as opposed to the K-frames?

The reason I ask is because I'm not really looking for a heavy-duty shooter, but want something that will take a beating and keep on shooting all the same.

I'm in the market for a medium frame .357 magnum revolver. The 586 sure is looking good...

Thanks for any insights you can offer.
Just my .02 I think the recoil seems a bit less from my 4" 686. Though that could just be my imagination. The full under lug seems to make follow up shots a bit faster as well.
As far as how it carries, it feels about the same as my 1911, I've never carried a K frame so I can't really compare it to anything else. It's not exactly a light weight, but it doesn't bother me to tote it around the woods all day either.
__________________
Μολών Λaβέ
sniper7369 is offline  
Old September 22, 2008, 06:27 PM   #509
JCMAG
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 1, 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 287
Thanks Sniper, I appreciate it
JCMAG is offline  
Old September 22, 2008, 06:51 PM   #510
1KPerDay
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 19, 2006
Location: Happy Valley, UT
Posts: 8,587
sorry please disregard. Mods please delete if you care enough.


carry on, folks, nice wheelguns.

Last edited by 1KPerDay; September 22, 2008 at 06:52 PM. Reason: I'm stupid
1KPerDay is online now  
Old September 27, 2008, 04:52 PM   #511
wep45
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 21, 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 544
My first firearm. S&W 686-4PP

Attachment 85333

Attachment 85334

Glad to be a member of the 686 club

Last edited by wep45; January 6, 2009 at 06:41 PM.
wep45 is offline  
Old September 27, 2008, 05:24 PM   #512
Snagglepuss
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 4, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 314
Is that a 4 inch, sure looks like 6 inch to me. Must be the photo. My second firearm was a 4 inch 686P
__________________
EXIT STAGE LEFT
Criminals thrive on the indulgence of an understanding society
http://www.1911auto.org/forum/index.php?referrerid=24
Snagglepuss is offline  
Old September 27, 2008, 05:39 PM   #513
WJR
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 21, 2003
Location: AL, USA
Posts: 209
wep45,

That is a great revolver. I have the exact same model, 686-4 6" with powerport. That revo is my wife's favorite as it is so pleasant to shoot.

snagglepuss,

They 686-4PP models are 6" barrels.

WJR
WJR is offline  
Old September 27, 2008, 11:26 PM   #514
Sean Dempsey
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 29, 2006
Location: Utahrd
Posts: 357
I finally joined the club after posting about it in 03-2007.

Got it at the gun show. Was $450, which was fine for me.

I will get some pics tomorrow, but I am guessing I can describe it and you'll all know.

- Stainless 4"
- Hogue monogrip (love it)
- Pinned barrel
- The chambers are NOT recessed like on my 1978 Model 28. Not sure if they're supposed to be or not.
- No lawyer lock yay!


Something about a stout 4" revolver just feels so right to me. Even compared with my brand now USP 45, I really am a revolver man at heart.

Anyways - whats the best way to make the stainless look as good as possible?
__________________
There are no choices. Nothing but a straight line. The illusion comes afterwards, when you ask 'Why me?' and 'What if?'. When you look back and see the branches, like a pruned bonsai tree, or forked lightning. If you had done something differently, it wouldn't be you, it would be someone else looking back, asking a different set of questions.
Sean Dempsey is offline  
Old September 28, 2008, 04:16 PM   #515
wep45
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 21, 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 544
Anyways - whats the best way to make the stainless look as good as possible?

Mother's Mag & Aluminum Polish (get it at WalMart)
It will clean your stainless up real nice and make it shine. It also works great for getting the black gunk off of your revolver's cylinder face.
wep45 is offline  
Old September 29, 2008, 08:56 PM   #516
Sean Dempsey
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 29, 2006
Location: Utahrd
Posts: 357
So how exactly do you get the chrome like polish? I got the Mothers Mag and Alum, and also Billet polish, I rub it on, rub rub rub til the black residue appears, then buff off.

Done this over and over, still looks the same.

What do I need to do to get guns like Hexidesimals?
__________________
There are no choices. Nothing but a straight line. The illusion comes afterwards, when you ask 'Why me?' and 'What if?'. When you look back and see the branches, like a pruned bonsai tree, or forked lightning. If you had done something differently, it wouldn't be you, it would be someone else looking back, asking a different set of questions.
Sean Dempsey is offline  
Old September 29, 2008, 09:14 PM   #517
Sean Dempsey
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 29, 2006
Location: Utahrd
Posts: 357
Where can you see the model number with the dash?

on mine, when I open the cylinder, stamped on the frame it says, formatted like this

"AUE 74 89
M
MOD 686"


There's no dash and nothing after the 686. Is this an M model, or a dash nothing?
__________________
There are no choices. Nothing but a straight line. The illusion comes afterwards, when you ask 'Why me?' and 'What if?'. When you look back and see the branches, like a pruned bonsai tree, or forked lightning. If you had done something differently, it wouldn't be you, it would be someone else looking back, asking a different set of questions.
Sean Dempsey is offline  
Old September 29, 2008, 10:22 PM   #518
Ky Larry
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 22, 2003
Location: Ky
Posts: 3,203
I have a 686 ,4" brl, Millet Red Dot,B-Square mounts,Pachmyr grips. Not as slick as my Model 19 or my Python but it has a great trigger and lockup is very tight. Shoots any ammo very accurately. I've put 1000's of rounds thru it.

Gotta learn to post pictures. You guys have some very handsom firearms.
__________________
"Suppose you were a congressman. Now,suppose you were an idiot. But I repeat myself." Mark Twain
Ky Larry is offline  
Old September 30, 2008, 05:17 AM   #519
chriske
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 15, 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 426
easyrider,

I'm very very intrested in your MRBF 686 project , especially regarding .38's in that .357Mag cylinder.

Keep us (or me?) posted, will you?

At very long last a picture of a gun that's been working !
sometimes wonder if most guns that are spoken of here are mere "lookers" instead of "shooters".

BTW : Mine is a 4" 586.
chriske is offline  
Old September 30, 2008, 06:03 AM   #520
def4pos8
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 31, 2007
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 560
Better late than never. . . .

The SSR is my duty back-up to the Model 66 as I've not been able to find a tritium front sight that works. The 24/7 Big Dot is too tall, even with the Clylinder & Slide fixed rear.

I do like Hogue grips. All shown are Coco Bolo, mostly red-tone heartwood but the Model of 1988/625 has a more yellow tint of sapwood. I also like Hogue's "fish scale" checkering pattern.

The group snaps include the 686, 66, 1988/625, 67-0 and 617 (10-shot).
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCN0497.JPG (191.9 KB, 51 views)
File Type: jpg DSCN0498.JPG (200.4 KB, 49 views)
File Type: jpg DSCN0499.JPG (172.8 KB, 91 views)
File Type: jpg DSCN0500.JPG (178.0 KB, 73 views)
__________________
If the sun's up, you still have a pulse and background radiation levels are nominal -- everything else is gravy!
ChAir Force Specialty Code 1825K
def4pos8 is offline  
Old September 30, 2008, 09:13 AM   #521
wep45
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 21, 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 544
There's no dash and nothing after the 686. Is this an M model, or a dash nothing?

Sean,

You have one of the first 686's to be made a dash nothing or sometimes refered to as a 686-0 The "M" by the model number means that it has been sent back to Smith & Wesson after production and modified for cylinder binding, which was a failure comon to the 686-0 and 686-1 models. So now you are good to go. Enjoy that 686 of yours. You have a great revolver.

Don"t worry if your stainless doesn't shine like the sun, your 686 will shoot like the
wep45 is offline  
Old September 30, 2008, 11:14 AM   #522
Sean Dempsey
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 29, 2006
Location: Utahrd
Posts: 357
Quote:
You have one of the first 686's to be made a dash nothing or sometimes refered to as a 686-0 The "M" by the model number means that it has been sent back to Smith & Wesson after production and modified for cylinder binding, which was a failure comon to the 686-0 and 686-1 models. So now you are good to go. Enjoy that 686 of yours. You have a great revolver.


Awesome. I am glad it's one of the 1980 models. It sits next to my late fathers Model 28 6" highway patrolman (pinned barrel, recessed cylinders). That's a 1978.

It's father and son 357's now. I should take a picture of them side by side for sentimental value and post it. He bought the N frame because he wanted to kill a deer with it. He said he'd hand load 357's as hot as physically possible, with powder clear to the brim of the casing, and just barley crimp that bullet on there.

Never did get a chance to down a deer with it though
__________________
There are no choices. Nothing but a straight line. The illusion comes afterwards, when you ask 'Why me?' and 'What if?'. When you look back and see the branches, like a pruned bonsai tree, or forked lightning. If you had done something differently, it wouldn't be you, it would be someone else looking back, asking a different set of questions.
Sean Dempsey is offline  
Old October 7, 2008, 03:27 PM   #523
wjh2657
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 3, 2008
Location: Lafayette, TN
Posts: 88
I used my 686 2 1/2" for CCW qual here in TN. I shot 96/96 (fire 48 rounds). Gal next to me was shooting a 9 MM (I won't say what brand. no need for bashing) and she was all over paper and didn't qualify. After second string fired I let her use my 686 and try again. She shot 92/96 and qualified with no problem. So much for ladies and big guns! We were using .38 Spl WWB 130 gr FMJs from Wally World.
__________________
" A man has got to know his limitations!"
Inspector Harry Callihan, SFPD
wjh2657 is offline  
Old October 11, 2008, 07:22 PM   #524
Gambit
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 11, 2008
Location: Dixie
Posts: 23
I bought this one back around '91 when they were $329, new, and I have put many rounds through it. It also wears a set of Pachmeyers from time to time.
It is my bedside guardian along with one speed loader full of 125 Federals.




Gambit is offline  
Old October 14, 2008, 01:07 PM   #525
TENmm
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 13, 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 17
This is for BAPHOMET: I have looked all over the site of the manufacturer for THOSE grips. What model name or number are those grips?
I would love to get those for my 686.
BTW, 686 was my very first gun which i carried on the job for years.
TENmm is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.