Quantcast
The 686 - Page 28 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Revolvers

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 14, 2011, 10:59 AM   #676
SigFan6255
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 31, 2010
Posts: 12
I am thinking about buying a 686+ 6" 7shot. The guy is asking $625 with a box of ammo and 1 speed loader. He said it has 27 rds through it. Is this a fair deal? I really love the look and feel of the 686.
SigFan6255 is offline  
Old January 14, 2011, 11:47 AM   #677
MarkDozier
Member.
 
 
Join Date: May 15, 2006
Posts: 375
Sig
That would be about average price for the 6 inch.

I just got my 686 about 6 months ago. Smoothest revolver I ever shot. I love the 357 magnun round fired from that gun. Makes you go ummmmmm.
MarkDozier is offline  
Old January 14, 2011, 11:50 AM   #678
Paints
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 13, 2006
Posts: 170
Quote:
I think a 686 should be shiny...
That looks like it never gets fired

A 686 should be used, not locked in a glass display case!
__________________
The more law-abiding people that have guns, the better off we are," Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters said. "Because the bad guys always have guns, You look at these school shootings or church shootings, the ones that have been stopped, it was because someone there had a gun."
Paints is offline  
Old January 23, 2011, 10:25 PM   #679
texgunner
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 3, 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 175
I have an 4" 686+, a 686 SSR and a 3" 686 Deluxe TALO exclusive. Used to have a 6" 686+ but used it in a trade for 4" M27-3.

Last edited by texgunner; January 23, 2011 at 10:32 PM.
texgunner is offline  
Old January 24, 2011, 09:20 PM   #680
psyshack
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 526
My new 686+ 4"

I did a full trigger job on it, stoned/tuned and springs. Shimmed the trigger and hammer. Bead blasted the trigger and hammer to match the cylinder release. Lapped and put a very slight polish to the bore and made the rest of the pistol very Bright.

__________________
New American Expiation:

Where is my hand out? I want it now!!!!
psyshack is offline  
Old February 4, 2011, 11:13 AM   #681
motorcycle-charlie
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 13, 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 257
been thinkin about gettin a 686 for a while now. might take the plunge when i get the tax return. its between the 686 and a 1911. i had a nice 1911 and sold it about 10 years ago. been wanting another one, but like alot of you, i have a thing for revolvers. would like to get both but cant. i also need a new furnace. every time i think i have my mind set on the .45, i come back to the 686. maybee a 625 would solve my dilema.
motorcycle-charlie is offline  
Old February 4, 2011, 01:47 PM   #682
mikey357
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 27, 2002
Location: Griffin, GA
Posts: 164
Well, let's try THIS...three 686 "Pluses", all in NON-Standard Barrel Lengths...a Three-incher, a Five-incher and a Seven-incher...The Seven-inch gun is a "Dash Five", made PRIOR TO the current "Talo" series--the Talo's are all "Dash Sixes", and have "the Lock"--the seven-inch "Dash Five" is particularly UNCOMMON...depending on who you believe, there were anywhere from 67 to around 300 made!!!...





...hope you ENJOY....mikey357
__________________
mikey357, TFL Alumnus # 7556
mikey357 is offline  
Old February 4, 2011, 03:46 PM   #683
451 Detonics
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 4, 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,442
well....I'll throw mine up here as well...it isn't exactly factory tho...

Glenn Custom set up for Action Pistol...

__________________
Tergum absentis vir , EGO sum scientia
451 Detonics is offline  
Old February 7, 2011, 11:05 AM   #684
germ
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 7, 2009
Posts: 151
Round vs Square butt grips

A year or so ago I had the opportunity to shoot a 2" 7rnd 686 with the round butt. It fit me like is was custom molded right into my hand. The first time I squeezed the trigger I knew I'd have to get one some day. I've also shot and/or handled several with the square butts, which I detested.

I see photos of 686's of both square and round. My question is, are the frames different or is it just the grips? Can you just swap the grips? For some reason I'm thinking that the frames are different.

Also, I have an opportunity to get a 4" 68-1 from a friend for an ok price, but I've balked because it has the square butt.
germ is offline  
Old February 7, 2011, 11:26 AM   #685
sixgunner455
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 25, 2006
Posts: 2,549
The standard S&W revolver comes with a round butt today. For most of the 20th century, they came with square butts, but many people wanted round butts, so they started making them all that way. Reason is, you can put grips on a round but to make it square, but you can't go the other way without major surgery on the grip frame. So, if you buy a new/newish one, it'll have the round butt.

The no-dash 586 I'm currently drooling over (and waiting impatiently for my tax refund to show up) has a square butt, due to its manufacturing date.
__________________
Life is too short to hunt with an ugly dog. - me

If you can't hit a snake at 20 feet with a 12 gauge, you ain't gonna hit a dove, either. -McGunner
sixgunner455 is offline  
Old February 7, 2011, 12:49 PM   #686
germ
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 7, 2009
Posts: 151
Thanks. What date (or dash#) did they switched to round?
germ is offline  
Old February 18, 2011, 06:09 PM   #687
Dahm
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 18, 2009
Posts: 6
I just threw some Ahrends Cocobolo grips on my 686P, and its looking fantastic. They feel 10 times better than the standard Hogue grips (which I thought were also great by the way). They're a little beefier and give a bit better purchase on palm swell and finger grooves.

Here it is:







Dahm is offline  
Old March 27, 2011, 11:09 AM   #688
MtnSpur
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 7, 2010
Location: West Texas
Posts: 405
Can I join? Yesterday's acquisition:


Now a holster and maybe even a Hunter cartridge belt while meandering around the ranch? Yeah baby...
__________________
"The end comes no matter what, the only thing that matters is how do you wanna go out, on your feet or on your knees?.....FBI Director James Grace from "The Kingdom"
MtnSpur is offline  
Old March 29, 2011, 09:05 PM   #689
Nematocyst
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 5, 2005
Location: 44°N x 69°W
Posts: 11,607
Quote:
Can I join?
686 owners do not have to ask to join.

They are de facto members.
__________________
______________

Blades, Levers, Sticks & Wheels
Nematocyst is offline  
Old March 30, 2011, 03:08 AM   #690
MarkDozier
Member.
 
 
Join Date: May 15, 2006
Posts: 375
Curse you Mikey 357.... You 3 inch 686 "Pluse" is making me get another 686.
MarkDozier is offline  
Old March 30, 2011, 03:52 PM   #691
357Shooter
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Location: Murphy, NC
Posts: 154
Just ordered today

Just ordered a 686+ 3" from Buds' today, going to go with a Milt Sparks PMK Holster. http://www.miltsparks.com/PMK.htm
I'll post as soon as it's in. I've got my new LNL Press and 850 pieces of brass ready to go, any thoughts on favorite rounds?
__________________
Scott
357Shooter is offline  
Old March 30, 2011, 04:26 PM   #692
Nematocyst
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 5, 2005
Location: 44°N x 69°W
Posts: 11,607
Oh, man, I would so love to be able to afford a 3" 686.

I had a 4" once upon a time, but it was just too long for me.
__________________
______________

Blades, Levers, Sticks & Wheels
Nematocyst is offline  
Old March 31, 2011, 09:36 PM   #693
Dakota Bones
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 14, 2011
Location: Devils Lake, ND
Posts: 11
Attachment 139619Attachment 139619 Will this do.Love this gun

Last edited by Dakota Bones; April 1, 2011 at 08:02 AM.
Dakota Bones is offline  
Old April 1, 2011, 04:58 PM   #694
ms6852
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 19, 2009
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,250
Here is mine, like a fine wine it just gets better with age.
__________________
ONLY TWO DEFINING FORCES HAVE GIVEN UP THEIR LIVES FOR YOU. ONE IS JESUS CHRIST FOR YOUR SOUL AND THE OTHER IS THE AMERICAN SOLDIER FOR YOUR FREEDOM.
ms6852 is offline  
Old April 2, 2011, 07:04 AM   #695
Stainz
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 24, 2003
Location: Pinson, AL
Posts: 3,022
Not all 686+'s have full lugs...



Not a fan of full lugs, when this one became available as the '04 'Stocking Dealer Exclusive', equipped as shown new - with the HiViz front and V-notch rear sight, Ahrends cocobolo square conversion grip, and partial lug - I jumped on it. Oddly, it was $10 less than the 4" 686+ on the same shelf! It was $489 + s/t then.... the good old days!

Yeah, I've shown it before... just thought other 'short lug-ites' might need something to look for in the 686 family.

Stainz
Stainz is offline  
Old April 2, 2011, 06:26 PM   #696
Walkalong
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: November 20, 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 29,607
Lovely. I might be able to overlook that hole in the side for a half lug 6" 686.
__________________
Do you ever wonder why nobody ever robs the bag man for the mob? No, you don't.

"Oh bother" said Pooh, as he chambered another round. Author unknown.
Walkalong is offline  
Old April 3, 2011, 05:02 PM   #697
GLShooter
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 343
Here's mine I won at a PPC match.



Greg
GLShooter is offline  
Old April 3, 2011, 07:29 PM   #698
Walkalong
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: November 20, 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 29,607
Nice. It looks like mine. I love mine.

__________________
Do you ever wonder why nobody ever robs the bag man for the mob? No, you don't.

"Oh bother" said Pooh, as he chambered another round. Author unknown.
Walkalong is offline  
Old April 3, 2011, 07:37 PM   #699
Hanshi
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 25, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 278
Don't have a pic of it ready but I got my 686 in 1985 and it is one of the best .357s Ive ever handled. I used it to take a number of deer over the years and it's accurate with .38wc, too.
Hanshi is offline  
Old April 4, 2011, 05:53 AM   #700
madcratebuilder
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,983
Quote:
I see photos of 686's of both square and round. My question is, are the frames different or is it just the grips? Can you just swap the grips? For some reason I'm thinking that the frames are different.
The first RB 686's came out in 1984 I believe. The only difference is the bottom of the grip frame being rounded. If you don't mind the weight the 2.5" RB makes a very nice carry piece.
__________________
A Veteran, whether active duty, retired, national guard, or reserve, is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to “The United States of America” for an amount of “up to and including my life.”
madcratebuilder is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.