THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Rifle Country

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old February 25, 2007, 07:36 AM   #1
selector67
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 18, 2006
Location: TN.
Posts: 181
KEL-TEC 308 Video

Seen this on YouTube, this gun is bad unique ejection. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9Xqa2vwq60
__________________
A government that disarms its citizens in the guise of protecting them, is in reality, protecting themselves from its citizens.
selector67 is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 07:39 AM   #2
selector67
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 18, 2006
Location: TN.
Posts: 181
KEL-TEC 308 Video

Seen this on YouTube, this gun is bad unique ejection. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9Xqa2vwq60
__________________
A government that disarms its citizens in the guise of protecting them, is in reality, protecting themselves from its citizens.
selector67 is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 08:41 AM   #3
Nightcrawler
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 25, 2002
Location: Utah, inside the Terraformed Zone
Posts: 6,953
I love how a bunch of brass spits out when he reloads. It's like emptying the cylinder on a revolver. This rifle would be perfect in a movie.
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΈ || WOLVERINES!

The cake is a lie.

Atomic Rockets!

FBMG: Fear the bunny.
Nightcrawler is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 08:44 AM   #4
Giolli Joker
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Location: Genova - Italy
Posts: 147
Cool!
__________________
I'm Italian, that's why my English isn't good... I apologize for my possible mistakes. :-)

Fast Accurate Reliable
Giolli Joker is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 10:09 AM   #5
TIMC
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 16, 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,371
I like! Also looks good for keeping spent brass in good shape for reloading. Some semi-auto's damage cases through ejection and cases can also be hard to find.
I want one even more now!
TIMC is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 10:13 AM   #6
VirgilCaine
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 24, 2005
Posts: 600
The idea is great, but that recoil looks pretty brutal to me. Anyone else think so?
VirgilCaine is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 10:33 AM   #7
JShirley
Administrator
  
 
Join Date: December 20, 2002
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,350
No. Hand-held .308s will move wafer-thin shooters. Notice how little muzzle rise there is.

John
__________________
Wandering Thoughts
Battle Blog
The best gun is the gun you are best with..- Ed Ames
JShirley is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 10:43 AM   #8
BsChoy
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 14, 2005
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,210
very little muzzle flash for an 18 incher too
BsChoy is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 11:24 AM   #9
iamkris
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 6, 2003
Location: My own little slice of Purgatory
Posts: 2,627
Quote:
The idea is great, but that recoil looks pretty brutal to me. Anyone else think so?
...not if you've ever shot any other .308. That is what you need to expect.

Which is a good demo of why the full auto M14 or FN-FAL wasn't such a good idea.
__________________
NRA Endowment Life Member
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor


OneBigA$$MistakeAmerica
iamkris is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 11:55 AM   #10
MrChicken
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 16, 2004
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 110
Interesting, is that a bullet dimple in the armor just above the bench?
MrChicken is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 12:07 PM   #11
Pax Jordana
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 11, 2006
Location: Near Philadelphia.
Posts: 822
I love the things they've done with the bullpup design. The only thing is, looking at the schematics on keltec.com I thought we'd see vigorous shell ejection. In the video it looks like the shells just kinna... fall out. I'm not sure how I'd feel about that - how easy would it be to clog the tube?

At any rate, I'm still saving my pennies.

MrChicken - it could be, or it could be an anchor point for the sound dampening material on the wall??
__________________
-- PJ (Jordan)

See also: thehighroad dot us
Pax Jordana is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 12:27 PM   #12
MechAg94
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 18, 2005
Location: Texas Gulf Coast
Posts: 4,438
Good point. Very little muzzle climb or flash.
Looks like a very interesting gun. I don't really want another .308, but that one I might have to pick up.

I wonder if there is any chance of spent cases jamming up in that ejection chute.
__________________
"No tendency is quite so strong in human nature as the desire to lay down rules of conduct for other people."

"The world is not going to be saved by legislation."
William Howard Taft
MechAg94 is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 12:34 PM   #13
GreenFurniture
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 7, 2003
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 673
Looks like Kel-Tec ripped off FN's F2000 design, cheapened it up and put it in a .308.
__________________
www.coalcreekarmory.com
07 FFL / 02 SOT
GreenFurniture is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 01:14 PM   #14
JShirley
Administrator
  
 
Join Date: December 20, 2002
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,350
Eh? The RFB is in a heavier caliber, attractive and more streamlined. It also has a great trigger. I totally see how you could come to that conclusion.
__________________
Wandering Thoughts
Battle Blog
The best gun is the gun you are best with..- Ed Ames
JShirley is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 01:29 PM   #15
Evil Monkey
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 26, 2006
Posts: 1,305


I'm definitely getting one.
__________________
I said the NRA and other organizations should have paramilitary groups, and they all laughed at me. I hope these forums are still around in the future, so I can laugh at them.
Evil Monkey is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 04:47 PM   #16
Wes Janson
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 12, 2006
Posts: 1,920
Quote:
Looks like Kel-Tec ripped off FN's F2000 design, cheapened it up and put it in a .308.
If you look at a diagram of parts, or handle the trigger pack off of one, you'd know how ridiculously wrong that statement is. They both are bullpups with tubes along the barrel for brass ejection, that's about the only similarity between them.
__________________
Quote:
"Training errors are recorded on paper. Tactical errors are etched in stone." -Erwin Rommel
Quote:
Explanations exist: they have existed for all times, for there is always an easy solution to every problem — neat, plausible and wrong. - H.L. Mencken
Wes Janson is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 06:17 PM   #17
The Grand Inquisitor
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 5, 2004
Location: Iowa City, IA
Posts: 791
That video really sold me on the rifle.


Why are people upset about the spent cartridge ejection? It's funny how people can scream and moan about innovation, but when someone makes a rifle that uses a new feature, they get their panties in a bunch and clam up.

I highly doubt that the brass could clump together and cause a back up without some other foreign debris being involved.

I also really liked the way that all of the excess brass is ejected when the charging handle is actuated.
__________________
Vermicious Kanid: Devouring Predator of the Oompa Loompa's and scourge of the Wonka Corporation.

Currently looking to buy an AUG, Krinkov, Vector Arms RPD, and everything else.
The Grand Inquisitor is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 06:58 PM   #18
Ian
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Posts: 2,821
That basic ejections system worked just find on the Maxim and Vickers guns...
__________________
Forgotten Weapons - your source for rare, experimental, and prototype military firearms.
Ian is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 07:57 PM   #19
MachIVshooter
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 11, 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,100
Quote:
Hand-held .308s will move wafer-thin shooters. Notice how little muzzle rise there is.
The bore axis on the RFB isn't just low; it's FLAT. I'm betting the impulse is fairly stout from such a compact, 8 pound 7.62mm.

I still want one really bad, though. C'mon, K-T, get 'em out!
__________________
The road to hell is paved with gun-grabbing liberals
MachIVshooter is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 08:42 PM   #20
cajun47
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 29, 2006
Posts: 402
do they make that in 7.62x39mm or 9mm?
cajun47 is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 08:56 PM   #21
mattw
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Posts: 1,875
Possibly the coolest looking rifle I've ever seen! I'm sold on this thing, sign me up!
mattw is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 09:13 PM   #22
Badger Arms
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 1, 2003
Location: Harnett County, NC
Posts: 3,668
Screw YouTube

http://www.kel-tec.com/download.html
__________________
We may or may not worship God, but John Moses Browning made sure we can choose.
Badger Arms is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 09:43 PM   #23
MCgunner
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 3, 2005
Location: Texas Coastal Bend
Posts: 13,686
I still don't care for tacticool, but it does solve the problem of left handed shooters and bull pups without having to switch anything from one side to the other. Being a left handed shooter, I never gave a nit for the bull pup idea and really don't see the need other than it stores more compact than a conventional rifle. At least this one is in a decent caliber. .22s don't excite me and 7.62x39 is just a 30 caliber that's been castrated. I own a couple, but their ballistics don't impress me. .308 is a REAL rifle caliber.
MCgunner is online now  
Old February 25, 2007, 09:43 PM   #24
PaladinX13
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 29, 2002
Posts: 745
Quote:
do they make that in 7.62x39mm or 9mm?
Well it's not out yet, but they are considering the 7.62x39mm if the .308 sells well. I doubt there are any plans for a 9mm variant.
PaladinX13 is offline  
Old February 25, 2007, 10:00 PM   #25
Smellvin
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 5, 2007
Posts: 80
The only problem is that with all that metal blocking the chamber, it might be rather difficult to clear after a malfunction. If that's not an issue, I'd definitely like to get one.
Smellvin is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.