Quantcast
Charter or taurus - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Revolvers

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 9, 2016, 06:42 PM   #1
simonstough
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 2, 2012
Posts: 72
Charter or taurus

I'm buying a .357 next month and I'm down to either the charter mag pug or a Taurus in .357 either a 605 or 617. The Taurus is 100-150 more, my question is
...is the extra money justifiable? Or should I save the hundred and buy from an American company, I've heard horror stories about both brands and their customer service. It isn't going to be a go to self defense weapon, I've already got higher quality revolvers and a 1911 for that role, the home defense niche is covered it's going to be a heavy hitting range gun and maybe carried if I'm comfortable that it's reliable.
simonstough is offline  
Old January 9, 2016, 08:50 PM   #2
Drail
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 17, 2008
Posts: 4,629
Charter. Taurus has gone just about all the way down the drain with their current production. Their older guns are fine. You might get a new Charter with a defect - but they will fix it very quickly.
Drail is offline  
Old January 9, 2016, 09:05 PM   #3
TruthTellers
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 15, 2015
Posts: 935
I'll take Charter on this one. Been in business 50+ years and have been known as good quality, value oriented carry guns for decades.

May not be as popular today with the pocket auto craze, but they're still good.

EDIT: Also, .357 from such a short barrel isn't a good choice for home defense. You shoot that in the house, you're gonna have a blinding flash at night and probably be deaf for a week. Why not look at the .38?
TruthTellers is offline  
Old January 9, 2016, 10:27 PM   #4
Drail
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 17, 2008
Posts: 4,629
Definitely go with .38 Spl. loads in a snub. A .357 Mag in a snub is a complete waste of powder and is considerably harder to fire multiple shots from. Want to learn to flinch? Shoot some 125 gr. flame thrower loads out of a snub. Be sure to also try it at night if you can.
Drail is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 03:45 AM   #5
Analogkid
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 16, 2011
Posts: 274
My vote would be Charter as well.

The ports really help if you can get that model. Kinda spit back at you a bit though. Not a big deal.


The charters have came a long way lately.


Good luck with purchase!
Analogkid is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 04:03 AM   #6
Stony
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 11, 2014
Location: East Texas
Posts: 366
Might as well ask what's better....halitosis or bad breath? You are asking for a crap shoot either way.
Stony is online now  
Old January 10, 2016, 04:06 AM   #7
Old Dog
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 11, 2004
Location: somewhere on Puget Sound
Posts: 3,990
Quote:
I'll take Charter on this one. Been in business 50+ years and have been known as good quality, value oriented carry guns for decades.
Um, my understanding is that the current "Charter Arms" is NOT the same company as the older Charter Arms ...
__________________
Will
Old Dog is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 04:18 AM   #8
Cooldill
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 19, 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,735
You're right, they're better.

But they still kick out plenty of lemons.
Cooldill is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 05:52 AM   #9
Shootshellz
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 27, 2015
Posts: 146
Neither. How much is your life worth?
Shootshellz is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 08:31 AM   #10
45Frank
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 3, 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 340
Just wondering how much cheaper are they then a Ruger, even used Rugers are good for ever?
Picked up a 1950's Mark I years ago and was is just like new until a pipe leaked in my gun room and left a rust spot on it. Sent it back to Ruger for a rebluing and it came back with all new innards, new grip box and papers. All for just around $100.00. Will either of these companies do that in 50 years for what you may be saving?
__________________
They Repealed My II Amendment I had No Guns
They Disregarded My V Amendment I Was Innocent
They Violated My IV Amendment I Had Nothing To Hide
They Repealed My I Amendment "I COULD SAY NOTHING" /NRA Life Member
45Frank is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 09:59 AM   #11
p95
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 24, 2010
Location: NE Tennessee
Posts: 37
dont you like smith and wessons???
__________________

No Matter where you go---THERE YOU ARE.
p95 is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 10:19 AM   #12
joed
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,985
I've owned Charter and would never own another one. Also owned one Taurus and I regret selling it.

Why not buy a used S&W or Ruger?
joed is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 11:25 AM   #13
Grumulkin
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 1, 2005
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 2,195
I had a Taurus and sold it with no regrets and would never buy another.

I have a Charter Arms revolver and was suprised at how nice it is. I would happily buy another if I needed one.
Grumulkin is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 11:54 AM   #14
The Bushmaster
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 29, 2005
Location: Ava, Missouri
Posts: 7,753
Smith & Wesson, Colt or Ruger. There will never be a taurus or charter arms in my safe or around the house.
__________________
I have one nerve left and you're standing on it...

DEMOCRACY is two wolves and one sheep voting on what to have for lunch...
LIBERTY is a well armed sheep contesting the outcome of the vote...
The Bushmaster is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 12:22 PM   #15
WiTom
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 2, 2016
Posts: 10
Stay away from anything Charter 2000, but they have gotten better since. I am in the same court that how much is your life worth? Cheap is not always better when protecting you or a loved one. Just saying.
WiTom is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 01:07 PM   #16
stoky
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 19, 2005
Location: Wyomin!
Posts: 632
Quote:
dont you like smith and wessons???
I like Smiths, but in customer service they pale in comparison to Ruger, in my experience. From what I've read and heard, here and elsewhere, even the new Charter is superior to S&W in terms of customer support.
To the original question, I'd say Charter.
I have some Smiths and Rugers, have no Taurus nor Charter. I think the "how much is your life worth?" stich is hackneyed and fallacious. If it's reliable, reasonably accurate and the ergonomics suit you, it's expensive enough.
stoky is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 02:03 PM   #17
Tallball
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 2, 2014
Posts: 854
I have owned this one for a couple of years. It goes bang every time. The trigger is a little odd, but not heavy. It is as accurate as the fixed sights and my so-so shooting abilities allow. This one is 44 special, a preferred caliber of mine. If I ran across another Charter that tickled my fancy and passed my inspection, I wouldn't hesitate to buy it.


Last edited by Tallball; January 10, 2016 at 02:15 PM.
Tallball is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 02:10 PM   #18
Tallball
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 2, 2014
Posts: 854
I own Beretta, Colt, Ruger, Smith and Wesson, etc. This Taurus is the one that sleeps near my bed. I owned a Model 66 since the late 80's and had to use it for SD twice. When it was stolen about 15 years ago I bought this somewhat fancier version of the Model 66 to replace it. They cost me about $200 apiece used. The triggers, sights, and accuracy are/were excellent on both. When I have shot more thousands of rounds through something I shoot better, I will lock it away. Until then, it is my little security blanket.


Last edited by Tallball; January 10, 2016 at 03:04 PM.
Tallball is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 02:19 PM   #19
CornCod
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 12, 2006
Posts: 803
I carried a Taurus revolver as a security guard for awhile. I own a current production Charter Arms snubby in .22 magnum which has thus far presented no problems. My best advice would be to go over any prospective purchase with a fine-toothed comb. Check for excessive play in the cylinder or crane. Make sure the ejector rod works smoothly. Ask the store clerk for permission to dry fire it a few times.
CornCod is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 02:31 PM   #20
bannockburn
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 24, 2007
Posts: 10,615
Between the two I would probably go with Charter Arms. Just my own observation but on occasion I have checked out both brands at various gun shows and Taurus revolvers just seem to have more build quality issues to them than a comparable Charter Arms revolver.
__________________
"An elegant weapon for a more civilized age."-Obi Wan Kenobi
bannockburn is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 02:37 PM   #21
khari
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 31, 2014
Posts: 28
Good suggestions about considering others. You can get a good Ruger Security Six for anywhere from $325 to $450, and those are as solid as they come.
khari is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 03:42 PM   #22
Haywood
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 12, 2006
Location: N. Ohio
Posts: 595
The 617 with Ribber Grip or Hogue Grip would handle shooting 357 recoil the best. If you are going to shoot 38s all would work. I had a 605 and still have the 617.
__________________
Two Snubs and Reloads, Every Day all Day.
Haywood is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 06:20 PM   #23
old fart
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 25, 2010
Posts: 299
of the two you mentioned i would pick charter, customer service much better. i had a charter a few years ago and hadt o send it in, came back in two weeks as a new gun. sold it to my brother inlaw to fund a vehicle purchase, he still has it and its working fine. however what about ruger, when i was looking to buy a carry revolver recently after selling my nano, i found a new ruger was only $50 more than a charter and about $75 more than a new taurus. ruger is worth the extra money. now i know how it is to be on a budget and a fixed income, if ruger was $150 or more then i would have went with charter myself, but just $50 i knew right away to go ruger,
old fart is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 08:30 PM   #24
joem1945
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 6, 2014
Posts: 1,548
I wouldn't recommend taurus as I've had bad luck with 2 of them. Only 2 left and when they quit I'm done with them forever.
joem1945 is offline  
Old January 10, 2016, 08:57 PM   #25
Omaha-BeenGlockin
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 26, 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,465
I own an all stainless Taurus 605----with no complaints at all



It has been a good gun---so far---don't know what else to say---it shoots where I aim it and goes bang every time----and I got it cheap
Omaha-BeenGlockin is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.