Quantcast
Lot's of new Striker fired pistols out - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Autoloaders

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 31, 2014, 12:12 PM   #1
george burns
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 26, 2014
Posts: 321
Lot's of new Striker fired pistols out

Which one has caught your eye as a possible purchase, and why.
The PPQ
The Sig 320
The H&K VP9
The Ruger, "I don't put this one in the same category as the others"
The new Shield without the Safety
Or Something else, perhaps a Glock 30 S, or M&P, Bomberg, Sphinz?
george burns is offline  
Old July 31, 2014, 12:15 PM   #2
Orion8472
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 8, 2008
Posts: 2,502
The XDs 9mm 4.0 caught my attention. Purchased one.

The news about the striker fired Ruger LC9s is something I'm going to check out as well.
__________________
ďWhat gets us into trouble isnít what we donít know; itís what we know for sure that just ainít so!" Ė Mark Twain
Orion8472 is offline  
Old July 31, 2014, 12:24 PM   #3
sigarms228
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 3, 2011
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 575
I have owned a PPQ for almost three years now and just adore it.

I pick up my VP9 Friday because I am an HK fan and got a great price on it. I did have a chance to handle and dry fire it with my first trip to my FFL to fill out the paperwork. Illinois waiting period however is 72 hours.

I am anxious to handle and try out the SIG P320/P320C because I am a huge SIG fan and have heard a lot of good things about it and like the concept.

Yes this is a great time to be in the market for a striker fired pistol.
sigarms228 is offline  
Old July 31, 2014, 12:32 PM   #4
TarDevil
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 29, 2009
Location: NC Coast
Posts: 1,059
I have fought and resisted as long as I can, but nagging back issues are forcing me to look at something lighter on my hip. I had narrowed my criteria to something in 17 - 19 ozs, 7 rounds of 9mm. I was pretty much committed to the Sig 938 when the Ruger LC9s was announced.

I've been carrying the SR9c for a number of years. It has been totally reliable, ergos are perfect and I shoot it well. If the LC9s is similar in feel but in a smaller package it makes sense to stick with Ruger... plus saves me quite a few bucks.
__________________
"...remember the ultimate goal was to be smart enough not to shoot but good enough that if you have to shoot you can solve your problem."
Clint Smith
TarDevil is offline  
Old July 31, 2014, 03:33 PM   #5
mgmorden
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 22, 2009
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
Posts: 3,786
The SIG hold the least interest for me personally. I just don't see me and it having a future.

The 5" PPQ M2 would be the most practical I guess. I've been wanting to try something else other than my M&P 9L in competition and it seems like it would be a good match.

The HK VP9 looks good too, and I don't currently own an HK (I have at least one gun from every other company on the list), so it does hold a certain interest there, but it's a little ways further down on the wish list.
__________________
"What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving." - Adrian Rogers
mgmorden is online now  
Old July 31, 2014, 03:49 PM   #6
Danny Tumma
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 3, 2013
Posts: 19
I bought the PPQ Mark 1. I love it. I would have considered the H&k except with the PPQ it seems redundant.
Danny Tumma is offline  
Old July 31, 2014, 04:19 PM   #7
Plan2Live
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 17, 2011
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 912
I gave serious consideration to the Shield, even to the point of selling an older pistol to fund the Shield purchase but held off. Now I'm rethinking that purchase. I still prefer DA/SA hammer fired pistols.
__________________
Ammo is a lot like air, you don't really think about it until you don't have any.
Plan2Live is offline  
Old July 31, 2014, 04:33 PM   #8
Vodoun da Vinci
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,167
Shot a lot of hand guns in the last 18 months and purchased 6 pistols - 2 of them striker fired Glocks (A 26 and a 42) and I adore them. Still, my personal favorite gun is my Beretta Px4 SC which is DA/SA and hammer fired.

I like my Glocks but my favorite go to guns are all hammer fired autos or revolvers - probably due to my Appendix carry style.

VooDoo
__________________
Beretta Px4 9mm subcompact, Glock 26 Gen4, Dan Wesson 15-2VH .357 Magnum, Ruger LCR .38 Special +P, Colt 1903 Model M .32ACP, Ruger 3 screw Blackhawk .357 Magnum, Ruger Bearcat .22, S&W Model 19 .357 Magnum, Colt Officers ACP .45, Glock 42
Vodoun da Vinci is offline  
Old July 31, 2014, 05:39 PM   #9
ScarLata
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 24, 2013
Posts: 61
► PPQ M1

► Steyr L9-A1

► Sig P320
ScarLata is offline  
Old July 31, 2014, 08:51 PM   #10
jjones45
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 21, 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 295
Hk vp9
Sig p320 carry
I bought a ppq m2 last year and love it. As a matter of fact it's almost been my exclusive carry gun. I like it so much I am still debating on adding a 5" ppq to the stable. It's just a matter of which gun appeals to me most when I handle them I guess
jjones45 is offline  
Old July 31, 2014, 09:22 PM   #11
ritepath
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 17, 2010
Location: SWVA
Posts: 554
I'm personally eyeing the P320 and a M&P pro.

If I had someone that would buy my safety equipped shield, I'd pick up one without a safety. But since I've spent time on the trigger and know it's been 100% that'll probably never happen.

If I knew how accurate the 320 is compared to a pro then I'd have it narrowed down a little more. I like the feel of the 320, and would invest in a small "frame" just to see how that felt compared to the med frames I've handled.

The pro I know how well it feels and better still how well I can shoot it.

Or maybe I'd just rather get a CZ p-09.
ritepath is offline  
Old July 31, 2014, 09:29 PM   #12
almherdfan
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 24, 2011
Location: Wild, Wonderful, WV
Posts: 302
The Ruger LC9s has my attention. I've have a SR9c and LC9 w/Viridian green laser. I would be very happy if these fine firearms mated.
almherdfan is offline  
Old July 31, 2014, 09:34 PM   #13
george burns
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 26, 2014
Posts: 321
I am leaning toward a PPQ maybe the "Navy", only because the new HK seems a bit larger than I wanted. The Sig is reasonable as far as money goes, I just haven't seen one yet.
After going in a big circle I picked up another Glock 30, only in the "S", which really is an ideal gun. I loaded up 11 rounds of that "Liberty Civil Defense" ammo. It weighs nothing, 78 grain bullet coming out of a 45. Only good for 25 yards from every test I read, but I have some in 9 in my carry also, but I carry 2 spare mags with all my guns, just in case.
Now it's time for a new striker fired 9mm.
I wish the CCP would come out already.
george burns is offline  
Old July 31, 2014, 11:05 PM   #14
benzy2
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 24, 2008
Posts: 2,315
The one that I was most interested in (and recently bought) was the M&P CORE. I've used red dots on rimfire pistols for a while but wanted to try one on a centerfire. I also wanted to have the option to co-witness the irons in case something happened to the sight. The CORE does that for me out of the box. An aftermarket or custom milled Glock/M&P slide could get you a little lower mount, but having the ability to swap optics down the road made the CORE stand out. While the first thing I've come to do with any M&P I've owned is swap out at least the sear for an APEX sear, this gun doesn't need it. It could use a smoothed out firing pin safety, but once past it the trigger comes to a firm wall and breaks real crisp in the 5-6lb range. For a range gun I'd like to lighten it a little, but it really feels like the pull on most of the production firing pin safety model 1911's made today. I never thought I'd say that about an M&P trigger. I guess I may have just won the M&P lotto on this specific one.

The VP9 had my interest but really didn't do anything for me that a Glock 19 doesn't do. If I weren't invested in a mid sized 9mm it would be more of an interest, but for me personally I have that role covered.

The Sig P320 was a bit of a let down. Didn't shoot it so no final verdict but it didn't do anything to stand out.

The shield is nice to see, but the change in the safety isn't enough to get me or keep me from buying one. Just not in the market now for a slim, small 9mm. That covers the LC9s as well. Just not looking for a small single stack 9.

Walther seems to do things well but for one reason or another aren't high on my personal list. Maybe it's a lack of use with them or limited local availability. Just never caused a desire though they seem like a decent gun.

The Glock 42 is one that still ranks high on my polymer striker fired list. I shoot that pistol as well or better than any other small single stack I've owned. Now that I've been able to get Pearce grip extensions for the 42 mags, the gun is in an entirely new league. So easy to shoot when I get a better grip on the thing. .380 may not be everyone's cup of tea, but I enjoy shooting it, let alone carrying it.
benzy2 is offline  
Old August 1, 2014, 12:16 AM   #15
herrwalther
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 1, 2013
Posts: 1,511
I think the only striker fired pistol I would get in the next year is a PPQ M1.
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
OEF Veteran
herrwalther is offline  
Old August 1, 2014, 05:55 AM   #16
RustyShackelford
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 27, 2006
Posts: 2,394
Greatest hits.....

If time & $$$ were not issues, Id buy these pistols in the next few weeks/months;

Glock 23 gen 04 .40, Glock 41 .45acp, Glock 42 .380acp
M&P .40S&W full size(with safety), M&P Shield 9x19mm(no thumb safety), M&P .45acp FDE format 4.5" barrel with safety
XDs .45acp 4" barrel or 4.0 version
Bersa Concealed Carry 9mm(OD green frame)
Beretta Nano 9mm with night sights & add on FDE frame
SIG Sauer P290RS 9x19mm
Walther PPQ M2 long slide in 9x19(maybe .40)
FNS long-slide in 9x19mm

I like the look & feel of the long-slide style pistols but the regular duty size is fine too. It's important for the loaded, polymer frame pistol to feel balanced or even in the grip. Some models like HK, SIG-Sauer, etc do this better than others. You do get what you pay for with US firearms sometimes .

Davidson's lifetime warranty is a good motivator for sales, IMO. Some weapons like M&Ps or Glocks need some minor TLC or custom work to get them on track.

I saw a great offer on a Ruger SR40 full size(with stainless slide) & a Davidson's plan for only $400.00. It was a local FFL holder too.

Rusty
PS; I heard the new Glock 42s had some factory changes so try & find the latest format when you look at them. Gun shop clerks or managers may be unaware too.
__________________
If you don't practice, you don't deserve to win.

Andre Agassi
RustyShackelford is offline  
Old August 1, 2014, 01:45 PM   #17
NOMI WASP
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 8, 2014
Location: South Eastern US
Posts: 113
PPQ+1 for me.... Since Glock wasn't an option
NOMI WASP is offline  
Old August 1, 2014, 02:54 PM   #18
gstockton
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 13, 2011
Posts: 5
I picked up a Sig P320 this week only shot it a little ( 100 rounds ) so far love it
gstockton is offline  
Old August 1, 2014, 03:02 PM   #19
Bartojc
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 6, 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 25
Been waiting to commit to something smaller. Currently have a SR9c and I've been looking at an LC9. The LC9s has my attention, glad I waited. Guess I might as well wait a little longer and make sure the bugs are worked out.

If no the LC9s then the Shield might get the nod.

-jeff
Bartojc is offline  
Old August 1, 2014, 04:07 PM   #20
dsk
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 1, 2003
Posts: 769
I just got a PPQ M2, that gun will make a decent shot out of anybody.
dsk is offline  
Old August 1, 2014, 04:16 PM   #21
Old Fuff
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 21,910
For the manufacturer it's the least expensive trigger/ignition system, so everything else being equal it puts more money in they're pocket.

Don't plan to buy one because I prefer revolvers, but should a deal come along...
Old Fuff is online now  
Old August 1, 2014, 09:13 PM   #22
Phaedrus/69
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 20, 2013
Posts: 458
I have an H&K VP9 pre-ordered and hope to have it soon. I'm a big HK guy, first of all. Second I did get to fondle one and it feels awesome. Very very similar ergonomically to the P30 which is maybe my favorite handgun (and primary CCW). It even uses the same mags as the P30 and I have a dozen already. So far I have only dry fired it but I feel the trigger is the best striker fired I have ever felt. The PPQ is about neck and neck trigger wise to me. But I can't find the M2 version around here, and I will never go back to the American style mag release button; the paddle release is vastly superior to me.
Phaedrus/69 is offline  
Old August 2, 2014, 07:16 AM   #23
The Lone Haranguer
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 30, 2006
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 11,555
Quote:
The Ruger, "I don't put this one in the same category as the others"
The new Shield without the Safety
Those pique my interest, at least a little. The P320 would if it had a slimmer slide.
The Lone Haranguer is offline  
Old August 2, 2014, 07:35 AM   #24
bikemutt
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,693
I snagged a Sig 320 about a month ago on impulse. After more careful inspection I had a bit of buyer's remorse, under the hood it just wasn't a "Sig". But I could not ignore the reason I bought it in the first place; amazing (for me) ergonomics.

So, rather than selling it and taking a loss, figured may as well go shoot it. That sealed the deal, I really like the pistol. Considering it was $600 out the door (9.5% sales tax here), the value is there. Nothing against Glock but I prefer the 320 in every way to my G17, other than availability of accessories.
__________________
They were just a bunch old dead white guys but they invented this country, and they meant what they said. The Second Amendment isn't about the National Guard or the police...It is about law-abiding, private U.S. citizens. Period. - Charlton Heston
bikemutt is offline  
Old August 2, 2014, 10:10 AM   #25
Bentonville
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 18, 2006
Posts: 418
VP9 is going to be my next purchase. I have a P30L and the ergonomics fit my hand better than any pistol I have ever owned. The VP9 is similarly designed and I don't own a striker fired pistol. The reviews out on this gun say the trigger system is really nice. HK quality and customer service is unquestionable in my book based on my experience.
Bentonville is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.