Quantcast
Convert 92FS from Safety/Decock to Safety-only - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Autoloaders

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 19, 2007, 06:12 PM   #1
kle
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 6, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 296
Convert 92FS from Safety/Decock to Safety-only

Standard disclaimer: blah blah blah tried searching, found nothing blah blah blah please move to appropriate forum blah blah blah please be gentle.

I recently picked up a Beretta 92FS and I was wondering if it would be possible to convert the safety from "decock, block firing pin, and disengage trigger" to just "block firing pin and disengage trigger", to have it work as I expect a safety to work (i.e. no decock).

I figure that there are three ways to do this: modify the hammer release lever so that it is not touched when the safety is applied (i.e. file it down), modify the safety so that it doesn't touch the hammer release lever (somehow), or remove the hammer release lever altogether.

I've done some reading and I know there are versions of the 92 out there that do what I want already, but I'm wondering if I can have something like this done (or do it myself!) to my particular 92. Ideally it would be a reversible modification so I could put it back to safety/decock if I wanted to.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it, but does anyone have any thoughts or ideas?
kle is offline  
Old November 19, 2007, 06:31 PM   #2
Jimmie
Registration in progress
 
 
Join Date: February 22, 2006
Posts: 619
There's a TDA without a decocker?

There's the 92D which is DA only.
The FS has the safety/decocker.
The G has the decocker/no safety.

Where'd you read about the no decocker version? Or are you referring to the DAO?
Jimmie is offline  
Old November 19, 2007, 06:37 PM   #3
kle
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 6, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmie
Where'd you read about the no decocker version? Or are you referring to the DAO?
From what I've read, the 92 Brigadier (with the heavier slide) also has a safety that acts like I describe: disable trigger, block firing pin, but don't decock.

I'm wondering if there's a way I can get this functionality with my 92FS.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmie
There's a TDA without a decocker?
I'm sure there are lots of traditional double-action pistols w/o a decocker...CZ-75 comes to mind--I fondled one at The Nation's Gun Show this weekend: the safety did not decock the hammer (allowing for Cocked and Locked). The safety also would not actuate when the hammer was decocked (not that it needs to be on 'safe' with a double-action...). There was no decocker.

This 92FS is my first pistol with a safety, and also my first TDA pistol--my other experience is with SA and DA/SA revolvers, DAO pistols, half-cocked striker-fired pistols, and my H&K P7. Thus I'm jumping into a new-to-me manual of arms.

I also wonder if it's possible to convert the 92FS to DAO, but the safety's quirks are enough to chew on for now =)
kle is offline  
Old November 19, 2007, 06:59 PM   #4
Jimmie
Registration in progress
 
 
Join Date: February 22, 2006
Posts: 619
As I understand it, the Brigadier only refers to the recontoured, heavier slide. The "FS" or "G" before "Brigadier" still denote the operation of the pistol.
Jimmie is offline  
Old November 19, 2007, 07:36 PM   #5
6_gunner
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 4, 2006
Location: Indiana/Kentucky
Posts: 534
You want to be able to carry it cocked and locked, like a single action, right? I'm not very familiar with the Beretta, but I doubt that there would be an easy and reliable way to get it to do that. I'm sure it's possible, but it may require a gunsmith and lots of money.

You may consider getting a different gun. Like you said, the CZ-75 has the option of carrying cocked and locked or decocking the hammer. The Browning Hi-Power would be another option, but it is a single action. I personally prefer either of these guns to the Beretta.
__________________
"Now remember, things look bad and it looks like you're not gonna make it, then you gotta get mean. I mean plumb, mad-dog mean. 'Cause if you lose your head and you give up then you neither live nor win. That's just the way it is."--Josey Wales
6_gunner is offline  
Old November 19, 2007, 08:24 PM   #6
Lonestar49
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 17, 2007
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 2,652
Bad news

...

This very subject came up in the Beretta forum, and the report was:

If you have a 92fs F model decocker/safety, then it cannot be converted and the only way is to get, I believe is a D-model 92 slide, as the inner workings of the slide mounted safety-decocker, leave no room or way to convert it.

I could be wrong, but this was from many with both models, and all agreed on the on main answer, no. One has to buy a new D-model slide.


Ls
__________________
~ Fate is the Hunter ~

Beretta
SIG
Springfield
7 German Shepherds ~ RIP

~ Be the person your dog thinks you are ~

(OO) Lost but making good time
Lonestar49 is offline  
Old November 19, 2007, 08:36 PM   #7
kle
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 6, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6_gunner
You want to be able to carry it cocked and locked, like a single action, right? I'm not very familiar with the Beretta, but I doubt that there would be an easy and reliable way to get it to do that. I'm sure it's possible, but it may require a gunsmith and lots of money.

You may consider getting a different gun. Like you said, the CZ-75 has the option of carrying cocked and locked or decocking the hammer. The Browning Hi-Power would be another option, but it is a single action. I personally prefer either of these guns to the Beretta.
C'ed & L'ed, essentially, yeah. Not for carry, though--strictly range-only. I sold a Keltec P11 and a S&W SW9VE--both decent guns--for this 92FS (although it feels like holding the wrong end of a baseball bat compared to the P11 and the SW9VE). If I were going to carry, I'd get the CZ-75, too--it fits my hands better. That one's safety has its quirks too--the safety can't be applied in double action (but then it doesn't need to be, either). I'll probably get a CZ-75 anyways.

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=201199 -- I did a google search and came up with a THR thread that mentioned that "only very few select Beretta 92's are cocked and locked."

Hmm. After examining the mechanism, it seems that it needs the "hammer release lever" to keep the "firing pin catch lever" in position (I'm going by the names of parts listed at http://e-gunparts.com/productschem.a...odel=1150z92FS ), but the lever itself isn't there for any other reason than to be tripped when the safety is set. Thus, it's conceivable that all I'd have to do is to have the hammer release lever filed down so that it isn't touched by the safety...Too bad e-Gunparts.com doesn't have it in stock, or else I'd buy it and try it. Oh well =)
kle is offline  
Old November 19, 2007, 08:42 PM   #8
kle
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 6, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonestar49
If you have a 92fs F model decocker/safety, then it cannot be converted and the only way is to get, I believe is a D-model 92 slide.
Ah. Well, I'm trying to do this with a minimum of spare parts and money. I can live with it as-is, as it's a range-only gun (I even bought pretty wood grips for it). Thanks for the info!

Though I'll keep that in mind, since I'm also considering a .22LR conversion kit, which will also be a considerable chunk of money, and having a D-Model slide (and specifically its safety) would be more of a "drop-in" conversion (and wouldn't require tools, even). Now if I could find a source for a D-Model slide...
kle is offline  
Old November 19, 2007, 11:05 PM   #9
Navy87Guy
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 6, 2005
Location: Stafford VA
Posts: 635
LoneStar is correct -- there is no way to "convert" a 92FS to a 92G (the decocker-only version). It is possible on other models (like the PX4) - but not on the 92.

Jim
__________________
Beretta M9 -- 92G Vertec -- PX 4 Storm 9mm -- 92 Billennium -- CX 4 Storm 9mm
CZ SP-01 Tactical -- M&P 9 -- M&P 9C -- Ruger KP93 -- KelTec P-32
Colt M1911 (NOT an A1!) -- RIA Full Size 1911 .45 ACP
Stag AR-15 2T, Saiga 7.62x39 AK, Saiga S12 Tactical Shotgun
http://home.comcast.net/~navy87guy/home/index.html
Navy87Guy is offline  
Old November 19, 2007, 11:24 PM   #10
kle
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 6, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Navy87Guy
there is no way to "convert" a 92FS to a 92G (the decocker-only version)
Really? It isn't just a question of whether the slide has the G-decocker or the FS-safety/decocker installed? Dang. I'm really jumping onto this Beretta 92-wagon pretty late; my experience up til now is with handguns with the simplest manuals of arms...no safeties or decockers or nothin'.

Thanks, everyone, for the info!
kle is offline  
Old November 19, 2007, 11:29 PM   #11
Trebor
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 15, 2003
Posts: 4,799
Check CDNN. I think they had some "D" model slides advertised recently.

I don't have the catalog in front of me, so I could be remembering wrong, but it's worth a call to ask.
__________________
Rob Reed
NRA Certified Instructor (Pistol, PPITH)
SigArms Academy Certified Instructor (Pistol)
Graduate, LFI-1 & LFI-2
CCW classes and private instruction in the Metro Detroit and Lansing areas
Trebor is offline  
Old November 20, 2007, 12:05 AM   #12
kle
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 6, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trebor
Check CDNN.
http://www.cdnninvestments.com/beretta4.html -- all I saw were out-of-stock 96G slides/magazine conversions (same as in the PDF catalog). I might give them a call, though...
kle is offline  
Old November 20, 2007, 10:53 PM   #13
kle
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 6, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 296
Well...I should've examined the function more thoroughly--turns out the little pin that the safety pops down to "disengage the trigger bar" only disables it from cocking the hammer--I removed the hammer release lever, cocked the hammer, and engaged the safety. The hammer stayed cocked, but when I pulled the trigger, the hammer was dropped--not good. Oh well. Guess I'll have to get a CZ75 or a 1911 if I want real cocked-and-locked =)

Thanks, everyone!
kle is offline  
Old November 20, 2007, 10:56 PM   #14
dsk
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 1, 2003
Posts: 757
Your other option is to trade it for either a Taurus PT92 or an early Beretta 92 with the frame-mounted safety.
dsk is offline  
Old June 20, 2014, 12:12 AM   #15
Ouzo
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 20, 2014
Posts: 4
Hey I know this comes years late, however I had a 92fs in the late 90s I did not like the decocking either. What I did was remove the decocking lever and made a small round bush to fill the gap where the lever sat. This allowed the safety to be engaged without decocking, now in the safe position if the trigger is pulled you are correct the hammer will drop however if you look at the back of the gun where the hammer falls when you engage the safety it rotates and covers the firing pin which keeps it safe.....I lived in zimbabwe at the time and carried my beretta almost daily for many years I also put many rounds through it.....not once did a have an AD....this modification I believe is safe and will work on you 92FS
Ouzo is offline  
Old June 20, 2014, 01:58 PM   #16
NoVA Shooter
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 13, 2009
Posts: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ouzo View Post
.....not once did a have an AD....this modification I believe is safe and will work on you 92FS
Being lucky and safe are two different things. Just because you never had an accident doesn't make it safe.
NoVA Shooter is offline  
Old June 20, 2014, 02:02 PM   #17
RX-79G
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 19, 2013
Posts: 227
Quote:
Being lucky and safe are two different things. Just because you never had an accident doesn't make it safe.
Beretta, Taurus, Tanfoglio, CZ, Colt and many, many others have sold hundreds of thousands of guns that people manually decocked. What's your point?
RX-79G is offline  
Old June 25, 2014, 06:13 PM   #18
Ouzo
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 20, 2014
Posts: 4
Nothing to do with luck....unless the trigger is pulled the beretta will not fire even if the hammer drops.... Correct handling of any firearm will prevent AD etc.
The modification described does not remove the safety it just over-rides the automatic de-cocking.
In fact I have since found the part required for this is available at brownells

http://www.brownells.com/schematics/...aspx#r31sid882
Ouzo is offline  
Old June 25, 2014, 06:16 PM   #19
Ouzo
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 20, 2014
Posts: 4
Sorry when the link opens click on the red 31 on the exploded view, this is the de-cocking lever....all available part options for this will be brought up.

Anyone looking to remove the de-cocking.....it's as easy as $2
Ouzo is offline  
Old June 25, 2014, 06:24 PM   #20
Ouzo
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 20, 2014
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by kle View Post
Well...I should've examined the function more thoroughly--turns out the little pin that the safety pops down to "disengage the trigger bar" only disables it from cocking the hammer--I removed the hammer release lever, cocked the hammer, and engaged the safety. The hammer stayed cocked, but when I pulled the trigger, the hammer was dropped--not good. Oh well. Guess I'll have to get a CZ75 or a 1911 if I want real cocked-and-locked =)

Thanks, everyone!
Quote:
Well...I should've examined the function more thoroughly--turns out the little pin that the safety pops down to "disengage the trigger bar" only disables it from cocking the hammer--I removed the hammer release lever, cocked the hammer, and engaged the safety. The hammer stayed cocked, but when I pulled the trigger, the hammer was dropped--not good. Oh well. Guess I'll have to get a CZ75 or a 1911 if I want real cocked-and-locked =)
If you look at the firing pin at the back of your beretta, when the safety is engaged it turns it over and covers it completely hence even pulling the trigger on a live round when safety is engaged....it will not fire.
Ouzo is offline  
Old June 25, 2014, 09:17 PM   #21
Jim Watson
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Posts: 17,956
I once looked at a S&W with the idea of making a hammer release lever with a hook that would capture the sear instead of cramming it back.
But it is flat, the Beretta part is more complicated.

As Ouzo says, just take it out, you will still be protected by the other safety features.
__________________
I have a few facts and a lot of opinions.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old June 25, 2014, 09:42 PM   #22
beeenbag
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 10, 2010
Location: Grayson, Ky
Posts: 979
Wow, 7 year old thread revived!
__________________
“Lord, make my hand fast and accurate.
Let my aim be true and my hand faster
than those who would seek to destroy me.
Grant me victory over my foes and those who wish to do harm to me and mine.
Let not my last thought be ‘If I only had my gun.’”
And Lord, if today is truly the day you call me home
Let me die in a pile of empty brass.”


www.zcastbulletz.com
beeenbag is offline  
Old June 25, 2014, 10:05 PM   #23
JTQ
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 6, 2009
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 3,508
Both Wilson Combat and Allegheny Gun Works will convert a safety/decocker Beretta to a decocker only.

http://wilsoncombat.com/new/custom-beretta.asp

I believe Allegheny can convert a 92D to a frame mounted safety.

http://alleghenygunworks.com/index.p...vices-packages
JTQ is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.