Quantcast
Scope for my Mossberg 590A1? - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Shotguns

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 28, 2014, 12:08 AM   #1
Tallbald
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 29, 2009
Location: Southern KY
Posts: 445
Scope for my Mossberg 590A1?

Love my new 590A1 with its sewer pipe barrel, parkerized finish and like me, all around good looks (LOL). Yes, it has the ghost ring sights that are great and dead on, but I love to send slugs downrange and knock big stuff over for fun. I'd like to try scoping it with a low power (3X to 4X ?) optic to see what sort of fun I can have at the 50 yard line. I never bought a "shotgun scope" and don't really know what I ned to look for. Can I use an old El Paso Weaver K4 I have or would my gun likely shake it loose?
Suggestions sure appreciated. Thanks. Don
__________________
If it's time to bury them, it's time to dig them up.
ROA Club Member #24 on this forum
Tallbald is offline  
Old July 28, 2014, 01:56 AM   #2
RMc
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 28, 2007
Posts: 312
The first concern is finding a scope base / mount system to fit your 590.
RMc is offline  
Old July 28, 2014, 02:32 AM   #3
Charlie Horse
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 27, 2012
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 88
Such things do exist...
http://www.gggaz.com/mossberg-500-an...ope-mount.html

I wish I had some insight on the scope you're talking about.
__________________
"Being a Time Lord means knowing what was, what is, what could be, and what must never be allowed to happen." The Doctor

"Come to think of it, the same could be said for a student of history." Me
Charlie Horse is offline  
Old July 28, 2014, 05:14 AM   #4
336A
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 26, 2007
Posts: 924
Look for Weaver base and medium hight rings as Low rings will put the scope to close over the safety. I use the above along with a Nikon Monarch Turkey Pro 1.5-4.5x20mm scope on my Mossberg 500. As a young kid just getting into deer hunting I got away with a cheap Bushnell Sportview 3-9x32 on my rifled barrel with no problems. I still have that scope to believe it or not.
__________________
If numbers killed I'd be hunting with a calculator
336A is offline  
Old July 28, 2014, 01:09 PM   #5
RMc
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 28, 2007
Posts: 312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie Horse View Post
Such things do exist...
http://www.gggaz.com/mossberg-500-an...ope-mount.html

I wish I had some insight on the scope you're talking about.
The 590 may need to be drilled and tapped.
The scope would have to be a long eye relief model or mounted very high or the receiver sight would have to be removed.
RMc is offline  
Old July 29, 2014, 12:39 AM   #6
Tallbald
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 29, 2009
Location: Southern KY
Posts: 445
Mine is factory drilled and tapped. That's a big plus to me, and one reason I'm even considering optics for it. The Weaver is a 1970's vintage "Made in El Paso, TX" garden variety fixed power scope I bough for $40 at a pawn shop near Ft Knox, KY back in '79. I don't know though if the vintage optics are up to 12 gauge recoil. Back then I don't remember anyone even discussing scoping a shotgun. There WERE no turkeys in Kentucky as far as I remember, at least in South Central KY. Don
__________________
If it's time to bury them, it's time to dig them up.
ROA Club Member #24 on this forum
Tallbald is offline  
Old July 29, 2014, 02:14 AM   #7
Jorg Nysgerrig
Member
  
 
Join Date: April 13, 2006
Posts: 7,736
I would be more concerned about eye-relief than the scope. The 870 rifled barrel and scope combo I bought didn't have nearly enough eye-relief (or I simply don't know how to shoot a shotgun with a scope) and it kissed me a couple of times before I bought a fairly inexpensive Bushnell shotgun scope with 6 inches of eye-relief. That worked like a champ.
Jorg Nysgerrig is offline  
Old July 29, 2014, 11:41 PM   #8
Bobson
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 9, 2011
Location: Snohomish County, Washington
Posts: 2,979
I keep visiting this thread and can't help wonder, why are you looking for a 3-4x power scope for shooting at 50 yards? I think a red dot would serve you very well at that range, depending on the reticle; and it would be equally well served (if unnecessary) in the HD or whatever role a person might typically employ a 590A1 for.

Depending on how much you want to spend, you'd have a hard time beating an Aimpoint H-1 with 2MOA dot. I sincerely doubt (though don't know firsthand - maybe someone else can chime in) that it would be damaged by the recoil from a 12 gauge. These things are built like tanks. At 50 yards, any gun capable of it should be able to maintain 1 MOA at 50 yards with this optic. I would think that would be more than precise enough out of a 590A1.

Also, eye relief also would no longer matter, ofc. For your stated application, I see no downside except the cost - which really isn't too extreme for an optic of such quality. It can be had for under $500, or just under $600 with a matching tank of a mounting system.
__________________
More Christians have been executed by persecutors in the 20th century than the sum total of all those who were similarly persecuted in every past century, combined.

"As for me and my house, we will serve the LORD." - Joshua 24:15
Bobson is offline  
Old July 29, 2014, 11:53 PM   #9
PabloJ
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 17, 2010
Posts: 4,078
You can use inexpensive weaver bases and rings. Top choice for scope would be 1" Nikon Monarch Safari. One guy that puts together dangerous game bolt rifles in cals .400 or above (those generating >100flbs of recoil force) said they hold up better than 2.5 or 3x fixed power Leupolds. I had one of those scopes on my Remington .350 carbine and the only minor complaint was ends of posts were not pointed other than that it was fine piece of glass for very reasonable price. It was basically more durable Leupold for $100 less.

Last edited by PabloJ; July 29, 2014 at 11:59 PM.
PabloJ is offline  
Old August 9, 2014, 12:35 PM   #10
Tallbald
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 29, 2009
Location: Southern KY
Posts: 445
Lots of good information here and I thank everyone. Basically my 590A1 is a HD gun, but just to mix things up for fun, I take it to the range to do some slug work. My eyes need the extra magnification. Don
__________________
If it's time to bury them, it's time to dig them up.
ROA Club Member #24 on this forum
Tallbald is offline  
Old August 9, 2014, 12:48 PM   #11
rcmodel
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 49,197
IMO: Your old K4 Weaver will very likely take all the recoil you can stand.

People put them on the hardest kicking rifles there were back in the day.

rc
__________________
Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Or all your primers in a glass jar!
rcmodel is offline  
Old August 9, 2014, 02:08 PM   #12
rodregier
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 5, 2007
Location: Halifax,NS Canada
Posts: 1,350
Aimpoint H1 will stand up to 12ga recoil just fine. I have experience with one on a Chinese 870 clone. Reports by others on such usage are also favourable...
rodregier is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.