Quantcast
On Fighting Shotguns.... - Page 9 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Shotguns

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 2, 2009, 01:42 PM   #201
JShirley
Administrator
  
 
Join Date: December 20, 2002
Location: DC
Posts: 18,902
I like your list, Dave...but they DID improve the 1903!



It's called the 1917!
JShirley is offline  
Old May 2, 2009, 05:29 PM   #202
ojibweindian
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 27, 2002
Location: Union Grove, Alabama
Posts: 2,300
Thanks, sm!

Very interesting drill, the one using tennis balls. Would never have thought of using tennis balls as targets.

Lots to chew on. Again, thanks!
__________________
placidity is tacit acceptance of tyranny
ojibweindian is offline  
Old May 2, 2009, 06:04 PM   #203
plumberroy
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 25, 2006
Posts: 568
Quote:
Mag extensions change the balance of the gun, and side saddles do so as well
sure do even the elastic buttstock cuffs full of shells change the balance I wear the butt stock cuff on my left wrist/forearm (I'm a lefty)I have big enough wrist it stays right there.
Roy
__________________
Every breath I take as a Free man was paid for with the blood of an American Soldier
plumberroy is offline  
Old May 2, 2009, 06:30 PM   #204
Dave McCracken
Moderator In Memoriam
 
 
Join Date: December 20, 2002
Location: MD.
Posts: 13,938
John, my friend.....

At this point in time I've owned and operated one 03, two 03A3s, and two sporterized 1917s.

I like the Springfields better, but the 17 is oneheckuva rifle also.

Let's agree to disagree on this, and return to the subject at hand.

Shotguns....
Dave McCracken is offline  
Old May 2, 2009, 06:44 PM   #205
mljdeckard
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 5, 2006
Location: In a part of Utah that resembles Tattooine.
Posts: 12,561
(I have a 1917 and I love it, but I very much want an 03A3.)
__________________
"I'm not saying we should kill all the stupid people. I'm just saying that we should remove all the warning labels and let the problem work itself out."
mljdeckard is offline  
Old May 2, 2009, 07:43 PM   #206
Badger Arms
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 1, 2003
Location: Harnett County, NC
Posts: 3,685
Quote:
Originally Posted by JShirley

I like your list, Dave...but they DID improve the 1903!



It's called the 1917!
I'll have to agree on all counts. Better, faster, stronger, more accurate, better stock (until the "C" stock) higher capacity, better sights, more of 'em, and no brittle receivers!

Tell me again, what is the advantage of the 1903? Oh, cool, you can adjust the sights better... whatever.
__________________
We may or may not worship God, but John Moses Browning made sure we can choose.
Badger Arms is offline  
Old May 3, 2009, 09:28 PM   #207
Dave McCracken
Moderator In Memoriam
 
 
Join Date: December 20, 2002
Location: MD.
Posts: 13,938
Looking back, I recall the triggers on the 03s were better, though I had converted one to a single stage so that can't count.

I had been taught early by a former infantryman to cycle a bolt action by hitting the bolt knob with my palm and not grabbing it with my fingers.

That worked better on the 03s than the 1917s, but it was even better on a Lee-Enfield Jungle Carbine I had back then.
Dave McCracken is offline  
Old May 5, 2009, 04:04 AM   #208
krab
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 7, 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4
Periodically when I go to my local range with my 870 synthetic Express 18" vang Comp and Bear coat modified shotgun I practice reloading and shooting one shell at a time without putting a single shell in the magazine tube.

I may spend 2 hours hand feeding the barrel ramp in order to load by feel not sight while keeping my eyes on the threat. This also allows me to reload in low or no light situations.

When firing my shotgun I am always reminded what a devastating weapon I have in my hands and I always respect this much power!
krab is offline  
Old May 19, 2009, 12:53 AM   #209
chudykGT
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 31
Krab, you have a good idea there. When comparing the choke and 26" barrel of my buddies 870 vs my open choke 20" we would load one shell at a time only.

Right now I have a Remy 870 express in synthetic with a 2rnd mag extension. I have a sling for carrying on hikes, but I do admit having it on really annoys me indoors. It just wants to snag on everything.
__________________
With the amount of jamming I experienced, I can only assume the word "Universal" In Winchester Universal shotshells stands for "garbage"
chudykGT is offline  
Old May 25, 2009, 04:10 PM   #210
Luv my 1897
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 25, 2009
Location: Sutter, CA
Posts: 45
In my book, simplicity is better.

I have an 1897 which is a great shooting, well balanced gun and a first time shooter can operate it with minimal instruction. Of course, it is somewhat of an out of date shotgun that you will probably not find in typical gun shops.

I am not particularly fond of Benelli shotguns because they are slightly more complex to operate (so I've heard). Plus I like to stick with American gun companies. If I were to purchase a new shotgun I would probably go with the Mossberg 590. My father has one and swears by it. I have shot it in many different configurations and it always performs well. I have not personally shot a Remington 870, so I really have no frame of reference for that gun, but I am sure they are just as reliable.

I would never buy a semi-auto shotgun due to not being able to cycle through to different rounds in the mag tube. Say you have you have two door breaching rounds then slug, 00buck, slug, 00buck... you get it, you can't cycle the second breaching round if the first does the job to get to the slug. You generally have to fire the second breaching round to get to the slug without complications (IE ejecting ALL cartridges accidentally) You can with a pump gun.

All in all, I would bet my life on my 1897 since I have it regularly checked and tuned by one of the best gunsmiths in the area (in my personal opinion) that can work on the beast. It hasn't failed me yet. Plus I run around two boxes of bird load every week or two to keep proficient. I use bird load for home protection due to the lack of over penetration. I don't want to accidentally shoot a slug or buckshot through my exterior house walls, possibly hitting someone outside.
Luv my 1897 is offline  
Old May 25, 2009, 04:19 PM   #211
Luv my 1897
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 25, 2009
Location: Sutter, CA
Posts: 45
Thumbs down Stockless pistol grip=Bank robbery gun

Like the range master at my local gun club says, "A shotgun with a pistol grip only is good for one thing, bank robberies or as an entry tool." I could not agree more! I recently shot my father-in-law's shotgun with a non-recoil reducing pistol grip. We were putting slugs through it. My wrist was useless for a week afterward! :
Luv my 1897 is offline  
Old May 25, 2009, 04:31 PM   #212
Luv my 1897
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 25, 2009
Location: Sutter, CA
Posts: 45
To krab???

I don't understand why you would only load one shell into the feed ramp. Is it hard for you to find the mag tube... directly under where you are hand feeding your shells? I personally think it would take less time to thumb two to three shells into the tube than hand loading each shell. let me know what you think the advantage is, I am not trying to bash you, more just understand other shooter's tactics.



~Bryan~
Luv my 1897 is offline  
Old May 31, 2009, 11:25 AM   #213
7Star
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 24, 2008
Posts: 86
I just finished reading this thread... and I have not seen much mention of a full stock vs. a full stock with pistol grip. My old Mossberg 500 is due for a new stock.. I bought it used and the stock was not in great shape. I was planning on replacing it with the same wood stock. However, I am planning to start doing some more tactical/practice shooting and was wondering what others thought of the advantages of a pistol grip/full stock. I realize this is may be primarily a preference... but I know, for me, most of my rifles have this set up.
7Star is offline  
Old May 31, 2009, 11:32 AM   #214
Dave McCracken
Moderator In Memoriam
 
 
Join Date: December 20, 2002
Location: MD.
Posts: 13,938
Here's my thoughts on a stock with separate PG.

About 200 years of R&D have gone into shotgun stocks as they are. All of this has focussed on whatever will direct the shot quickly and consistently.

Standard stocks work. I find the separate PG stocks slower and a trifle awkward.

Yes, I have shot rifles well with separate PGs.

They're not shotguns.

For me, the standard stock works best.

But do not take my word for it. Note that all clays work done by the best shooters is done with standard stocks. Ljutic's Space Gun had a SPG stock and few are now found on the trap lines despite Ljutic's excellent designs and workmanship.

Last edited by Dave McCracken; May 31, 2009 at 11:56 AM.
Dave McCracken is offline  
Old May 31, 2009, 11:51 AM   #215
7Star
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 24, 2008
Posts: 86
Thank you for the input. I was thinking in a similar fashion. However, I have noted the military was more frequently using the Bennelli with the pistol grip. I guess I am wondering about the decision making behind that choice.
7Star is offline  
Old May 31, 2009, 05:33 PM   #216
chieftain
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 25, 2002
Location: The Free State of Arizona
Posts: 1,255
Quote:
Thank you for the input. I was thinking in a similar fashion. However, I have noted the military was more frequently using the Bennelli with the pistol grip. I guess I am wondering about the decision making behind that choice.
RE: Full stock with pistol grip.

I think the military is using them just because they have converted all their small arms to pistol grip type stocks. Commonality, that's all. Not a bad idea as such.

As the military most often uses the shotgun for breaching and holding them properly for that duty is much easier in some cases with the full pistol grip stock.

I think that is as deep as it goes.

In my day we were using full stock w/o pistol grips in combat, but most often only the Company Gunny or platoon Sgt's had them. Effective when we were being overrun, useless in most fire fights.

When I did fight in built up area's (today's MOAT) once for a couple weeks in Hue, I did not see any shot guns deployed, but me and my guys were thrown into a pickup outfit.

I think it boils down to what works best for you.

Good luck, and let us know what you decide on and report back how good it works or what ever.

Fred

Stupid should hurt
__________________
MINDSET - SKILLSET - TOOLSET - IN THAT ORDER! OODA -- COL John Boyd, USAF
“To lead untrained men in to war, is to waste them.” - Confucious
"Training errors are recorded on paper, tactical errors are etched in stone." - Field Marshal Erwin Rommel
“We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality” - Ayn Rand
Semper Fi
chieftain is offline  
Old June 7, 2009, 05:59 PM   #217
BK
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 27, 2002
Location: Blood of the Apache
Posts: 501
I'd like a Dominion Outlaw. Maybe when this state sovereignty/firearms/interstate commerce things comes to a head, I can get a SBS without all the federal mumbo jumbo attached.
BK is offline  
Old June 7, 2009, 11:18 PM   #218
7Star
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 24, 2008
Posts: 86
Good luck on avoiding the federal mumbo jumbo. Dominion Outlaw.... that's a double barrel with hammers... you would think it'd be easier to get a double barrel.
7Star is offline  
Old June 8, 2009, 12:25 AM   #219
model of 1905
member
 
 
Join Date: December 16, 2008
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 377
Dave, I'm not sure what shooting clays has to do with a fighting shotgun. I understand your point but I'll stick with my 930SPX with a pistol grip for SD/HD. Just works better for me. YMMV
model of 1905 is offline  
Old June 8, 2009, 10:04 PM   #220
Dave McCracken
Moderator In Memoriam
 
 
Join Date: December 20, 2002
Location: MD.
Posts: 13,938
1905, clays are usually moving fast on unknown vectors. A standard trap.skeet clay target is 4.1" in diameter, about the width of a good part of a human CNS.

If one can hit these in short time frames, bigger, slower, closer targets are gimmees.....
Dave McCracken is offline  
Old June 9, 2009, 11:50 AM   #221
Water-Man
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 22, 2008
Location: N. Georgia
Posts: 1,935
While a 12ga. has some advantages, don't discount using a 20ga. You might consider the Remington 870 Express Combo for its versatility.
__________________
PROUD TO BE A VETERAN
Water-Man is offline  
Old August 25, 2009, 03:20 PM   #222
lobo9er
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 8, 2009
Location: Earth, Currently
Posts: 2,807
chieftain
Quote:
I have moved my 590 Mossy to second place. I have moved a new Double barrel with dog ears up to first place.
My exact setup. Break action is as reliable as they come, backed up with a pump takes care of the HD situation.
lobo9er is offline  
Old November 30, 2009, 10:25 AM   #223
RangerHAAF
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 24, 2003
Location: Decatur, Georgia
Posts: 471
I have a Remington 870 Express pump that I have setup for home defense. I added too many ubiquitous accessories to it like a side saddle, magazine extension, etc. I don't know why I did this, maybe reading too many gun mags. It shoots great but it is so heavy. On the other hand my M1-Benelli is the best SG in my arsenal; it's light, shoots almost every kind of shell that's loaded into it and hasn't jammed yet. I carry it in my gun rack inside of my truck. The Benelli inertia system is the best shooting operating system that I've yet to encounter in an autoloading shotgun; it's also the cleanest.
__________________
Where excellence is possible, good is not enough.
RangerHAAF is offline  
Old December 31, 2009, 03:35 PM   #224
spazzymcgee
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 29, 2009
Location: Marydel, DE
Posts: 151
I agree with most of you that HD shotguns need to be simple, and reliable. But a sidesaddle never hurt anyone, right? I use a winchester 1300 defender with an 8 round magazine tube, and an 18 inch barrel. I also just put a tacstar side saddle on it. The sidesaddle is a necessity in my book because that extra 6 rounds could save my life. But anything else on a shotgun just makes no sense to me.
spazzymcgee is offline  
Old January 19, 2010, 07:55 AM   #225
lobo9er
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 8, 2009
Location: Earth, Currently
Posts: 2,807
Question for Dave McCracken whats your views on low powered scopes?
lobo9er is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.